| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
24/04/2023 |
|
Actualizado : |
09/05/2023 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autor : |
QUIÑONES, A.; KASPARY, T. E.; GARCIA, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
AMPARO QUIÑONES DELLEPIANE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; TIAGO EDU KASPARY, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MILTON ALEJANDRO GARCIA LATASA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Malezas en sistemas ganaderos y agrícolas. (Capítulo 6). |
|
Complemento del título : |
Primera sección: Transitando hacia la protección agroecológica de los cultivos. Editora: Carolina Leoni. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2023 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: Georgina Paula García-Inza; José María Paruelo; Roberto Zoppolo. (eds). Aportes científicos y tecnológicos del Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA) del Uruguay a las trayectorias agroecológicas. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires : Fundación CICCUS, 2023. p.107-128. |
|
Páginas : |
p.107-128. |
|
ISBN : |
978-987-693-926-3 |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Contenido : |
Las malezas son plantas no deseadas que se desarrollan fuera de lugar e interfieren con las actividades o el bienestar humano (WSSA, 1956). ---- 1. Introducción. --
1.1. Contextualización de la problemática de malezas. -- 1.2. Las malezas y el uso de herbicidas en Uruguay. -- 2. Abordaje actual del manejo de malezas. -- 2.1. Sistemas ganaderos. -- 2.2. Sistemas agrícolas. -- 3. Tecnología propuesta. -- 3.1. Sistema ganadero. Manejo integrado de malezas. -- 3.2. Sistemas agrícolas. Uso de cultivos de cobertura y rolado en el manejo de malezas. -- 4. Mejoras a partir del uso/de la implementación de la tecnología propuesta. -- 4.1. Sistema ganadero. Efectos directos e indirectos del control de malezas. -- 4.2. Sistemas agrícolas. -- Densidad de siembra de avena negra y control de malezas. -- Rolado como método de terminación en avena negra. -- 5. Nuevas tecnologías y perspectivas. -- 5.1. Uso de Paspalum notatum INIA Sepé para el manejo de capín Annoni. -- 5.2. Aplicaciones de precisión para el manejo de malezas. -- |
|
Thesagro : |
HERBICIDAS; MALEZAS; SISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/17070/1/Capitulo6Malezasensistemasganaderosyagricolas.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01854naa a2200205 a 4500
001 1064051
005 2023-05-09
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
020 $a978-987-693-926-3
100 1 $aQUIÑONES, A.
245 $aMalezas en sistemas ganaderos y agrícolas. (Capítulo 6).$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
300 $ap.107-128.
520 $aLas malezas son plantas no deseadas que se desarrollan fuera de lugar e interfieren con las actividades o el bienestar humano (WSSA, 1956). ---- 1. Introducción. -- 1.1. Contextualización de la problemática de malezas. -- 1.2. Las malezas y el uso de herbicidas en Uruguay. -- 2. Abordaje actual del manejo de malezas. -- 2.1. Sistemas ganaderos. -- 2.2. Sistemas agrícolas. -- 3. Tecnología propuesta. -- 3.1. Sistema ganadero. Manejo integrado de malezas. -- 3.2. Sistemas agrícolas. Uso de cultivos de cobertura y rolado en el manejo de malezas. -- 4. Mejoras a partir del uso/de la implementación de la tecnología propuesta. -- 4.1. Sistema ganadero. Efectos directos e indirectos del control de malezas. -- 4.2. Sistemas agrícolas. -- Densidad de siembra de avena negra y control de malezas. -- Rolado como método de terminación en avena negra. -- 5. Nuevas tecnologías y perspectivas. -- 5.1. Uso de Paspalum notatum INIA Sepé para el manejo de capín Annoni. -- 5.2. Aplicaciones de precisión para el manejo de malezas. --
650 $aHERBICIDAS
650 $aMALEZAS
650 $aSISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN
700 1 $aKASPARY, T. E.
700 1 $aGARCIA, A.
773 $tIn: Georgina Paula García-Inza; José María Paruelo; Roberto Zoppolo. (eds). Aportes científicos y tecnológicos del Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA) del Uruguay a las trayectorias agroecológicas. Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires : Fundación CICCUS, 2023. p.107-128.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
08/07/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
08/07/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
RIVAS, F.; HAMPTON, J.G.; NARCISO, J.; ROSTÁS, M.; WESSMAN, P.; SAVILLE, D.J.; JACKSON, T.A.; GLARE, T.R. |
|
Afiliación : |
FEDERICO RIVAS FRANCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand; JOHN G. HAMPTON, Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand; JOSEFINA NARCISO, Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand; MICHAEL ROSTÁS, Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand; PER WESSMAN, Research Institute of Sweden (RISE), Boras, Sweden; DAVID J. SAVILLE, Saville Statistical Consulting Limited, Canterbury, New Zealand; TREVOR A. JACKSON, AgResearch, Lincoln Research Centre, Lincoln, Canterbury, New Zealand; TRAVIS R. GLARE, Bio-Protection Research Centre, Lincoln University, Canterbury, New Zealand. |
|
Título : |
Effects of a maize root pest and fungal pathogen on entomopathogenic fungal rhizosphere colonization, endophytism and induction of plant hormones. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Biological Control, November 2020, Volume 150, Article number 104347. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104347 |
|
ISSN : |
1049-9644 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104347 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 16 March 202 // Revised 12 June 2020 // Accepted 15 June 2020 // Available online 18 June 2020.
