| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 675 | |
| 21. |  | BRIANO, C.; SCARSI, A.; VELAZCO, J.I.; BAKKER, M.; BANCHERO, G.; MEIKLE, A.; QUINTANS, G. Alta y baja asignación de forraje antes del parto: efectos sobre variables productivas y reproductivas. Resultados preliminares In: QUINTANS, G.; SCARSI, A. (Eds.). Seminario de actualización técnica: cría vacuna Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2013. p. 175-185 (INIA Serie Técnica; 208)| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|    |
| 23. | | SCAGLIA, G. Alternativas de alimentación para la recría ln: Jornada Anual de Producción Animal, 1996, Palo a Pique, Treinta y Tres, UY. [Resultados experimentales]. Treinta y Tres: INIA, 1996. p. 63-68. (Serie Actividades de Difusión, 110). INIA Treinta y Tres. Unidad Experimental Palo a Pique (UEPP).| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 25. | | UNGERFELD, R.; HÖTZEL, M.J.; QUINTANS, G. Alternativas para disminuir el estrés del destete en bovinos de carne. En: Congreso Asociación Uruguaya de Producción Animal (AUPA) (4º, 29-30 Oct. 2012, Montevideo, UY). 2012. [Actas], Montevideo, Uruguay. Veterinaria, 2012, vol. 72, no. 48, Supp. 1 Congreso publicado en la revista arbitrada: Veterinaria (Uruguay)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|  |
| 34. | | VELAZCO, J.I.; ROVIRA, P.J. Análisis integrado de los experimentos. In: ROVIRA, P.J.; VELAZCO, J.I. (Eds). Suplementación de bovinos en pastoreo: autoconsumo. Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2012. p. 57-62 (INIA Serie Técnica; 199) El análisis se refiere a los trabajos que componen la ST 199.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 675 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha actual : |
18/04/2017 |
|
Actualizado : |
15/10/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
A - 1 |
|
Autor : |
HERD, R.M.; VELAZCO, J.I.; ARTHUR, P.F.; HEGARTY, R.F. |
|
Afiliación : |
JOSÉ IGNACIO VELAZCO DE LOS REYES, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Associations among methane emission traits measured in the feedlot and in respiration chambers in Angus cattle to vary in feed efficiency. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2016 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Animal Science. 2016, v.94(11), p. 4882-4891 |
|
DOI : |
10.2527/JAS2016-0613 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received May 7, 2016. Accepted September 7, 2016. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
The objective of the study was to evaluate associations among animal performance and methane emission traits under feedlot conditions and in respiration chambers in Angus cattle bred to vary in residual feed intake (RFI), which is a measure of feed efficiency. Fifty-nine cattle were tested for feedlot RFI, of which 41 had methane production recorded on an ad libitum grain-based ration in the feedlot, 59 on a restricted grain-based ration in respiration chambers, and 57 on a restricted roughage ration in respiration chambers. The cattle became older and heavier as they went through the different phases of the experiment, but their feed intake (expressed as DMI) and daily emission of enteric methane (methane production rate; MPR) did not increase proportionally, as feed offered was restricted in the respiration chamber tests. Methane emissions by individual animals relative to their DMI were calculated as methane yield (MY; MPR/DMI) and as 2 measures of residual methane production (RMP and RMP), which were calculated as the difference between measured MPR and that predicted from feed intake by 2 different equations. Within each test regime, MPR was positively correlated ( = 0.28 to 0.61) with DMI. Phenotypic correlations for MY, RMP, and RMP between the feedlot test and the restricted grain test ( = 0.40 to 0.43) and between the restricted grain test and the restricted roughage test were moderate ( = 0.36 to 0.41) and moderate to strong between the feedlot test and the restricted roughage test ( = 0.54 to 0.58). These results indicate that the rankings of animals for methane production relative to feed consumed are relatively stable over the 3 test phases. Feedlot feed conversion ratio and RFI were not correlated with MPR in the feedlot test and grain-based chamber test but were negatively correlated with MPR in the chamber roughage test ( = -0.31 and -0.37). Both were negatively correlated with MY and RMP in the feedlot test ( = -0.42 to -0.54) and subsequent chamber roughage test ( = -0.27 to -0.49). Midparent estimated breeding values for RFI tended to be negatively correlated with MY and RMP in the feedlot test ( = -0.27 and -0.27) and were negatively correlated with MY, RMP, and RMP in the chamber roughage test ( = -0.33 to -0.36). These results showed that in young growing cattle, lower RFI was associated with higher MY, RMP, and RMP but had no significant association with MPR. MenosAbstract:
