|
|
Registros recuperados : 34 | |
1. | | FONT I FURNOLS, M.; SAN JULIÁN, R.; GUERRERO, L.; SAÑUDO, C. Aceptabilidad de consumidores españoles, alemanes e ingleses frente a la carne de ovino de diferentes sistemas productivos y tiempos de maduración. In: JORNADA SOBRE PRESENTACIÓN DE RESULTADOS DEL PROYECTO, MADRID, MARZO, 2006; SAÑUDO, C.; MONTOSSI, F. (Coord.). Madrid: INIA (España), 2006. p. 53-55 Contiene presentación oral de María Font i Furnols, p. 57-59.Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
5. | | SAN JULIÁN, R.; NUTE, G.; SAÑUDO, C.; FONT I FURNOLS, M.; GUERRERO, L.; MONTOSSI, F. Sensorial evaluation of lamb meat produced under different production systems of Uruguay. [Abstract]. In: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF MEAT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICoMST), 51., 2005, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Book of Abstracts, 2005. p. 17Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
6. | | SAN JULIÁN, R.; NUTE, G.; SAÑUDO, C.; FONT I FURNOLS, M.; GUERRERO, L.; MONTOSSI, F. Sensory evaluation of beef meat produced under different production systems of Uruguay. [Abstract] In: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF MEAT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICoMST), 51., 2005, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Book of Abstracts, 2005. p. 18Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
7. | | SAN JULIÁN, R.; NUTE, G.; SAÑUDO, C.; FONT I FURNOLS, M.; GUERRERO, L.; MONTOSSI, F. Sensory evaluation of beef meat produced under different production systems of Uruguay. In: INTERNATIONAL CONGRESS OF MEAT SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (ICoMST), 51., 2005, Baltimore, Maryland, USA. Proceedings.Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
10. | | REALINI, C.E.; FONT I FURNOLS, M.; SAÑUDO, C.; MONTOSSI, F.; OLIVER, M.A.; GUERRERO, L. Spanish, French and British consumers' acceptability of Uruguayan beef, and consumers' beef choice associated with country of origin, finishing diet and meat price. Meat Science, 2013, v. 95, no. 1, p. 14-21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.004 Article history: Received 5 February 2012; Received in revised form 25 February 2013; Accepted 4 April 2013. Acknowledgments: The authors wish to acknowledge the financial support of the Agencia Española de Cooperación Internacional para...Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
11. | | MONTOSSI, F.; FONT-I-FURNOLS, M.; DEL CAMPO, M.; SAN JULIAN, R.; BRITO, G.; SAÑUDO, C. Producción sostenible de carne ovina y las tendencias en las preferencias de los consumidores: compatibilidades, contradicciones y dilemas sin resolver. In:SARAVIA, H.; AYALA, W.; BARRIOS, E. (Ed.). Seminario de actualización técnica: producción de carne ovina de calidad. Montevideo (UY) : Montevideo (UY) : INIA, 2014. p. 1-44 (Serie Técnica; 221)Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
12. | | MONTOSSI, F.; CAZZULI, F.; BRITO, G.; REALINI, C.; LUZARDO, S.; ROVIRA, P.J.; FONT-I-FURNOLS, M. The challenges of aligning consumer preferences and production systems: Analysing the case of a small beef meat exporting country. International Journal of Agricultural Policy and Research, 2018, v. 6, no. 9, p. 144-159. History article: Received 31 July 2018; Revised 17 September 2018; Accepted 21 September 2018, Published 25 October, 2018.Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
13. | | MONTOSSI, F.; FONT I FURNOLS, M.M.; DEL CAMPO, M.; SAN JULIAN, R.; BRITO, G.; SAÑUDO, C. Sustainable sheep production and consumer preference trends: Compatibilities, contradictions, and unresolved dilemmas. Meat Science, 2013, v. 95, p. 772-789. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.048 Article history: Received 25 February 2013; Received in revised form 21 April 2013; Accepted 22 April 2013.Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
