|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
29/05/2017 |
Actualizado : |
12/12/2018 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
ANTÚNEZ, K.; INVERNIZZI, C.; MENDOZA, Y.; VANENGELSDORP, D.; ZUNINO, P. |
Afiliación : |
KARINA ANTÚNEZ, MEC/ IIBCE (Instituto de Investigaciones de Ciencias Biológicas "Clemente Estable"); CIRO INVERNIZZI, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Ciencias; YAMANDU MENDOZA SPINA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; DENNIS VANENGELSDORP, Universidad de Maryland; PABLO ZUNINO, MEC/ IIBCE (Instituto de Investigaciones de Ciencias Biológicas "Clemente Estable"). |
Título : |
Honeybee colony losses in Uruguay during 2013-2014. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2017 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Apidologie, 2017, 48 (3), pp. 364 - 370 . |
DOI : |
10.1007/s13592-016-0482-2 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 29 December 2015 // Revised: 21 June 2016 // Accepted 9 November 2016.
La versión electrónica del artículo contiene material suplementario. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
High rates of honey bee colony losses have been reported worldwide; however, data about colony loss rates in South America is scarce. This study quantified colony losses experienced in Uruguay during the 2013?2014 season and identifies the self-diagnosed causes for these losses. An estimated 2.6% of all Uruguayan beekeepers, who collectively managed 5% of the estimated 550,000 colonies in the country, responded to this survey.We found that total summer and winter losses were similar (summer 19.0% (95% CI 13.26?24.77%), winter 20.2% (95% CI 14.98?25.39)), as were the average operational losses (summer 19.8% (95% CI 14.01?25.52), winter 18.3% (95% CI 13.15?23.56%)). The total annual loss was 28.5% (95% CI 22.42?34.51%), with each beekeeper losing, on average, 28.6%(95% CI 22.52?34.61%) of the colonies in their operation. Loss rates were similar across operations of different sizes. Queen failure, diseases and parasites, and pesticides were the leading self-reported and selfdiagnosed causes of colony losses. This study is the first to document honey bee colony losses in Uruguay, establishing a baseline for future long-term monitoring.
@ INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France, 2016 |
Palabras claves : |
AFRICANIZED HONEY BEE; HONEY BEE COLONY LOSSES; QUESTIONNAIRE; SURVEILLANCE. |
Thesagro : |
ABEJA MELIFERA; APICULTURA; APIS MELLIFERA; SISTEMAS DE VIGILANCIA; SUD AMERICA. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
Marc : |
LEADER 02189naa a2200301 a 4500 001 1057222 005 2018-12-12 008 2017 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1007/s13592-016-0482-2$2DOI 100 1 $aANTÚNEZ, K. 245 $aHoneybee colony losses in Uruguay during 2013-2014.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2017 500 $aArticle history: Received: 29 December 2015 // Revised: 21 June 2016 // Accepted 9 November 2016. La versión electrónica del artículo contiene material suplementario. 520 $aABSTRACT. High rates of honey bee colony losses have been reported worldwide; however, data about colony loss rates in South America is scarce. This study quantified colony losses experienced in Uruguay during the 2013?2014 season and identifies the self-diagnosed causes for these losses. An estimated 2.6% of all Uruguayan beekeepers, who collectively managed 5% of the estimated 550,000 colonies in the country, responded to this survey.We found that total summer and winter losses were similar (summer 19.0% (95% CI 13.26?24.77%), winter 20.2% (95% CI 14.98?25.39)), as were the average operational losses (summer 19.8% (95% CI 14.01?25.52), winter 18.3% (95% CI 13.15?23.56%)). The total annual loss was 28.5% (95% CI 22.42?34.51%), with each beekeeper losing, on average, 28.6%(95% CI 22.52?34.61%) of the colonies in their operation. Loss rates were similar across operations of different sizes. Queen failure, diseases and parasites, and pesticides were the leading self-reported and selfdiagnosed causes of colony losses. This study is the first to document honey bee colony losses in Uruguay, establishing a baseline for future long-term monitoring. @ INRA, DIB and Springer-Verlag France, 2016 650 $aABEJA MELIFERA 650 $aAPICULTURA 650 $aAPIS MELLIFERA 650 $aSISTEMAS DE VIGILANCIA 650 $aSUD AMERICA 653 $aAFRICANIZED HONEY BEE 653 $aHONEY BEE COLONY LOSSES 653 $aQUESTIONNAIRE 653 $aSURVEILLANCE 700 1 $aINVERNIZZI, C. 700 1 $aMENDOZA, Y. 700 1 $aVANENGELSDORP, D. 700 1 $aZUNINO, P. 773 $tApidologie, 2017, 48 (3), pp. 364 - 370 .
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
31/07/2017 |
Actualizado : |
13/12/2022 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
MOTTA, R. R.; SILVA, F. F.; LOPES, P. S.; TEMPELMAN, R. J.; SOLLERO, B. P.; AGUILAR, I.; CARDOSO, F. F. |
Afiliación : |
R. R. MOTTA, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech Faculty, TERRA Teaching and Research Centre, University of Liège, Gembloux, Belgium; F. F. SILVA, Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil; P. S. LOPES, Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil; R. J. TEMPELMAN, Department of Animal Science, Michigan State University, MI, USA; B. P. SOLLERO, Embrapa Pecuária Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; IGNACIO AGUILAR GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; F. F. CARDOSO, Embrapa Pecuária Sul, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; 6 Programa de Pós-graduação em Zootecnia, Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. |
Título : |
Analyses of reaction norms reveal new chromosome regions associated with tick resistance in cattle. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animal, 2018, volume 12, Issue 2, pages 205-214. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117001562 |
DOI : |
10.1017/S1751731117001562 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 12 December 2016; Accepted 22 May 2017; Published online: 13 July 2017.
