| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 16 | |
| 1. |  | AGUILAR, I.; TSURUTA, S.; MASUDA, Y.; LOURENCO, D.A.L.; LEGARRA, A.; MISZTAL, I. BLUPF90 suite of programs for animal breeding with focus on genomics. Volume Methods and Tools - Software, p. 751. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 11., Aotea Centre Auckland, New Zealand: WCGALP, ICAR, 11-16 feb 2018. 6 p.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
| 2. | | LOURENÇO, D. A. L.; MISZTAL, I.; TSURUTA, S.; FRAGOMENI, B.; AGUILAR, I.; MASUDA, Y.; MOSER, D. Direct and indirect genomic evaluations in beef cattle. Interbull Bulletin, 2015, v. 49, p.80 - 84.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 3. | | LOURENCO, D.A.L.; MISZTAL, I.; WANG, H.; AGUILAR, I.; TSURUTA, S.; BERTRAND, J.K. Prediction accuracy for a simulated maternally affected trait of beef cattle using different genomic evaluation models. Journal of Animal Science, 2013, v.91, no.9, p.4090-4098. Article history: Published online July 26, 2013.
This study was partially funded by the American Angus Association (St. Joseph, MO) and the USDA Agriculture and Food Research Initiative (Grant no. 2009-65205-05665 from the USDA National...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|  |
| 4. | | FRAGOMENI, B.O.; LOURENCO, D.A.L.; TSURUTA, S.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; MISZTAL, I. Use of genomic recursions and algorithm for proven and young animals for single-step genomic BLUP analyses - a simulation study. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2015, v.132, no.5, p. 340-345.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 5. | | LOURENCO, D.A.L.; MISZTAL, I.; TSURUTA, S.; AGUILAR, I.; LAWLOR, T.J.; FORNI, S.; WELLER, J.I. Are evaluations on young genotyped animals benefiting from the past generations?. Journal of Dairy Science, 2014, v.97, no.6, p.3930-3942. OPEN ACCESS Article history: Received November 26, 2013. // Accepted February 11, 2014. OPEN ACCESS| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|  |
| 6. | | LOURENCO, D.A.L.; FRAGOMENI, B.O.; TSURUTA, S.; AGUILAR, I.; ZUMBACH, B.; HAWKEN, R.J.; LEGARRA, A.; MISZTAL, I. Accuracy of estimated breeding values with genomic information on males, females, or both: An example on broiler chicken. Genetics Selection Evolution, 2015, v. 242, p. 47-56. OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received: 14 October 2014 / Accepted: 22 June 2015 / Published: 02 July 2015.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 7. | | MISZTAL, I.; FRAGOMENI, B.; LOURENÇO, D. A. L.; TSURUTA, S.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; LAWLOR, T. J. Efficient inversion of genomic relationship matrix by the Algorithm for Proven and Young (APY). Interbull Bulletin, 2015, v. 49, p. 111-116.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 8. | | FRAGOMENI, B.O.; LOURENCO, D.A.L.; TSURUTA, S.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; LAWLOR, T.J.; MIZTAL, I. Hot topic: Use of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) with a large number of genotypes. Journal of Dairy Science, 2015, v.98, no.6, p.4090-4094. OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received November 18, 2014 / Accepted March 13, 2015 / Published online: April 8, 2015.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 9. | | MASUDA, Y.; MISZTAL, I.; TSURUTA, S.; LEGARRA, A.; AGUILAR, I.; LOURENCO, D.A.L.; FRAGOMENI, B.O.; LAWLOR, T.J. Implementation of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor for US Holsteins with a large number of genotyped animals. Journal of Dairy Science, 2016, v.99, no.3, p.1968-1974. OPEN ACCESS OPEN ACCESS. Received 19 October 2015, Accepted 1 December 2015, Available online 21 January 2016| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 10. | | LOURENCO, D.A.L.; MISZTAL, I.; TSURUTA, S.; AGUILAR, I.; EZRA, E.; RON, M.; SHIRAK, A.; WELLER, J.I. Methods for genomic evaluation of a relatively small genotyped dairy population and effect of genotyped cow information in multiparity analyses. Journal of Dairy Science, 2014, v.97, no.3, p.1742-1752. OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received September 10, 2013. / Accepted December 6, 2013.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 11. | | MASUDA, Y.; MISZTAL, I.; TSURUTA, S.; LOURENÇO, D. A. L.; FRAGOMENI, B.; LEGARRA, A.; AGUILAR, I.; LAWLOR, T. J. Single-step genomic evaluations with 570K genotyped animals in US Holsteins. Interbull Bulletin, 2015, v. 49, p. 85-89.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 12. | | MASUDA, Y; MISZTAL, I.; LEGARRA, A.; TSURUTA, S.; LOURENCO, D.A.L.; FRAGOMENI, B.O.; AGUILAR, I. Technical note: Avoiding the direct inversion of the numerator relationship matrix for genotyped animals in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction solved with the preconditioned conjugate gradient. Journal of Animal Science, 2017, v. 95(1): 49-52. Article history: Received: July 05, 2016; Accepted: Aug 16, 2016; Published: February 2, 2017.