14. | | BRANSCHEID, W.; DOBROWOLSKI, A.; SPINDLER, M.; SAÑUDO, C.; SAN JULIÁN, R.; FONT I FURNOLS, M.; OLIVER, M.A.; CAÑEQUE, V.; MONTOSSI, F.; WICKE, M. Consumer acceptability of beef and lamb from Uruguay and Germany. [Verbraucherakzeptanz von uruguayischem und deutschem Rind- Und Lammfleisch] Fleischwirtschaft, 2006, Volume 86, Issue 8, Pages 101-106. 2-s2.0-33747804694Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
15. | | FONT I FURNOLS, M.M.; REALINI, C.; MONTOSSI, F.; SAÑUDO, C.; CAMPO, M.M.; OLIVER, M.A.; NUTE, G.R.; GUERRERO, L. Consumer´s purchasing intention for lamb meat affected by country of origin, feeding system and meat price: a conjoint study in Spain, France and United Kingdom. Food Quality and Preference, 2011, Volume 22, Issue 5, July 2011, Pages 443-451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodqual.2011.02.007 22 Article history: Received 28 October 2010; Received in revised form 21 February 2011; Accepted 22 February 2011; Available online 24 February 2011. Acknowledgements: Authors would like to thank INIA-Uruguay, INIA-Spain and AECI(Agencia...Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
16. | | RESCONI, V.C.; CAMPO, M.M.; FONT I FURNOLS, M.; OLIVER, M.A.; LUZARDO, S.; SAN JULIÁN, R.; BRITO, G.; MONTOSSI, F.; SAÑUDO, C. Effect of different feeding systems in the sensory quality of uruguayan beef. In: International Congress of Meat Science and Technology (54., Cape Town, South Africa). Cape Town, 2008. p. 177Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
17. | | REALINI, C.E.; FONT I FURNOLS, M; GUERRERO, L.; MONTOSSI, F.; CAMPO, M.M.; SAÑUDO, C.; NUTE, G.R.; ALVAREZ, I.; CAÑEQUE, V.; BRITO, G.; OLIVER, M.A. Effect of finishing diet on consumer acceptability of Uruguayan beef in the European market. Meat Science, 2009, v. 81, p. 499-506 Article history: Received 8 April 2008 // Received in revised form 24 September 2008 // Accepted 5 October 2008.Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
18. | | RESCONI, V. C.; CAMPO, M. M.; LARA, P.; PARDOS, J. J.; OLLETA, J. L.; FONT I FURNOLS, M.; GUERRERO, L.; SAÑUDO, C. Evaluación sensorial de carne de corderos finalizados en diferentes sistemas de alimentación In: MONTOSSI, F.; SAÑUDO, C. (Eds.). Cooperación Hispano-Uruguaya. Diferenciación y valorización de la carne ovina y bovina del Uruguay en Europa: Influencia de Sistemas de Producción sobre Bienestar Animal, Atributos Sensoriales, Aceptabilidad y Percepción de Consumidores y Salud Humana Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2007. p. 103-106 (INIA Serie Técnica ; 168)Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
19. | | FONT I FURNOLS, M.; REALINI, C. E.; GUERRERO, L.; NUTE, G. R.; SAÑUDO, C.; CAMPO, M. M.; MUELA, E.; OLIVER, M. A. Efecto del sistema de alilmentación sobre la aceptabilidad de la carne ovina uruguaya en el mercado europeo In: MONTOSSI, F.; SAÑUDO, C. (Eds.). Cooperación Hispano-Uruguaya. Diferenciación y valorización de la carne ovina y bovina del Uruguay en Europa: Influencia de Sistemas de Producción sobre Bienestar Animal, Atributos Sensoriales, Aceptabilidad y Percepción de Consumidores y Salud Humana Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2007. p. 107-112 (INIA Serie Técnica ; 168)Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
20. | | REALINI, C. E.; FONT I FURNOLS, M.; GUERRERO, L.; PETERS, Z.; NUTE, G. R.; CAMPO, M. M.; SAÑUDO, C.; OLIVER, M. A. Efecto del sistema de alimentación sobre la aceptabilidad de la carne de vacuno uruguaya en el mercado europeo In: MONTOSSI, F.; SAÑUDO, C. (Eds.). Cooperación Hispano-Uruguaya. Diferenciación y valorización de la carne ovina y bovina del Uruguay en Europa: Influencia de Sistemas de Producción sobre Bienestar Animal, Atributos Sensoriales, Aceptabilidad y Percepción de Consumidores y Salud Humana Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2007. p. 71-77 (INIA Serie Técnica ; 168)Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 34 | |
