| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 12 | |
| 1. |  | WEINROTH, M.; ROVIRA, P.J.; YANG, X.; PARKER, J.; MORLEY, P.S.; BELK, K.E. Characterization of antibiotic resistance transmission in the beef production system. Abstract. In: RCM Reciprocal Meat Conference, 71, Kansas City, 2018. Kansas, American Meat Science Association (AMSA), 2018.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|    |
| 2. | | WEINROTH, M.D.; YANG, X.; NOYES, N.R.; ROVIRA, P.J.; MARTIN, J.N.; MORLEY, P.S.; BELK, K.E. Foodborne pathogens and virulence in the microbiome of cattle grown naturally verses conventionally. In: 63rd International Congress of Meat Science and Technology. Cork. Ireland. 2017. Troy, D.; McDonnell, C.; Hinds, L.; Kerry, J. eds. Nurturing locally, growing globally. The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers, 2017. p. 505-507| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 3. | | NOYES, N. R.; ABDO, Z.; ROVIRA, P.J.; DOSTER, E.; YANG, X.; LINKE, L. M.; BURGESS, B. A.; MARTIN. J.; BOUCHER, C.; MORLEY, P. S.; BELK, K. E. A bayesian approach to investigating the effect of metaphylaxis on the microbiome-resistance of the commercial feedlot steers. Abstract. In: Plant and Animal Genome Conference, 24. San Diego, USA, 2016.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 4. | | DOSTER, E.; ROVIRA, P.J.; NOYES, N.R.; BURGESS, B.A.; YANG, X.; WEINROTH, M.; LINKE, L.; MAGNUSON, R.; PABILONIA, K.; BOUCHER, C. Comparing Salmonella enterica detection in feces using aerobic culture, targeted molecular tests, and shotgun metagenomics. In: SYMPOSIUM OF AMERICAN COLLEGE OF VETERINARY INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2017, GREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO, USA. Proceedings of ACVIM 2017, Greenwood Village, CO, USA. p. 338.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 5. | | DOSTER, E.; ROVIRA, P.J.; NOYES, N.R.; BURGESS, B.A.; YANG, X.; WEINROTH, M.D.; LINKE, L.; MAGNUSON, R.; BOUCHER, C.; BELK, K.E.; MORLEY, P.S. A cautionary report for pathogen identification using shotgun metagenomics; a comparison to aerobic culture and polymerase chain reaction for Salmonella enterica identification. Frontier in Microbiology, 2019, 10:2499. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.02499 7 p. Article history: received: 8 July 2019 // Accepted 16 October 2019 // Published 01 November 2019.
Open Access Journal. www.frontiersin.org| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 6. | | DOSTER, E.; ROVIRA, P.J.; NOYES, N.; BURGES, B.; YANG, X.; WEINROTH, M.; LINKE, L.; MAGNUSON, R.; JONES, K.; BOUCHER, C.; RUIZ, J.; MORLEY, P.; BELK, K. Shotgun metagenomic detection of Salmonella enterica in feedlot cattle compared to aerobic culture and PCR techniques. [Abstract]. In: Conference of Research Workers in Animal Diseases, 2016. Chicago (USA): En línea| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 7. | | ROVIRA, P.J.; MCALLISTER, T.; LAKIN, S.M.; COOK, S.R.; DOSTER, E.; NOYES, N. R.; WEINROTH, M.D.; YANG, X.; PARKER, J. K.; BOUCHER, C.; BOOKER, C. W.; WOENER, D. R.; BELK, K. E.; MORLEY, P. S. Characterization of the microbial resistome in conventional and "raised without antibiotics" beef and dairy production systems. Frontier in Microbiology, September 2019. v. 10, article 1980, 11 p. OPEN ACCESS. Received 18 March 2019 // Accepted 12 August 2019 // Published 4 September 2019.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 8. | | WEINROTH, M.D.; SCOTT, H.M.; NORBY, B.; LONERAGAN, G.H.; NOYES, N.R.; ROVIRA, P.J.; DOSTER, E.; YANG, X.; WOERNER, D.R.; MORLEY, P.S.; BELK, K.E. Effects of ceftiofur and chlortetracycline on the resistomes of feedlot cattle. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, July 2018, vol. 84, no.13, e00610-18. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Article history: Received 15 March 2018. / Accepted 24 April 2018. / Accepted manuscript posted online 4 May 2018. OPEN ACCESS.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 9. | | DOSTER, E.; ROVIRA, P.J.; NOYES, N.R.; BURGESS, B. A.; YANG, X.; WEINROTH, M.D.; LAKIN, S.M.; DEAN, C.J.; LINKE, L.; MAGNUSON, R.; JONES, K.I.; BOUCHER, C.; RUIZ, J.; BELK, K.E.; MORLEY, P.S. Investigating effects of tulathromycin metaphylaxis on the fecal resistome and microbiome of commercial feedlot cattle early in the feeding period. Frontier in Microbiology, 2018, 9:1715. 14 p. Article history: Received: 14 April 2018; Accepted: 09 July 2018; Published: 30 July 2018.
