| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 58 | |
| 6. |  | ALLEGRI, M. Mejoramiento de pasturas. ln: JORNADA GANADERA DE SUELOS ARENOSOS, 2., 1979, TACUAREMBÓ, URUGUAY. Montevideo (Uruguay): CIAAB, 1979. p. 7-10| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
|    |
| 7. | | ALLEGRI, M. Métodos de mejoramiento de pasturas naturales ln: Reunión Técnica [en] Producción y Conservación de Pasturas y Forrajes, 1969 set-oct : La Estanzuela, Colonia [Memorias]. Montevideo (Uruguay): CIAAB, 1969. p13-18 (CIAAB Miscelánea ; 7)| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 11. | | ALLEGRI, M.; GRIERSON, J. La capacitación tecnica en el CIAAB. ln: Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura (IICA). Seminario sobre politicas de adiestramiento de personal. Montevideo (Uruguay): IICA-Cono Sur/BID, 1982. p. 37-48 (IICA PROCISUR Diálogo ; 2)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 16. | | FORMOSO, F.; ALLEGRI, M. Leguminosas en la región noreste. Tacuarembó (Uruguay): CIAAB, 1977. 27 p. (CIAAB Miscelánea ; 21) A fines de la década del 60, el Centro de Investigaciones Agrícolas "Alberto Boerger" impulsó la ejecucidn de Proyectos Regionales de Investigación en pasturas, tendientes a lograr información en relación a pasturas naturales,...| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 58 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
09/09/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
02/06/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
GRAUDAL, L.; ARAVANOPOULOS, F.; BENNADJI, Z.; CHANGTRAGOON, S.; FADY, B.; KJAER, E.D.; LOO, J.; RAMAMONJISOA, L.; VENDRAMIN, G.G. |
|
Afiliación : |
LARS GRAUDAL, Forest & Landscape Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; FILIPPOS ARAVANOPOULOS, Aristotle University of Thesaloniki, Greece.; ZOHRA BENNADJI SOUALHIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SUCHITRA CHANGTRAGOON, Forest and Plant Conservation Research Office, Department of National Parks, Wildlife and Plant Conservation, Thailand; BRUNO FADY, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique (INRA) Avignon, France; ERIK D. KJAER, Forest & Landscape Denmark, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; JUDY LOO, Bioversity International, Rome, Italy; LOLONA RAMAMONJISOA, Silo National des Graines Forestieres, Madagascar; GIOVANNI G. VENDRAMIN, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche (CNR) Florence, Italy. |
|
Título : |
Global to local genetic diversity indicators of evolutionary potential in tree species within and outside forests. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2014 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Forest Ecology and Management, Volume 333, 1 December 2014, Pages 35-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.002 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.002 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Available online 13 June 2014. |
|
Contenido : |
There is a general trend of biodiversity loss at global, regional, national and local levels. To monitor this trend, international policy processes have created a wealth of indicators over the last two decades. However, genetic diversity indicators are regrettably absent from comprehensive bio-monitoring schemes.
Here, we provide a review and an assessment of the different attempts made to provide such indicators for tree genetic diversity from the global level down to the level of the management unit. So far, no generally accepted indicators have been provided as international standards, nor tested for their possible use in practice. We suggest that indicators for monitoring genetic diversity and dynamics should be based on ecological and demographic surrogates of adaptive diversity as well as genetic markers capable of identifying genetic erosion and gene flow. A comparison of past and present genecological distributions (patterns of genetic variation of key adaptive traits in the ecological space) of selected species is a realistic way of assessing the trend of intra-specific variation, and thus provides a state indicator of tree genetic diversity also able to reflect possible pressures threatening genetic diversity. Revealing benefits of genetic diversity related to ecosystem services is complex, but current trends in plantation performance offer the possibility of an indicator of benefit. Response indicators are generally much easier to define, because recognition
and even quantification of, e.g., research, education, breeding, conservation, and regulation actions and programs are relatively straightforward. Only state indicators can reveal genetic patterns and processes, which are fundamental for maintaining genetic diversity. Indirect indicators of pressure, benefit, or response should therefore not be used independently of state indicators. A coherent set of indicators covering diversity?productivity?knowledge?management based on the genecological approach is proposed for application on appropriate groups of tree species in the wild and in cultivation worldwide.