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
11/12/2018 |
Actualizado : |
06/02/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
A - 1 |
Autor : |
MOTA, R. R.; LOPES, P. S.; TEMPELMAN, R. J.; SILVA, F. F.; AGUILAR, I.; GOMES, C. C. G.; CARDOSO, F. F. |
Afiliación : |
R. R. MOTA, Animal Science Department, Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil; P. S. LOPES, Animal Science Department, Federal University of Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil; R. J. TEMPELMAN, Animal Science Department, Michigan State University, United States; F. F. SILVA, Animal Science Department, Federal University of Viçosa, Brazil; IGNACIO AGUILAR GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; C. C. G. GOMES, Embrapa South Livestock, Brazil; F. F. CARDOSO, eAnimal Science Department, Federal University of Pelotas, Brazil. |
Título : |
Genome-enabled prediction for tick resistance in Hereford and Braford beef cattle via reaction norm models. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2016 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Animal Science, May 2016, Volume 94, Issue 5, Pages 1834 - 1843. |
ISSN : |
0021-8812 |
DOI : |
10.2527/jas.2015-0194 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received December 11, 2015. // Accepted March 10, 2016. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Very few studies have been conducted to infer genotype × environment interaction (G×E) based in genomic prediction models using SNP markers. Therefore, our main objective was to compare a conventional genomic-based single-step model (HBLUP) with its reaction norm model extension (genomic 1-step linear reaction norm model [HLRNM]) to provide EBV for tick resistance as well as to compare predictive performance of these models with counterpart models that ignore SNP marker information, that is, a linear animal model (ABLUP) and its reaction norm extension (1-step linear reaction norm model [ALRNM]). Phenotypes included 10,673 tick counts on 4,363 Hereford and Braford animals, of which 3,591 were genotyped. Using the deviance information criterion for model choice, ABLUP and HBLUP seemed to be poorer fitting in comparison with their respective genomic model extensions. The HLRNM estimated lower average and reaction norm genetic variability compared with the ALRNM, whereas ABLUP and HBLUP seemed to be poorer fitting in comparison with their respective genomic reaction norm model extensions. Heritability and repeatability estimates varied along the environmental gradient (EG) and the genetic correlations were remarkably low between high and low EG, indicating the presence of G×E for tick resistance in these populations. Based on 5-fold K-means partitioning, mean cross-validation estimates with their respective SE of predictive accuracy were 0.66 (SE 0.02), 0.67 (SE 0.02), 0.67 (SE 0.02), and 0.66 (SE 0.02) for ABLUP, HBLUP, HLRNM, and ALRNM, respectively. For 5-fold random partitioning, HLRNM (0.71 ± 0.01) was statistically different from ABLUP (0.67 ± 0.01). However, no statistical significance was reported when considering HBLUP (0.70 ± 0.01) and ALRNM (0.70 ± 0.01). Our results suggest that SNP marker information does not lead to higher prediction accuracies in reaction norm models. Furthermore, these accuracies decreased as the tick infestation level increased and as the relationship between animals in training and validation data sets decreased.
© 2016 American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. MenosABSTRACT.
