|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha : |
10/09/2014 |
Actualizado : |
27/04/2020 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
MONTOSSI, F.; FONT I FURNOLS, M.M.; DEL CAMPO, M.; SAN JULIAN, R.; BRITO, G.; SAÑUDO, C. |
Afiliación : |
FABIO MARCELO MONTOSSI PORCILE, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; MARÍA FONT I FURNOLS, IRTA-Food Technology, Girona, Spain; MARCIA DEL CAMPO GIGENA, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; ROBERTO SAN JULIAN SANCHEZ, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; GUSTAVO WALTER BRITO DIAZ, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; C. SAÑUDO, Department of Animal Production and Food Science, University of Zaragoza, Zaragoza, Spain. |
Título : |
Sustainable sheep production and consumer preference trends: Compatibilities, contradictions, and unresolved dilemmas. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2013 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Meat Science, 2013, v. 95, p. 772-789. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.048 |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.048 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 25 February 2013; Received in revised form 21 April 2013; Accepted 22 April 2013. |
Contenido : |
There are increasing concerns of society towards the consumption of animal products which have been produced and transformed ina sustainablemanner. This trendin
fluencesconsumerpurchasing decision making,particularly in developed countries. On the other hand, in the next years, the pressure to increase the volume and ef
ficiency of meat production will be much higher to cope with the expected unsatisfied demand. At least in part, current and future technologies could contribute to solve this challenge. However, the use of some of these innovations could have a negative effect on consumer preferences. There is no consensus in our society about this dilemma. The objective of this paper is to review the scientific evidence related to these topics and to analyze and discuss the effect of some of the extrinsic and intrinsic factors linked with the sheep industry which could affect the acceptability of lamb meat by consumers. |
Palabras claves : |
CONSUMER PERCEPTIONS; SHEEP MEAT; SUSTAINABILITY. |
Thesagro : |
CARNE; OVINOS. |
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
Marc : |
LEADER 01827naa a2200265 a 4500 001 1050102 005 2020-04-27 008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.048$2DOI 100 1 $aMONTOSSI, F. 245 $aSustainable sheep production and consumer preference trends$bCompatibilities, contradictions, and unresolved dilemmas. 260 $c2013 500 $aArticle history: Received 25 February 2013; Received in revised form 21 April 2013; Accepted 22 April 2013. 520 $aThere are increasing concerns of society towards the consumption of animal products which have been produced and transformed ina sustainablemanner. This trendin fluencesconsumerpurchasing decision making,particularly in developed countries. On the other hand, in the next years, the pressure to increase the volume and ef ficiency of meat production will be much higher to cope with the expected unsatisfied demand. At least in part, current and future technologies could contribute to solve this challenge. However, the use of some of these innovations could have a negative effect on consumer preferences. There is no consensus in our society about this dilemma. The objective of this paper is to review the scientific evidence related to these topics and to analyze and discuss the effect of some of the extrinsic and intrinsic factors linked with the sheep industry which could affect the acceptability of lamb meat by consumers. 650 $aCARNE 650 $aOVINOS 653 $aCONSUMER PERCEPTIONS 653 $aSHEEP MEAT 653 $aSUSTAINABILITY 700 1 $aFONT I FURNOLS, M.M. 700 1 $aDEL CAMPO, M. 700 1 $aSAN JULIAN, R. 700 1 $aBRITO, G. 700 1 $aSAÑUDO, C. 773 $tMeat Science, 2013$gv. 95, p. 772-789. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.04.048
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha actual : |
28/03/2016 |
Actualizado : |
23/10/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
Autor : |
DALLA RIZZA, M.; SCHVARTZMAN, C.; BOSCHI, F.; MAIDANA, M.; MURCHIO, S.; VILARO, F. |
Afiliación : |
MARCO DALLA RIZZA VILARO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CLAUDIA SCHVARTZMAN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FEDERICO BOSCHI, INASE (Instituto Nacional de Semillas).; MATIAS MAIDANA ETCHEVERRY, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA SARA MURCHIO VIGNOLO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FRANCISCO LUIS VILARO PAREJA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Complementando herramientas para el mejoramiento genético vegetal: ingeniería genética y mejoramiento convencional. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2016 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Revista INIA Uruguay, 2016, No.44, p. 42-46. |
Serie : |
(Revista INIA; 44) |
ISSN : |
1510-9011 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Palabras claves : |
EVALUACION DE RIESGO AMBIENTAL (ERA); GRANJAS MOLECULARES. |
Thesagro : |
BIOSEGURIDAD; BIOTECNOLOGIA; BIOTECNOLOGIA VEGETAL; EVALUACIÓN DE RIESGO; FITOMEJORAMIENTO; ORGANISMOS GENETICAMENTE MODIFICADOS; PAPA; TOMATE. |
Asunto categoría : |
F30 Genética vegetal y fitomejoramiento |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/5579/1/Rev.INIA-2016-No44-p.42-46.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 00928naa a2200313 a 4500 001 1054534 005 2019-10-23 008 2016 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1510-9011 100 1 $aDALLA RIZZA, M. 245 $aComplementando herramientas para el mejoramiento genético vegetal$bingeniería genética y mejoramiento convencional. 260 $c2016 490 $a(Revista INIA; 44) 650 $aBIOSEGURIDAD 650 $aBIOTECNOLOGIA 650 $aBIOTECNOLOGIA VEGETAL 650 $aEVALUACIÓN DE RIESGO 650 $aFITOMEJORAMIENTO 650 $aORGANISMOS GENETICAMENTE MODIFICADOS 650 $aPAPA 650 $aTOMATE 653 $aEVALUACION DE RIESGO AMBIENTAL (ERA) 653 $aGRANJAS MOLECULARES 700 1 $aSCHVARTZMAN, C. 700 1 $aBOSCHI, F. 700 1 $aMAIDANA, M. 700 1 $aMURCHIO, S. 700 1 $aVILARO, F. 773 $tRevista INIA Uruguay, 2016, No.44, p. 42-46.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|