| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 9 | |
| 1. |  | FRAGOMENI, B.O.; MISZTAL, I.; LOURENCO, D.L.; AGUILAR, I.; OKIMOTO, R.; MUIR, W.M. Changes in variance explained by top SNP windows over generations for three traits in broiler chicken Frontiers in Genetics, 2014, v.5, no.Oct., Article number 332. OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Published 01 October 2014.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
| 2. | | FRAGOMENI, B.O.; LOURENCO, D.A.L.; TSURUTA, S.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; MISZTAL, I. Use of genomic recursions and algorithm for proven and young animals for single-step genomic BLUP analyses - a simulation study. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2015, v.132, no.5, p. 340-345.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|  |
| 3. | | LOURENCO, D.A.L.; FRAGOMENI, B.O.; TSURUTA, S.; AGUILAR, I.; ZUMBACH, B.; HAWKEN, R.J.; LEGARRA, A.; MISZTAL, I. Accuracy of estimated breeding values with genomic information on males, females, or both: An example on broiler chicken. Genetics Selection Evolution, 2015, v. 242, p. 47-56. OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received: 14 October 2014 / Accepted: 22 June 2015 / Published: 02 July 2015.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|  |
| 4. | | FRAGOMENI, B.O.; LOURENCO, D.A.L.; TSURUTA, S.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; LAWLOR, T.J.; MIZTAL, I. Hot topic: Use of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP) with a large number of genotypes. Journal of Dairy Science, 2015, v.98, no.6, p.4090-4094. OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received November 18, 2014 / Accepted March 13, 2015 / Published online: April 8, 2015.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 5. | | MASUDA, Y.; MISZTAL, I.; TSURUTA, S.; LEGARRA, A.; AGUILAR, I.; LOURENCO, D.A.L.; FRAGOMENI, B.O.; LAWLOR, T.J. Implementation of genomic recursions in single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor for US Holsteins with a large number of genotyped animals. Journal of Dairy Science, 2016, v.99, no.3, p.1968-1974. OPEN ACCESS OPEN ACCESS. Received 19 October 2015, Accepted 1 December 2015, Available online 21 January 2016| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 6. | | MASUDA, Y; MISZTAL, I.; LEGARRA, A.; TSURUTA, S.; LOURENCO, D.A.L.; FRAGOMENI, B.O.; AGUILAR, I. Technical note: Avoiding the direct inversion of the numerator relationship matrix for genotyped animals in single-step genomic best linear unbiased prediction solved with the preconditioned conjugate gradient. Journal of Animal Science, 2017, v. 95(1): 49-52. Article history: Received: July 05, 2016; Accepted: Aug 16, 2016; Published: February 2, 2017.
This research was partially funded by the United States Department of Agriculture?s National Institute of Food and Agriculture (Agriculture and...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 7. | | LOURENCO, D. A. L.; TSURUTA, S.; FRAGOMENI, B. O.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; BERTRAND, J. K.; AMEN, T. S.; WANG. L.; MOSER, D. W.; MISZTAL, I. Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.(*) Journal of Animal Science, 2015, v. 93, p. 2653-2662. Published June 25, 2015. OPEN ACCESS. (*) This study was partially funded by the American Angus Association (St. Joseph, MO), Zoetis (Kalamazoo, MI), and Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grants no. 2015-67015-22936 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture?s...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 8. | | LOURENCO, D.A.L.; FRAGOMENI, B.O.; BRADFORD, H.L.; MENEZES I.R.; FERRAZ, J.B.S.; AGUILAR, I.; MISZTAL, I. Implications of SNP weighting on single-step genomic predictions for different reference population sizes. Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 2017, v. 134 (6), p. 463-471. Article history: Received: 28 February 2017 / Accepted: 19 July 2017.
