|
|
Registros recuperados : 224 | |
181. | | FORNERIS, N. S.; LEGARRA, A.; VITEZICA, Z. G.; TSURUTA, S.; AGUILAR, I.; CANTET, R.J.C.; MISZTAL, I. Quality control of genotypes using heritability estimates of gene content. Volume Genetic Improvement Programs: Selection using molecular information (Posters), 471. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 10., Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 17-22, 2014. p.471.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
182. | | LONDOÑO-GIL, M.; LÓPEZ-CORREA, R.; AGUILAR, I.; MAGNABOSCO, C.U.; HIDALGO, J.; BUSSIMAN, F.; BALDI, F.; LOURENCO, D. Strategies for genomic predictions of an indicine multi-breed population using single-step GBLUP. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12882 - [Early view] Article history: Received 22 March 2024, Revised 10 May 2024, Accepted 15 May 2024. -- Corresponding author: Londoño-Gil, M.; Faculdade de Ciências Agrárias e Veterinárias, Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho, Via de...Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
183. | | Aguilar, I.; Pravia, M.I.; Ravagnolo, O.; Chiappesoni, G.; Mattos, M.; Ahlig, I.; Urioste, J.; Naya, H. Servicio de evaluación de reproductores Aberdeen Angus Las Brujas, Canelones (Uruguay): INIA, 2004. 23 pBiblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
184. | | LOURENCO, D.; TSURUTA, S.; FRAGOMENI, B.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; MILLER, S.; MOSER, D.; MISZTAL, I. Single-step genomic BLUP for national beef cattle evaluation in US: from initial developments to final implementation. Volume Species - Bovine (beef) 1, 495. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 11., Aotea Centre Auckland, New Zealand: WCGALP, ICAR, 11-16 feb 2018.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
185. | | MASUDA, Y.; MISZTAL, I.; TSURUTA, S.; LOURENÇO, D. A. L.; FRAGOMENI, B.; LEGARRA, A.; AGUILAR, I.; LAWLOR, T. J. Single-step genomic evaluations with 570K genotyped animals in US Holsteins. Interbull Bulletin, 2015, v. 49, p. 85-89.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
186. | | MASUDA, Y; MISZTAL, I.; LEGARRA, A.; TSURUTA, S.; LOURENCO, D.A.L.; FRAGOMENI, B.O.; AGUILAR, I. Technical note: Avoiding the direct inversion of the numerator relationship matrix for genotyped animals in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction solved with the preconditioned conjugate gradient. Journal of Animal Science, 2017, v. 95(1): 49-52. Article history: Received: July 05, 2016; Accepted: Aug 16, 2016; Published: February 2, 2017.
This research was partially funded by the United States Department of Agriculture?s National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Agriculture and...Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
187. | | CARDOSO, F. F.; SOLLERO, B. P.; COMIN, H. B.; GOMES, C. G.; ROSO, V. M.; HIGA, R. H.; CAETANO, A. R.; YOKOO, M. J.; AGUILAR, I. Accuracy of genomic prediction for tick resistance in Braford and Hereford cattle. Volume Species Breeding: Beef cattle (Posters), 713. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 10., Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 17-22, 2014. p.713. Acknowledgments: Research supported by CNPq - National Council for Scientific and Technological Development grant 478992/2012-2, Embrapa - Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation grants 02.09.07.004 and 01.11.07.002.07, and CAPES -...Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
188. | | SILVA, D.A.; COSTA, C.N.; SILVA, A.A.; SILVA, H.T.; LOPES, P.S.; SILVA, F.F.; VERONEZE, R.; THOMPSON, G.; AGUILAR, I.; CARVALHEIRA, J. Autoregressive and random regression test-day models for multiple lactations in genetic evaluation of Brazilian Holstein cattle. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 1 May 2020, Volume 137, Issue 3, Pages 305-315. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12459 Article history: Received: 10 July 2019 / Revised: 31 October 2019 / Accepted: 3 November 2019 / First published: 08 December 2019.
