| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
26/11/2015 |
|
Actualizado : |
29/01/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
LOURENCO, D. A. L.; TSURUTA, S.; FRAGOMENI, B. O.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; BERTRAND, J. K.; AMEN, T. S.; WANG. L.; MOSER, D. W.; MISZTAL, I. |
|
Afiliación : |
D. A. L. LOURENCO, Universidad de Georgia (UG); SHOGO TSURUTA, Universidad de Georgia (UG); B. O. FRAGOMENI, Universidad de Georgia (UG); Y. MASUDA, Universidad de Georgia (UG); IGNACIO AGUILAR GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; A. LEGARRA, INRA (Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique); J. K. BERTRAND, Universidad de Georgia (UG); T. S. AMEN, Angus Genetics Inc.; L. WANG, Angus Genetics Inc.; D. W. MOSER, Angus Genetics Inc.; IGNACY MISZTAL, Universidad de Georgia (UG). |
|
Título : |
Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.(*) |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Animal Science, 2015, v. 93, p. 2653-2662. Published June 25, 2015. OPEN ACCESS. |
|
DOI : |
10.2527/jas.2014-8836 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
(*) This study was partially funded by the American Angus Association (St. Joseph, MO), Zoetis (Kalamazoo, MI), and Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grants no. 2015-67015-22936 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture?s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. We gratefully acknowledge the very helpful comments by the two anonymous reviewers. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Predictive ability of genomic EBV when using single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) in Angus cattle was investigated. Over 6 million records were available on birth weight (BiW) and weaning weight (WW), almost 3.4 million on postweaning gain (PWG), and over 1.3 million on calving ease (CE). Genomic information was available on, at most, 51,883 animals,
which included high and low EBV accuracy animals. Traditional EBV was computed by BLUP and genomic EBV by ssGBLUP and indirect prediction based on SNP effects was derived from ssGBLUP; SNP effects were calculated based on the following reference populations: ref_2k (contains top bulls and top cows that had an EBV accuracy for BiW ≥0.85), ref_8k (contains all parents that were genotyped), and ref_33k (contains all genotyped animals born up to 2012). Indirect prediction was obtained as direct genomic value (DGV) or as an
index of DGV and parent average (PA). Additionally, runs with ssGBLUP used the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix calculated by an algorithm for proven and young animals (APY) that uses recursions on a small subset of reference animals. An extra reference subset included 3,872 genotyped parents of genotyped animals (ref_4k). Cross-validation was used to assess predictive ability on a validation population of 18,721 animals born in 2013. Computations for growth traits used multiple-trait linear model and, for CE, a bivariate CE?BiW threshold-linear model. With BLUP, predictivities were 0.29, 0.34, 0.23, and 0.12 for BiW, WW, PWG, and CE, respectively. With ssGBLUP and ref_2k, predictivities were 0.34, 0.35, 0.27, and 0.13 for BiW, WW, PWG, and CE, respectively, and with ssGBLUP and ref_33k, predictivities were 0.39, 0.38, 0.29, and 0.13 for BiW, WW, PWG, and CE, respectively. Low predictivity for CE was due to low incidence rate of difficult calving. Indirect predictions with ref_33k were as accurate as with full ssGBLUP. Using the APY and recursions on ref_4k gave 88% gains of full ssGBLUP and using the APY and recursions on ref_8k gave 97% gains of full ssGBLUP. Genomic evaluation in beef cattle with ssGBLUP is feasible while keeping the models (maternal, multiple trait, and threshold) already used in regular BLUP. Gains in predictivity are dependent on the composition of the reference population. Indirect predictions via SNP effects derived from ssGBLUP allow for accurate genomic predictions on young animals, with no advantage of including PA in
the index if the reference population is large. With the APY conditioning on about 10,000 reference animals, ssGBLUP is potentially applicable to a large number of genotyped animals without compromising predictive ability.
© 2015 American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved MenosABSTRACT.
Predictive ability of genomic EBV when using single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) in Angus cattle was investigated. Over 6 million records were available on birth weight (BiW) and weaning weight (WW), almost 3.4 million on postweaning gain (PWG), and over 1.3 million on calving ease (CE). Genomic information was available on, at most, 51,883 animals,
which included high and low EBV accuracy animals. Traditional EBV was computed by BLUP and genomic EBV by ssGBLUP and indirect prediction based on SNP effects was derived from ssGBLUP; SNP effects were calculated based on the following reference populations: ref_2k (contains top bulls and top cows that had an EBV accuracy for BiW ≥0.85), ref_8k (contains all parents that were genotyped), and ref_33k (contains all genotyped animals born up to 2012). Indirect prediction was obtained as direct genomic value (DGV) or as an
index of DGV and parent average (PA). Additionally, runs with ssGBLUP used the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix calculated by an algorithm for proven and young animals (APY) that uses recursions on a small subset of reference animals. An extra reference subset included 3,872 genotyped parents of genotyped animals (ref_4k). Cross-validation was used to assess predictive ability on a validation population of 18,721 animals born in 2013. Computations for growth traits used multiple-trait linear model and, for CE, a bivariate CE?BiW threshold-linear model. With BLUP, predictivities were 0.29,... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
BEEF CATTLE; GENETIC RESURSION; INDIRECT PREDICTION. |
|
Thesagro : |
GANADO DE CARNE; GENOMIC SELECTION; MEJORAMIENTO GENETICO ANIMAL. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L10 Genética y mejoramiento animal |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/5303/1/Lourenco-et-al-2015-JAS.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04125naa a2200337 a 4500
001 1054005
005 2020-01-29
008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.2527/jas.2014-8836$2DOI
100 1 $aLOURENCO, D. A. L.
