|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Salto Grande; INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha : |
15/07/2015 |
Actualizado : |
24/10/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Revista INIA |
Autor : |
INIA (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA) |
Título : |
Revista INIA Uruguay. (No.2, Marzo 2005). |
Fecha de publicación : |
2005 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Montevideo (Uruguay) : INIA, 2005. |
Páginas : |
48 p. |
Serie : |
(Revista INIA; 02) |
ISSN : |
1510-9011 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Thesagro : |
ARROZ; BIOTECNOLOGIA; BOVINOS DE CARNE; C0NTROL DE ENFERMEDADES; CAMBIO CLIMATICO; CIENCIA; CITRUS; CLIMA; CLIMATOLOGIA; COMUNICACION; CULTIVOS DE GRANO; CULTIVOS DE SECANO; ENTOMOLOGIA; ESPECIES FORRAJERAS; EUCALYPTUS; EXPLOTACION AGRICOLA FAMILIAR; FITOPATOLOGIA; FORESTALES; FORRAJES; FRUTALES; FRUTICULTURA; GANADO BOVINO; GRANOS; GRAS; HORTALIZAS; HORTICULTURA; INIA; INNOVACION; INVESTIGACIÓN; LECHERÍA; LEGUMINOSAS FORRAJERAS; MANEJO DE CULTIVOS; MEJORAMIENTO ANIMAL; METEOROLOGIA; MICROBIOLOGIA; OVINOS; PASTURAS; PRODUCCIÓN ANIMAL; PRODUCCION DE LANA; PRODUCCION DE LECHE; PRODUCCION LECHERA; REVISTA INIA 2005; SEMILLAS; SOJA; SUELOS; SUINOS; SUSTENTABILIDAD AMBIENTAL; TECNOLOGÍA; TRANSFERENCIA DE TECNOLOGIA; VARIEDADES; VITICULTURA. |
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/13596/1/Revista-INIA-02.pdf
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/4811/1/Revista-INIA-02.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01901nam a2200745 a 4500 001 1053065 005 2019-10-24 008 2005 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1510-9011 100 1 $aINIA (INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA) 245 $aRevista INIA Uruguay. (No.2, Marzo 2005). 260 $aMontevideo (Uruguay) : INIA$c2005 300 $a48 p. 490 $a(Revista INIA; 02) 650 $aARROZ 650 $aBIOTECNOLOGIA 650 $aBOVINOS DE CARNE 650 $aC0NTROL DE ENFERMEDADES 650 $aCAMBIO CLIMATICO 650 $aCIENCIA 650 $aCITRUS 650 $aCLIMA 650 $aCLIMATOLOGIA 650 $aCOMUNICACION 650 $aCULTIVOS DE GRANO 650 $aCULTIVOS DE SECANO 650 $aENTOMOLOGIA 650 $aESPECIES FORRAJERAS 650 $aEUCALYPTUS 650 $aEXPLOTACION AGRICOLA FAMILIAR 650 $aFITOPATOLOGIA 650 $aFORESTALES 650 $aFORRAJES 650 $aFRUTALES 650 $aFRUTICULTURA 650 $aGANADO BOVINO 650 $aGRANOS 650 $aGRAS 650 $aHORTALIZAS 650 $aHORTICULTURA 650 $aINIA 650 $aINNOVACION 650 $aINVESTIGACIÓN 650 $aLECHERÍA 650 $aLEGUMINOSAS FORRAJERAS 650 $aMANEJO DE CULTIVOS 650 $aMEJORAMIENTO ANIMAL 650 $aMETEOROLOGIA 650 $aMICROBIOLOGIA 650 $aOVINOS 650 $aPASTURAS 650 $aPRODUCCIÓN ANIMAL 650 $aPRODUCCION DE LANA 650 $aPRODUCCION DE LECHE 650 $aPRODUCCION LECHERA 650 $aREVISTA INIA 2005 650 $aSEMILLAS 650 $aSOJA 650 $aSUELOS 650 $aSUINOS 650 $aSUSTENTABILIDAD AMBIENTAL 650 $aTECNOLOGÍA 650 $aTRANSFERENCIA DE TECNOLOGIA 650 $aVARIEDADES 650 $aVITICULTURA
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Salto Grande (SG) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha actual : |
18/09/2014 |
Actualizado : |
15/05/2015 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
A - 2 |
Autor : |
ROEL, A.; HEILMAN, J.L.; MCCAULEY, G.N. |
Afiliación : |
ALVARO ROEL DELLAZOPPA, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Water use and plant response in two rice irrigation methods. |
Fecha de publicación : |
1999 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agricultural Water Management, 1999, v. 39, no. 1, p. 35-46. |
ISSN : |
0378-3774 |
DOI : |
10.1016/S0378-3774(98)00087-0 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Contenido : |
Abstract
Pin-Point (PP) irrigation is being used by rice producers in the southern US to suppress red rice (Oryza sativa), the major weed in rice production. In PP irrigation, germinated seed is dropped into the floodwater. After 24 h the field is drained, remains moist for 3 to 5 days, then reflooded until near harvest. Little is known about water use of the PP method in comparison to the conventional Flush-Flood (FF) method in which germinated seed is also dropped into the floodwater and the field is drained after 24 h, similar to PP, or the field is drill-seeded, flooded and drained, but permanent flood is delayed for 30 to 35 days. During this 30 to 35 days non-flood period, flushing (periodic irrigation) is used to maintain seedling contact with the soil and prevent water stress. Water use of PP and FF irrigated rice was studied during 1994 and 1995 growing seasons near Beaumont, TX. Three plots were subjected to the PP irrigation technique and three to the FF method. A flow meter measured irrigation water applied, and lysimeters measured evapotranspiration, transpiration, and evaporation. The FF method required an average of 113 mm more irrigation water than the PP method, due to flushing of FF plots during the non-flood period. Evapotranspiration (ET) was higher for PP plots during the period when FF plots were dry. During the flood period, ET in FF plots was higher than in PP plots in 1994, due to mainly a lower leaf area index and a more open canopy which led to greater evaporation from the water surface. No differences in ET were found in 1995. Stomatal conductance was lower in FF plots during the non-flood period, indicating some degree of water stress. Irrigation method did not affect yield, but the PP method reduced time to 100% heading by 5 to 7 days. These results suggest that the PP method can be useful not only to suppress red rice, but also to save water and produce an earlier maturing crop. Early maturity is particularly important in areas where ratoon cropping is practiced. MenosAbstract