Funding information: The authors acknowledge the Brazilian Holstein Cattle Breeders Association (ABCBRH)...Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
189. | | REBOLLO, I.; SCHEFFEL, S.; BLANCO, P.H.; MOLINA, F.; MARTÍNEZ, S.; CARRACELAS, G.; AGUILAR, I.; PÉREZ DE VIDA, F.; ROSAS, J.E. Consolidating twenty-three years of historical data from an irrigated subtropical rice breeding program in Uruguay. Crop Science, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20955 - [Article in Press]. Article history: First published 15 March 2023. -- Corresponding author: jrosas@inia.org.uy --Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
190. | | PRAVIA, M.I.; NAVAJAS, E.; DELAFUENTE, J.; LEMA, O.M.; RAVAGNOLO, O.; AGUILAR, I.; CALISTRO, A.; BRITO, G.; PERAZA, P.; CLARIGET, J.M.; DALLA RIZZA, M.; MONTOSSI, F. Construyendo las bases para la selección genómica en la raza Hereford. Eficiencia de conversión y calidad de canal y carne. Revista INIA Uruguay, 2014, no.38, p. 56-59. (Revista INIA; 38)Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
191. | | NAVAJAS, E.; RAVAGNOLO, O.; AGUILAR, I.; PRAVIA, M.I.; CALISTRO, A.; MACEDO, F.; LEMA, O.M.; DEL PINO, M.L.; DALLA RIZZA, M.; CIAPPESONI, G. EPD Genómicos de eficiencia de conversión en la raza Hereford. Anuario Hereford (Montevideo), p. 176-178, 2017.Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
192. | | DE MATTOS, D.; CIAPPESONI, G.; GIMENO, D.; RAVAGNOLO, O.; AGUILAR, I.; DE BARBIERI, I.; MONTOSSI, F.; MARTÍNEZ, H.; FRUGONI, J.C.; GRATTAROLA, M.; PÉREZ JONES, J.; FROS, A. Evaluación genética del núcleo fundacional merino fino: análisis combinado población merino fino - generación 2002. ln: INIA Tacuarembó. Sociedad Criadores Merino Australiano del Uruguay. SUL. Proyecto Merino Fino del Uruguay: cuarta distribución de carneros generados en el Núcleo Fundacional de Merino Fino de la la Unidad Experimental Glencoe, 1999 - 2003. Glencoe, Paysandú, 10 de diciembre, 2003. Tacuarembó (Uruguay): INIA, 2003. p. 59-71 (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión ; 343)Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
197. | | RAVAGNOLO, O.; LEMA, O.M.; CALISTRO, A.; GONZALEZ, I.; LEMES, F.; COSTALES, J.; ZAMIT, W.; AGUILAR, I.; NAVAJAS, E.; SOARES DE LIMA, J.M. Evaluación genética de la raza Hereford 2020. Anuario Hereford (Montevideo), 2020, p. 206-208.Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
198. | | ROMAN, L.; LA MANNA, A.; ACOSTA, Y.; MENDOZA, A.; AGUILAR, I.; MORALES-PIÑEYRUA, J.; PLA, M.; LAURA ASTIGARRAGA, L.; SARAVIA, C. Evaluación de medidas de mitigación del estrés por calor sobre las respuestas productivas de vacas lecheras de alta producción. In: Día de Campo: producción de forraje y leche en verano. La Estanzuela, Colonia, (Uruguay): INIA, 2013. p. 15. (Serie Actividades de Difusión; 705).Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
199. | | NAVAJAS, E.; MACEDO, F.; RAVAGNOLO, O.; AGUILAR, I.; CLARIGET, J.; LEMA, O.M.; PERAZA, P.; PRAVIA, M.I.; DALLA RIZZA, M.; CIAPPESONI, G. Herramientas genómicas para mejorar la eficiencia de alimentación y la calidad de canal de la raza Hereford. 3 - SIMPOSIOS "MEJORA GENÉTICA EN PRODUCCIÓN Y CALIDAD DE CARNE EN ESPECIES DE INTERÉS ECONÓMICO" In: JOURNAL OF BASIC & APPLIED GENETICS, 2016, Vol.27, Iss. 1 (Supp.). XVI LATIN AMERICAN CONGRESS OF GENETICS, IV CONGRESS OF THE URUGUAYAN SOCIETY OF GENETICS, XLIX ANNUAL MEETING OF THE GENETICS SOCIETY OF CHILE, XLV ARGENTINE CONGRESS OF GENETICS, 9-12 October 2016. PROCEEDINGS. Montevideo (Uruguay): SAG, 2016. p. 28Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
200. | | LOURENCO, D. A. L.; TSURUTA, S.; FRAGOMENI, B. O.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; BERTRAND, J. K.; AMEN, T. S.; WANG. L.; MOSER, D. W.; MISZTAL, I. Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.(*) Journal of Animal Science, 2015, v. 93, p. 2653-2662. Published June 25, 2015. OPEN ACCESS. (*) This study was partially funded by the American Angus Association (St. Joseph, MO), Zoetis (Kalamazoo, MI), and Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grants no. 2015-67015-22936 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture?s...Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 224 | |
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
26/11/2015 |
