| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
16/08/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
27/04/2023 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
MCWHORTER, T.M.; BERMANN, M.; GARCIA, A.L.S.; LEGARRA, A.; AGUILAR, I.; MISZTAL, I.; LOURENCO, D. |
|
Afiliación : |
TAYLOR M. MCWHORTER, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA; MATIAS BERMANN, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA; ANDRE L. S. GARCIA, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA; ANDRÉS LEGARRA, UMR GenPhySE, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Castanet- Tolosan, France; IGNACIO AGUILAR GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; IGNACY MISZTAL, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA; DANIELA LOURENCO, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA. |
|
Título : |
Implication of the order of blending and tuning when computing the genomic relationship matrix in single-step GBLUP. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2023 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2023, volume 140, issue 1, pp. 60-78. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12734 |
|
ISSN : |
0931-2668; eISSN: 1439-0388 |
|
DOI : |
10.1111/jbg.12734 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 18 March 2019; Revised 15 July 2019; Accepted: 29 July 2019; First published 10 August 2022.
Correspondence: McWhorter, T.M.; Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States; email:taylor.mcwhorter@uga.edu --
This study was partially funded by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant no. 2020?67015?31030 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Australian Government's National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Washington, DC). -- This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. License Creative Commons: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) relies on the combination of the genomic ((Formula presented.)) and pedigree relationship matrices for all ((Formula presented.)) and genotyped ((Formula presented.)) animals. The procedure ensures (Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.) are compatible so that both matrices refer to the same genetic base (?tuning?). Then (Formula presented.) is combined with a proportion of (Formula presented.) (?blending?) to avoid singularity problems and to account for the polygenic component not accounted for by markers. This computational procedure has been implemented in the reverse order (blending before tuning) following the sequential research developments. However, blending before tuning may result in less optimal tuning because the blended matrix already contains a proportion of (Formula presented.). In this study, the impact of ?tuning before blending? was compared with ?blending before tuning? on genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV), single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects and indirect predictions (IP) from ssGBLUP using American Angus Association and Holstein Association USA, Inc. data. Two slightly different tuning methods were used; one that adjusts the mean diagonals and off-diagonals of (Formula presented.) to be similar to those in (Formula presented.) and another one that adjusts based on the average difference between all elements of (Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.). Over 6 million Angus growth records and 5.9 million Holstein udder depth records were available. Genomic information was available on 51,478 Angus and 105,116 Holstein animals. Average realized relationship estimates among groups of animals were similar across scenarios. Scatterplots show that GEBV, SNP effects and IP did not noticeably change for all animals in the evaluation regardless of the order of computations and when using blending parameter of 0.05. Formulas were derived to determine the blending parameter that maximizes changes in the genomic relationship matrix and GEBV when changing the order of blending and tuning. Algebraically, the change is maximized when the blending parameter is equal to 0.5. Overall, tuning (Formula presented.) before blending, regardless of blending parameter used, had a negligible impact on genomic predictions and SNP effects in this study. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. MenosABSTRACT.- Single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) relies on the combination of the genomic ((Formula presented.)) and pedigree relationship matrices for all ((Formula presented.)) and genotyped ((Formula presented.)) animals. The procedure ensures (Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.) are compatible so that both matrices refer to the same genetic base (?tuning?). Then (Formula presented.) is combined with a proportion of (Formula presented.) (?blending?) to avoid singularity problems and to account for the polygenic component not accounted for by markers. This computational procedure has been implemented in the reverse order (blending before tuning) following the sequential research developments. However, blending before tuning may result in less optimal tuning because the blended matrix already contains a proportion of (Formula presented.). In this study, the impact of ?tuning before blending? was compared with ?blending before tuning? on genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV), single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects and indirect predictions (IP) from ssGBLUP using American Angus Association and Holstein Association USA, Inc. data. Two slightly different tuning methods were used; one that adjusts the mean diagonals and off-diagonals of (Formula presented.) to be similar to those in (Formula presented.) and another one that adjusts based on the average difference between all elements of (Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.). Over 6 million Angus growth rec... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Genetic base; Indirect predictions; Residual polygenic effect; Scaling of genomic matrices; Single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L10 Genética y mejoramiento animal |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16748/1/J-Animal-Breeding-Genetics-2022-McWhorter-Implication-of-the-order-of-blending-and-tuning-when-computing-the-genomic.pdf
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1111/jbg.12734?download=true
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04321naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1063528
005 2023-04-27
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0931-2668; eISSN: 1439-0388
024 7 $a10.1111/jbg.12734$2DOI
100 1 $aMCWHORTER, T.M.
