|
|
Registros recuperados : 7 | |
1. | | FRAGOMENI, B.O.; MISZTAL, I.; LOURENCO, D.L.; AGUILAR, I.; OKIMOTO, R.; MUIR, W.M. Changes in variance explained by top SNP windows over generations for three traits in broiler chicken Frontiers in Genetics, 2014, v.5, no.Oct., Article number 332. OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Published 01 October 2014.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
3. | | CHEN, C.Y.; MISZTAL, I.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; MUIR, W.M. Effect of different genomic relationship matrices on accuracy and scale. Journal of Animal Science, 2011, v.89, no.9, p.2673-2679. Article history: Received September 29, 2010. / Accepted March 21, 2011.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
4. | | CHEN, C. Y.; MISZTAL, I.; AGUILAR, I.; TSURUTA, S.; MEUWISSEN, T.; AGGREY, S. E.; MUIR, W. M. Genome wide marker assisted selection in chicken: making the most of all data, pedigree, phenotypic, and genomic in a simple one step procedure. Volume Genetic improvement programmes: Selection using molecular information - Lecture Sessions, 0288. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 9., Leipzig, Germany, August 1-6, 2010. p. 0288. Acknowledgements: The authors thank Cobb-Vantress for access to data for this study. This study was partially funded by the Holstein Association, Smithfield Premium Genetics, and by AFRI grants 2009-65205-05665 and 2010-65205-20366 from...Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
5. | | WANG, H.; MISZTAL, I.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; FERNANDO, R.L.; VITEZICA, Z.; OKIMOTO, R.; WING, T.; HAWKEN, R.; MUIR, W.M. Genome-wide association mapping including phenotypes from relatives without genotypes in a single-step (ssGWAS) for 6-week body weight in broiler chickens. Frontiers in Genetics, 2014, v.5, p.1-10. OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received 03 March 2014 // Paper pending published 04 April 2014 // Accepted 25 April 2014 // Published online: 20 May 2014.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
6. | | CHEN, C.Y.; MISZTAL, I.; AGUILAR, I.; TSURUTA, S.; MEUWISSEN, T.H.E.; AGGREY, S.E.; WING, T.; MUIR, W.M. Genome-wide marker-assisted selection combining all pedigree phenotypic information with genotypic data in one step: An example using broiler chickens. Journal of Animal Science, 2011, v.89, no.1, p.23-28. Article history: Received April 9, 2010 / Accepted September 22, 2010.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
7. | | MISZTAL, I.; WANG, H.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; TSURUTA, S.; LOURENCO, D.; FRAGOMENI, B. O.; ZHANG, X.; MUIR, W. M.; CHENG, H. H.; OKIMOTO, R.; WING, T.; HAWKEN, R. R.; ZUMBACH, B.; FERNANDO, R. GWAS using ssGBLUP. Volume Species Breeding: Poultry, 325. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 10., Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 17-22, 2014. p.325.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 7 | |
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
15/11/2015 |
Actualizado : |
09/10/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
B - 2 |
Autor : |
FRAGOMENI, B.O.; MISZTAL, I.; LOURENCO, D.L.; AGUILAR, I.; OKIMOTO, R.; MUIR, W.M. |
Afiliación : |
IGNACIO AGUILAR GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Changes in variance explained by top SNP windows over generations for three traits in broiler chicken |
Fecha de publicación : |
2014 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Frontiers in Genetics, 2014, v.5, no.Oct., Article number 332. OPEN ACCESS. |
ISSN : |
1664-8021 |
DOI : |
10.3389/fgene.2014.00332 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Published 01 October 2014. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
The purpose of this study was to determine if the set of genomic regions inferred as accounting for the majority of genetic variation in quantitative traits remain stable over multiple generations of selection. The data set contained phenotypes for five generations of broiler chicken for body weight, breast meat, and leg score. The population consisted of 294,632 animals over five generations and also included genotypes of 41,036 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) for 4,866 animals, after quality control. The SNP effects were calculated by a GWAS type analysis using single step genomic BLUP approach for generations 1-3, 2-4, 3-5, and 1-5. Variances were calculated for windows of 20 SNP. The top ten windows for each trait that explained the largest fraction of the genetic variance across generations were examined. Across generations, the top 10 windows explained more than 0.5% but less than 1% of the total variance. Also, the pattern of the windows was not consistent across generations. The windows that explained the greatest variance changed greatly among the combinations of generations, with a few exceptions. In many cases, a window identified as top for one combination, explained less than 0.1% for the other combinations. We conclude that identification of top SNP windows for a population may have little predictive power for genetic selection in the following generations for the traits here evaluated.