Actualizado : |
29/01/2020 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
LOURENCO, D. A. L.; TSURUTA, S.; FRAGOMENI, B. O.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; BERTRAND, J. K.; AMEN, T. S.; WANG. L.; MOSER, D. W.; MISZTAL, I. |
Afiliación : |
D. A. L. LOURENCO, Universidad de Georgia (UG); SHOGO TSURUTA, Universidad de Georgia (UG); B. O. FRAGOMENI, Universidad de Georgia (UG); Y. MASUDA, Universidad de Georgia (UG); IGNACIO AGUILAR GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; A. LEGARRA, INRA (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique); J. K. BERTRAND, Universidad de Georgia (UG); T. S. AMEN, Angus Genetics Inc.; L. WANG, Angus Genetics Inc.; D. W. MOSER, Angus Genetics Inc.; IGNACY MISZTAL, Universidad de Georgia (UG). |
Título : |
Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.(*) |
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Animal Science, 2015, v. 93, p. 2653-2662. Published June 25, 2015. OPEN ACCESS. |
DOI : |
10.2527/jas.2014-8836 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
(*) This study was partially funded by the American Angus Association (St. Joseph, MO), Zoetis (Kalamazoo, MI), and Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grants no. 2015-67015-22936 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture?s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. We gratefully acknowledge the very helpful comments by the two anonymous reviewers. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Predictive ability of genomic EBV when using single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) in Angus cattle was investigated. Over 6 million records were available on birth weight (BiW) and weaning weight (WW), almost 3.4 million on postweaning gain (PWG), and over 1.3 million on calving ease (CE). Genomic information was available on, at most, 51,883 animals,
which included high and low EBV accuracy animals. Traditional EBV was computed by BLUP and genomic EBV by ssGBLUP and indirect prediction based on SNP effects was derived from ssGBLUP; SNP effects were calculated based on the following reference populations: ref_2k (contains top bulls and top cows that had an EBV accuracy for BiW ≥0.85), ref_8k (contains all parents that were genotyped), and ref_33k (contains all genotyped animals born up to 2012). Indirect prediction was obtained as direct genomic value (DGV) or as an
index of DGV and parent average (PA). Additionally, runs with ssGBLUP used the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix calculated by an algorithm for proven and young animals (APY) that uses recursions on a small subset of reference animals. An extra reference subset included 3,872 genotyped parents of genotyped animals (ref_4k). Cross-validation was used to assess predictive ability on a validation population of 18,721 animals born in 2013. Computations for growth traits used multiple-trait linear model and, for CE, a bivariate CE?BiW threshold-linear model. With BLUP, predictivities were 0.29, 0.34, 0.23, and 0.12 for BiW, WW, PWG, and CE, respectively. With ssGBLUP and ref_2k, predictivities were 0.34, 0.35, 0.27, and 0.13 for BiW, WW, PWG, and CE, respectively, and with ssGBLUP and ref_33k, predictivities were 0.39, 0.38, 0.29, and 0.13 for BiW, WW, PWG, and CE, respectively. Low predictivity for CE was due to low incidence rate of difficult calving. Indirect predictions with ref_33k were as accurate as with full ssGBLUP. Using the APY and recursions on ref_4k gave 88% gains of full ssGBLUP and using the APY and recursions on ref_8k gave 97% gains of full ssGBLUP. Genomic evaluation in beef cattle with ssGBLUP is feasible while keeping the models (maternal, multiple trait, and threshold) already used in regular BLUP. Gains in predictivity are dependent on the composition of the reference population. Indirect predictions via SNP effects derived from ssGBLUP allow for accurate genomic predictions on young animals, with no advantage of including PA in
the index if the reference population is large. With the APY conditioning on about 10,000 reference animals, ssGBLUP is potentially applicable to a large number of genotyped animals without compromising predictive ability.
© 2015 American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved MenosABSTRACT.
