|
|
Registros recuperados : 4 | |
1. | | FREY, G.E; PACHAS, A.N; NOELLEMEYER, E.; BALMELLI, G.; FASSOLA, H.E.; COLCOMBET, L; STEVENSON, H.D.; HAMILTON, J; HUBBARD, W; CUBBAGE, F.W. Resumen y comparación de los sistemas silvopastoriles en seis regiones del mundo. En: Congreso Nacional de Sistemas Silvopastoriles, 1., 2009, Posadas, Misiones, Argentina Actas. Buenos Aires (Argentina): INTA, 2009. p. 435-446Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
2. | | CUBBAGE, F.; BALMELLI, G.; BUSSONI, A.; NOELLEMEYER, E.; PACHAS, A.N.; FASSOLA, H.; COLCOMBET, L.; ROSSNER, B.; FREY, G.; DUBE, F.; LOPES DE SILVA, M.; STEVENSON, H.; HAMILTON, J.; HUBBARD, W. Comparing silvopastoral systems and prospects in eight regions of the world. Agroforest Systems, 2012, v. 86, p. 303-314 History article: Received: 20 October 2011; Accepted: 6 January 2012; Published online: 5 February 2012.Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
3. | | CUBBAGE, F.; KANIESKI, B.; RUBILAR, R.; BUSSONI, A.; OLMOS, V. M.; BALMELLI, G.; MAC DONAGH, P.; LORD, R.; HERNÁNDEZ, C.; ZHANG, P.; HUANG, J.; KORHONENK, J.; YAO, R.; HALL, P.; DELL LA TORRE, R.; DÍAZ-BALTEIRO, L.; CARRERO, O.; MONGES, E.; THU, H.T.T.; FREY, G.; HOWARD, M.; CHAVET, M.; MOCHAN, S.; HOEFLICH, V.A.; CHUDY, R.; MAASS, D.; CHIZMAR, S.; ABT, R. Global timber investments, 2005 to 2017. Forest Policy and Economics, March 2020, Volume 112, Article number 102082. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102082 Article history: Received 26 April 2019 / Revised 4 November 2019 / Accepted 13 December 2019 / Available online 7 February 2020.
Corresponding author: Frederick Cubbage - email:fred_cubbage@ncsu.edu
This research was partially funded by...Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
4. | | CUBBAGE, F.; KOESBANDANA, S.; MAC DONAGH, P.; RUBILAR, R.; BALMELLI, G.; MORALES OLMOS, V.; DE LA TORRE, R.; MURARA, M.; HOEFLICH, V.A.; KOTZE, H.; GONZALEZ, R.; CARRERO, O.; FREY, G.; ADAMS, T.; TURNER, J.; LORD, R.; HUANG, J.; MACINTYRE, C.; MCGINLEY, K.; ABT, R.; PHILLIPS, R. Global timber investments, wood costs, regulation, and risk. Biomass and Bioenergy, 2010, v. 34, no. 12, p. 1667-1678 Article history: Received 10 November 2009 / Received in revised form 31 March 2010 / Accepted 31 May 2010. / Available online 29 June 2010.Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 4 | |
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
29/05/2017 |
Actualizado : |
12/12/2018 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
ANTÚNEZ, K.; INVERNIZZI, C.; MENDOZA, Y.; VANENGELSDORP, D.; ZUNINO, P. |
Afiliación : |
KARINA ANTÚNEZ, MEC/ IIBCE (Instituto de Investigaciones de Ciencias Biológicas "Clemente Estable"); CIRO INVERNIZZI, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Ciencias; YAMANDU MENDOZA SPINA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; DENNIS VANENGELSDORP, Universidad de Maryland; PABLO ZUNINO, MEC/ IIBCE (Instituto de Investigaciones de Ciencias Biológicas "Clemente Estable"). |
Título : |
Honeybee colony losses in Uruguay during 2013-2014. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2017 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Apidologie, 2017, 48 (3), pp. 364 - 370 . |
DOI : |
10.1007/s13592-016-0482-2 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 29 December 2015 // Revised: 21 June 2016 // Accepted 9 November 2016.
