| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha : |
27/08/2018 |
|
Actualizado : |
25/02/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
MIRABALLES, C.; RIET-CORREA, F. |
|
Afiliación : |
MÓNICA MIRABALLES FERRER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FRANKLIN RIET-CORREA AMARAL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
A review of the history of research and control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Experimental and Applied Acarology, 2018, v. 75, no. 4, p. 383-398. |
|
DOI : |
10.1007/s10493-018-0278-3 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 13 May 2018 / Accepted: 30 July 2018. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract: In Uruguay, control of Rhipicephalus microplus began in 1910. In 1941 the eradication of R. micoplus throughout the country was declared mandatory, although this attempt was unsuccessful. Since 2008 the country was divided into two regions: the south-western region, which is free of ticks; and a region of tick control that includes all departments to the north of the Rio Negro and five departments in the eastern region. In Uruguay, investigations on R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis started in 1921, and in the 1970s, studies of the epidemiology of R. microplus determined that from 2 to 3.5 generations can be produced annually and that the country is in an area of enzootic instability for babesiosis and anaplasmosis. Knowledge of tick epidemiology and of tick resistance to different acaricides led to the development of efficient methods of control or eradication, including integrated control and generational treatment. Although research results have led to a legal framework regarding R. microplus control, these measures have had variable results. This can be attributed to several factors, such as the discontinuation of the control measures,
variable financial resources, changes in the dynamics of livestock movement, failure to adopt available technology for tick control by farmers, climate change, environmental alterations such as forestation and the increasing resistance of ticks to acaricides, which led to the development of multiresistant ticks. This paper reviews the history of R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay and proposes alternatives for their control. MenosAbstract: In Uruguay, control of Rhipicephalus microplus began in 1910. In 1941 the eradication of R. micoplus throughout the country was declared mandatory, although this attempt was unsuccessful. Since 2008 the country was divided into two regions: the south-western region, which is free of ticks; and a region of tick control that includes all departments to the north of the Rio Negro and five departments in the eastern region. In Uruguay, investigations on R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis started in 1921, and in the 1970s, studies of the epidemiology of R. microplus determined that from 2 to 3.5 generations can be produced annually and that the country is in an area of enzootic instability for babesiosis and anaplasmosis. Knowledge of tick epidemiology and of tick resistance to different acaricides led to the development of efficient methods of control or eradication, including integrated control and generational treatment. Although research results have led to a legal framework regarding R. microplus control, these measures have had variable results. This can be attributed to several factors, such as the discontinuation of the control measures,
variable financial resources, changes in the dynamics of livestock movement, failure to adopt available technology for tick control by farmers, climate change, environmental alterations such as forestation and the increasing resistance of ticks to acarici... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
ANAPLAMOSIS; BABESIOSIS; CATTLE TICK; CONTROL. |
|
Thesagro : |
URUGUAY. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L73 Enfermedades de los animales |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02490naa a2200217 a 4500
001 1058946
005 2019-02-25
008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1007/s10493-018-0278-3$2DOI
100 1 $aMIRABALLES, C.
245 $aA review of the history of research and control of Rhipicephalus (Boophilus) microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2018
500 $aArticle history: Received: 13 May 2018 / Accepted: 30 July 2018.
520 $aAbstract: In Uruguay, control of Rhipicephalus microplus began in 1910. In 1941 the eradication of R. micoplus throughout the country was declared mandatory, although this attempt was unsuccessful. Since 2008 the country was divided into two regions: the south-western region, which is free of ticks; and a region of tick control that includes all departments to the north of the Rio Negro and five departments in the eastern region. In Uruguay, investigations on R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis started in 1921, and in the 1970s, studies of the epidemiology of R. microplus determined that from 2 to 3.5 generations can be produced annually and that the country is in an area of enzootic instability for babesiosis and anaplasmosis. Knowledge of tick epidemiology and of tick resistance to different acaricides led to the development of efficient methods of control or eradication, including integrated control and generational treatment. Although research results have led to a legal framework regarding R. microplus control, these measures have had variable results. This can be attributed to several factors, such as the discontinuation of the control measures, variable financial resources, changes in the dynamics of livestock movement, failure to adopt available technology for tick control by farmers, climate change, environmental alterations such as forestation and the increasing resistance of ticks to acaricides, which led to the development of multiresistant ticks. This paper reviews the history of R. microplus, babesiosis and anaplasmosis in Uruguay and proposes alternatives for their control.