This research was partially funded by the United States Department of Agriculture?s National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Agriculture and...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 13. | | LOURENCO, D. A. L.; TSURUTA, S.; FRAGOMENI, B. O.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; BERTRAND, J. K.; AMEN, T. S.; WANG. L.; MOSER, D. W.; MISZTAL, I. Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.(*) Journal of Animal Science, 2015, v. 93, p. 2653-2662. Published June 25, 2015. OPEN ACCESS. (*) This study was partially funded by the American Angus Association (St. Joseph, MO), Zoetis (Kalamazoo, MI), and Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grants no. 2015-67015-22936 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture?s...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 14. | | LOURENCO, D.A.L.; FRAGOMENI, B.O.; BRADFORD, H.L.; MENEZES I.R.; FERRAZ, J.B.S.; AGUILAR, I.; MISZTAL, I. Implications of SNP weighting on single-step genomic predictions for different reference population sizes. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2017, v. 134 (6), p. 463-471. Article history: Received: 28 February 2017 / Accepted: 19 July 2017.
This study was partially funded by the American Angus Association (St. Joseph, MO), Zoetis (Kalamazoo, MI) and by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 15. | | TONUSSI, R.L.; LONDOÑO-GIL, M.; DE OLIVEIRA SILVA, R.M.; MAGALHÃES, A.F.B.; AMORIM, S:T.; KLUSKA, S.; ESPIGOLAN, R.; PERIPOLLI, E.; PEREIRA, A.S.C.; LÔBO, R.B.; AGUILAR, I.; LOURENÇO, D.A.L.; BALDI, F. Accuracy of genomic breeding values and predictive ability for postweaning liveweight and age at first calving in a Nellore cattle population with missing sire information. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2021, Volume 53, Issue 4, Article number 432. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02879-w Article history: Received 19 March 2021; Accepted 30 July 2021; Published online 10 August 2021.
Corresponding author: Londoño-Gil, M.; Grupo de Melhoramento Animal, Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias E Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 16. | | TONUSSI, R. L.; SILVA, R. M. D. O.; MAGALHÃES, A.F.B.; ESPIGOLAN, R.; PERIPOLLI, E.; OLIVIERI, B. F.; FEITOSA, F. L. B.; LEMOS, M. V. A.; BERTON, M. P.; CHIAIA, H. L. J.; PEREIRA, A. S. C.; LÔBO, R. B.; BEZERRA, L. A. F.; MAGNABOSCO, C. D. U.; LOURENÇO, D.A.L.; AGUILAR, I.; BALDI, F. Application of single step genomic BLUP under different uncertain paternity scenarios using simulated data. (Research article). PLoS ONE, September 2017, Volume 12, Issue 9, Article number e0181752. OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received September 22, 2016 // Accepted July 6, 2017 // Published September 28, 2017.
Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are within the paper, its Supporting Information files, and in Figshare.
Funding: This...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 16 | |
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
11/12/2018 |
|
Actualizado : |
18/06/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
TONUSSI, R. L.; SILVA, R. M. D. O.; MAGALHÃES, A.F.B.; ESPIGOLAN, R.; PERIPOLLI, E.; OLIVIERI, B. F.; FEITOSA, F. L. B.; LEMOS, M. V. A.; BERTON, M. P.; CHIAIA, H. L. J.; PEREIRA, A. S. C.; LÔBO, R. B.; BEZERRA, L. A. F.; MAGNABOSCO, C. D. U.; LOURENÇO, D.A.L.; AGUILAR, I.; BALDI, F. |
|
Afiliación : |
RAFAEL LARA TONUSSI, Department of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; RAFAEL MEDEIROS DE OLIVEIRA SILVA, Department of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; FABRÍCIA BRAGA MAGALHÃES, Department of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; RAFAEL ESPIGOLAN, Department of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazi; ELISA PERIPOLLI, Department of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; BIANCA FERREIRA OLIVIERI, Department of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; FABIELI LOISE BRAGA FEITOSA, Department of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; MARCOS VINICÍUS ANTUNES LEMOS, Department of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; MARIANA PIATTO BERTON, Department of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; HERMENEGILDO LUCAS JUSTINO CHIAIA, Department of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil; ANGELICA SIMONE CRAVO PEREIRA, Department of Nutrition and Animal Production, Faculty of Animal Science and Food Engineering, Pirassununga, Brazil; RAYSILDO BARBOSA LÔBO, National Association of Breeders and Researchers (ANCP), Ribeirão Preto, Brazil; LUIZ ANTÔNIO FRAMARTINO BEZERRA, Department of Genetic, Medical School of Ribeirão Preto, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil; CLÁUDIO DE ULHOA MAGNABOSCO, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (EMBRAPA), Distrito Federal, Brazil; DANIELA ANDRESSA LINO LOURENÇO, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, United States of America; IGNACIO AGUILAR GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FERNANDO BALDI, Department of Animal Science, School of Agricultural and Veterinarian Sciences, Jaboticabal, São Paulo, Brazil. |
|
Título : |
Application of single step genomic BLUP under different uncertain paternity scenarios using simulated data. (Research article). |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2017 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
PLoS ONE, September 2017, Volume 12, Issue 9, Article number e0181752. OPEN ACCESS. |
|
ISSN : |
1932-6203 |
|
DOI : |
10.1371/journal.pone.0181752 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received September 22, 2016 // Accepted July 6, 2017 // Published September 28, 2017.
Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are within the paper, its Supporting Information files, and in Figshare.
Funding: This work was funded by the Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), 2013/25910-0, Mr Rafael Lara Tonussi, and Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), 2011/21241-0, PhD Fernando Bald. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
The objective of this study was to investigate the application of BLUP and single step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) models in different scenarios of paternity uncertainty with different strategies of scaling the G matrix to match the A22 matrix, using simulated data for beef cattle. Genotypes, pedigree, and phenotypes for age at first calving (AFC) and weight at 550 days (W550) were simulated using heritabilities based on real data (0.12 for AFC and 0.34 for W550). Paternity uncertainty scenarios using 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% of multiple sires (MS) were studied. The simulated genome had a total length of 2,333 cM, containing 735,293 biallelic markers and 7,000 QTLs randomly distributed over the 29 BTA. It was assumed that QTLs explained 100% of the genetic variance. For QTL, the amount of alleles per loci randomly ranged from two to four. The BLUP model that considers phenotypic and pedigree data, and the ssGBLUP model that combines phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information were used for genetic evaluations. Four ways of scaling the mean of the genomic matrix (G) to match to the mean of the pedigree relationship matrix among genotyped animals (A22) were tested. Accuracy, bias, and inflation were investigated for five groups of animals: ALL = all animals; BULL = only bulls; GEN = genotyped animals; FEM = females; and YOUNG = young males. With the BLUP model, the accuracies of genetic evaluations decreased for both traits as the proportion of unknown sires in the population increased. The EBV accuracy reduction was higher for GEN and YOUNG groups. By analyzing the scenarios for YOUNG (from 0 to 100% of MS), the decrease was 87.8 and 86% for AFC and W550, respectively. When applying the ssGBLUP model, the accuracies of genetic evaluation also decreased as the MS in the pedigree for both traits increased. However, the accuracy reduction was less than those observed for BLUP model. Using the same comparison (scenario 0 to 100% of MS), the accuracies reductions were 38 and 44.6% for AFC and W550, respectively. There were no differences between the strategies for scaling the G matrix for ALL, BULL, and FEM groups under the different scenarios with missing pedigree. These results pointed out that the uninformative part of the A22 matrix and genotyped animals with paternity uncertainty did not influence the scaling of G matrix. On the basis of the results, it is important to have a G matrix in the same scale of the A22 matrix, especially for the evaluation of young animals in situations with missing pedigree information. In these situations, the ssGBLUP model is an appropriate alternative to obtain a more reliable and less biased estimate of breeding values, especially for young animals with few or no phenotypic records. For accurate and unbiased genomic predictions with ssGBLUP, it is necessary to assure that the G matrix is compatible with the A22 matrix, even in situations with paternity uncertainty.
© 2017 Tonussi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. MenosABSTRACT.
The objective of this study was to investigate the application of BLUP and single step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) models in different scenarios of paternity uncertainty with different strategies of scaling the G matrix to match the A22 matrix, using simulated data for beef cattle. Genotypes, pedigree, and phenotypes for age at first calving (AFC) and weight at 550 days (W550) were simulated using heritabilities based on real data (0.12 for AFC and 0.34 for W550). Paternity uncertainty scenarios using 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% of multiple sires (MS) were studied. The simulated genome had a total length of 2,333 cM, containing 735,293 biallelic markers and 7,000 QTLs randomly distributed over the 29 BTA. It was assumed that QTLs explained 100% of the genetic variance. For QTL, the amount of alleles per loci randomly ranged from two to four. The BLUP model that considers phenotypic and pedigree data, and the ssGBLUP model that combines phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information were used for genetic evaluations. Four ways of scaling the mean of the genomic matrix (G) to match to the mean of the pedigree relationship matrix among genotyped animals (A22) were tested. Accuracy, bias, and inflation were investigated for five groups of animals: ALL = all animals; BULL = only bulls; GEN = genotyped animals; FEM = females; and YOUNG = young males. With the BLUP model, the accuracies of genetic evaluations decreased for both traits as the proportion of unknown sires in the popula... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
CATTLE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GENOMICS; INHERITANCE PATTERNS; PEDIGREE. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/12157/1/journal.pone.0181752.pdf
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article/file?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0181752&type=printable
https://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0181752#sec009
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04899naa a2200433 a 4500
001 1059368
005 2019-06-18
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1932-6203
024 7 $a10.1371/journal.pone.0181752$2DOI
100 1 $aTONUSSI, R. L.