Predictive ability of genomic EBV when using single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) in Angus cattle was investigated. Over 6 million records were available on birth weight (BiW) and weaning weight (WW), almost 3.4 million on postweaning gain (PWG), and over 1.3 million on calving ease (CE). Genomic information was available on, at most, 51,883 animals,
which included high and low EBV accuracy animals. Traditional EBV was computed by BLUP and genomic EBV by ssGBLUP and indirect prediction based on SNP effects was derived from ssGBLUP; SNP effects were calculated based on the following reference populations: ref_2k (contains top bulls and top cows that had an EBV accuracy for BiW ≥0.85), ref_8k (contains all parents that were genotyped), and ref_33k (contains all genotyped animals born up to 2012). Indirect prediction was obtained as direct genomic value (DGV) or as an
index of DGV and parent average (PA). Additionally, runs with ssGBLUP used the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix calculated by an algorithm for proven and young animals (APY) that uses recursions on a small subset of reference animals. An extra reference subset included 3,872 genotyped parents of genotyped animals (ref_4k). Cross-validation was used to assess predictive ability on a validation population of 18,721 animals born in 2013. Computations for growth traits used multiple-trait linear model and, for CE, a bivariate CE?BiW threshold-linear model. With BLUP, predictivities were 0.29,... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
BEEF CATTLE; GENETIC RESURSION; INDIRECT PREDICTION. |
Thesagro : |
GANADO DE CARNE; GENOMIC SELECTION; MEJORAMIENTO GENETICO ANIMAL. |
Asunto categoría : |
L10 Genética y mejoramiento animal |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/5303/1/Lourenco-et-al-2015-JAS.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04125naa a2200337 a 4500 001 1054005 005 2020-01-29 008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.2527/jas.2014-8836$2DOI 100 1 $aLOURENCO, D. A. L. 245 $aGenetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.(*)$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2015 500 $a(*) This study was partially funded by the American Angus Association (St. Joseph, MO), Zoetis (Kalamazoo, MI), and Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grants no. 2015-67015-22936 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture?s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. We gratefully acknowledge the very helpful comments by the two anonymous reviewers. 520 $aABSTRACT. Predictive ability of genomic EBV when using single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) in Angus cattle was investigated. Over 6 million records were available on birth weight (BiW) and weaning weight (WW), almost 3.4 million on postweaning gain (PWG), and over 1.3 million on calving ease (CE). Genomic information was available on, at most, 51,883 animals, which included high and low EBV accuracy animals. Traditional EBV was computed by BLUP and genomic EBV by ssGBLUP and indirect prediction based on SNP effects was derived from ssGBLUP; SNP effects were calculated based on the following reference populations: ref_2k (contains top bulls and top cows that had an EBV accuracy for BiW ≥0.85), ref_8k (contains all parents that were genotyped), and ref_33k (contains all genotyped animals born up to 2012). Indirect prediction was obtained as direct genomic value (DGV) or as an index of DGV and parent average (PA). Additionally, runs with ssGBLUP used the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix calculated by an algorithm for proven and young animals (APY) that uses recursions on a small subset of reference animals. An extra reference subset included 3,872 genotyped parents of genotyped animals (ref_4k). Cross-validation was used to assess predictive ability on a validation population of 18,721 animals born in 2013. Computations for growth traits used multiple-trait linear model and, for CE, a bivariate CE?BiW threshold-linear model. With BLUP, predictivities were 0.29, 0.34, 0.23, and 0.12 for BiW, WW, PWG, and CE, respectively. With ssGBLUP and ref_2k, predictivities were 0.34, 0.35, 0.27, and 0.13 for BiW, WW, PWG, and CE, respectively, and with ssGBLUP and ref_33k, predictivities were 0.39, 0.38, 0.29, and 0.13 for BiW, WW, PWG, and CE, respectively. Low predictivity for CE was due to low incidence rate of difficult calving. Indirect predictions with ref_33k were as accurate as with full ssGBLUP. Using the APY and recursions on ref_4k gave 88% gains of full ssGBLUP and using the APY and recursions on ref_8k gave 97% gains of full ssGBLUP. Genomic evaluation in beef cattle with ssGBLUP is feasible while keeping the models (maternal, multiple trait, and threshold) already used in regular BLUP. Gains in predictivity are dependent on the composition of the reference population. Indirect predictions via SNP effects derived from ssGBLUP allow for accurate genomic predictions on young animals, with no advantage of including PA in the index if the reference population is large. With the APY conditioning on about 10,000 reference animals, ssGBLUP is potentially applicable to a large number of genotyped animals without compromising predictive ability. © 2015 American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved 650 $aGANADO DE CARNE 650 $aGENOMIC SELECTION 650 $aMEJORAMIENTO GENETICO ANIMAL 653 $aBEEF CATTLE 653 $aGENETIC RESURSION 653 $aINDIRECT PREDICTION 700 1 $aTSURUTA, S. 700 1 $aFRAGOMENI, B. O. 700 1 $aMASUDA, Y. 700 1 $aAGUILAR, I. 700 1 $aLEGARRA, A. 700 1 $aBERTRAND, J. K. 700 1 $aAMEN, T. S. 700 1 $aWANG. L. 700 1 $aMOSER, D. W. 700 1 $aMISZTAL, I. 773 $tJournal of Animal Science, 2015$gv. 93, p. 2653-2662. Published June 25, 2015. OPEN ACCESS.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|