These indicators realistically reflect the state, trends and potentials of the world?s tree genetic resources to support sustainable growth. The state of the genetic iversity will be based on trends in population distributions and diversity patterns for selected species. The productivity of the genetic resource of trees in current use will reflect the possible potential of mobilizing the resource further. Trends in knowledge will underpin the potential capacity for development of the resource and current anagement of the genetic resource itself will reveal how well we are actually doing and where improvements are required. MenosThere is a general trend of biodiversity loss at global, regional, national and local levels. To monitor this trend, international policy processes have created a wealth of indicators over the last two decades. However, genetic diversity indicators are regrettably absent from comprehensive bio-monitoring schemes.
Here, we provide a review and an assessment of the different attempts made to provide such indicators for tree genetic diversity from the global level down to the level of the management unit. So far, no generally accepted indicators have been provided as international standards, nor tested for their possible use in practice. We suggest that indicators for monitoring genetic diversity and dynamics should be based on ecological and demographic surrogates of adaptive diversity as well as genetic markers capable of identifying genetic erosion and gene flow. A comparison of past and present genecological distributions (patterns of genetic variation of key adaptive traits in the ecological space) of selected species is a realistic way of assessing the trend of intra-specific variation, and thus provides a state indicator of tree genetic diversity also able to reflect possible pressures threatening genetic diversity. Revealing benefits of genetic diversity related to ecosystem services is complex, but current trends in plantation performance offer the possibility of an indicator of benefit. Response indicators are generally much easier to define, because recognition
and e... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
DIVERSITY; GENETIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC VERIFIERS; KNOWLEDGE; MANAGEMENT; PRODUCTIVITY; THE GENECOLOGICAL APPROACH; TYPE OF INDICATORS. |
|
Thesagro : |
FORESTACIÓN; GENETICA FORESTAL. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
K10 Producción forestal |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03847naa a2200349 a 4500
001 1050069
005 2020-06-02
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.002$2DOI
100 1 $aGRAUDAL, L.
245 $aGlobal to local genetic diversity indicators of evolutionary potential in tree species within and outside forests.
260 $c2014
500 $aArticle history: Available online 13 June 2014.
520 $aThere is a general trend of biodiversity loss at global, regional, national and local levels. To monitor this trend, international policy processes have created a wealth of indicators over the last two decades. However, genetic diversity indicators are regrettably absent from comprehensive bio-monitoring schemes. Here, we provide a review and an assessment of the different attempts made to provide such indicators for tree genetic diversity from the global level down to the level of the management unit. So far, no generally accepted indicators have been provided as international standards, nor tested for their possible use in practice. We suggest that indicators for monitoring genetic diversity and dynamics should be based on ecological and demographic surrogates of adaptive diversity as well as genetic markers capable of identifying genetic erosion and gene flow. A comparison of past and present genecological distributions (patterns of genetic variation of key adaptive traits in the ecological space) of selected species is a realistic way of assessing the trend of intra-specific variation, and thus provides a state indicator of tree genetic diversity also able to reflect possible pressures threatening genetic diversity. Revealing benefits of genetic diversity related to ecosystem services is complex, but current trends in plantation performance offer the possibility of an indicator of benefit. Response indicators are generally much easier to define, because recognition and even quantification of, e.g., research, education, breeding, conservation, and regulation actions and programs are relatively straightforward. Only state indicators can reveal genetic patterns and processes, which are fundamental for maintaining genetic diversity. Indirect indicators of pressure, benefit, or response should therefore not be used independently of state indicators. A coherent set of indicators covering diversity?productivity?knowledge?management based on the genecological approach is proposed for application on appropriate groups of tree species in the wild and in cultivation worldwide. These indicators realistically reflect the state, trends and potentials of the world?s tree genetic resources to support sustainable growth. The state of the genetic iversity will be based on trends in population distributions and diversity patterns for selected species. The productivity of the genetic resource of trees in current use will reflect the possible potential of mobilizing the resource further. Trends in knowledge will underpin the potential capacity for development of the resource and current anagement of the genetic resource itself will reveal how well we are actually doing and where improvements are required.
650 $aFORESTACIÓN
650 $aGENETICA FORESTAL
653 $aDIVERSITY
653 $aGENETIC AND DEMOGRAPHIC VERIFIERS
653 $aKNOWLEDGE
653 $aMANAGEMENT
653 $aPRODUCTIVITY
653 $aTHE GENECOLOGICAL APPROACH
653 $aTYPE OF INDICATORS
700 1 $aARAVANOPOULOS, F.
700 1 $aBENNADJI, Z.
700 1 $aCHANGTRAGOON, S.
700 1 $aFADY, B.
700 1 $aKJAER, E.D.
700 1 $aLOO, J.
700 1 $aRAMAMONJISOA, L.
700 1 $aVENDRAMIN, G.G.
773 $tForest Ecology and Management, Volume 333, 1 December 2014, Pages 35-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2014.05.002
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
