|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
15/10/2014 |
Actualizado : |
15/10/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
CHEN, C.Y.; MISZTAL, I.; AGUILAR, I.; TSURUTA, S.; MEUWISSEN, T.H.E.; AGGREY, S.E.; WING, T.; MUIR, W.M. |
Afiliación : |
IGNACIO AGUILAR GARCIA, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Genome-wide marker-assisted selection combining all pedigree phenotypic information with genotypic data in one step: An example using broiler chickens. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2011 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Animal Science, 2011, v.89, no.1, p.23-28. |
ISSN : |
0021-8812 |
DOI : |
10.2527/jas.2010-3071 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received April 9, 2010 / Accepted September 22, 2010. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Data of broiler chickens for 2 pure lines across 3 generations were used for genomic evaluation. A complete population (full data set; FDS) consisted of 183,784 and 164,246 broilers for the 2 lines. The genotyped subsets (SUB) consisted of 3,284 and 3,098 broilers with 57,636 SNP. Genotyped animals were preselected based on more than 20 traits with different index applied to each line. Three traits were analyzed: BW at 6 wk (BW6), ultrasound measurement of breast meat (BM), and leg score (LS) coded 1 = no and 2 = yes for leg defect. Some phenotypes were missing for BM. The training population consisted of the first 2 generations including all animals in FDS or only genotyped animals in SUB. The validation data set contained only genotyped animals in the third generation. Genetic evaluations were performed using 3 approaches: 1) phenotypic BLUP, 2) extending BLUP methodologies to utilize pedigree and genomic information in a single step (ssGBLUP), and 3) Bayes A. Whereas BLUP and ssGBLUP utilized all phenotypic data, Bayes A could use only those of the genotyped subset. Heritabilities were 0.17 to 0.20 for BW6, 0.30 to 0.35 for BM, and 0.09 to 0.11 for LS. The average accuracies of the validation population with BLUP for BW6, BM, and LS were 0.46, 0.30, and <0 with SUB and 0.51, 0.34, and 0.28 with FDS. With ssGBLUP, those accuracies were 0.60, 0.34, and 0.06 with SUB and 0.61, 0.40, and 0.37 with FDS, respectively. With Bayes A, the accuracies were 0.60, 0.36, and 0.09 with SUB. With SUB, Bayes A and ssGBLUP had similar accuracies. For traits of high heritability, the accuracy of Bayes A/SUB and ssGBLUP/FDS were similar, and up to 50% better than BLUP/FDS. However, with low heritability, ssGBLUP/ FDS was 4 to 6 times more accurate than Bayes A/SUB and 50% better than BLUP/FDS. An optimal genomic evaluation would be multi-trait and involve all traits and records on which selection is based.
©2011 American Society of Animal Science. MenosABSTRACT.
Data of broiler chickens for 2 pure lines across 3 generations were used for genomic evaluation. A complete population (full data set; FDS) consisted of 183,784 and 164,246 broilers for the 2 lines. The genotyped subsets (SUB) consisted of 3,284 and 3,098 broilers with 57,636 SNP. Genotyped animals were preselected based on more than 20 traits with different index applied to each line. Three traits were analyzed: BW at 6 wk (BW6), ultrasound measurement of breast meat (BM), and leg score (LS) coded 1 = no and 2 = yes for leg defect. Some phenotypes were missing for BM. The training population consisted of the first 2 generations including all animals in FDS or only genotyped animals in SUB. The validation data set contained only genotyped animals in the third generation. Genetic evaluations were performed using 3 approaches: 1) phenotypic BLUP, 2) extending BLUP methodologies to utilize pedigree and genomic information in a single step (ssGBLUP), and 3) Bayes A. Whereas BLUP and ssGBLUP utilized all phenotypic data, Bayes A could use only those of the genotyped subset. Heritabilities were 0.17 to 0.20 for BW6, 0.30 to 0.35 for BM, and 0.09 to 0.11 for LS. The average accuracies of the validation population with BLUP for BW6, BM, and LS were 0.46, 0.30, and <0 with SUB and 0.51, 0.34, and 0.28 with FDS. With ssGBLUP, those accuracies were 0.60, 0.34, and 0.06 with SUB and 0.61, 0.40, and 0.37 with FDS, respectively. With Bayes A, the accuracies were 0.60, 0.36, and... Presentar Todo |
Thesagro : |
MARCADORES GENÉTICOS; POLLO. |
Asunto categoría : |
L10 Genética y mejoramiento animal |
Marc : |