Pin-Point (PP) irrigation is being used by rice producers in the southern US to suppress red rice (Oryza sativa), the major weed in rice production. In PP irrigation, germinated seed is dropped into the floodwater. After 24 h the field is drained, remains moist for 3 to 5 days, then reflooded until near harvest. Little is known about water use of the PP method in comparison to the conventional Flush-Flood (FF) method in which germinated seed is also dropped into the floodwater and the field is drained after 24 h, similar to PP, or the field is drill-seeded, flooded and drained, but permanent flood is delayed for 30 to 35 days. During this 30 to 35 days non-flood period, flushing (periodic irrigation) is used to maintain seedling contact with the soil and prevent water stress. Water use of PP and FF irrigated rice was studied during 1994 and 1995 growing seasons near Beaumont, TX. Three plots were subjected to the PP irrigation technique and three to the FF method. A flow meter measured irrigation water applied, and lysimeters measured evapotranspiration, transpiration, and evaporation. The FF method required an average of 113 mm more irrigation water than the PP method, due to flushing of FF plots during the non-flood period. Evapotranspiration (ET) was higher for PP plots during the period when FF plots were dry. During the flood period, ET in FF plots was higher than in PP plots in 1994, due to mainly a lower leaf area index and a more open canopy which led to gr... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
EVAPORACION; EVAPOTRANSPIRACION; REQUERIMIENTOS DE AGUA; TRANSPIRACION. |
Thesagro : |
ARROZ IRRIGADO. |
Asunto categoría : |
F06 Riego |
Marc : |
LEADER 02692naa a2200229 a 4500 001 1050382 005 2015-05-15 008 1999 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0378-3774 024 7 $a10.1016/S0378-3774(98)00087-0$2DOI 100 1 $aROEL, A. 245 $aWater use and plant response in two rice irrigation methods.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c1999 520 $aAbstract Pin-Point (PP) irrigation is being used by rice producers in the southern US to suppress red rice (Oryza sativa), the major weed in rice production. In PP irrigation, germinated seed is dropped into the floodwater. After 24 h the field is drained, remains moist for 3 to 5 days, then reflooded until near harvest. Little is known about water use of the PP method in comparison to the conventional Flush-Flood (FF) method in which germinated seed is also dropped into the floodwater and the field is drained after 24 h, similar to PP, or the field is drill-seeded, flooded and drained, but permanent flood is delayed for 30 to 35 days. During this 30 to 35 days non-flood period, flushing (periodic irrigation) is used to maintain seedling contact with the soil and prevent water stress. Water use of PP and FF irrigated rice was studied during 1994 and 1995 growing seasons near Beaumont, TX. Three plots were subjected to the PP irrigation technique and three to the FF method. A flow meter measured irrigation water applied, and lysimeters measured evapotranspiration, transpiration, and evaporation. The FF method required an average of 113 mm more irrigation water than the PP method, due to flushing of FF plots during the non-flood period. Evapotranspiration (ET) was higher for PP plots during the period when FF plots were dry. During the flood period, ET in FF plots was higher than in PP plots in 1994, due to mainly a lower leaf area index and a more open canopy which led to greater evaporation from the water surface. No differences in ET were found in 1995. Stomatal conductance was lower in FF plots during the non-flood period, indicating some degree of water stress. Irrigation method did not affect yield, but the PP method reduced time to 100% heading by 5 to 7 days. These results suggest that the PP method can be useful not only to suppress red rice, but also to save water and produce an earlier maturing crop. Early maturity is particularly important in areas where ratoon cropping is practiced. 650 $aARROZ IRRIGADO 653 $aEVAPORACION 653 $aEVAPOTRANSPIRACION 653 $aREQUERIMIENTOS DE AGUA 653 $aTRANSPIRACION 700 1 $aHEILMAN, J.L. 700 1 $aMCCAULEY, G.N. 773 $tAgricultural Water Management, 1999$gv. 39, no. 1, p. 35-46.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|