| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
27/09/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
27/09/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
ZARBÁ, L.; PIQUER-RODRÍGUEZ, M.; BOILLAT, S.; LEVERS, C.; GASPARRI, I.; AIDE, T. M.; ÁLVAREZ-BERRÍOS, N. L.; ANDERSON, L. O.; ARAOZ, E.; ARIMA, E.; BATISTELLA, M.; CALDERÓN-LOOR, M.; ECHEVERRÍA, C.; GONZALEZ-ROGLICH, M.; JOBBÁGY, E. G.; MATHEZ-STIEFEL, S.-L.; RAMIREZ-REYES, C-; PACHECHO, A.; VALLEJOS, M.; YOUNG, K. R.; GRAU, R. |
|
Afiliación : |
LUCÍA ZARBÁ, Instituto de Ecología Regional (IER), Universidad Nacional de Tucumán (UNT) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Tucumán, Argentina.; MARÍA PIQUER-RODRÍGUEZ, Instituto Ecología Regional (IER), Univ. Nacional de Tucumán (UNT). Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Tucumán, Argentina; Lateinamerika-Institut, Freie Universität Berlin, Germany; Geography Department, Humbold, Germany; SÉBASTIEN BOILLAT, Institute of Geography, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland; CHRISTIAN LEVERS, Depart. Environmental Geography, Inst. for Environmental Studies, Vrije Univ. Amsterdam, Netherlands; Inst. for Resources, Environment and Sustainability, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada; School of Public Policy and Global Affairs, Univ.; IGNACIO GASPARRI, Instituto de Ecología Regional (IER), Universidad Nacional de Tucumán (UNT) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Tucumán, Argentina; T. MITCHELL AIDE, Department of Biology, University of Puerto Rico-Rio Piedras, Puerto Rico; NORA L. ÁLVAREZ-BERRÍOS, USDA Forest Service, International Institute of Tropical Forestry, Río Piedras, Puerto Rico; LIANA O. ANDERSON, National Center for Monitoring and Early Warning of Natural Disasters-CEMADEN, Ministry of Science, Technology and Innovation-MCTI, Brazil; EZEQUIEL ARAOZ, Instituto de Ecología Regional (IER), Universidad Nacional de Tucumán (UNT) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Tucumán, Argentina; EUGENIO ARIMA, Department of Geography and the Environment, University of Texas at Austin, United States; MATEUS BATISTELLA, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa Agricultural Informatics) State University of Campinas (Unicamp), Brazil; MARCO CALDERÓN-LOOR, Centre for Integrative Ecology, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Deakin University, Melbourne, Australia;Grupo de Investigación de Biodiversidad, Medio Ambiente y Salud-BIOMAS, Universidad de las Américas (UDLA), Quito, Ecuador; CRISTIAN ECHEVERRÍA, Landscape Ecology Laboratory, Facultad de Ciencias Forestales, Universidad de Concepción, Chile; Millennium Nucleus Center for the Socioeconomic Impact of Environmental Policies (CESIEP), Santiago de Chile, Chile; MARIANO GONZALEZ-ROGLICH, Wildlife Conservation Society, Buenos Aires, Argentina; ESTEBAN G. JOBBÁGY, Grupo de Estudios Ambientales, IMASL-CONICET and Universidad Nacional de San Luis, San Luis, Argentina; South American Institute for Resilience and Sustainability Studies (SARAS), Maldonado, Uruguay; SARAH-LAN MATHEZ-STIEFEL, Centre for Development and Environment, University of Bern, Switzerland; Wyss Academy for Nature at the University of Bern, Switzerland; CARLOS RAMIREZ-REYES, Quantitative Ecology & Spatial Technologies Laboratory, Department of Wildlife, Fisheries and Aquaculture, Mississippi State University, United States; ANDREA PACHECO, German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv) Halle-Jena-Leipzig, Germany; MARÍA VALLEJOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Departamento de Métodos Cuantitativos y Sistemas de Información, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de Buenos Aires, Argentina; KENNETH R. YOUNG, Department of Geography and the Environment, University of Texas at Austin, United States; RICARDO GRAU, Instituto de Ecología Regional (IER), Universidad Nacional de Tucumán (UNT) Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Tucumán, Argentina. |
|
Título : |
Mapping and characterizing social-ecological land systems of South America. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Ecology and Society, 2022, Volume 27, Issue 2, Article number 27. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13066-270227 |
|
ISSN : |
1708-3087 |
|
DOI : |
10.5751/ES-13066-270227 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article: Gold Open Access, Green Open Access. -- Erratum: On 6 June 2022 the abstract was edited. See online for more detail: https://ecologyandsociety.org/vol27/iss2/art27/#dataarchive_stmt --
LICENSE: Published under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article is under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt the work provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license. -- Article metrics: https://plu.mx/plum/a/?doi=10.5751/ES-13066-270227&theme=plum-bigben-theme |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Humans place strong pressure on land and have modified around 75% of Earth's terrestrial surface. In this context, ecoregions and biomes, merely defined on the basis of their biophysical features, are incomplete characterizations of the territory. Land system science requires classification schemes that incorporate both social and biophysical dimensions. In this study, we generated spatially explicit social-ecological land system (SELS) typologies for South America with a hybrid methodology that combined data-driven spatial analysis with a knowledge-based evaluation by an interdisciplinary group of regional specialists. Our approach embraced a