Open Access journal.
https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2018.01715| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 10. | | WEINROTH, M.D.; LANKIN, S.M.; NOYES, N.R.; YANG, X.; ROVIRA, P.J.; DOSTER, E.; DEAN, C.; PARKER, J.K.; ANDERSON, C.; ABDO, Z.; BOUCHER, C.; RUIZ, J.; BELK, K.E.; MORLEY, P.S. Metagenomic investigations of antimicrobial resistance in beef, pork, and broiler production systems. [Abstract]. ln: Conference of Research Workers in Animal Disease. (3-5 Dec., 2017, Chicago, Illinois, USA) Presentation Abstracts. Chicago, Illinois (USA): CRWAD, 2017. p. 27.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 11. | | MORLEY, P.; BELK, K.; DOSTER, E.; LAKIN, S.; DEAN, C.; MUGGLI, M.; NOYES, N.; ROVIRA, P.J.; WEINROTH, M.; YANG, X.; ABDO, Z.; BOUCHER, C.; RUIZ, J.; SCOTT, H.M.; VAN METRE, D.C.; WOERNER, D.E. Metagnomic investigations of antimicrobial resitance in food animal populations. In: USDA NIFA Antimicrobial Resistance Program Project. 2017, Florida, USA. p. 14-15| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 12. | | DOSTER, E.; ROVIRA, P.J.; NOYES, N. R.; BURGESS, B.A.; YANG, X.; WEINROTH, M.; LINKE, L.; MAGNUSON, R.; JONES, K.; BOUCHER, C.; RUIZ, J.; MORLEY, P.S.; BELK, K.E. Use of shotgun metagenomic to evaluate the microbiome in cattle feces following tulathromycin metaphylaxis. [Abstract]. In: Conference of Research Workers in Animal Diseases, 96th, 2015,Chicago (USA): CRWAD, 2015. p. 128.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 12 | |
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
07/05/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
06/09/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Nacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Nacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
FERNÁNDEZ, G.; SCAPARONI, F.; SISQUELLA, M.; PINTOS, P.; LUQUE, E.; MOLTINI, A.; LADO, J. |
|
Afiliación : |
GERÓNIMO FERNÁNDEZ VELAZCO, Asociación Civil Unión de Productores y Exportadores de Fruta del Uruguay, Montevideo, Uruguay.; FEDERICO SCAPARONI, Ejercicio libre de la profesión, Salto, Uruguay.; MARIA SISQUELLA, Institute of Agrifood Research and Technology (IRTA), Catalunya, España.; PEDRO MAXIMILIANO PINTOS RODRIGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MAYZA ELEANA LUQUE NUÑEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANA INÉS MOLTINI PALADINO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOANNA LADO LINDNER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Effects of different comercial coatings on postharvest citrus fruit quality for export. [Efecto de distintos recubrimientos comerciales en la calidad poscosecha de frutos cítricos para exportación.]. [Efeito de diferentes revestimentos comerciais na quali-dade pós-colheita de frutas cítricas para exportaçao.]. |
|
Complemento del título : |
Food Technology. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agrociencia Uruguay, Apr 2021, vol. 25, no. 1, e337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.25.337 |
|
ISSN : |
e-ISSN: 2730-5066 |
|
DOI : |
10.31285/AGRO.25.337 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 09 Mar 2020; Accepted 04 Nov 2020; Published 10 Feb 2021.
Editor: Gustavo González-Neves (Universidad de Ja República, Montevideo, Uruguay).