Very few studies have been conducted to infer genotype × environment interaction (G×E) based in genomic prediction models using SNP markers. Therefore, our main objective was to compare a conventional genomic-based single-step model (HBLUP) with its reaction norm model extension (genomic 1-step linear reaction norm model [HLRNM]) to provide EBV for tick resistance as well as to compare predictive performance of these models with counterpart models that ignore SNP marker information, that is, a linear animal model (ABLUP) and its reaction norm extension (1-step linear reaction norm model [ALRNM]). Phenotypes included 10,673 tick counts on 4,363 Hereford and Braford animals, of which 3,591 were genotyped. Using the deviance information criterion for model choice, ABLUP and HBLUP seemed to be poorer fitting in comparison with their respective genomic model extensions. The HLRNM estimated lower average and reaction norm genetic variability compared with the ALRNM, whereas ABLUP and HBLUP seemed to be poorer fitting in comparison with their respective genomic reaction norm model extensions. Heritability and repeatability estimates varied along the environmental gradient (EG) and the genetic correlations were remarkably low between high and low EG, indicating the presence of G×E for tick resistance in these populations. Based on 5-fold K-means partitioning, mean cross-validation estimates with their respective SE of predictive accuracy were 0.66 (SE 0.02), 0.67 (SE 0.02)... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
ACCURACY; CROSS-VALIDATION; GENETIC CORRELATION; HERITABILITY. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/12162/1/mota2016.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03053naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1059370 005 2019-02-06 008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0021-8812 024 7 $a10.2527/jas.2015-0194$2DOI 100 1 $aMOTA, R. R. 245 $aGenome-enabled prediction for tick resistance in Hereford and Braford beef cattle via reaction norm models.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2016 500 $aArticle history: Received December 11, 2015. // Accepted March 10, 2016. 520 $aABSTRACT. Very few studies have been conducted to infer genotype × environment interaction (G×E) based in genomic prediction models using SNP markers. Therefore, our main objective was to compare a conventional genomic-based single-step model (HBLUP) with its reaction norm model extension (genomic 1-step linear reaction norm model [HLRNM]) to provide EBV for tick resistance as well as to compare predictive performance of these models with counterpart models that ignore SNP marker information, that is, a linear animal model (ABLUP) and its reaction norm extension (1-step linear reaction norm model [ALRNM]). Phenotypes included 10,673 tick counts on 4,363 Hereford and Braford animals, of which 3,591 were genotyped. Using the deviance information criterion for model choice, ABLUP and HBLUP seemed to be poorer fitting in comparison with their respective genomic model extensions. The HLRNM estimated lower average and reaction norm genetic variability compared with the ALRNM, whereas ABLUP and HBLUP seemed to be poorer fitting in comparison with their respective genomic reaction norm model extensions. Heritability and repeatability estimates varied along the environmental gradient (EG) and the genetic correlations were remarkably low between high and low EG, indicating the presence of G×E for tick resistance in these populations. Based on 5-fold K-means partitioning, mean cross-validation estimates with their respective SE of predictive accuracy were 0.66 (SE 0.02), 0.67 (SE 0.02), 0.67 (SE 0.02), and 0.66 (SE 0.02) for ABLUP, HBLUP, HLRNM, and ALRNM, respectively. For 5-fold random partitioning, HLRNM (0.71 ± 0.01) was statistically different from ABLUP (0.67 ± 0.01). However, no statistical significance was reported when considering HBLUP (0.70 ± 0.01) and ALRNM (0.70 ± 0.01). Our results suggest that SNP marker information does not lead to higher prediction accuracies in reaction norm models. Furthermore, these accuracies decreased as the tick infestation level increased and as the relationship between animals in training and validation data sets decreased. © 2016 American Society of Animal Science. All rights reserved. 653 $aACCURACY 653 $aCROSS-VALIDATION 653 $aGENETIC CORRELATION 653 $aHERITABILITY 700 1 $aLOPES, P. S. 700 1 $aTEMPELMAN, R. J. 700 1 $aSILVA, F. F. 700 1 $aAGUILAR, I. 700 1 $aGOMES, C. C. G. 700 1 $aCARDOSO, F. F. 773 $tJournal of Animal Science, May 2016, Volume 94, Issue 5, Pages 1834 - 1843.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|