holistic consideration of the social-ecological land systems, gathering a dataset of 26 variables spanning across 7 dimensions: physical, biological, land cover, economic, demographic, political, and cultural. We identified 13 SELS nested in 5 larger social-ecological regions (SER). Each SELS was discussed and described by specific groups of specialists. Although 4 environmental and 1 socioeconomic variable explained most of the distribution of the coarse SER classification, a diversity of 15 other variables were shown to be essential for defining several SELS, highlighting specific features that differentiate them. The SELS spatial classification presented is a systematic and operative characterization of South American social-ecological land systems. We propose its use can contribute as a reference framework for a wide range of applications such as analyzing observations within larger contexts, designing system-specific solutions for sustainable development, and structuring hypothesis testing and comparisons across space. Similar efforts could be done elsewhere in the world. Copyright © 2022 by the author(s). MenosABSTRACT.- Humans place strong pressure on land and have modified around 75% of Earth's terrestrial surface. In this context, ecoregions and biomes, merely defined on the basis of their biophysical features, are incomplete characterizations of the territory. Land system science requires classification schemes that incorporate both social and biophysical dimensions. In this study, we generated spatially explicit social-ecological land system (SELS) typologies for South America with a hybrid methodology that combined data-driven spatial analysis with a knowledge-based evaluation by an interdisciplinary group of regional specialists. Our approach embraced a holistic consideration of the social-ecological land systems, gathering a dataset of 26 variables spanning across 7 dimensions: physical, biological, land cover, economic, demographic, political, and cultural. We identified 13 SELS nested in 5 larger social-ecological regions (SER). Each SELS was discussed and described by specific groups of specialists. Although 4 environmental and 1 socioeconomic variable explained most of the distribution of the coarse SER classification, a diversity of 15 other variables were shown to be essential for defining several SELS, highlighting specific features that differentiate them. The SELS spatial classification presented is a systematic and operative characterization of South American social-ecological land systems. We propose its use can contribute as a reference framework for a wide ran... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Automatization; Hierarchical clustering; Multidisciplinary data; Participatory mapping; Social-ecological mapping. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16772/1/ES-2021-13066.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03737naa a2200457 a 4500
001 1063581
005 2022-09-27
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1708-3087
024 7 $a10.5751/ES-13066-270227$2DOI
100 1 $aZARBÁ, L.
245 $aMapping and characterizing social-ecological land systems of South America.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle: Gold Open Access, Green Open Access. -- Erratum: On 6 June 2022 the abstract was edited. See online for more detail: https://ecologyandsociety.org/vol27/iss2/art27/#dataarchive_stmt -- LICENSE: Published under license by The Resilience Alliance. This article is under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. You may share and adapt the work provided the original author and source are credited, you indicate whether any changes were made, and you include a link to the license. -- Article metrics: https://plu.mx/plum/a/?doi=10.5751/ES-13066-270227&theme=plum-bigben-theme
520 $aABSTRACT.- Humans place strong pressure on land and have modified around 75% of Earth's terrestrial surface. In this context, ecoregions and biomes, merely defined on the basis of their biophysical features, are incomplete characterizations of the territory. Land system science requires classification schemes that incorporate both social and biophysical dimensions. In this study, we generated spatially explicit social-ecological land system (SELS) typologies for South America with a hybrid methodology that combined data-driven spatial analysis with a knowledge-based evaluation by an interdisciplinary group of regional specialists. Our approach embraced a holistic consideration of the social-ecological land systems, gathering a dataset of 26 variables spanning across 7 dimensions: physical, biological, land cover, economic, demographic, political, and cultural. We identified 13 SELS nested in 5 larger social-ecological regions (SER). Each SELS was discussed and described by specific groups of specialists. Although 4 environmental and 1 socioeconomic variable explained most of the distribution of the coarse SER classification, a diversity of 15 other variables were shown to be essential for defining several SELS, highlighting specific features that differentiate them. The SELS spatial classification presented is a systematic and operative characterization of South American social-ecological land systems. We propose its use can contribute as a reference framework for a wide range of applications such as analyzing observations within larger contexts, designing system-specific solutions for sustainable development, and structuring hypothesis testing and comparisons across space. Similar efforts could be done elsewhere in the world. Copyright © 2022 by the author(s).
