| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
18/12/2018 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos Indexados |
|
Autor : |
LOURENÇO, D. A. L.; MISZTAL, I.; TSURUTA, S.; FRAGOMENI, B.; AGUILAR, I.; MASUDA, Y.; MOSER, D. |
|
Afiliación : |
IGNACIO AGUILAR GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Direct and indirect genomic evaluations in beef cattle. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Interbull Bulletin, 2015, v. 49, p.80 - 84. |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
We tested two modifications into single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) that allow it to work with a large amount of genotyped animals. The first method is based on genomic recursions (APY) to construct the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix without directly inverting it; all available genotyped animals are included in ssGBLUP with APY, but they are split into base and non-base, and the method returns direct predictions. The second method is an interim genomic evaluation (IP) for young genotyped animals; only a reference set of animals are used in ssGBLUP with IP, and the method returns indirect predictions for young genotyped animals. A dataset from American Angus with records for growth traits was used. Over 8 million animals were in the pedigree, of which 51,883 were genotyped. The ssGBLUP with APY was as accurate as regular ssGBLUP when the number of genotyped base animals was at least 10,000; this method was also faster and required less memory. The ssGBLUP with IP mimicking the previous official evaluation returned the same accuracy of GEBV for young animals as the regular ssGBLUP. While the first method enables complete genomic evaluations for huge genotyped populations, the second allows for quick genomic predictions on young animals without including their information into a new run of evaluation. |
|
Palabras claves : |
BIG GENOTYPED POPULATION; GENOMIC RECURSIONS; INTERIM GEBV; SINGLE-STEP GENOMIC BLUP. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/12202/1/1381-2377-1-PB.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02005naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1012456
005 2018-12-18
008 2015 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aLOURENÇO, D. A. L.
245 $aDirect and indirect genomic evaluations in beef cattle.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2015
520 $aABSTRACT. We tested two modifications into single-step genomic BLUP (ssGBLUP) that allow it to work with a large amount of genotyped animals. The first method is based on genomic recursions (APY) to construct the inverse of the genomic relationship matrix without directly inverting it; all available genotyped animals are included in ssGBLUP with APY, but they are split into base and non-base, and the method returns direct predictions. The second method is an interim genomic evaluation (IP) for young genotyped animals; only a reference set of animals are used in ssGBLUP with IP, and the method returns indirect predictions for young genotyped animals. A dataset from American Angus with records for growth traits was used. Over 8 million animals were in the pedigree, of which 51,883 were genotyped. The ssGBLUP with APY was as accurate as regular ssGBLUP when the number of genotyped base animals was at least 10,000; this method was also faster and required less memory. The ssGBLUP with IP mimicking the previous official evaluation returned the same accuracy of GEBV for young animals as the regular ssGBLUP. While the first method enables complete genomic evaluations for huge genotyped populations, the second allows for quick genomic predictions on young animals without including their information into a new run of evaluation.
653 $aBIG GENOTYPED POPULATION
653 $aGENOMIC RECURSIONS
653 $aINTERIM GEBV
653 $aSINGLE-STEP GENOMIC BLUP
700 1 $aMISZTAL, I.
700 1 $aTSURUTA, S.
700 1 $aFRAGOMENI, B.
700 1 $aAGUILAR, I.
700 1 $aMASUDA, Y.
700 1 $aMOSER, D.
773 $tInterbull Bulletin, 2015$gv. 49, p.80 - 84.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 3 | |
| 1. |  | LOURENÇO, D. A. L.; MISZTAL, I.; TSURUTA, S.; FRAGOMENI, B.; AGUILAR, I.; MASUDA, Y.; MOSER, D. Direct and indirect genomic evaluations in beef cattle. Interbull Bulletin, 2015, v. 49, p.80 - 84.| Tipo: Artículos Indexados |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
| 2. | | LOURENCO, D.; TSURUTA, S.; FRAGOMENI, B.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; MILLER, S.; MOSER, D.; MISZTAL, I. Single-step genomic BLUP for national beef cattle evaluation in US: from initial developments to final implementation. Volume Species - Bovine (beef) 1, 495. In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, 11., Aotea Centre Auckland, New Zealand: WCGALP, ICAR, 11-16 feb 2018.| Tipo: Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 3. | | LOURENCO, D. A. L.; TSURUTA, S.; FRAGOMENI, B. O.; MASUDA, Y.; AGUILAR, I.; LEGARRA, A.; BERTRAND, J. K.; AMEN, T. S.; WANG. L.; MOSER, D. W.; MISZTAL, I. Genetic evaluation using single-step genomic best linear unbiased predictor in American Angus.(*) Journal of Animal Science, 2015, v. 93, p. 2653-2662. Published June 25, 2015. OPEN ACCESS. (*) This study was partially funded by the American Angus Association (St. Joseph, MO), Zoetis (Kalamazoo, MI), and Agriculture and Food Research Initiative Competitive Grants no. 2015-67015-22936 from the U.S. Department of Agriculture?s...| Tipo: Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales | Circulación / Nivel : Internacional - -- |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 3 | |
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