245 $aImplication of the order of blending and tuning when computing the genomic relationship matrix in single-step GBLUP.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
500 $aArticle history: Received 18 March 2019; Revised 15 July 2019; Accepted: 29 July 2019; First published 10 August 2022. Correspondence: McWhorter, T.M.; Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United States; email:taylor.mcwhorter@uga.edu -- This study was partially funded by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grant no. 2020?67015?31030 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture, Australian Government's National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Washington, DC). -- This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non-commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. License Creative Commons: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
520 $aABSTRACT.- Single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) relies on the combination of the genomic ((Formula presented.)) and pedigree relationship matrices for all ((Formula presented.)) and genotyped ((Formula presented.)) animals. The procedure ensures (Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.) are compatible so that both matrices refer to the same genetic base (?tuning?). Then (Formula presented.) is combined with a proportion of (Formula presented.) (?blending?) to avoid singularity problems and to account for the polygenic component not accounted for by markers. This computational procedure has been implemented in the reverse order (blending before tuning) following the sequential research developments. However, blending before tuning may result in less optimal tuning because the blended matrix already contains a proportion of (Formula presented.). In this study, the impact of ?tuning before blending? was compared with ?blending before tuning? on genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV), single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) effects and indirect predictions (IP) from ssGBLUP using American Angus Association and Holstein Association USA, Inc. data. Two slightly different tuning methods were used; one that adjusts the mean diagonals and off-diagonals of (Formula presented.) to be similar to those in (Formula presented.) and another one that adjusts based on the average difference between all elements of (Formula presented.) and (Formula presented.). Over 6 million Angus growth records and 5.9 million Holstein udder depth records were available. Genomic information was available on 51,478 Angus and 105,116 Holstein animals. Average realized relationship estimates among groups of animals were similar across scenarios. Scatterplots show that GEBV, SNP effects and IP did not noticeably change for all animals in the evaluation regardless of the order of computations and when using blending parameter of 0.05. Formulas were derived to determine the blending parameter that maximizes changes in the genomic relationship matrix and GEBV when changing the order of blending and tuning. Algebraically, the change is maximized when the blending parameter is equal to 0.5. Overall, tuning (Formula presented.) before blending, regardless of blending parameter used, had a negligible impact on genomic predictions and SNP effects in this study. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
653 $aGenetic base
653 $aIndirect predictions
653 $aResidual polygenic effect
653 $aScaling of genomic matrices
653 $aSingle-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction
700 1 $aBERMANN, M.
700 1 $aGARCIA, A.L.S.
700 1 $aLEGARRA, A.
700 1 $aAGUILAR, I.
700 1 $aMISZTAL, I.
700 1 $aLOURENCO, D.