The objective of the study was to evaluate associations among animal performance and methane emission traits under feedlot conditions and in respiration chambers in Angus cattle bred to vary in residual feed intake (RFI), which is a measure of feed efficiency. Fifty-nine cattle were tested for feedlot RFI, of which 41 had methane production recorded on an ad libitum grain-based ration in the feedlot, 59 on a restricted grain-based ration in respiration chambers, and 57 on a restricted roughage ration in respiration chambers. The cattle became older and heavier as they went through the different phases of the experiment, but their feed intake (expressed as DMI) and daily emission of enteric methane (methane production rate; MPR) did not increase proportionally, as feed offered was restricted in the respiration chamber tests. Methane emissions by individual animals relative to their DMI were calculated as methane yield (MY; MPR/DMI) and as 2 measures of residual methane production (RMP and RMP), which were calculated as the difference between measured MPR and that predicted from feed intake by 2 different equations. Within each test regime, MPR was positively correlated ( = 0.28 to 0.61) with DMI. Phenotypic correlations for MY, RMP, and RMP between the feedlot test and the restricted grain test ( = 0.40 to 0.43) and between the restricted grain test and the restricted roughage test were moderate ( = 0.36 to 0.41) and moderate to strong between the feedlot test and t... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
CATTLE; EFICIENCIA ALIMENTICIA; FEED EFFICIENCY; GAS METANO; GASES DE EFECTO INVERNADERO; GREENHOUSE GAS; METHANE. |
|
Thesagro : |
BOVINOS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
T01 Polución |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03329naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1057076
005 2019-10-15
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.2527/JAS2016-0613$2DOI
100 1 $aHERD, R.M.
245 $aAssociations among methane emission traits measured in the feedlot and in respiration chambers in Angus cattle to vary in feed efficiency.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2016
500 $aArticle history: Received May 7, 2016. Accepted September 7, 2016.
520 $aAbstract: The objective of the study was to evaluate associations among animal performance and methane emission traits under feedlot conditions and in respiration chambers in Angus cattle bred to vary in residual feed intake (RFI), which is a measure of feed efficiency. Fifty-nine cattle were tested for feedlot RFI, of which 41 had methane production recorded on an ad libitum grain-based ration in the feedlot, 59 on a restricted grain-based ration in respiration chambers, and 57 on a restricted roughage ration in respiration chambers. The cattle became older and heavier as they went through the different phases of the experiment, but their feed intake (expressed as DMI) and daily emission of enteric methane (methane production rate; MPR) did not increase proportionally, as feed offered was restricted in the respiration chamber tests. Methane emissions by individual animals relative to their DMI were calculated as methane yield (MY; MPR/DMI) and as 2 measures of residual methane production (RMP and RMP), which were calculated as the difference between measured MPR and that predicted from feed intake by 2 different equations. Within each test regime, MPR was positively correlated ( = 0.28 to 0.61) with DMI. Phenotypic correlations for MY, RMP, and RMP between the feedlot test and the restricted grain test ( = 0.40 to 0.43) and between the restricted grain test and the restricted roughage test were moderate ( = 0.36 to 0.41) and moderate to strong between the feedlot test and the restricted roughage test ( = 0.54 to 0.58). These results indicate that the rankings of animals for methane production relative to feed consumed are relatively stable over the 3 test phases. Feedlot feed conversion ratio and RFI were not correlated with MPR in the feedlot test and grain-based chamber test but were negatively correlated with MPR in the chamber roughage test ( = -0.31 and -0.37). Both were negatively correlated with MY and RMP in the feedlot test ( = -0.42 to -0.54) and subsequent chamber roughage test ( = -0.27 to -0.49). Midparent estimated breeding values for RFI tended to be negatively correlated with MY and RMP in the feedlot test ( = -0.27 and -0.27) and were negatively correlated with MY, RMP, and RMP in the chamber roughage test ( = -0.33 to -0.36). These results showed that in young growing cattle, lower RFI was associated with higher MY, RMP, and RMP but had no significant association with MPR.
650 $aBOVINOS
653 $aCATTLE
653 $aEFICIENCIA ALIMENTICIA
653 $aFEED EFFICIENCY
653 $aGAS METANO
653 $aGASES DE EFECTO INVERNADERO
653 $aGREENHOUSE GAS
653 $aMETHANE
700 1 $aVELAZCO, J.I.
700 1 $aARTHUR, P.F.
700 1 $aHEGARTY, R.F.
773 $tJournal of Animal Science. 2016$gv.94(11), p. 4882-4891
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