LEADER 02840naa a2200265 a 4500 001 1051115 005 2019-10-15 008 2011 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0021-8812 024 7 $a10.2527/jas.2010-3071$2DOI 100 1 $aCHEN, C.Y. 245 $aGenome-wide marker-assisted selection combining all pedigree phenotypic information with genotypic data in one step$bAn example using broiler chickens.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2011 500 $aArticle history: Received April 9, 2010 / Accepted September 22, 2010. 520 $aABSTRACT. Data of broiler chickens for 2 pure lines across 3 generations were used for genomic evaluation. A complete population (full data set; FDS) consisted of 183,784 and 164,246 broilers for the 2 lines. The genotyped subsets (SUB) consisted of 3,284 and 3,098 broilers with 57,636 SNP. Genotyped animals were preselected based on more than 20 traits with different index applied to each line. Three traits were analyzed: BW at 6 wk (BW6), ultrasound measurement of breast meat (BM), and leg score (LS) coded 1 = no and 2 = yes for leg defect. Some phenotypes were missing for BM. The training population consisted of the first 2 generations including all animals in FDS or only genotyped animals in SUB. The validation data set contained only genotyped animals in the third generation. Genetic evaluations were performed using 3 approaches: 1) phenotypic BLUP, 2) extending BLUP methodologies to utilize pedigree and genomic information in a single step (ssGBLUP), and 3) Bayes A. Whereas BLUP and ssGBLUP utilized all phenotypic data, Bayes A could use only those of the genotyped subset. Heritabilities were 0.17 to 0.20 for BW6, 0.30 to 0.35 for BM, and 0.09 to 0.11 for LS. The average accuracies of the validation population with BLUP for BW6, BM, and LS were 0.46, 0.30, and <0 with SUB and 0.51, 0.34, and 0.28 with FDS. With ssGBLUP, those accuracies were 0.60, 0.34, and 0.06 with SUB and 0.61, 0.40, and 0.37 with FDS, respectively. With Bayes A, the accuracies were 0.60, 0.36, and 0.09 with SUB. With SUB, Bayes A and ssGBLUP had similar accuracies. For traits of high heritability, the accuracy of Bayes A/SUB and ssGBLUP/FDS were similar, and up to 50% better than BLUP/FDS. However, with low heritability, ssGBLUP/ FDS was 4 to 6 times more accurate than Bayes A/SUB and 50% better than BLUP/FDS. An optimal genomic evaluation would be multi-trait and involve all traits and records on which selection is based. ©2011 American Society of Animal Science. 650 $aMARCADORES GENÉTICOS 650 $aPOLLO 700 1 $aMISZTAL, I. 700 1 $aAGUILAR, I. 700 1 $aTSURUTA, S. 700 1 $aMEUWISSEN, T.H.E. 700 1 $aAGGREY, S.E. 700 1 $aWING, T. 700 1 $aMUIR, W.M. 773 $tJournal of Animal Science, 2011$gv.89, no.1, p.23-28.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registros recuperados : 45 | |
4. | | MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; TSURUTA, S.; MISZTAL, I. Acceleration of computations in AI REML for single-step GBLUP models. Volume Methods and Tools: Statistical methods - linear and nonlinear models (Posters), 703. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 10., Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 17-22, 2014. p.703.Tipo: Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
6. | | TSURUTA, S.; MISZTAL, I.; AGUILAR, I.; LAWLOR, T. J. Genome wide association study on cow mortality in three US regions. Volume Species Breeding: Dairy cattle (Posters), 805. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 10., Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 17-22, 2014. p.805.Tipo: Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
8. | | AGUILAR, I.; MISZTAL, I.; LEGARRA, A.; TSURUTA, S. Efficient computations of genomic relationship matrix and other matrices used in the single-step evaluation. Volume Methods and tools: Software and bioinformatics - Lecture Sessions, 0768. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 9., Leipzig, Germany, August 1-6, 2010. p. 0768. Acknowledgments: This study was partially funded by the Holstein Association USA Inc. and by AFRI grants 2009-65205-05665 and 2010-65205-20366 from the USDA NIFA Animal Genome Program. The authors thank P.M. VanRaden from Animal...Tipo: Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
9. | | TSURUTA, S.; MISZTAL, I.; AGUILAR, I.; LAWLOR, T.J. Multiple-trait genomic evaluation of linear type traits using genomic and phenotypic data in US Holsteins. Journal of Dairy Science, 2011, v.94, no.8, p.4198-4204. OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received February 9, 2011. / Accepted April 8, 2011.Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : A - 1 |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
10. | | AGUILAR, I.; MISZTAL, I.; TSURUTA, S.; LEGARRA, A.; WANG, H. PREGSF90 - POSTGSF90: Computational tools for the implementation of single-step genomic selection and genome-wide association with ungenotyped individuals in BLUPF90 programs. Volume Methods and Tools: Statistical and genomic tools for mapping QTL and genes (Posters), 680. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 10., Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 17-22, 2014. p.680.Tipo: Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
11. | | MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; TSURUTA, S.; MISZTAL, I. Technical note: Acceleration of sparse operations for average-information REML analyses with supernodal methods and sparse-storage refinements. Journal of Animal Science, 2015, v. 93, p. 4670 - 4674. Published October 9, 2015 Article history: Received June 8, 2015.; Accepted August 7, 2015.