245 $aGenetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.(*)$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2015
500 $a(*) This study was partially funded by the American Angus Association (St. Joseph, MO), Zoetis (Kalamazoo, MI), and Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grants no. 2015-67015-22936 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture?s National Institute of Food and Agriculture. We gratefully acknowledge the very helpful comments by the two anonymous reviewers.
520 $aABSTRACT. Predictive ability of genomic EBV when using single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) in Angus cattle was investigated. Over 6 million records were available on birth weight (BiW) and weaning weight (WW), almost 3.4 million on postweaning gain (PWG), and over 1.3 million on calving ease (CE). Genomic information was available on, at most, 51,883 animals, which included high and low EBV accuracy animals. Traditional EBV was computed by BLUP and genomic EBV by ssGBLUP and indirect prediction based on SNP effects was derived from ssGBLUP; SNP effects were calculated based on the following reference populations: ref_2k (contains top bulls and top cows that had an EBV accuracy for BiW ≥0.85), ref_8k (contains all parents that were genotyped), and ref_33k (contains all genotyped animals born up to 2012). Indirect prediction was obtained as direct genomic value (DGV) or as an index of DGV and parent average (PA). Additionally, runs with ssGBLUP used the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix calculated by an algorithm for proven and young animals (APY) that uses recursions on a small subset of reference animals. An extra reference subset included 3,872 genotyped parents of genotyped animals (ref_4k). Cross-validation was used to assess predictive ability on a validation population of 18,721 animals born in 2013. Computations for growth traits used multiple-trait linear model and, for CE, a bivariate CE?BiW threshold-linear model. With BLUP, predictivities were 0.29, 0.34, 0.23, and 0.12 for BiW, WW, PWG, and CE, respectively. With ssGBLUP and ref_2k, predictivities were 0.34, 0.35, 0.27, and 0.13 for BiW, WW, PWG, and CE, respectively, and with ssGBLUP and ref_33k, predictivities were 0.39, 0.38, 0.29, and 0.13 for BiW, WW, PWG, and CE, respectively. Low predictivity for CE was due to low incidence rate of difficult calving. Indirect predictions with ref_33k were as accurate as with full ssGBLUP. Using the APY and recursions on ref_4k gave 88% gains of full ssGBLUP and using the APY and recursions on ref_8k gave 97% gains of full ssGBLUP. Genomic evaluation in beef cattle with ssGBLUP is feasible while keeping the models (maternal, multiple trait, and threshold) already used in regular BLUP. Gains in predictivity are dependent on the composition of the reference population. Indirect predictions via SNP effects derived from ssGBLUP allow for accurate genomic predictions on young animals, with no advantage of including PA in the index if the reference population is large. With the APY conditioning on about 10,000 reference animals, ssGBLUP is potentially applicable to a large number of genotyped animals without compromising predictive ability. © 2015 American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved
650 $aGANADO DE CARNE
650 $aGENOMIC SELECTION
650 $aMEJORAMIENTO GENETICO ANIMAL
653 $aBEEF CATTLE
653 $aGENETIC RESURSION
653 $aINDIRECT PREDICTION
700 1 $aTSURUTA, S.
700 1 $aFRAGOMENI, B. O.
700 1 $aMASUDA, Y.
700 1 $aAGUILAR, I.
700 1 $aLEGARRA, A.
700 1 $aBERTRAND, J. K.
700 1 $aAMEN, T. S.
700 1 $aWANG. L.
700 1 $aMOSER, D. W.
700 1 $aMISZTAL, I.