This study was partially funded by the American Angus Association (St. Joseph, MO), Zoetis (Kalamazoo, MI) and by Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 9. | | MISZTAL, I.; WANG, H.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; TSURUTA, S.; LOURENCO, D.; FRAGOMENI, B. O.; ZHANG, X.; MUIR, W. M.; CHENG, H. H.; OKIMOTO, R.; WING, T.; HAWKEN, R. R.; ZUMBACH, B.; FERNANDO, R. GWAS using ssGBLUP. Volume Species Breeding: Poultry, 325. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 10., Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 17-22, 2014. p.325.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 9 | |
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
15/11/2015 |
|
Actualizado : |
09/10/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
B - 2 |
|
Autor : |
FRAGOMENI, B.O.; MISZTAL, I.; LOURENCO, D.L.; AGUILAR, I.; OKIMOTO, R.; MUIR, W.M. |
|
Afiliación : |
IGNACIO AGUILAR GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Changes in variance explained by top SNP windows over generations for three traits in broiler chicken |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2014 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Frontiers in Genetics, 2014, v.5, no.Oct., Article number 332. OPEN ACCESS. |
|
ISSN : |
1664-8021 |
|
DOI : |
10.3389/fgene.2014.00332 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Published 01 October 2014. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
The purpose of this study was to determine if the set of genomic regions inferred as accounting for the majority of genetic variation in quantitative traits remain stable over multiple generations of selection. The data set contained phenotypes for five generations of broiler chicken for body weight, breast meat, and leg score. The population consisted of 294,632 animals over five generations and also included genotypes of 41,036 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) for 4,866 animals, after quality control. The SNP effects were calculated by a GWAS type analysis using single step genomic BLUP approach for generations 1-3, 2-4, 3-5, and 1-5. Variances were calculated for windows of 20 SNP. The top ten windows for each trait that explained the largest fraction of the genetic variance across generations were examined. Across generations, the top 10 windows explained more than 0.5% but less than 1% of the total variance. Also, the pattern of the windows was not consistent across generations. The windows that explained the greatest variance changed greatly among the combinations of generations, with a few exceptions. In many cases, a window identified as top for one combination, explained less than 0.1% for the other combinations. We conclude that identification of top SNP windows for a population may have little predictive power for genetic selection in the following generations for the traits here evaluated.
© 2014 Fragomeni, Misztal, Lourenco, Aguilar, Okimoto and Muir. MenosABSTRACT.
The purpose of this study was to determine if the set of genomic regions inferred as accounting for the majority of genetic variation in quantitative traits remain stable over multiple generations of selection. The data set contained phenotypes for five generations of broiler chicken for body weight, breast meat, and leg score. The population consisted of 294,632 animals over five generations and also included genotypes of 41,036 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) for 4,866 animals, after quality control. The SNP effects were calculated by a GWAS type analysis using single step genomic BLUP approach for generations 1-3, 2-4, 3-5, and 1-5. Variances were calculated for windows of 20 SNP. The top ten windows for each trait that explained the largest fraction of the genetic variance across generations were examined. Across generations, the top 10 windows explained more than 0.5% but less than 1% of the total variance. Also, the pattern of the windows was not consistent across generations. The windows that explained the greatest variance changed greatly among the combinations of generations, with a few exceptions. In many cases, a window identified as top for one combination, explained less than 0.1% for the other combinations. We conclude that identification of top SNP windows for a population may have little predictive power for genetic selection in the following generations for the traits here evaluated.
© 2014 Fragomeni, Misztal, Lourenco, Aguilar, Okimoto and... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Gene identification; Genome-wide association study; Genomic selection; QTL; SsGBLUP. |
|
Thesagro : |
MEJORAMIENTO GENETICO ANIMAL; POLLO DE ENGORDE. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L10 Genética y mejoramiento animal |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/5195/1/Aguilar-I.-2014.-Frontiers-in-Genetics.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02443naa a2200301 a 4500
001 1053891
005 2019-10-09
008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1664-8021
024 7 $a10.3389/fgene.2014.00332$2DOI
100 1 $aFRAGOMENI, B.O.
245 $aChanges in variance explained by top SNP windows over generations for three traits in broiler chicken$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2014
500 $aArticle history: Published 01 October 2014.
520 $aABSTRACT. The purpose of this study was to determine if the set of genomic regions inferred as accounting for the majority of genetic variation in quantitative traits remain stable over multiple generations of selection. The data set contained phenotypes for five generations of broiler chicken for body weight, breast meat, and leg score. The population consisted of 294,632 animals over five generations and also included genotypes of 41,036 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) for 4,866 animals, after quality control. The SNP effects were calculated by a GWAS type analysis using single step genomic BLUP approach for generations 1-3, 2-4, 3-5, and 1-5. Variances were calculated for windows of 20 SNP. The top ten windows for each trait that explained the largest fraction of the genetic variance across generations were examined. Across generations, the top 10 windows explained more than 0.5% but less than 1% of the total variance. Also, the pattern of the windows was not consistent across generations. The windows that explained the greatest variance changed greatly among the combinations of generations, with a few exceptions. In many cases, a window identified as top for one combination, explained less than 0.1% for the other combinations. We conclude that identification of top SNP windows for a population may have little predictive power for genetic selection in the following generations for the traits here evaluated. © 2014 Fragomeni, Misztal, Lourenco, Aguilar, Okimoto and Muir.
650 $aMEJORAMIENTO GENETICO ANIMAL
650 $aPOLLO DE ENGORDE
653 $aGene identification
653 $aGenome-wide association study
653 $aGenomic selection
653 $aQTL
653 $aSsGBLUP
700 1 $aMISZTAL, I.
700 1 $aLOURENCO, D.L.
700 1 $aAGUILAR, I.
700 1 $aOKIMOTO, R.
700 1 $aMUIR, W.M.
773 $tFrontiers in Genetics, 2014$gv.5, no.Oct., Article number 332. OPEN ACCESS.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