© 2014 Fragomeni, Misztal, Lourenco, Aguilar, Okimoto and Muir. MenosABSTRACT.
The purpose of this study was to determine if the set of genomic regions inferred as accounting for the majority of genetic variation in quantitative traits remain stable over multiple generations of selection. The data set contained phenotypes for five generations of broiler chicken for body weight, breast meat, and leg score. The population consisted of 294,632 animals over five generations and also included genotypes of 41,036 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) for 4,866 animals, after quality control. The SNP effects were calculated by a GWAS type analysis using single step genomic BLUP approach for generations 1-3, 2-4, 3-5, and 1-5. Variances were calculated for windows of 20 SNP. The top ten windows for each trait that explained the largest fraction of the genetic variance across generations were examined. Across generations, the top 10 windows explained more than 0.5% but less than 1% of the total variance. Also, the pattern of the windows was not consistent across generations. The windows that explained the greatest variance changed greatly among the combinations of generations, with a few exceptions. In many cases, a window identified as top for one combination, explained less than 0.1% for the other combinations. We conclude that identification of top SNP windows for a population may have little predictive power for genetic selection in the following generations for the traits here evaluated.
© 2014 Fragomeni, Misztal, Lourenco, Aguilar, Okimoto and... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Gene identification; Genome-wide association study; Genomic selection; QTL; SsGBLUP. |
Thesagro : |
MEJORAMIENTO GENETICO ANIMAL; POLLO DE ENGORDE. |
Asunto categoría : |
L10 Genética y mejoramiento animal |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/5195/1/Aguilar-I.-2014.-Frontiers-in-Genetics.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02443naa a2200301 a 4500 001 1053891 005 2019-10-09 008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1664-8021 024 7 $a10.3389/fgene.2014.00332$2DOI 100 1 $aFRAGOMENI, B.O. 245 $aChanges in variance explained by top SNP windows over generations for three traits in broiler chicken$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2014 500 $aArticle history: Published 01 October 2014. 520 $aABSTRACT. The purpose of this study was to determine if the set of genomic regions inferred as accounting for the majority of genetic variation in quantitative traits remain stable over multiple generations of selection. The data set contained phenotypes for five generations of broiler chicken for body weight, breast meat, and leg score. The population consisted of 294,632 animals over five generations and also included genotypes of 41,036 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) for 4,866 animals, after quality control. The SNP effects were calculated by a GWAS type analysis using single step genomic BLUP approach for generations 1-3, 2-4, 3-5, and 1-5. Variances were calculated for windows of 20 SNP. The top ten windows for each trait that explained the largest fraction of the genetic variance across generations were examined. Across generations, the top 10 windows explained more than 0.5% but less than 1% of the total variance. Also, the pattern of the windows was not consistent across generations. The windows that explained the greatest variance changed greatly among the combinations of generations, with a few exceptions. In many cases, a window identified as top for one combination, explained less than 0.1% for the other combinations. We conclude that identification of top SNP windows for a population may have little predictive power for genetic selection in the following generations for the traits here evaluated. © 2014 Fragomeni, Misztal, Lourenco, Aguilar, Okimoto and Muir. 650 $aMEJORAMIENTO GENETICO ANIMAL 650 $aPOLLO DE ENGORDE 653 $aGene identification 653 $aGenome-wide association study 653 $aGenomic selection 653 $aQTL 653 $aSsGBLUP 700 1 $aMISZTAL, I. 700 1 $aLOURENCO, D.L. 700 1 $aAGUILAR, I. 700 1 $aOKIMOTO, R. 700 1 $aMUIR, W.M. 773 $tFrontiers in Genetics, 2014$gv.5, no.Oct., Article number 332. OPEN ACCESS.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|