| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha : |
18/09/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
15/05/2015 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
ROEL, A.; HEILMAN, J.L.; MCCAULEY, G.N. |
|
Afiliación : |
ALVARO ROEL DELLAZOPPA, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Water use and plant response in two rice irrigation methods. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
1999 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agricultural Water Management, 1999, v. 39, no. 1, p. 35-46. |
|
ISSN : |
0378-3774 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/S0378-3774(98)00087-0 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract
Pin-Point (PP) irrigation is being used by rice producers in the southern US to suppress red rice (Oryza sativa), the major weed in rice production. In PP irrigation, germinated seed is dropped into the floodwater. After 24 h the field is drained, remains moist for 3 to 5 days, then reflooded until near harvest. Little is known about water use of the PP method in comparison to the conventional Flush-Flood (FF) method in which germinated seed is also dropped into the floodwater and the field is drained after 24 h, similar to PP, or the field is drill-seeded, flooded and drained, but permanent flood is delayed for 30 to 35 days. During this 30 to 35 days non-flood period, flushing (periodic irrigation) is used to maintain seedling contact with the soil and prevent water stress. Water use of PP and FF irrigated rice was studied during 1994 and 1995 growing seasons near Beaumont, TX. Three plots were subjected to the PP irrigation technique and three to the FF method. A flow meter measured irrigation water applied, and lysimeters measured evapotranspiration, transpiration, and evaporation. The FF method required an average of 113 mm more irrigation water than the PP method, due to flushing of FF plots during the non-flood period. Evapotranspiration (ET) was higher for PP plots during the period when FF plots were dry. During the flood period, ET in FF plots was higher than in PP plots in 1994, due to mainly a lower leaf area index and a more open canopy which led to greater evaporation from the water surface. No differences in ET were found in 1995. Stomatal conductance was lower in FF plots during the non-flood period, indicating some degree of water stress. Irrigation method did not affect yield, but the PP method reduced time to 100% heading by 5 to 7 days. These results suggest that the PP method can be useful not only to suppress red rice, but also to save water and produce an earlier maturing crop. Early maturity is particularly important in areas where ratoon cropping is practiced. MenosAbstract
Pin-Point (PP) irrigation is being used by rice producers in the southern US to suppress red rice (Oryza sativa), the major weed in rice production. In PP irrigation, germinated seed is dropped into the floodwater. After 24 h the field is drained, remains moist for 3 to 5 days, then reflooded until near harvest. Little is known about water use of the PP method in comparison to the conventional Flush-Flood (FF) method in which germinated seed is also dropped into the floodwater and the field is drained after 24 h, similar to PP, or the field is drill-seeded, flooded and drained, but permanent flood is delayed for 30 to 35 days. During this 30 to 35 days non-flood period, flushing (periodic irrigation) is used to maintain seedling contact with the soil and prevent water stress. Water use of PP and FF irrigated rice was studied during 1994 and 1995 growing seasons near Beaumont, TX. Three plots were subjected to the PP irrigation technique and three to the FF method. A flow meter measured irrigation water applied, and lysimeters measured evapotranspiration, transpiration, and evaporation. The FF method required an average of 113 mm more irrigation water than the PP method, due to flushing of FF plots during the non-flood period. Evapotranspiration (ET) was higher for PP plots during the period when FF plots were dry. During the flood period, ET in FF plots was higher than in PP plots in 1994, due to mainly a lower leaf area index and a more open canopy which led to gr... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
EVAPORACION; EVAPOTRANSPIRACION; REQUERIMIENTOS DE AGUA; TRANSPIRACION. |
|
Thesagro : |
ARROZ IRRIGADO. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F06 Riego |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02692naa a2200229 a 4500
001 1050382
005 2015-05-15
008 1999 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0378-3774
024 7 $a10.1016/S0378-3774(98)00087-0$2DOI
100 1 $aROEL, A.