773 $tJournal of Animal Science, 2015$gv. 93, p. 2653-2662. Published June 25, 2015. OPEN ACCESS.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
31/07/2017 |
|
Actualizado : |
20/02/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
LADO, B.; BATTENFIELD, S. D.; GUZMÁN, C.; QUINCKE, M.; SINGH, R. P.; DREISIGACKER, S.; PEÑA, R. J.; FRITZ, AL.; SILVA, P.; POLAND, J.; GUTIÉRREZ, L. |
|
Afiliación : |
BETTINA LADO, Statistics Dep., Facultad de Agronomía, Univ. de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay; SARAH D. BATTENFIELD, Kansas State University, Department of Plant Pathology, Manhattan, United States; CARLOS GUZMÁN, Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maiz y Trigo, Global Wheat Program, Mexico City, Mexico; MARTIN CONRADO QUINCKE WALDEN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; RAVI PRAKASH SINGH, Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maiz y Trigo, Global Wheat Program, Mexico City, Mexico; SUSANNE DREISIGACKER, Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maiz y Trigo, Applied Biotechnology Center, Mexico City, Mexico; ROBERTO JAVIER PEÑA, Centro Internacional de Mejoramiento de Maiz y Trigo, Global Wheat Program, Mexico City, Mexico; ALLAN K. FRITZ, Kansas State University, Manhattan, United States; MARIA PAULA SILVA VILLELLA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JESSE A. POLAND, Kansas State University, Department of Plant Pathology and Department of Agronomy, Manhattan, United States; LUCÍA GUTIÉRREZ, Kansas State University, Department of Plant Pathology and Department of Agronomy, Manhattan, United States. |
|
Título : |
Strategies for selecting crosses using genomic prediction in two wheat breeding programs. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2017 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
The Plant Genome, 2017, v.10, Issue 2, 12p. OPEN ACCESS |
|
ISSN : |
1940-3372 |
|
DOI : |
10.3835/plantgenome2016.12.0128 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received: Dec 14, 2016 // Accepted: Mar 18, 2017 // Published: July 6, 2017.
B. Lado and S. Battenfield contributed equally.Assigned to Associate Editor Nicholas Tinker.
This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND license. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
The single most important decision in plant breeding programs is the selection of appropriate crosses. The ideal cross would provide superior predicted progeny performance and enough diversity to maintain genetic gain. The aim of this study was to compare the best crosses predicted using combinations of mid-parent value and variance prediction accounting for linkage disequilibrium (VLD) or assuming linkage equilibrium (VLE). After predicting the mean and the variance of each cross, we selected crosses based on mid-parent value, the top 10% of the progeny, and weighted mean and variance within progenies for grain yield, grain protein content, mixing time, and loaf volume in two applied wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) breeding programs: Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA) Uruguay and CIMMYT Mexico. Although the variance of the progeny is important to increase the chances of finding superior individuals from transgressive segregation, we observed that the mid-parent values of the crosses drove the genetic gain but the variance of the progeny had a small impact on genetic gain for grain yield. However, the relative importance of the variance of the progeny was larger for quality traits. Overall, the genomic resources and the statistical models are now available to plant breeders to predict both the performance of breeding lines per se as well as the value of progeny from any potential crosses.
© Crop Science Society of America |
|
Palabras claves : |
GENOMIC SELECTION; WHEAT; WHEAT BREEDING PROGRAMS. |
|
Thesagro : |
TRIGO. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/12466/1/tpg-10-2-plantgenome2016.12.0128.pdf
https://dl.sciencesocieties.org/publications/tpg/articles/10/2/plantgenome2016.12.0128
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02631naa a2200325 a 4500
001 1057423
005 2019-02-20
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1940-3372
024 7 $a10.3835/plantgenome2016.12.0128$2DOI
100 1 $aLADO, B.
245 $aStrategies for selecting crosses using genomic prediction in two wheat breeding programs.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
500 $aArticle history: Received: Dec 14, 2016 // Accepted: Mar 18, 2017 // Published: July 6, 2017. B. Lado and S. Battenfield contributed equally.Assigned to Associate Editor Nicholas Tinker. This is an open access article distributed under the CC BY-NC-ND license.
520 $aABSTRACT. The single most important decision in plant breeding programs is the selection of appropriate crosses. The ideal cross would provide superior predicted progeny performance and enough diversity to maintain genetic gain. The aim of this study was to compare the best crosses predicted using combinations of mid-parent value and variance prediction accounting for linkage disequilibrium (VLD) or assuming linkage equilibrium (VLE). After predicting the mean and the variance of each cross, we selected crosses based on mid-parent value, the top 10% of the progeny, and weighted mean and variance within progenies for grain yield, grain protein content, mixing time, and loaf volume in two applied wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) breeding programs: Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA) Uruguay and CIMMYT Mexico. Although the variance of the progeny is important to increase the chances of finding superior individuals from transgressive segregation, we observed that the mid-parent values of the crosses drove the genetic gain but the variance of the progeny had a small impact on genetic gain for grain yield. However, the relative importance of the variance of the progeny was larger for quality traits. Overall, the genomic resources and the statistical models are now available to plant breeders to predict both the performance of breeding lines per se as well as the value of progeny from any potential crosses. © Crop Science Society of America
650 $aTRIGO
653 $aGENOMIC SELECTION
653 $aWHEAT
653 $aWHEAT BREEDING PROGRAMS
700 1 $aBATTENFIELD, S. D.
700 1 $aGUZMÁN, C.
700 1 $aQUINCKE, M.
700 1 $aSINGH, R. P.
700 1 $aDREISIGACKER, S.
700 1 $aPEÑA, R. J.
700 1 $aFRITZ, AL.
700 1 $aSILVA, P.
700 1 $aPOLAND, J.
700 1 $aGUTIÉRREZ, L.
773 $tThe Plant Genome, 2017$gv.10, Issue 2, 12p. OPEN ACCESS
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
