| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
25/11/2015 |
|
Actualizado : |
24/06/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
RAVA, C.; FERRARO, B.; LANFRANCO, B. |
|
Afiliación : |
CATALINA RAVA ZEFFERINO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; BRUNO FERRARO ALBERTONI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; BRUNO ANTONIO LANFRANCO CRESPO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Costo de oportunidad de la tierra en la competitividad de la ganadería bovina de exportación en Uruguay. (Opportunity cost of land in the competitiveness of livestock production for export markets). |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2013 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Economía Agraria, 2013, v. 17, p. 9-21. |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
This article analyzed the weight of land in the economic performance of the primary livestock production sector, using the policy analysis matrix (PAM). The financial cost of the assets immobilized with the land factor was considered through its opportunity cost (OC). The study considered four alternatives to measure the OC: (a) a unique value given by a low-risk
interest rate; (b) differential value, using rent value for the land exploited in such regime and a low-risk interest rate for the land owned by the producer; (c) differential value, using the same average value of rent for the land exploited in the scheme and zero-rate for the rest of the land; (d) unique zero-rate value for the whole land. The results suggest that, in general, Uruguayan livestock producers do not consider a OC for the land when assessing the profitability of their activity. For them, the land is a long-term safe investment, devoid of risk. In order to capture the true rationality of the livestock producer it would be advisable to consider the OC only when the producer actually leases the land and pays a rent. In principle, for owned land, it would be better considering a zero rate OC. |
|
Palabras claves : |
BENEFICIOS PRIVADOS; COSTOS DE OPORTUNIDAD; ECONOMIC RATIONALITY; LAND RENT; MATRIZ DE ANALISIS DE POLITICAS; OPPORTUNITY COST; POLICY ANALYSIS MATRIX AND PRIVATE PROFITS; RACIONALIDAD ECONOMICA. |
|
Thesagro : |
RENTA DE LA TIERRA. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
E11 Economía de la tierra y políticas fundiarias |
|
URL : |
http://purl.umn.edu/169569
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/5293/1/Rava-C.-2013.-Economia-Agraria-v.17.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02082naa a2200253 a 4500
001 1053991
005 2021-06-24
008 2013 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aRAVA, C.
245 $aCosto de oportunidad de la tierra en la competitividad de la ganadería bovina de exportación en Uruguay. (Opportunity cost of land in the competitiveness of livestock production for export markets).$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2013
520 $aABSTRACT. This article analyzed the weight of land in the economic performance of the primary livestock production sector, using the policy analysis matrix (PAM). The financial cost of the assets immobilized with the land factor was considered through its opportunity cost (OC). The study considered four alternatives to measure the OC: (a) a unique value given by a low-risk interest rate; (b) differential value, using rent value for the land exploited in such regime and a low-risk interest rate for the land owned by the producer; (c) differential value, using the same average value of rent for the land exploited in the scheme and zero-rate for the rest of the land; (d) unique zero-rate value for the whole land. The results suggest that, in general, Uruguayan livestock producers do not consider a OC for the land when assessing the profitability of their activity. For them, the land is a long-term safe investment, devoid of risk. In order to capture the true rationality of the livestock producer it would be advisable to consider the OC only when the producer actually leases the land and pays a rent. In principle, for owned land, it would be better considering a zero rate OC.
650 $aRENTA DE LA TIERRA
653 $aBENEFICIOS PRIVADOS
653 $aCOSTOS DE OPORTUNIDAD
653 $aECONOMIC RATIONALITY
653 $aLAND RENT
653 $aMATRIZ DE ANALISIS DE POLITICAS
653 $aOPPORTUNITY COST
653 $aPOLICY ANALYSIS MATRIX AND PRIVATE PROFITS
653 $aRACIONALIDAD ECONOMICA
700 1 $aFERRARO, B.
700 1 $aLANFRANCO, B.
773 $tEconomía Agraria, 2013$gv. 17, p. 9-21.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 69 | |
| 26. |  | FERRARO, B.; OVIEDO, S.; GUTIERREZ, N. (Ed.). Plan Estratégico 2016-2020 Visión 2030. Ciencia y tecnología para un agro inteligente, innovador, competitivo y sostenible, al servicio del país. Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2017. 60 p. (Temas Institucionales; 15) Miembros de la Junta Directiva de INIA: Ing. Agr., MSc., PhD. Álvaro Roel, Presidente; D.M.T.V., PhD. José Luis Repetto, Vicepresidente; Ing. Agr. Jorge Peñagaricano; Ing. Agr., MSc. Diego Payssé; Ing. Agr. Pablo Gorriti; Ing. Agr....| Tipo: Temas Institucionales |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
|    |
| 40. | | SILVA, M.E.; BERVEJILLO, J.; LANFRANCO, B.; FERRARO, B. La iniciativa "Red de soluciones para el desarrollo sostenible" y las políticas públicas de intensificación sostenible en Uruguay. In: BERVEJILLO, J.; CAYOTA, S.; GÓMEZ MILLER, R. (Eds.). Desafíos de la intensificación sostenible para la política pública. Convenio INIA-OPYPA/MGAP. Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2016. p. 85-89 (Serie Técnica; 227) El equipo de base de este proyecto se conformó por Mario Mondelli (OPYPA), José Bervejillo (OPYPA), M. Eugenia Silva (OPYPA), Bruno Lanfranco (INIA), Bruno Ferraro (INIA), Rodrigo Saldías (INIA), Cecilia Penengo (IRI ? INIA), David Kanter...| Tipo: Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 69 | |
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
