| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
11/08/2016 |
|
Actualizado : |
07/12/2018 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
MOTA, R.R.; TEMPELMAN, R.J.; LOPEZ, P.S.; AGUILAR, I.; SILVA, F.S.; CARDOSO, F.S. |
|
Afiliación : |
RODRIGO R. MOTA, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Brazil; Michigan State University, USA; ROBERT J. TEMPELMAN, Michigan State University, USA; PAULO S. LOPES, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Brazil; IGNACIO AGUILAR GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FABYANO S. SILVA, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Brazil; FERNANDO S. CARDOSO, Embrapa - Bage; Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Brazil. |
|
Título : |
Genotype by environment interaction for tick resistance of Hereford and Braford beef cattle using reaction norm models. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2016 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Genetics Selection Evolution, 2016, v. 48, no. 3. |
|
DOI : |
10.1186/s12711-015-0178-5 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Received: 28 January 2015 / Accepted: 10 December 2015 / Published: 14 January 2016 |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Background.
The cattle tick is a parasite that adversely affects livestock performance in tropical areas. Although countries such as Australia and Brazil have developed genetic evaluations for tick resistance, these evaluations have not considered genotype by environment (G*E) interactions. Genetic gains could be adversely affected, since breedstock comparisons are environmentally dependent on the presence of G*E interactions, particularly if residual variability is also heterogeneous across environments. The objective of this study was to infer upon the existence of G*E interactions for tick resistance of cattle based on various models with different assumptions of genetic and residual variability.
© Mota et al. 2016 |
|
Thesagro : |
BRAFORD; GANADO DE CARNE; HEREFORD. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
http://gsejournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12711-015-0178-5
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/5864/1/Mota-R.R.-2016.-GSE.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01526naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1055252
005 2018-12-07
008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1186/s12711-015-0178-5$2DOI
100 1 $aMOTA, R.R.
245 $aGenotype by environment interaction for tick resistance of Hereford and Braford beef cattle using reaction norm models.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2016
500 $aReceived: 28 January 2015 / Accepted: 10 December 2015 / Published: 14 January 2016
520 $aABSTRACT. Background. The cattle tick is a parasite that adversely affects livestock performance in tropical areas. Although countries such as Australia and Brazil have developed genetic evaluations for tick resistance, these evaluations have not considered genotype by environment (G*E) interactions. Genetic gains could be adversely affected, since breedstock comparisons are environmentally dependent on the presence of G*E interactions, particularly if residual variability is also heterogeneous across environments. The objective of this study was to infer upon the existence of G*E interactions for tick resistance of cattle based on various models with different assumptions of genetic and residual variability. © Mota et al. 2016
650 $aBRAFORD
650 $aGANADO DE CARNE
650 $aHEREFORD
700 1 $aTEMPELMAN, R.J.
700 1 $aLOPEZ, P.S.
700 1 $aAGUILAR, I.
700 1 $aSILVA, F.S.
700 1 $aCARDOSO, F.S.
773 $tGenetics Selection Evolution, 2016$gv. 48, no. 3.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
29/05/2017 |
|
Actualizado : |
12/12/2018 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
ANTÚNEZ, K.; INVERNIZZI, C.; MENDOZA, Y.; VANENGELSDORP, D.; ZUNINO, P. |
|
Afiliación : |
KARINA ANTÚNEZ, MEC/ IIBCE (Instituto de Investigaciones de Ciencias Biológicas "Clemente Estable"); CIRO INVERNIZZI, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Ciencias; YAMANDU MENDOZA SPINA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; DENNIS VANENGELSDORP, Universidad de Maryland; PABLO ZUNINO, MEC/ IIBCE (Instituto de Investigaciones de Ciencias Biológicas "Clemente Estable"). |
|
Título : |
Honeybee colony losses in Uruguay during 2013-2014. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2017 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Apidologie, 2017, 48 (3), pp. 364 - 370 . |
|
DOI : |
10.1007/s13592-016-0482-2 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 29 December 2015 // Revised: 21 June 2016 // Accepted 9 November 2016.
La versión electrónica del artículo contiene material suplementario. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
High rates of honey bee colony losses have been reported worldwide; however, data about colony loss rates in South America is scarce. This study quantified colony losses experienced in Uruguay during the 2013?2014 season and identifies the self-diagnosed causes for these losses. An estimated 2.6% of all Uruguayan beekeepers, who collectively managed 5% of the estimated 550,000 colonies in the country, responded to this survey.We found that total summer and winter losses were similar (summer 19.0% (95% CI 13.26?24.77%), winter 20.2% (95% CI 14.98?25.39)), as were the average operational losses (summer 19.8% (95% CI 14.01?25.52), winter 18.3% (95% CI 13.15?23.56%)). The total annual loss was 28.5% (95% CI 22.42?34.51%), with each beekeeper losing, on average, 28.6%(95% CI 22.52?34.61%) of the colonies in their operation. Loss rates were similar across operations of different sizes. Queen failure, diseases and parasites, and pesticides were the leading self-reported and selfdiagnosed causes of colony losses. This study is the first to document honey bee colony losses in Uruguay, establishing a baseline for future long-term monitoring.
@ INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France, 2016 |
|
Palabras claves : |
AFRICANIZED HONEY BEE; HONEY BEE COLONY LOSSES; QUESTIONNAIRE; SURVEILLANCE. |
|
Thesagro : |
ABEJA MELIFERA; APICULTURA; APIS MELLIFERA; SISTEMAS DE VIGILANCIA; SUD AMERICA. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02189naa a2200301 a 4500
001 1057222
005 2018-12-12
008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1007/s13592-016-0482-2$2DOI
100 1 $aANTÚNEZ, K.
245 $aHoneybee colony losses in Uruguay during 2013-2014.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2017
500 $aArticle history: Received: 29 December 2015 // Revised: 21 June 2016 // Accepted 9 November 2016. La versión electrónica del artículo contiene material suplementario.
520 $aABSTRACT. High rates of honey bee colony losses have been reported worldwide; however, data about colony loss rates in South America is scarce. This study quantified colony losses experienced in Uruguay during the 2013?2014 season and identifies the self-diagnosed causes for these losses. An estimated 2.6% of all Uruguayan beekeepers, who collectively managed 5% of the estimated 550,000 colonies in the country, responded to this survey.We found that total summer and winter losses were similar (summer 19.0% (95% CI 13.26?24.77%), winter 20.2% (95% CI 14.98?25.39)), as were the average operational losses (summer 19.8% (95% CI 14.01?25.52), winter 18.3% (95% CI 13.15?23.56%)). The total annual loss was 28.5% (95% CI 22.42?34.51%), with each beekeeper losing, on average, 28.6%(95% CI 22.52?34.61%) of the colonies in their operation. Loss rates were similar across operations of different sizes. Queen failure, diseases and parasites, and pesticides were the leading self-reported and selfdiagnosed causes of colony losses. This study is the first to document honey bee colony losses in Uruguay, establishing a baseline for future long-term monitoring. @ INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France, 2016
650 $aABEJA MELIFERA
650 $aAPICULTURA
650 $aAPIS MELLIFERA
650 $aSISTEMAS DE VIGILANCIA
650 $aSUD AMERICA
653 $aAFRICANIZED HONEY BEE
653 $aHONEY BEE COLONY LOSSES
653 $aQUESTIONNAIRE
653 $aSURVEILLANCE
700 1 $aINVERNIZZI, C.
700 1 $aMENDOZA, Y.
700 1 $aVANENGELSDORP, D.
700 1 $aZUNINO, P.
773 $tApidologie, 2017, 48 (3), pp. 364 - 370 .
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
