|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
20/06/2015 |
Actualizado : |
20/06/2015 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Informes Agroclimáticos |
Autor : |
GIMENEZ, A.; CASTAÑO, J.; FUREST, J.; CAL, A.; TISCORNIA, G.; SCHIAVI, C. |
Afiliación : |
AGUSTIN EDUARDO GIMENEZ FUREST, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOSE PEDRO CASTAÑO SANCHEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOSE MARIA FUREST CROCCO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ADRIAN TABARE CAL ALVAREZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUADALUPE TISCORNIA TOSAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CARLOS IGNACIO SCHIAVI RAMPELBERG, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Informe Agroclimático 2014 - Situación a Febrero. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2014 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2014. |
Páginas : |
4 p. |
Idioma : |
Español |
Palabras claves : |
AGROCLIMA; AGROCLIMATOLOGÍA; BOLETIN AGROCLIMÁTICO; CARACTERIZACIÓN AGROCLIMÁTICA; DIRECCION VIENTO; ESTACIONES AGROMETEOROLOGICAS; ESTACIONES AUTOMATICAS; ESTACIONES INIA; ESTADO DEL TIEMPO; ESTRÉS HÍDRICO; GRAFICAS AGROCLIMATICOS; GRAS; HELIOFANOGRAFO; INFORMACION SATELITAL; INUNDACIONES; LLUVIAS DIARIAS; MAXIMA; MEDIA; MINIMA; PANEL SOLAR; PERSPECTIVAS CLIMATICAS; PLUVIOMETRO; PRECIPITACION NACIONAL; PREVENCION HELADAS; PRONOSTICO; SENSOR; SIMETRICO; TANQUE A; TERMOCUPLAS; TERMOHIDROGRAFO; VARIABLES AGROCLIMATICAS; VELETA. |
Thesagro : |
AGROCLIMATOLOGIA; CAMBIO CLIMATICO; CLIMA; CLIMATOLOGIA; ESTACIONES METEOROLOGICAS; ESTRES HIDRICO; EVAPORACION; EVAPOTRANSPIRACION; HUMEDAD; HUMEDAD RELATIVA; LLUVIA; METEOROLOGIA; PERSPECTIVAS; PLUVIOMETROS; PRONOSTICO DEL TIEMPO; SENSORES; SISTEMAS; SISTEMAS DE INFORMACION; SUELO; TEMPERATURA; TERMOMETROS. |
Asunto categoría : |
P40 Meteorología y climatología |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/4732/1/Inf.Agr.-febrero-2014.pdf
http://www.inia.uy/Publicaciones/Paginas/Informe-agroclimatico-2014---Situacion-Febrero.aspx
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02093nam a2200805 a 4500 001 1052888 005 2015-06-20 008 2014 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 100 1 $aGIMENEZ, A. 245 $aInforme Agroclimático 2014 - Situación a Febrero.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aMontevideo (Uruguay): INIA$c2014 300 $a4 p. 650 $aAGROCLIMATOLOGIA 650 $aCAMBIO CLIMATICO 650 $aCLIMA 650 $aCLIMATOLOGIA 650 $aESTACIONES METEOROLOGICAS 650 $aESTRES HIDRICO 650 $aEVAPORACION 650 $aEVAPOTRANSPIRACION 650 $aHUMEDAD 650 $aHUMEDAD RELATIVA 650 $aLLUVIA 650 $aMETEOROLOGIA 650 $aPERSPECTIVAS 650 $aPLUVIOMETROS 650 $aPRONOSTICO DEL TIEMPO 650 $aSENSORES 650 $aSISTEMAS 650 $aSISTEMAS DE INFORMACION 650 $aSUELO 650 $aTEMPERATURA 650 $aTERMOMETROS 653 $aAGROCLIMA 653 $aAGROCLIMATOLOGÍA 653 $aBOLETIN AGROCLIMÁTICO 653 $aCARACTERIZACIÓN AGROCLIMÁTICA 653 $aDIRECCION VIENTO 653 $aESTACIONES AGROMETEOROLOGICAS 653 $aESTACIONES AUTOMATICAS 653 $aESTACIONES INIA 653 $aESTADO DEL TIEMPO 653 $aESTRÉS HÍDRICO 653 $aGRAFICAS AGROCLIMATICOS 653 $aGRAS 653 $aHELIOFANOGRAFO 653 $aINFORMACION SATELITAL 653 $aINUNDACIONES 653 $aLLUVIAS DIARIAS 653 $aMAXIMA 653 $aMEDIA 653 $aMINIMA 653 $aPANEL SOLAR 653 $aPERSPECTIVAS CLIMATICAS 653 $aPLUVIOMETRO 653 $aPRECIPITACION NACIONAL 653 $aPREVENCION HELADAS 653 $aPRONOSTICO 653 $aSENSOR 653 $aSIMETRICO 653 $aTANQUE A 653 $aTERMOCUPLAS 653 $aTERMOHIDROGRAFO 653 $aVARIABLES AGROCLIMATICAS 653 $aVELETA 700 1 $aCASTAÑO, J. 700 1 $aFUREST, J. 700 1 $aCAL, A. 700 1 $aTISCORNIA, G. 700 1 $aSCHIAVI, C.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
27/01/2020 |
Actualizado : |
29/05/2020 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
SILVA, D.A.; COSTA, C.N.; SILVA, A.A.; SILVA, H.T.; LOPES, P.S.; SILVA, F.F.; VERONEZE, R.; THOMPSON, G.; AGUILAR, I.; CARVALHEIRA, J. |
Afiliación : |
DELVAN ALVES SILVA, Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil; CLAUDIO NÁPOLIS COSTA, Embrapa Dairy Cattle, Juiz de Fora, Brazil; ALESSANDRA ALVES SILVA, Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil; HUGO TEIXEIRA SILVA, Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil; PAULO SÁVIO LOPES, Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil; FABYANO FONSECA SILVA, Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil; RENATA VERONEZE, Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, Brazil; GERTRUDE THOMPSON, Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources (CIBIO-InBio), University of Porto, Vairão, Portugal; Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Vairão, Portugal; IGNACIO AGUILAR GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JÚLIO CARVALHEIRA, Research Center in Biodiversity and Genetic Resources (CIBIO-InBio), University of Porto, Vairão, Portugal; Institute of Biomedical Sciences Abel Salazar (ICBAS), University of Porto, Vairão, Portugal. |
Título : |
Autoregressive and random regression test-day models for multiple lactations in genetic evaluation of Brazilian Holstein cattle. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 1 May 2020, Volume 137, Issue 3, Pages 305-315. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12459 |
ISSN : |
0931-2668 |
DOI : |
10.1111/jbg.12459 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 10 July 2019 / Revised: 31 October 2019 / Accepted: 3 November 2019 / First published: 08 December 2019.