245 $aWater use and plant response in two rice irrigation methods.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c1999
520 $aAbstract Pin-Point (PP) irrigation is being used by rice producers in the southern US to suppress red rice (Oryza sativa), the major weed in rice production. In PP irrigation, germinated seed is dropped into the floodwater. After 24 h the field is drained, remains moist for 3 to 5 days, then reflooded until near harvest. Little is known about water use of the PP method in comparison to the conventional Flush-Flood (FF) method in which germinated seed is also dropped into the floodwater and the field is drained after 24 h, similar to PP, or the field is drill-seeded, flooded and drained, but permanent flood is delayed for 30 to 35 days. During this 30 to 35 days non-flood period, flushing (periodic irrigation) is used to maintain seedling contact with the soil and prevent water stress. Water use of PP and FF irrigated rice was studied during 1994 and 1995 growing seasons near Beaumont, TX. Three plots were subjected to the PP irrigation technique and three to the FF method. A flow meter measured irrigation water applied, and lysimeters measured evapotranspiration, transpiration, and evaporation. The FF method required an average of 113 mm more irrigation water than the PP method, due to flushing of FF plots during the non-flood period. Evapotranspiration (ET) was higher for PP plots during the period when FF plots were dry. During the flood period, ET in FF plots was higher than in PP plots in 1994, due to mainly a lower leaf area index and a more open canopy which led to greater evaporation from the water surface. No differences in ET were found in 1995. Stomatal conductance was lower in FF plots during the non-flood period, indicating some degree of water stress. Irrigation method did not affect yield, but the PP method reduced time to 100% heading by 5 to 7 days. These results suggest that the PP method can be useful not only to suppress red rice, but also to save water and produce an earlier maturing crop. Early maturity is particularly important in areas where ratoon cropping is practiced.
650 $aARROZ IRRIGADO
653 $aEVAPORACION
653 $aEVAPOTRANSPIRACION
653 $aREQUERIMIENTOS DE AGUA
653 $aTRANSPIRACION
700 1 $aHEILMAN, J.L.
700 1 $aMCCAULEY, G.N.
773 $tAgricultural Water Management, 1999$gv. 39, no. 1, p. 35-46.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 502 | |
| 121. |  | VIKRAM, A.; ROVIRA, P.J.; MILLER, E.; AGGA, G.E.; ARTHUR, T.M.; WHEELER, T.L.; SCHMIDT, J.W. Impact of raised without antibiotics practices on occurrences of antimicrobial resistance. [Abstract]. In: Meeting Abstract. Beef Industry Safety Summit, February 28-March 2, 2017, Houston, Texas.| Tipo: Abstracts/Resúmenes |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|    |
| 122. | | BRANDA, A.; FEDERICI, M.; GIANNITTI, F.; CAFFARENA, D.; SCHILD, C.; CASAUX, L.; BRIANO, C.; DALLA RIZZA, M.; LLAMBÍ, S.; FRAGA, M.; RIET-CORREA, F.; DUTRA, F. Monitoreo de terneros holando portadores de blad mediante curvas de disociación de alta resolución y secuenciación. In: INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria); INIA Las Brujas; Biotecnología. Jornada de Agrobiotecnología, X. Encuentro Nacional de REDBIO, II. Jornada técnica. Las Brujas, Canelones (UY): INIA, 2017. p. 3-5. (Serie Actividades de Difusión; 780)| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|  |
| 131. | | CAFFARENA, D.; RIET-CORREA, F.; GIANNITTI, F. Uso de protocolos de manejo del dolor durante el desbotonamiento y descorne de las terneras de tambo: ¿Qué tan común es en Uruguay y Argentina?. In: Jornadas Uruguayas de Buiatría, 45., 2017, Paysandú, Uy., Matto, C.; Delpiazzo, R.(Ed.). Trabajos presentados. Paysandú: Centro Médico Veterinario de Paysandú/Sociedad Uruguaya de Buiatría, 2017. p.212-214.| Tipo: Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 132. | | LUZARDO, S.; BRITO, G.; DEL CAMPO, M.; MONTOSSI, F. What is meat in Uruguay? Animal Frontiers, 2017, v. 7, no. 4, 76-78. OPEN ACCESS. https://doi.org/10.2527/af.2017.0450 Article history: Published online September 21, 2017.| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : Internacional - -- |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 135. | | SCHILD, C.; GIANNITTI, F.; MEDEIROS,R.; SILVEIRA, CS.; CAFFARENA, D.; POPPENGA, RH.; RIET-CORREA, F. Acute lead arsenate poisoning in beef cattle in Uruguay. In: American Association of Veterinary Laboratory Diagnosticians (AAVLD), 59º; United States Animal Health Association (USAHA) Annual Meeting, Greensboro, North Carolina, Oct 13-19, 2016.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 140. | | NOYES, N. R.; ABDO, Z.; ROVIRA, P.J.; DOSTER, E.; YANG, X.; LINKE, L. M.; BURGESS, B. A.; MARTIN. J.; BOUCHER, C.; MORLEY, P. S.; BELK, K. E. A bayesian approach to investigating the effect of metaphylaxis on the microbiome-resistance of the commercial feedlot steers. Abstract. In: Plant and Animal Genome Conference, 24. San Diego, USA, 2016.| Tipo: Abstracts/Resúmenes |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 502 | |
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