773 $tJournal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2023, volume 140, issue 1, pp. 60-78. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12734
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 81 | |
| 61. |  | MISZTAL, I.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; JOHNSON, D.; TSURUTA, S.; LAWLOR, T. J. A unified approach to utilize phenotypic, full pedigree, and genomic information for genetic evaluation. Volume Methods and tools: Software and bioinformatics - Lecture Sessions, 0050. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 9., Leipzig, Germany, August 1-6, 2010. p. 0050. Acknowledgements: This study was partially funded by the Holstein Association, Smithfield Premium Genetics, and AFRI grants 2009-65205-05665 and 2010-65205-20366 from the USDA NIFA Animal Genome Program.| Tipo: Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
| 63. | | FRAGOMENI, B.O.; LOURENCO, D.A.L.; TSURUTA, S.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; MISZTAL, I. Use of genomic recursions and algorithm for proven and young animals for single-step genomic BLUP analyses - a simulation study. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2015, v.132, no.5, p. 340-345.| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : Internacional - -- |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|  |
| 64. | | AGUILAR, I.; MISZTAL, I.; JOHNSON, D. L.; LEGARRA, A.; TSURUTA, S.; LAWLOR, T. J. Uso de información genómica en evaluaciones genéticas. Agrociencia Uruguay, 2010, v. 14, no. 3, p. 43-47. Agrociencia, Nro especial: Congreso Asociación Uruguaya de Producción Animal, 3., 4-5 Noviembre 2010, Montevideo, UY: INIA, Facultad de Agronomía, SMVU.| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Nacionales | Circulación / Nivel : B - 5 |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 65. | | LOURENCO, D.A.L.; FRAGOMENI, B.O.; TSURUTA, S.; AGUILAR, I.; ZUMBACH, B.; HAWKEN, R.J.; LEGARRA, A.; MISZTAL, I. Accuracy of estimated breeding values with genomic information on males, females, or both: An example on broiler chicken. Genetics Selection Evolution, 2015, v. 242, p. 47-56. OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received: 14 October 2014 / Accepted: 22 June 2015 / Published: 02 July 2015.| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : Internacional - -- |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|  |
| 66. | | LOURENCO, D.A.L.; MISZTAL, I.; TSURUTA, S.; AGUILAR, I.; LAWLOR, T.J.; FORNI, S.; WELLER, J.I. Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations?. Journal of Dairy Science, 2014, v.97, no.6, p.3930-3942. OPEN ACCESS Article history: Received November 26, 2013. // Accepted February 11, 2014. OPEN ACCESS| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : A - 1 |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 67. | | CHEN, C. Y.; MISZTAL, I.; AGUILAR, I.; TSURUTA, S.; MEUWISSEN, T.; AGGREY, S. E.; MUIR, W. M. Genome wide marker assisted selection in chicken: making the most of all data, pedigree, phenotypic, and genomic in a simple one step procedure. Volume Genetic improvement programmes: Selection using molecular information - Lecture Sessions, 0288. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 9., Leipzig, Germany, August 1-6, 2010. p. 0288. Acknowledgements: The authors thank Cobb-Vantress for access to data for this study. This study was partially funded by the Holstein Association, Smithfield Premium Genetics, and by AFRI grants 2009-65205-05665 and 2010-65205-20366 from...| Tipo: Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 68. | | MISZTAL, I.; FRAGOMENI, B.; LOURENÇO, D. A. L.; TSURUTA, S.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; LAWLOR, T. J. Efficient inversion of genomic relationship matrix by the Algorithm for Proven and Young (APY). Interbull Bulletin, 2015, v. 49, p. 111-116.| Tipo: Artículos Indexados |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 69. | | LOURENCO, D.A.L.; MISZTAL, I.; TSURUTA, S.; AGUILAR, I.; EZRA, E.; RON, M.; SHIRAK, A.; WELLER, J.I. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses. Journal of Dairy Science, 2014, v.97, no.3, p.1742-1752. OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received September 10, 2013. / Accepted December 6, 2013.| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : A - 1 |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 70. | | MASUDA, Y.; MISZTAL, I.; TSURUTA, S.; LEGARRA, A.; AGUILAR, I.; LOURENCO, D.A.L.; FRAGOMENI, B.O.; LAWLOR, T.J. Implementation of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor for US Holsteins with a large number of genotyped animals. Journal of Dairy Science, 2016, v.99, no.3, p.1968-1974. OPEN ACCESS OPEN ACCESS. Received 19 October 2015, Accepted 1 December 2015, Available online 21 January 2016| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : Internacional - -- |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 71. | | MCWHORTER, T.M.; BERMANN, M.; GARCIA, A.L.S.; LEGARRA, A.; AGUILAR, I.; MISZTAL, I.; LOURENCO, D. Implication of the order of blending and tuning when computing the genomic relationship matrix in single-step GBLUP. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2023, volume 140, issue 1, pp. 60-78. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12734 Article history: Received 18 March 2019; Revised 15 July 2019; Accepted: 29 July 2019; First published 10 August 2022.