Correspondence: Joana Lado - Email: jado@inia.org.uy |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT - The use of fruit coatings aims to avoid dehydration, minimize the occurrence of spots in the peel and weight loss as well as extend the postharvest life maintaining fruit appearance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different fruit coatings in fruit quality, weight loss and acetaldehyde and ethanol production in differ-ent mandarin and orange varieties, during postharvest storage. With that aim, fruits of different varieties, with or without degreening and with postharvest fungicide treatment, were treated in experimental conditions with the commercial coatings Brillaqua UE-Mercosur and UEJ-Mercosur, Citrosol AUE and Sunseal, and Concentrol AC36, repeating the evaluation of the more promising treatments in commercial conditions together with Brillaqua UEF6-Mercosur, Citrosol AKUE y Tecnidex Teycer-GLK. In both experiments, fruit was stored for 6 weeks at 1±0.5 ºC plus 7 days at room temperature simulating shelf life. External and internal quality were evaluated at different moments during storage. None of the treatments affected fruit firmness, external or internal quality negatively compared with the commercial control BRIUE. The most promising treatments for their application in citrus post-harvest and storage at 1 ºC were Brillaqua UEF6- Mercosur, Citrosol AKUE y Tecnidex Teycer-GLK, showing an acceptable brightness level, good appearance and superior quality. Concentrol AC36 y Citrosol AUE were not discarded as alternatives since they presented acceptable brightness, appearance and acetaldehyde and etha-nol levels after storage.
.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.
RESUMEN - El uso de recubrimientos tiene como objetivo evitar la deshidratación, minimizar la aparición de manchas en la piel y la pérdida de peso, además de prolongar la vida poscosecha y mantener la apariencia de los frutos. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar el efecto de diferentes recubrimientos en la calidad, la pérdida de peso y la producción de acetaldehído y etanol en distintas variedades de mandarina y naranja, durante el almacena-miento poscosecha. Para ello, frutos de distintas variedades, con o sin desverdizado, y con tratamiento fungicida poscosecha, fueron tratados con los recubrimientos comerciales Brillaqua UE-Mercosur y UEJ-Mercosur, Citrosol AUE y Sunseal, y Concentrol AC36, en condiciones experimentales, repitiéndose la evaluación de los más pro-misorios en condiciones comerciales junto con Brillaqua UEF6- Mercosur, Citrosol AKUE y Tecnidex Teycer-GLK. En ambos ensayos la fruta se almacenó durante 6 semanas a 1±0,5 °C más 7 días a temperatura ambiente, simulando la vida comercial. Se evaluó la calidad visual e interna de los frutos en diferentes momentos del almacenamiento. Ningún tratamiento afectó negativamente la firmeza, la calidad externa o interna de la fruta en comparación con el control comercial BRIUE. Los recubrimientos más promisorios para su aplicación en pos-cosecha de frutos cítricos y posterior almacenamiento a 1 °C fueron Brillaqua UEF6- Mercosur, Citrosol AKUE y Tecnidex Teycer-GLK, presentando un nivel de brillo, aspecto visual general y calidad superiores. No se descar-tan los recubrimientos Concentrol AC36 y Citrosol AUE,con aceptables niveles de brillo luego de la conserva-ción, aspecto visual general, así como niveles de acetaldehído y etanol. MenosABSTRACT - The use of fruit coatings aims to avoid dehydration, minimize the occurrence of spots in the peel and weight loss as well as extend the postharvest life maintaining fruit appearance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different fruit coatings in fruit quality, weight loss and acetaldehyde and ethanol production in differ-ent mandarin and orange varieties, during postharvest storage. With that aim, fruits of different varieties, with or without degreening and with postharvest fungicide treatment, were treated in experimental conditions with the commercial coatings Brillaqua UE-Mercosur and UEJ-Mercosur, Citrosol AUE and Sunseal, and Concentrol AC36, repeating the evaluation of the more promising treatments in commercial conditions together with Brillaqua UEF6-Mercosur, Citrosol AKUE y Tecnidex Teycer-GLK. In both experiments, fruit was stored for 6 weeks at 1±0.5 ºC plus 7 days at room temperature simulating shelf life. External and internal quality were evaluated at different moments during storage. None of the treatments affected fruit firmness, external or internal quality negatively compared with the commercial control BRIUE. The most promising treatments for their application in citrus post-harvest and storage at 1 ºC were Brillaqua UEF6- Mercosur, Citrosol AKUE y Tecnidex Teycer-GLK, showing an acceptable brightness level, good appearance and superior quality. Concentrol AC36 y Citrosol AUE were not discarded as alternatives since the... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Armazenamento; Citros; PLATAFORMA AGROALIMENTOS; Pós-colheita; Postharvest; Storage; Wax. |
|
Thesagro : |
ALMACENAMIENTO; CERA; CITRUS; POSCOSECHA. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16743/1/Agrociencia-UY-2021-25-N1-337.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04842naa a2200361 a 4500
001 1062031
005 2022-09-06
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $ae-ISSN: 2730-5066
024 7 $a10.31285/AGRO.25.337$2DOI
100 1 $aFERNÁNDEZ, G.
