|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
15/06/2021 |
Actualizado : |
15/06/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
PRETI, M.; KNIGHT, A.L.; MUJICA, V.; BASOALTO, E.; FAVARO, R.; ANGELI, S. |
Afiliación : |
MICHELE PRETI, Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.; ALAN LEE KNIGHT, Instar Biologicals, Yakima, WA, USA.; MARIA VALENTINA MUJICA TELIZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ESTEBAN BASOALTO, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Instituto de Producción y Sanidad Vegetal, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile.; RICCARDO FAVARO, Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy.; SERGIO ANGELI, Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy. |
Título : |
Developing female removal for Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) in organic pear in the USA and Italy. |
Complemento del título : |
Original contribution. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Applied Entomology, 2021. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12918 |
ISSN : |
0931-2048 |
DOI : |
https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12918 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 10 February 2021; Revised 19 May 2021; Accepted 20 May 2021; First published: 05 June 2021.
Corresponding author: Angeli, S.; Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy; email:sergio.angeli@unibz.it |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Seventeen trials were conducted using traps baited with kairomone-based lures to evaluate female removal (FR) as an effective management tactic for codling moth, Cydia pomonella, L., in organic pear, Pyrus communis L., production in Italy and USA during 2019?2020. Studies included paired plots (0.4?1.4 ha) treated with or without 60 traps ha?1 in cultivars Bartlett and Abate Fétel. Paired plots were also treated together with or without mating disruption (MD) and with similar spray programmes. Three-, four-, and five-component lures were used with several trap types: green, clear or green/white bucket traps and orange delta traps. The three-component lure consisted of (E,E)-8,10-dodecadien-1-ol (sex pheromone, PH), (E,Z)-2,4-ethyl decadienoate (pear ester, PE) and acetic acid (AA); the four-component lure was PE, (E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene (DMNT), 6-ethenyl-2,2,6-trimethyloxan-3-ol (pyranoid linalool oxide, LOX), and AA, and the five-component lure had PH added. Preliminary studies were also conducted to evaluate the trapping efficacy of non-saturating bucket traps. A clear bucket trap baited with PE/DMNT/LOX + AA captured 97-fold more codling moth females than an orange delta trap baited with PH/PE. However, female captures did not differ between traps when both were baited with the four-component lure. Fruit injury from codling moth was significantly reduced with the implementation of FR in both pear production regions. At harvest, mean fruit protection in the USA studies was 65% and 27% in Italy. This difference was likely associated with the four-component lure being less effective in Italy than in the USA. Nevertheless, results demonstrate that FR can be a useful approach to remove females immigrating into orchards and as a new tactic to reduce pest pressure in selected areas of orchards allowing both MD and organic insecticide programmes to be more effective. Further studies should investigate the cost-benefit of matching the intensity of FR to variable pest pressures.
© 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Entomology published by Wiley-VCH GmbH. MenosABSTRACT.
Seventeen trials were conducted using traps baited with kairomone-based lures to evaluate female removal (FR) as an effective management tactic for codling moth, Cydia pomonella, L., in organic pear, Pyrus communis L., production in Italy and USA during 2019?2020. Studies included paired plots (0.4?1.4 ha) treated with or without 60 traps ha?1 in cultivars Bartlett and Abate Fétel. Paired plots were also treated together with or without mating disruption (MD) and with similar spray programmes. Three-, four-, and five-component lures were used with several trap types: green, clear or green/white bucket traps and orange delta traps. The three-component lure consisted of (E,E)-8,10-dodecadien-1-ol (sex pheromone, PH), (E,Z)-2,4-ethyl decadienoate (pear ester, PE) and acetic acid (AA); the four-component lure was PE, (E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene (DMNT), 6-ethenyl-2,2,6-trimethyloxan-3-ol (pyranoid linalool oxide, LOX), and AA, and the five-component lure had PH added. Preliminary studies were also conducted to evaluate the trapping efficacy of non-saturating bucket traps. A clear bucket trap baited with PE/DMNT/LOX + AA captured 97-fold more codling moth females than an orange delta trap baited with PH/PE. However, female captures did not differ between traps when both were baited with the four-component lure. Fruit injury from codling moth was significantly reduced with the implementation of FR in both pear production regions. At harvest, mean fruit protection in... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Bucket trap; Codling moth; Mass trapping; Organic pest management. |
Thesagro : |
PYRUS COMMUNIS. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
URL : |
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jen.12918
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03209naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1062137 005 2021-06-15 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0931-2048 024 7 $ahttps://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12918$2DOI 100 1 $aPRETI, M. 245 $aDeveloping female removal for Cydia pomonella (Lepidoptera$bTortricidae) in organic pear in the USA and Italy.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 500 $aArticle history: Received 10 February 2021; Revised 19 May 2021; Accepted 20 May 2021; First published: 05 June 2021. Corresponding author: Angeli, S.; Faculty of Science and Technology, Free University of Bozen-Bolzano, Bolzano, Italy; email:sergio.angeli@unibz.it 520 $aABSTRACT. Seventeen trials were conducted using traps baited with kairomone-based lures to evaluate female removal (FR) as an effective management tactic for codling moth, Cydia pomonella, L., in organic pear, Pyrus communis L., production in Italy and USA during 2019?2020. Studies included paired plots (0.4?1.4 ha) treated with or without 60 traps ha?1 in cultivars Bartlett and Abate Fétel. Paired plots were also treated together with or without mating disruption (MD) and with similar spray programmes. Three-, four-, and five-component lures were used with several trap types: green, clear or green/white bucket traps and orange delta traps. The three-component lure consisted of (E,E)-8,10-dodecadien-1-ol (sex pheromone, PH), (E,Z)-2,4-ethyl decadienoate (pear ester, PE) and acetic acid (AA); the four-component lure was PE, (E)-4,8-dimethyl-1,3,7-nonatriene (DMNT), 6-ethenyl-2,2,6-trimethyloxan-3-ol (pyranoid linalool oxide, LOX), and AA, and the five-component lure had PH added. Preliminary studies were also conducted to evaluate the trapping efficacy of non-saturating bucket traps. A clear bucket trap baited with PE/DMNT/LOX + AA captured 97-fold more codling moth females than an orange delta trap baited with PH/PE. However, female captures did not differ between traps when both were baited with the four-component lure. Fruit injury from codling moth was significantly reduced with the implementation of FR in both pear production regions. At harvest, mean fruit protection in the USA studies was 65% and 27% in Italy. This difference was likely associated with the four-component lure being less effective in Italy than in the USA. Nevertheless, results demonstrate that FR can be a useful approach to remove females immigrating into orchards and as a new tactic to reduce pest pressure in selected areas of orchards allowing both MD and organic insecticide programmes to be more effective. Further studies should investigate the cost-benefit of matching the intensity of FR to variable pest pressures. © 2021 The Authors. Journal of Applied Entomology published by Wiley-VCH GmbH. 650 $aPYRUS COMMUNIS 653 $aBucket trap 653 $aCodling moth 653 $aMass trapping 653 $aOrganic pest management 700 1 $aKNIGHT, A.L. 700 1 $aMUJICA, V. 700 1 $aBASOALTO, E. 700 1 $aFAVARO, R. 700 1 $aANGELI, S. 773 $tJournal of Applied Entomology, 2021. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12918
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registros recuperados : 167 | |
Registros recuperados : 167 | |
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|