650 $aURUGUAY
653 $aANAPLAMOSIS
653 $aBABESIOSIS
653 $aCATTLE TICK
653 $aCONTROL
700 1 $aRIET-CORREA, F.
773 $tExperimental and Applied Acarology, 2018$gv. 75, no. 4, p. 383-398.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 2,958 | |
| 24. |  | AMORÓS, M. E.; BUENAHORA, J.; ROSSINI, C. Aceites y coadyuvantes para el manejo eco-compatible de Diaphorina citri (Hemiptera: Liviidae). In: Sociedad Uruguaya de Fitopatología Jornada Uruguaya de Fitopatología, 6., Jornada Uruguaya de Protección Vegetal, 4., 21-22 octubre, 2021, Montevideo, Uruguay. Libro de resúmenes. Montevideo (UY): Sociedad Uruguay de Fitopatología (SUFIT), 2021. p. 62. Financiamiento: INIA, ANII.| Tipo: Abstracts/Resúmenes |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|    |
| 26. | | ALZUGARAY, R.; ÁVILA, S. Acerca de los cascarudos negros Revista INIA, 2006, no. 9, p. 21-23 Los Ing. Agr. Enrique Deambrosi (INIA Treinta y Tres) y Hernán Zorrilla (Asesor privado) aportaron sus observaciones de la zafra 2005-2006.| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 27. | | PÉREZ DE VIDA, F. Actividades de selección en Germoplasma Índica. In: PROGRAMA NACIONAL PRODUCCIÓN DE ARROZ; JORNADA ANUAL ARROZ, 2012, INIA TREINTA Y TRES, UY. Arroz: resultados experimentales 2011-2012. Treinta y Tres: INIA, 2012. Cap. 6 p.23-25. (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 686)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 30. | | VAZ MARTINS, D. Actualización de la información tecnológica en producción animal 2a. ed In: CARÁMBULA, M.; VAZ MARTINS, D.; INDARTE, E. (Eds.). Pasturas y producción animal en áreas de ganaderia extensiva. 2a. reimpresión . Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 1997. p. 146-151 (INIA Serie Técnica ; 13)| Tipo: Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 32. | | SCHILD, C.; GIANNITTI, F.; MEDEIROS,R.; SILVEIRA, CS.; CAFFARENA, D.; POPPENGA, RH.; RIET-CORREA, F. Acute lead arsenate poisoning in beef cattle in Uruguay. In: American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians (AAVLD), 59º; United States Animal Health Association (USAHA) Annual Meeting, Greensboro, North Carolina, Oct 13-19, 2016.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
|  |
| 36. | | GASO, D.; CERETTA, S.; BERGER, A.; DIAZ, M.; PEREYRA, S.; SASTRE, M. Adaptación de trigo, cebada y colza en el área agrícola del noreste: Red de ensayos 2009. Reunión, 9 de febrero, Tacuarembó, 2009. Tacuarembó (Uruguay): INIA, 2010. 44 p. Colaboran: TAFILAR S.A., MUSA, MOSA, ADP S.A., AGAR CROSS URUGUAY S.A, FADISOL S.A., SURCO S.A. y NIDERA URUGUAYA S. A.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 40. | | PEREYRA, S.; GERMAN, S.; GONZÁLEZ, S.N.; CASTRO, A.; GAMBA, F.; GUTIERREZ, L. Advances in the integrated management of leaf blotches in Uruguay. In: International Workshop on Barley Leaf Diseases , 2o. Rabat, Morocco: The International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas (ICARDA), April 5-7, 2017. p. 46.| Tipo: Abstracts/Resúmenes |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 2,958 | |
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