Corresponding author: Rivas-Franco, F.; Plataforma de Bioinsumos, National Institute for Agricultural Research (INIA), Las Brujas, Ruta 48 ? Km. 10, CP. 90200, Rincón del Colorado, Canelones, Uruguay; email:frivas@inia.org.uy
We thank to the National Agency for Research and Innovation (ANNI - Uruguay) for funding F. Rivas-Franco's PhD studies (POS_EXT_2014_1_105884). Operational funding was supplied by the Bio-Protection Research Centre?s Next Generation Biopesticide programme (CX10X1310 NZ MBIE) and Smarts Seeds Programme (LINX0702 NZ MBIE) |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Some entomopathogenic fungi, such as Metarhizium spp. and Beauveria spp., closely interact with plants by colonizing the rhizosphere or growing endophytically inside root tissues. These characteristics increase the potential for endophytic entomopathogenic fungi to persist in the root system when used as biological control agents. The mechanism by which endophytic entomopathogenic fungi are capable to colonize the internal plant tissues is also influenced by plants and can be regarded as an adaptive protection acquired by plants against herbivorous insects. The mutual benefits obtained by plants and fungi through this peculiar endophytic association supports the bodyguard hypothesis. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the ability of different isolates of Metarhizium spp. and a single isolate of Beauveria bassiana, coated onto seeds, to colonize the rhizosphere and root tissues of maize (Zea mays) and to assess whether the presence of an insect pest and fungal root pathogen influenced this interaction. All the entomopathogenic fungal isolates tested were able to colonize the rhizosphere to some extent, but one isolate of M. anisopliae and the one of M. robertsii performed best. Overall, the presence of Costelytra giveni (Scarabaeidae) larvae significantly decreased rhizosphere colonization by the entomopathogens, while the phytopathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum (Nectriaceae: Hypocreales) did not. Similarly, the presence of C. giveni decreased endophytic growth in root tissues by around 75% when considering all entomopathogens together. In contrast, a 112% increase in overall root endophytic colonization occurred in the presence of F. graminearum. Salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) content in maize plants changed depending on the isolate of M. anisopliae incorporated through seed coating and root herbivory by larval presence. In the absence of C. giveni, plants treated with M. anisopliae A1080 had higher SA and JA root content than control plants. Conversely, when larvae were present, maize plants treated with M. anisopliae F672 had increased levels of both phytohormones, indicating a potentially primed state. The observed decrease in root colonization by some entomopathogenic fungal isolates in the presence of larvae of C. giveni and the increase in endophytic colonization in the presence of F. graminearum are in accordance with the bodyguard hypothesis. Additionally, the changes observed in the SA and JA content in Metarhizium treated plants corresponded to plant responses related to systemic acquired resistance and to induced systemic resistance. Our results demonstrate that biotic soil factors can shape the outcome of endophytic entomopathogenic fungi-plant interaction, as well as affecting the plant physiology.
© 2020 Elsevier Inc. MenosABSTRACT.
Some entomopathogenic fungi, such as Metarhizium spp. and Beauveria spp., closely interact with plants by colonizing the rhizosphere or growing endophytically inside root tissues. These characteristics increase the potential for endophytic entomopathogenic fungi to persist in the root system when used as biological control agents. The mechanism by which endophytic entomopathogenic fungi are capable to colonize the internal plant tissues is also influenced by plants and can be regarded as an adaptive protection acquired by plants against herbivorous insects. The mutual benefits obtained by plants and fungi through this peculiar endophytic association supports the bodyguard hypothesis. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the ability of different isolates of Metarhizium spp. and a single isolate of Beauveria bassiana, coated onto seeds, to colonize the rhizosphere and root tissues of maize (Zea mays) and to assess whether the presence of an insect pest and fungal root pathogen influenced this interaction. All the entomopathogenic fungal isolates tested were able to colonize the rhizosphere to some extent, but one isolate of M. anisopliae and the one of M. robertsii performed best. Overall, the presence of Costelytra giveni (Scarabaeidae) larvae significantly decreased rhizosphere colonization by the entomopathogens, while the phytopathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum (Nectriaceae: Hypocreales) did not. Similarly, the presence of C. giveni decreased endophy... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Beauveria bassiana; BIOCONTROL; Costelytra giveni; Endophytic entomopathogenic fungi; Fusarium graminearum; Induced resistance; Jasmonic acid; Metarhizium spp; Rhizosphere competence; Salicylic acid; Seed coating. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
H20 Enfermedades de las plantas |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04680naa a2200373 a 4500
001 1061206
005 2020-07-08
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1049-9644
024 7 $a10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104347$2DOI
100 1 $aRIVAS, F.