La versión electrónica del artículo contiene material suplementario. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
High rates of honey bee colony losses have been reported worldwide; however, data about colony loss rates in South America is scarce. This study quantified colony losses experienced in Uruguay during the 2013?2014 season and identifies the self-diagnosed causes for these losses. An estimated 2.6% of all Uruguayan beekeepers, who collectively managed 5% of the estimated 550,000 colonies in the country, responded to this survey.We found that total summer and winter losses were similar (summer 19.0% (95% CI 13.26?24.77%), winter 20.2% (95% CI 14.98?25.39)), as were the average operational losses (summer 19.8% (95% CI 14.01?25.52), winter 18.3% (95% CI 13.15?23.56%)). The total annual loss was 28.5% (95% CI 22.42?34.51%), with each beekeeper losing, on average, 28.6%(95% CI 22.52?34.61%) of the colonies in their operation. Loss rates were similar across operations of different sizes. Queen failure, diseases and parasites, and pesticides were the leading self-reported and selfdiagnosed causes of colony losses. This study is the first to document honey bee colony losses in Uruguay, establishing a baseline for future long-term monitoring.
@ INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France, 2016 |
Palabras claves : |
AFRICANIZED HONEY BEE; HONEY BEE COLONY LOSSES; QUESTIONNAIRE; SURVEILLANCE. |
Thesagro : |
ABEJA MELIFERA; APICULTURA; APIS MELLIFERA; SISTEMAS DE VIGILANCIA; SUD AMERICA. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
Marc : |
LEADER 02189naa a2200301 a 4500 001 1057222 005 2018-12-12 008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1007/s13592-016-0482-2$2DOI 100 1 $aANTÚNEZ, K. 245 $aHoneybee colony losses in Uruguay during 2013-2014.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2017 500 $aArticle history: Received: 29 December 2015 // Revised: 21 June 2016 // Accepted 9 November 2016. La versión electrónica del artículo contiene material suplementario. 520 $aABSTRACT. High rates of honey bee colony losses have been reported worldwide; however, data about colony loss rates in South America is scarce. This study quantified colony losses experienced in Uruguay during the 2013?2014 season and identifies the self-diagnosed causes for these losses. An estimated 2.6% of all Uruguayan beekeepers, who collectively managed 5% of the estimated 550,000 colonies in the country, responded to this survey.We found that total summer and winter losses were similar (summer 19.0% (95% CI 13.26?24.77%), winter 20.2% (95% CI 14.98?25.39)), as were the average operational losses (summer 19.8% (95% CI 14.01?25.52), winter 18.3% (95% CI 13.15?23.56%)). The total annual loss was 28.5% (95% CI 22.42?34.51%), with each beekeeper losing, on average, 28.6%(95% CI 22.52?34.61%) of the colonies in their operation. Loss rates were similar across operations of different sizes. Queen failure, diseases and parasites, and pesticides were the leading self-reported and selfdiagnosed causes of colony losses. This study is the first to document honey bee colony losses in Uruguay, establishing a baseline for future long-term monitoring. @ INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France, 2016 650 $aABEJA MELIFERA 650 $aAPICULTURA 650 $aAPIS MELLIFERA 650 $aSISTEMAS DE VIGILANCIA 650 $aSUD AMERICA 653 $aAFRICANIZED HONEY BEE 653 $aHONEY BEE COLONY LOSSES 653 $aQUESTIONNAIRE 653 $aSURVEILLANCE 700 1 $aINVERNIZZI, C. 700 1 $aMENDOZA, Y. 700 1 $aVANENGELSDORP, D. 700 1 $aZUNINO, P. 773 $tApidologie, 2017, 48 (3), pp. 364 - 370 .
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|