1. We acknowledge the work by François Guillaume in programming a hash function. We greatly appreciate the work of the two anonymous reviewers.
2. The AIREMLF90 program...Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : Internacional - -- |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
12. | | GARCÍA, A.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; MILLER, S.; TSURUTA, S.; MISZTAL, I.; LOURENCO, D. Accuracy of indirect predictions for large datasets based on prediction error covariance of SNP effects from single-step GBLUP. [abstract 22]. Issue Section: Animal Breeding and Genetics. Journal of Animal Science, 2020, Volume 98, Issue Supplement 4, Pages 6-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jas/skaa278.012 Article history: 30 November 2020.
ASAS Annual 2020 Meeting Abstracts.Tipo: Abstracts/Resúmenes |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
14. | | LOURENCO, D; MISZTAL, I.; TSURUTA, S.; AGUILAR, I.; LAWLOR, T. J.; WELLER, J. I. Are evaluations on young genotyped dairy bulls benefiting from the past generations? [conference paper]. Volume Species Breeding: Dairy cattle, 297. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 10., Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 17-22, 2014. p.297.Tipo: Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
15. | | LOURENÇO, D. A. L.; MISZTAL, I.; TSURUTA, S.; FRAGOMENI, B.; AGUILAR, I.; MASUDA, Y.; MOSER, D. Direct and indirect genomic evaluations in beef cattle. Interbull Bulletin, 2015, v. 49, p.80 - 84.Tipo: Artículos Indexados |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
16. | | AGUILAR, I.; TSURUTA, S.; MASUDA, Y.; LOURENCO, D.A.L.; LEGARRA, A.; MISZTAL, I. BLUPF90 suite of programs for animal breeding with focus on genomics. Volume Methods and Tools - Software, p. 751. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 11., Aotea Centre Auckland, New Zealand: WCGALP, ICAR, 11-16 feb 2018. 6 p.Tipo: Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
17. | | GARCÍA, A.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; TSURUTA, S.; MISZTAL, I.; LOURENCO, D. Correction: Theoretical accuracy for indirect predictions based on SNP effects from single-step GBLUP (Genetics, selection, evolution : GSE (2022) 54:1 (66)). Genetics, Selection, Evolution : GSE, 2023, Volume 55, Issue 1, Pages 26. OPEN ACCESS. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-023-00799-x Article history: Published online 17 April 2023. -- Document: Erratum - Gold Open Access. -- The original article can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1186/s12711-022-00752-4Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : Internacional - -- |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
18. | | MISZTAL, I.; TSURUTA, S.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; VAN RADEN, P.M.; LAWLOR, T.J. Methods to approximate reliabilities in single-step genomic evaluation. Journal of Dairy Science, 2013, v.96, no.1, p.647-654. OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received April 24, 2012. / Accepted September 18, 2012.Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : A - 1 |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
19. | | AGUILAR, I.; MISZTAL, I.; JOHNSON, D.L.; LEGARRA, A.; TSURUTA, S.; LAWLOR, T.J. Hot topic: A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation of Holstein final score. Journal of Dairy Science, 2010, v. 93, no. 2, p. 743-752. OPEN ACCESS Article history: Received September 14, 2009 / Accepted November 10, 2009 / Published in issue: February 2010.Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : A - 1 |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
20. | | MISZTAL, I.; LOURENCO, D.; TSURUTA, S.; AGUILAR, I.; MASUDA, Y.; BERMANN, M.; CESARANI, A.; LEGARRA, A. How ssGBLUP became suitable for national dairy cattle evaluations. [668]. Part 37 - Bovine dairy - genetic evaluation methods. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP), 12., Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 3-8 July 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-940-4_668 2757-2760. Article history: Published online: February 9, 2023 -- Corresponding author: I. Misztal, email: ignacy@uga.eduTipo: Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 45 | |
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|