Correspondence: McWhorter, T.M.; Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, United...| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : Internacional - -- |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 72. | | FORNERIS, N. S.; LEGARRA, A.; VITEZICA, Z. G.; TSURUTA, S.; AGUILAR, I.; MISZTAL, I.; CANTET, R. J. C. Quality control of genotypes using heritability estimates of gene content at the marker. Genetics, 2015, v. 199, p. 675-681. OPEN ACCESS. Manuscript received September 26, 2014; accepted for publication December 18, 2014; published Early Online January 6, 2015.| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : Internacional - -- |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 73. | | FORNERIS, N. S.; LEGARRA, A.; VITEZICA, Z. G.; TSURUTA, S.; AGUILAR, I.; CANTET, R.J.C.; MISZTAL, I. Quality control of genotypes using heritability estimates of gene content. Volume Genetic Improvement Programs: Selection using molecular information (Posters), 471. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 10., Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 17-22, 2014. p.471.| Tipo: Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 74. | | LOURENCO, D.; TSURUTA, S.; FRAGOMENI, B.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; MILLER, S.; MOSER, D.; MISZTAL, I. Single-step genomic BLUP for national beef cattle evaluation in US: from initial developments to final implementation. Volume Species - Bovine (beef) 1, 495. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 11., Aotea Centre Auckland, New Zealand: WCGALP, ICAR, 11-16 feb 2018.| Tipo: Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 75. | | MASUDA, Y.; MISZTAL, I.; TSURUTA, S.; LOURENÇO, D. A. L.; FRAGOMENI, B.; LEGARRA, A.; AGUILAR, I.; LAWLOR, T. J. Single-step genomic evaluations with 570K genotyped animals in US Holsteins. Interbull Bulletin, 2015, v. 49, p. 85-89.| Tipo: Artículos Indexados |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 76. | | MASUDA, Y; MISZTAL, I.; LEGARRA, A.; TSURUTA, S.; LOURENCO, D.A.L.; FRAGOMENI, B.O.; AGUILAR, I. Technical note: Avoiding the direct inversion of the numerator relationship matrix for genotyped animals in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction solved with the preconditioned conjugate gradient. Journal of Animal Science, 2017, v. 95(1): 49-52. Article history: Received: July 05, 2016; Accepted: Aug 16, 2016; Published: February 2, 2017.
This research was partially funded by the United States Department of Agriculture?s National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Agriculture and...| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : Internacional - -- |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 77. | | LOURENCO, D. A. L.; TSURUTA, S.; FRAGOMENI, B. O.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; BERTRAND, J. K.; AMEN, T. S.; WANG. L.; MOSER, D. W.; MISZTAL, I. Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.(*) Journal of Animal Science, 2015, v. 93, p. 2653-2662. Published June 25, 2015. OPEN ACCESS. (*) This study was partially funded by the American Angus Association (St. Joseph, MO), Zoetis (Kalamazoo, MI), and Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grants no. 2015-67015-22936 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture?s...| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : Internacional - -- |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 78. | | WANG, H.; MISZTAL, I.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; FERNANDO, R.L.; VITEZICA, Z.; OKIMOTO, R.; WING, T.; HAWKEN, R.; MUIR, W.M. Genome-wide association mapping including phenotypes from relatives without genotypes in a single-step (ssGWAS) for 6-week body weight in broiler chickens. Frontiers in Genetics, 2014, v.5, p.1-10. OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received 03 March 2014 // Paper pending published 04 April 2014 // Accepted 25 April 2014 // Published online: 20 May 2014.| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : B - 2 |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 79. | | CHEN, C.Y.; MISZTAL, I.; AGUILAR, I.; TSURUTA, S.; MEUWISSEN, T.H.E.; AGGREY, S.E.; WING, T.; MUIR, W.M. Genome-wide marker-assisted selection combining all pedigree phenotypic information with genotypic data in one step: An example using broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Science, 2011, v.89, no.1, p.23-28. Article history: Received April 9, 2010 / Accepted September 22, 2010.| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : A - 1 |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 80. | | LOURENCO, D.A.L.; FRAGOMENI, B.O.; BRADFORD, H.L.; MENEZES I.R.; FERRAZ, J.B.S.; AGUILAR, I.; MISZTAL, I. Implications of SNP weighting on single-step genomic predictions for different reference population sizes. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2017, v. 134 (6), p. 463-471. Article history: Received: 28 February 2017 / Accepted: 19 July 2017.
This study was partially funded by the American Angus Association (St. Joseph, MO), Zoetis (Kalamazoo, MI) and by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive...| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : Internacional - -- |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 81 | |
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