245 $aEffects of different comercial coatings on postharvest citrus fruit quality for export. [Efecto de distintos recubrimientos comerciales en la calidad poscosecha de frutos cítricos para exportación.]. [Efeito de diferentes revestimentos comerciais na quali-dade pós-colheita de frutas cítricas para exportaçao.].$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Received 09 Mar 2020; Accepted 04 Nov 2020; Published 10 Feb 2021. Editor: Gustavo González-Neves (Universidad de Ja República, Montevideo, Uruguay). Correspondence: Joana Lado - Email: jado@inia.org.uy
520 $aABSTRACT - The use of fruit coatings aims to avoid dehydration, minimize the occurrence of spots in the peel and weight loss as well as extend the postharvest life maintaining fruit appearance. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of different fruit coatings in fruit quality, weight loss and acetaldehyde and ethanol production in differ-ent mandarin and orange varieties, during postharvest storage. With that aim, fruits of different varieties, with or without degreening and with postharvest fungicide treatment, were treated in experimental conditions with the commercial coatings Brillaqua UE-Mercosur and UEJ-Mercosur, Citrosol AUE and Sunseal, and Concentrol AC36, repeating the evaluation of the more promising treatments in commercial conditions together with Brillaqua UEF6-Mercosur, Citrosol AKUE y Tecnidex Teycer-GLK. In both experiments, fruit was stored for 6 weeks at 1±0.5 ºC plus 7 days at room temperature simulating shelf life. External and internal quality were evaluated at different moments during storage. None of the treatments affected fruit firmness, external or internal quality negatively compared with the commercial control BRIUE. The most promising treatments for their application in citrus post-harvest and storage at 1 ºC were Brillaqua UEF6- Mercosur, Citrosol AKUE y Tecnidex Teycer-GLK, showing an acceptable brightness level, good appearance and superior quality. Concentrol AC36 y Citrosol AUE were not discarded as alternatives since they presented acceptable brightness, appearance and acetaldehyde and etha-nol levels after storage. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. RESUMEN - El uso de recubrimientos tiene como objetivo evitar la deshidratación, minimizar la aparición de manchas en la piel y la pérdida de peso, además de prolongar la vida poscosecha y mantener la apariencia de los frutos. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar el efecto de diferentes recubrimientos en la calidad, la pérdida de peso y la producción de acetaldehído y etanol en distintas variedades de mandarina y naranja, durante el almacena-miento poscosecha. Para ello, frutos de distintas variedades, con o sin desverdizado, y con tratamiento fungicida poscosecha, fueron tratados con los recubrimientos comerciales Brillaqua UE-Mercosur y UEJ-Mercosur, Citrosol AUE y Sunseal, y Concentrol AC36, en condiciones experimentales, repitiéndose la evaluación de los más pro-misorios en condiciones comerciales junto con Brillaqua UEF6- Mercosur, Citrosol AKUE y Tecnidex Teycer-GLK. En ambos ensayos la fruta se almacenó durante 6 semanas a 1±0,5 °C más 7 días a temperatura ambiente, simulando la vida comercial. Se evaluó la calidad visual e interna de los frutos en diferentes momentos del almacenamiento. Ningún tratamiento afectó negativamente la firmeza, la calidad externa o interna de la fruta en comparación con el control comercial BRIUE. Los recubrimientos más promisorios para su aplicación en pos-cosecha de frutos cítricos y posterior almacenamiento a 1 °C fueron Brillaqua UEF6- Mercosur, Citrosol AKUE y Tecnidex Teycer-GLK, presentando un nivel de brillo, aspecto visual general y calidad superiores. No se descar-tan los recubrimientos Concentrol AC36 y Citrosol AUE,con aceptables niveles de brillo luego de la conserva-ción, aspecto visual general, así como niveles de acetaldehído y etanol.
650 $aALMACENAMIENTO
650 $aCERA
650 $aCITRUS
650 $aPOSCOSECHA
653 $aArmazenamento
653 $aCitros
653 $aPLATAFORMA AGROALIMENTOS
653 $aPós-colheita
653 $aPostharvest
653 $aStorage
653 $aWax
700 1 $aSCAPARONI, F.
700 1 $aSISQUELLA, M.
700 1 $aPINTOS, P.
700 1 $aLUQUE, E.
700 1 $aMOLTINI, A.
700 1 $aLADO, J.
773 $tAgrociencia Uruguay, Apr 2021, vol. 25, no. 1, e337. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.25.337
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