653 $aAutomatization
653 $aHierarchical clustering
653 $aMultidisciplinary data
653 $aParticipatory mapping
653 $aSocial-ecological mapping
700 1 $aPIQUER-RODRÍGUEZ, M.
700 1 $aBOILLAT, S.
700 1 $aLEVERS, C.
700 1 $aGASPARRI, I.
700 1 $aAIDE, T. M.
700 1 $aÁLVAREZ-BERRÍOS, N. L.
700 1 $aANDERSON, L. O.
700 1 $aARAOZ, E.
700 1 $aARIMA, E.
700 1 $aBATISTELLA, M.
700 1 $aCALDERÓN-LOOR, M.
700 1 $aECHEVERRÍA, C.
700 1 $aGONZALEZ-ROGLICH, M.
700 1 $aJOBBÁGY, E. G.
700 1 $aMATHEZ-STIEFEL, S.-L.
700 1 $aRAMIREZ-REYES, C-
700 1 $aPACHECHO, A.
700 1 $aVALLEJOS, M.
700 1 $aYOUNG, K. R.
700 1 $aGRAU, R.
773 $tEcology and Society, 2022, Volume 27, Issue 2, Article number 27. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-13066-270227
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
19/10/2018 |
|
Actualizado : |
04/06/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
CAZZULI, F.; LAGOMARSINO, X.; BOGGIANO, P.; SAADOUN, A.; MONTOSSI, F. |
|
Afiliación : |
FIORELLA CARLA CAZZULI ALBA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; XIMENA MARIA LAGOMARSINO LARRIERA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; P. BOGGIANO, Animal & Pastures Production Department, Agronomy Faculty, University of the Republic. Paysandú, Uruguay; A. SAADOUN, Physiology & Nutrition Department, Science Faculty, University of the Republic. Montevideo, Uruguay; FABIO MARCELO MONTOSSI PORCHILE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Self-feeding improved animal performance of calves grazing native grasslands during winter on extensive livestock production systems // El auto-suministro mejoró el desempeño de terneros pastoreando campo natural diferido en invierno en sistemas ganaderos extensivos. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agro Sur, 2018, v. 46, no. 1, p. 29-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4206/agrosur.2018.v46n1-04 |
|
ISSN : |
03048802 |
|
DOI : |
10.4206/agrosur.2018.v46n1-04 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 30.05.2018; Accepted 29.08.2018. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: These experiments were financially supported by the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA Uruguay). The authors would like to thank all field staff who worked on both experimental sites, as well as the thesis committee for all their valuable inputs to this paper. We would also like to acknowledge the inputs made by Ignacio de Barbieri, Martín Jaurena, Zully Ra-mos and Daniela Correa. Corresponding author: Fiorella CazzuliE-mail address:fcazzuli@inia.org.uy |
|
Contenido : |
Supplementing calves on deferred native grasslands during their first winter, helps overcoming the nutritive deficits which occur during this season. However, the demand of both qualification and availability of labour may restrain its adoption. The objective of this work was to evaluate calves? average daily live weight gain (ADG) and supplemental feed efficiency (SFE) as a response to self-feeding methods. Two experiments (Exp) were carried out: i) Exp A, on sandy soils with Braford calves
and, ii) Exp B on basaltic soils with Hereford calves. In each experiment 40 castrated male calves were used and randomly allotted to one of two replicates of these treatments: non-supplemented control (C); everyday restricted supplementation (E); restricted self-fed supplementation delivered two times a week (RSF); ad libitum self-fed (ASF). Exp A registered lowest ADG for C (0.155 kg an-1 day-1), similar ADG between E and RSF (0.623 kg an-1 day-1 on average) and highest for ASF (1.135 kg an-1 day-1) (p <0.05). For Exp B, ADG was affected being C ≤ E ≤ RSF < ASF (0.158, 0.390, 0.588 and 1.319 kg an-1 day-1, respectively). SFE values were not different (p >0.05) between treatments for Exp A, even though ASF presented a 50% higher SFE (9.4) than RSF (6.2) and E (6.1). SFE was affected (p <0.05), being ASF (7.7) < E = RSF (3.9 on average). It is possible to overcome winter live weight losses through the combination of deferred native grasslands and restricted self-feeding // La suplementación de terneros en su primer invierno pastoreando campo natural diferido compensa los déficits nutricionales registrados durante esta estación. No obstante, las necesidades de calificación y disponibilidad de mano de obra puede restringir su adopción. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar la ganancia media diaria (GMD) y la eficiencia de uso del suplemento (EUS) como respuesta a métodos de auto-suministro. Se realizaron dos experimentos: i) Exp A, sobre suelos arenosos utilizando terneros Braford y, ii) Exp B, sobre suelos de basalto utilizando terneros Hereford. En cada experimento se utilizaron 40 machos castrados en su primer invierno y fueron asignados al azar a una de las dos repeticiones de estos tratamientos: testigo no suplementado (T); suplementación diaria restringida (DR); suplementados restringidamente dos veces por semana mediante auto-suministro (ASR); suplementados ad libitum mediante auto-suministro (ASA). En el Exp A se registró la menor GMD para T (0,155 kg an-1 día-1), similares valores entre DR y ASR (promedio 0,623 kg an-1 día-1) y la más alta para ASA (1,135 kg an-1
día-1) (p <0,05). Para el Exp B, la GMD fue afectada, siendo T ≤ DR ≤ ASR < ASA (0,158; 0,390; 0,588 and 1,319 kg an-1 día-1, respectivamente). EUS no fue afectada en Exp A (p >0,05), si bien ASA presentó valores 50% superiores que ASR (6,2) y que T (6,1). En el Exp B, EUS fue afectada (p <0,05), siendo ASR (7,7) < DR = ASR (3,9 promedio). Es posible superar las pérdidas peso mediante una combinación de diferimiento de forraje y auto-suministro restringido. MenosSupplementing calves on deferred native grasslands during their first winter, helps overcoming the nutritive deficits which occur during this season. However, the demand of both qualification and availability of labour may restrain its adoption. The objective of this work was to evaluate calves? average daily live weight gain (ADG) and supplemental feed efficiency (SFE) as a response to self-feeding methods. Two experiments (Exp) were carried out: i) Exp A, on sandy soils with Braford calves
and, ii) Exp B on basaltic soils with Hereford calves. In each experiment 40 castrated male calves were used and randomly allotted to one of two replicates of these treatments: non-supplemented control (C); everyday restricted supplementation (E); restricted self-fed supplementation delivered two times a week (RSF); ad libitum self-fed (ASF). Exp A registered lowest ADG for C (0.155 kg an-1 day-1), similar ADG between E and RSF (0.623 kg an-1 day-1 on average) and highest for ASF (1.135 kg an-1 day-1) (p <0.05). For Exp B, ADG was affected being C ≤ E ≤ RSF < ASF (0.158, 0.390, 0.588 and 1.319 kg an-1 day-1, respectively). SFE values were not different (p >0.05) between treatments for Exp A, even though ASF presented a 50% higher SFE (9.4) than RSF (6.2) and E (6.1). SFE was affected (p <0.05), being ASF (7.7) < E = RSF (3.9 on average). It is possible to overcome winter live weight losses through the combination of deferred native grasslands and restricted self-feeding // La... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
BEEF CATTLE; GANADO DE CARNE; INFREQUENT SUPPLEMENTATION; NATIVE PASTURE; PASTURAS NATIVAS; SUPLEMENTACIÓN INFRECUENTE; SUPLEMENTO; SUPPLEMENT; URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04777naa a2200313 a 4500
001 1059227
005 2020-06-04
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a03048802
024 7 $a10.4206/agrosur.2018.v46n1-04$2DOI
100 1 $aCAZZULI, F.