Funding information: The authors acknowledge the Brazilian Holstein Cattle Breeders Association (ABCBRH) for providing data for this study. This study was partially financed by Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel and Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (CAPES/FCT, nº 99999.008462/2014‐03 and 88887.125450/2016‐00), and National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq 465377/2014‐9 ‐ PROGRAMA INCT and CNPq 142467/20154). |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Autoregressive (AR) and random regression (RR) models were fitted to test-day records from the first three lactations of Brazilian Holstein cattle with the objective of comparing their efficiency for national genetic evaluations. The data comprised 4,142,740 records of milk yield (MY) and somatic cell score (SCS) from 274,335 cows belonging to 2,322 herds. Although heritabilities were similar between models and traits, additive genetic variance estimates using AR were 7.0 (MY) and 22.2% (SCS) higher than those obtained from RR model. On the other hand, residual variances were lower in both traits when estimated through AR model. The rank correlation between EBV obtained from AR and RR models was 0.96 and 0.94 (MY) and 0.97 and 0.95 (SCS), respectively, for bulls (with 10 or more daughters) and cows. Estimated annual genetic gains for bulls (cows) obtained using AR were 46.11 (49.50) kg for MY and −0.019 (−0.025) score for SCS; whereas using RR these values were 47.70 (55.56) kg and −0.022 (−0.028) score. Akaike information criterion was lower for AR in both traits. Although AR model is more parsimonious, RR model assumes genetic correlations different from the unity within and across lactations. Thus, when these correlations are relatively high, these models tend to yield to similar predictions; otherwise, they will differ more and RR model would be theoretically sounder.
© 2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbH |
Palabras claves : |
Autoregression; Dairy cattle; Legendre polynomials; Random regression. |
Asunto categoría : |
L10 Genética y mejoramiento animal |
Marc : |
LEADER 03092naa a2200313 a 4500 001 1060695 005 2020-05-29 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0931-2668 024 7 $a10.1111/jbg.12459$2DOI 100 1 $aSILVA, D.A. 245 $aAutoregressive and random regression test-day models for multiple lactations in genetic evaluation of Brazilian Holstein cattle.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2020 500 $aArticle history: Received: 10 July 2019 / Revised: 31 October 2019 / Accepted: 3 November 2019 / First published: 08 December 2019. Funding information: The authors acknowledge the Brazilian Holstein Cattle Breeders Association (ABCBRH) for providing data for this study. This study was partially financed by Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel and Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (CAPES/FCT, nº 99999.008462/2014‐03 and 88887.125450/2016‐00), and National Council of Technological and Scientific Development (CNPq 465377/2014‐9 ‐ PROGRAMA INCT and CNPq 142467/20154). 520 $aABSTRACT. Autoregressive (AR) and random regression (RR) models were fitted to test-day records from the first three lactations of Brazilian Holstein cattle with the objective of comparing their efficiency for national genetic evaluations. The data comprised 4,142,740 records of milk yield (MY) and somatic cell score (SCS) from 274,335 cows belonging to 2,322 herds. Although heritabilities were similar between models and traits, additive genetic variance estimates using AR were 7.0 (MY) and 22.2% (SCS) higher than those obtained from RR model. On the other hand, residual variances were lower in both traits when estimated through AR model. The rank correlation between EBV obtained from AR and RR models was 0.96 and 0.94 (MY) and 0.97 and 0.95 (SCS), respectively, for bulls (with 10 or more daughters) and cows. Estimated annual genetic gains for bulls (cows) obtained using AR were 46.11 (49.50) kg for MY and −0.019 (−0.025) score for SCS; whereas using RR these values were 47.70 (55.56) kg and −0.022 (−0.028) score. Akaike information criterion was lower for AR in both traits. Although AR model is more parsimonious, RR model assumes genetic correlations different from the unity within and across lactations. Thus, when these correlations are relatively high, these models tend to yield to similar predictions; otherwise, they will differ more and RR model would be theoretically sounder. © 2019 Blackwell Verlag GmbH 653 $aAutoregression 653 $aDairy cattle 653 $aLegendre polynomials 653 $aRandom regression 700 1 $aCOSTA, C.N. 700 1 $aSILVA, A.A. 700 1 $aSILVA, H.T. 700 1 $aLOPES, P.S. 700 1 $aSILVA, F.F. 700 1 $aVERONEZE, R. 700 1 $aTHOMPSON, G. 700 1 $aAGUILAR, I. 700 1 $aCARVALHEIRA, J. 773 $tJournal of Animal Breeding and Genetics, 1 May 2020, Volume 137, Issue 3, Pages 305-315. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jbg.12459
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|