Corresponding author: R.R. Mota, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech Faculty, TERRA Teaching and Research Centre, University of Liège, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium,
rrmota@ulg.ac.be -- License Under a Creative Commons. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Despite single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) availability and frequent cost reduction has allowed genome-wide association studies even in complex traits as tick resistance, the use of this information source in SNP by environment interaction context is unknown for many economically important traits in cattle. We aimed at identifying putative genomic regions explaining differences in tick resistance in Hereford and Braford cattle under SNP by environment point of view as well as to identify candidate genes derived from outliers/significant markers. The environment was defined as contemporary group means of tick counts, since they seemed to be the most appropriate entities to describe the environmental gradient in beef cattle. A total of 4363 animals having tick counts (n=10 673) originated from 197 sires and 3966 dams were used. Genotypes were acquired on 3591 of these cattle. From top 1% SNPs (410) having the greatest effects in each environment, 75 were consistently relevant in all environments, which indicated SNP by environment interaction. The outliers/significant SNPs were mapped on chromosomes 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 23, 24, 26 and 28, and potential candidate genes were detected across environments. The presence of SNP by environment interaction for tick resistance indicates that genetic expression of resistance depends upon tick burden. Markers with major portion of genetic variance explained across environments appeared to be close to genes with different direct or indirect functions related to immune system, inflammatory process and mechanisms of tissue destruction/repair, such as energy metabolism and cell differentiation. © The Animal Consortium 2017 MenosABSTRACT.- Despite single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) availability and frequent cost reduction has allowed genome-wide association studies even in complex traits as tick resistance, the use of this information source in SNP by environment interaction context is unknown for many economically important traits in cattle. We aimed at identifying putative genomic regions explaining differences in tick resistance in Hereford and Braford cattle under SNP by environment point of view as well as to identify candidate genes derived from outliers/significant markers. The environment was defined as contemporary group means of tick counts, since they seemed to be the most appropriate entities to describe the environmental gradient in beef cattle. A total of 4363 animals having tick counts (n=10 673) originated from 197 sires and 3966 dams were used. Genotypes were acquired on 3591 of these cattle. From top 1% SNPs (410) having the greatest effects in each environment, 75 were consistently relevant in all environments, which indicated SNP by environment interaction. The outliers/significant SNPs were mapped on chromosomes 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 23, 24, 26 and 28, and potential candidate genes were detected across environments. The presence of SNP by environment interaction for tick resistance indicates that genetic expression of resistance depends upon tick burden. Markers with major portion of genetic variance explained across environments appeared to be close to... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
BEEF CATTLE; CANDIDATE GENES; ENVIRONMENT GRADIENT; GENE FUNCTION; SINGLE-STEP. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16916/1/10.1017-S1751731117001562.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02878naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1057417 005 2022-12-13 008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1017/S1751731117001562$2DOI 100 1 $aMOTTA, R. R. 245 $aAnalyses of reaction norms reveal new chromosome regions associated with tick resistance in cattle.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2018 500 $aArticle history: Received 12 December 2016; Accepted 22 May 2017; Published online: 13 July 2017. Corresponding author: R.R. Mota, Gembloux Agro-Bio Tech Faculty, TERRA Teaching and Research Centre, University of Liège, B-5030 Gembloux, Belgium, rrmota@ulg.ac.be -- License Under a Creative Commons. 520 $aABSTRACT.- Despite single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) availability and frequent cost reduction has allowed genome-wide association studies even in complex traits as tick resistance, the use of this information source in SNP by environment interaction context is unknown for many economically important traits in cattle. We aimed at identifying putative genomic regions explaining differences in tick resistance in Hereford and Braford cattle under SNP by environment point of view as well as to identify candidate genes derived from outliers/significant markers. The environment was defined as contemporary group means of tick counts, since they seemed to be the most appropriate entities to describe the environmental gradient in beef cattle. A total of 4363 animals having tick counts (n=10 673) originated from 197 sires and 3966 dams were used. Genotypes were acquired on 3591 of these cattle. From top 1% SNPs (410) having the greatest effects in each environment, 75 were consistently relevant in all environments, which indicated SNP by environment interaction. The outliers/significant SNPs were mapped on chromosomes 1, 2, 5, 6, 7, 9, 11, 13, 14, 15, 16, 18, 21, 23, 24, 26 and 28, and potential candidate genes were detected across environments. The presence of SNP by environment interaction for tick resistance indicates that genetic expression of resistance depends upon tick burden. Markers with major portion of genetic variance explained across environments appeared to be close to genes with different direct or indirect functions related to immune system, inflammatory process and mechanisms of tissue destruction/repair, such as energy metabolism and cell differentiation. © The Animal Consortium 2017 653 $aBEEF CATTLE 653 $aCANDIDATE GENES 653 $aENVIRONMENT GRADIENT 653 $aGENE FUNCTION 653 $aSINGLE-STEP 700 1 $aSILVA, F. F. 700 1 $aLOPES, P. S. 700 1 $aTEMPELMAN, R. J. 700 1 $aSOLLERO, B. P. 700 1 $aAGUILAR, I. 700 1 $aCARDOSO, F. F. 773 $tAnimal, 2018, volume 12, Issue 2, pages 205-214. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731117001562
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|