245 $aSelf-feeding improved animal performance of calves grazing native grasslands during winter on extensive livestock production systems // El auto-suministro mejoró el desempeño de terneros pastoreando campo natural diferido en invierno en sistemas ganaderos extensivos.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
500 $aArticle history: Received 30.05.2018; Accepted 29.08.2018. ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS: These experiments were financially supported by the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA Uruguay). The authors would like to thank all field staff who worked on both experimental sites, as well as the thesis committee for all their valuable inputs to this paper. We would also like to acknowledge the inputs made by Ignacio de Barbieri, Martín Jaurena, Zully Ra-mos and Daniela Correa. Corresponding author: Fiorella CazzuliE-mail address:fcazzuli@inia.org.uy
520 $aSupplementing calves on deferred native grasslands during their first winter, helps overcoming the nutritive deficits which occur during this season. However, the demand of both qualification and availability of labour may restrain its adoption. The objective of this work was to evaluate calves? average daily live weight gain (ADG) and supplemental feed efficiency (SFE) as a response to self-feeding methods. Two experiments (Exp) were carried out: i) Exp A, on sandy soils with Braford calves and, ii) Exp B on basaltic soils with Hereford calves. In each experiment 40 castrated male calves were used and randomly allotted to one of two replicates of these treatments: non-supplemented control (C); everyday restricted supplementation (E); restricted self-fed supplementation delivered two times a week (RSF); ad libitum self-fed (ASF). Exp A registered lowest ADG for C (0.155 kg an-1 day-1), similar ADG between E and RSF (0.623 kg an-1 day-1 on average) and highest for ASF (1.135 kg an-1 day-1) (p <0.05). For Exp B, ADG was affected being C ≤ E ≤ RSF < ASF (0.158, 0.390, 0.588 and 1.319 kg an-1 day-1, respectively). SFE values were not different (p >0.05) between treatments for Exp A, even though ASF presented a 50% higher SFE (9.4) than RSF (6.2) and E (6.1). SFE was affected (p <0.05), being ASF (7.7) < E = RSF (3.9 on average). It is possible to overcome winter live weight losses through the combination of deferred native grasslands and restricted self-feeding // La suplementación de terneros en su primer invierno pastoreando campo natural diferido compensa los déficits nutricionales registrados durante esta estación. No obstante, las necesidades de calificación y disponibilidad de mano de obra puede restringir su adopción. El objetivo de este trabajo fue evaluar la ganancia media diaria (GMD) y la eficiencia de uso del suplemento (EUS) como respuesta a métodos de auto-suministro. Se realizaron dos experimentos: i) Exp A, sobre suelos arenosos utilizando terneros Braford y, ii) Exp B, sobre suelos de basalto utilizando terneros Hereford. En cada experimento se utilizaron 40 machos castrados en su primer invierno y fueron asignados al azar a una de las dos repeticiones de estos tratamientos: testigo no suplementado (T); suplementación diaria restringida (DR); suplementados restringidamente dos veces por semana mediante auto-suministro (ASR); suplementados ad libitum mediante auto-suministro (ASA). En el Exp A se registró la menor GMD para T (0,155 kg an-1 día-1), similares valores entre DR y ASR (promedio 0,623 kg an-1 día-1) y la más alta para ASA (1,135 kg an-1 día-1) (p <0,05). Para el Exp B, la GMD fue afectada, siendo T ≤ DR ≤ ASR < ASA (0,158; 0,390; 0,588 and 1,319 kg an-1 día-1, respectivamente). EUS no fue afectada en Exp A (p >0,05), si bien ASA presentó valores 50% superiores que ASR (6,2) y que T (6,1). En el Exp B, EUS fue afectada (p <0,05), siendo ASR (7,7) < DR = ASR (3,9 promedio). Es posible superar las pérdidas peso mediante una combinación de diferimiento de forraje y auto-suministro restringido.
653 $aBEEF CATTLE
653 $aGANADO DE CARNE
653 $aINFREQUENT SUPPLEMENTATION
653 $aNATIVE PASTURE
653 $aPASTURAS NATIVAS
653 $aSUPLEMENTACIÓN INFRECUENTE
653 $aSUPLEMENTO
653 $aSUPPLEMENT
653 $aURUGUAY
700 1 $aLAGOMARSINO, X.
700 1 $aBOGGIANO, P.
700 1 $aSAADOUN, A.
700 1 $aMONTOSSI, F.
773 $tAgro Sur, 2018$gv. 46, no. 1, p. 29-39. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4206/agrosur.2018.v46n1-04
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