245 $aEffects of a maize root pest and fungal pathogen on entomopathogenic fungal rhizosphere colonization, endophytism and induction of plant hormones.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aArticle history: Received 16 March 202 // Revised 12 June 2020 // Accepted 15 June 2020 // Available online 18 June 2020. Corresponding author: Rivas-Franco, F.; Plataforma de Bioinsumos, National Institute for Agricultural Research (INIA), Las Brujas, Ruta 48 ? Km. 10, CP. 90200, Rincón del Colorado, Canelones, Uruguay; email:frivas@inia.org.uy We thank to the National Agency for Research and Innovation (ANNI - Uruguay) for funding F. Rivas-Franco's PhD studies (POS_EXT_2014_1_105884). Operational funding was supplied by the Bio-Protection Research Centre?s Next Generation Biopesticide programme (CX10X1310 NZ MBIE) and Smarts Seeds Programme (LINX0702 NZ MBIE)
520 $aABSTRACT. Some entomopathogenic fungi, such as Metarhizium spp. and Beauveria spp., closely interact with plants by colonizing the rhizosphere or growing endophytically inside root tissues. These characteristics increase the potential for endophytic entomopathogenic fungi to persist in the root system when used as biological control agents. The mechanism by which endophytic entomopathogenic fungi are capable to colonize the internal plant tissues is also influenced by plants and can be regarded as an adaptive protection acquired by plants against herbivorous insects. The mutual benefits obtained by plants and fungi through this peculiar endophytic association supports the bodyguard hypothesis. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the ability of different isolates of Metarhizium spp. and a single isolate of Beauveria bassiana, coated onto seeds, to colonize the rhizosphere and root tissues of maize (Zea mays) and to assess whether the presence of an insect pest and fungal root pathogen influenced this interaction. All the entomopathogenic fungal isolates tested were able to colonize the rhizosphere to some extent, but one isolate of M. anisopliae and the one of M. robertsii performed best. Overall, the presence of Costelytra giveni (Scarabaeidae) larvae significantly decreased rhizosphere colonization by the entomopathogens, while the phytopathogenic fungus Fusarium graminearum (Nectriaceae: Hypocreales) did not. Similarly, the presence of C. giveni decreased endophytic growth in root tissues by around 75% when considering all entomopathogens together. In contrast, a 112% increase in overall root endophytic colonization occurred in the presence of F. graminearum. Salicylic acid (SA) and jasmonic acid (JA) content in maize plants changed depending on the isolate of M. anisopliae incorporated through seed coating and root herbivory by larval presence. In the absence of C. giveni, plants treated with M. anisopliae A1080 had higher SA and JA root content than control plants. Conversely, when larvae were present, maize plants treated with M. anisopliae F672 had increased levels of both phytohormones, indicating a potentially primed state. The observed decrease in root colonization by some entomopathogenic fungal isolates in the presence of larvae of C. giveni and the increase in endophytic colonization in the presence of F. graminearum are in accordance with the bodyguard hypothesis. Additionally, the changes observed in the SA and JA content in Metarhizium treated plants corresponded to plant responses related to systemic acquired resistance and to induced systemic resistance. Our results demonstrate that biotic soil factors can shape the outcome of endophytic entomopathogenic fungi-plant interaction, as well as affecting the plant physiology. © 2020 Elsevier Inc.
653 $aBeauveria bassiana
653 $aBIOCONTROL
653 $aCostelytra giveni
653 $aEndophytic entomopathogenic fungi
653 $aFusarium graminearum
653 $aInduced resistance
653 $aJasmonic acid
653 $aMetarhizium spp
653 $aRhizosphere competence
653 $aSalicylic acid
653 $aSeed coating
700 1 $aHAMPTON, J.G.
700 1 $aNARCISO, J.
700 1 $aROSTÁS, M.
700 1 $aWESSMAN, P.
700 1 $aSAVILLE, D.J.
700 1 $aJACKSON, T.A.
700 1 $aGLARE, T.R.
773 $tBiological Control, November 2020, Volume 150, Article number 104347. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2020.104347
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