245 $aApplication of single step genomic BLUP under different uncertain paternity scenarios using simulated data. (Research article).$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
500 $aArticle history: Received September 22, 2016 // Accepted July 6, 2017 // Published September 28, 2017. Data Availability Statement: All relevant data are within the paper, its Supporting Information files, and in Figshare. Funding: This work was funded by the Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), 2013/25910-0, Mr Rafael Lara Tonussi, and Sao Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), 2011/21241-0, PhD Fernando Bald.
520 $aABSTRACT. The objective of this study was to investigate the application of BLUP and single step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) models in different scenarios of paternity uncertainty with different strategies of scaling the G matrix to match the A22 matrix, using simulated data for beef cattle. Genotypes, pedigree, and phenotypes for age at first calving (AFC) and weight at 550 days (W550) were simulated using heritabilities based on real data (0.12 for AFC and 0.34 for W550). Paternity uncertainty scenarios using 0, 25, 50, 75, and 100% of multiple sires (MS) were studied. The simulated genome had a total length of 2,333 cM, containing 735,293 biallelic markers and 7,000 QTLs randomly distributed over the 29 BTA. It was assumed that QTLs explained 100% of the genetic variance. For QTL, the amount of alleles per loci randomly ranged from two to four. The BLUP model that considers phenotypic and pedigree data, and the ssGBLUP model that combines phenotypic, pedigree and genomic information were used for genetic evaluations. Four ways of scaling the mean of the genomic matrix (G) to match to the mean of the pedigree relationship matrix among genotyped animals (A22) were tested. Accuracy, bias, and inflation were investigated for five groups of animals: ALL = all animals; BULL = only bulls; GEN = genotyped animals; FEM = females; and YOUNG = young males. With the BLUP model, the accuracies of genetic evaluations decreased for both traits as the proportion of unknown sires in the population increased. The EBV accuracy reduction was higher for GEN and YOUNG groups. By analyzing the scenarios for YOUNG (from 0 to 100% of MS), the decrease was 87.8 and 86% for AFC and W550, respectively. When applying the ssGBLUP model, the accuracies of genetic evaluation also decreased as the MS in the pedigree for both traits increased. However, the accuracy reduction was less than those observed for BLUP model. Using the same comparison (scenario 0 to 100% of MS), the accuracies reductions were 38 and 44.6% for AFC and W550, respectively. There were no differences between the strategies for scaling the G matrix for ALL, BULL, and FEM groups under the different scenarios with missing pedigree. These results pointed out that the uninformative part of the A22 matrix and genotyped animals with paternity uncertainty did not influence the scaling of G matrix. On the basis of the results, it is important to have a G matrix in the same scale of the A22 matrix, especially for the evaluation of young animals in situations with missing pedigree information. In these situations, the ssGBLUP model is an appropriate alternative to obtain a more reliable and less biased estimate of breeding values, especially for young animals with few or no phenotypic records. For accurate and unbiased genomic predictions with ssGBLUP, it is necessary to assure that the G matrix is compatible with the A22 matrix, even in situations with paternity uncertainty. © 2017 Tonussi et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
653 $aCATTLE
653 $aCOMPUTER SIMULATION
653 $aGENETIC VARIABILITY
653 $aGENETICS
653 $aGENOMICS
653 $aINHERITANCE PATTERNS
653 $aPEDIGREE
700 1 $aSILVA, R. M. D. O.
700 1 $aMAGALHÃES, A.F.B.
700 1 $aESPIGOLAN, R.
700 1 $aPERIPOLLI, E.
700 1 $aOLIVIERI, B. F.
700 1 $aFEITOSA, F. L. B.
700 1 $aLEMOS, M. V. A.
700 1 $aBERTON, M. P.
700 1 $aCHIAIA, H. L. J.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, A. S. C.
700 1 $aLÔBO, R. B.
700 1 $aBEZERRA, L. A. F.
700 1 $aMAGNABOSCO, C. D. U.
700 1 $aLOURENÇO, D.A.L.
700 1 $aAGUILAR, I.
700 1 $aBALDI, F.
773 $tPLoS ONE, September 2017, Volume 12, Issue 9, Article number e0181752. OPEN ACCESS.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
