| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
22/02/2014 |
|
Autor : |
Doorembos, J. ; Kassam, A.H. ; Bentvelsen, C.L.M. ; Branscheid, V. ; Plusje, J.M.G.A. ; Smith, M. ; Uittenbogaard, G.O. ; Van der wal, H.K. |
|
Título : |
Yield response to water |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
1979 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Roma (Italia): FAO, 1979. |
|
Páginas : |
176p. |
|
Serie : |
Irrigation and Drainage (FAO) |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Thesagro : |
ABASTECIMIENTO DE AGUA; ALFALFA; ALGODON; ARROZ; BANANO; CACAHUETE; CAñA DE AZUCAR; CEBOLLA; COL; DOSIS DE RIEGO; EVAPOTRANSPIRACION; FACTORES DE RENDIMIENTO; FRIJOL (PHASEOLUS); FRUTAS CITRICAS; GUISANTE; HELIANTHUS ANNUUS; MAIZ; NECESIDADES DE AGUA; OLEA EUROPAEA; PAPA; PIñA; RELACIONES PLANTA AGUA; REMOLACHA AZUCARERA; RENDIMIENTO DE CULTIVOS; SANDIA; SOJA; SORGOS; TABACO; TOMATE; TRIGO; USO DEL AGUA; VID. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01420nam a2200589 a 4500
001 1000874
005 2014-02-22
008 1979 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aDOOREMBOS, J.
245 $aYield response to water
260 $aRoma (Italia): FAO$c1979
300 $a176p.
490 $aIrrigation and Drainage (FAO)
650 $aABASTECIMIENTO DE AGUA
650 $aALFALFA
650 $aALGODON
650 $aARROZ
650 $aBANANO
650 $aCACAHUETE
650 $aCAñA DE AZUCAR
650 $aCEBOLLA
650 $aCOL
650 $aDOSIS DE RIEGO
650 $aEVAPOTRANSPIRACION
650 $aFACTORES DE RENDIMIENTO
650 $aFRIJOL (PHASEOLUS)
650 $aFRUTAS CITRICAS
650 $aGUISANTE
650 $aHELIANTHUS ANNUUS
650 $aMAIZ
650 $aNECESIDADES DE AGUA
650 $aOLEA EUROPAEA
650 $aPAPA
650 $aPIñA
650 $aRELACIONES PLANTA AGUA
650 $aREMOLACHA AZUCARERA
650 $aRENDIMIENTO DE CULTIVOS
650 $aSANDIA
650 $aSOJA
650 $aSORGOS
650 $aTABACO
650 $aTOMATE
650 $aTRIGO
650 $aUSO DEL AGUA
650 $aVID
700 1 $aKASSAM, A.H.
700 1 $aBENTVELSEN, C.L.M.
700 1 $aBRANSCHEID, V.
700 1 $aPLUSJE, J.M.G.A.
700 1 $aSMITH, M.
700 1 $aUITTENBOGAARD, G.O.
700 1 $aVAN DER WAL, H.K.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
07/03/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
30/11/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
VASEN, F.; SIERRA, M. |
|
Afiliación : |
FEDERICO VASEN, Universidad de Buenos Aires-CONICET, Buenos Aires, Argentina; MIGUEL OSCAR SIERRA PEREIRO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
"The Hardest Task"-peer review and the evaluation of technological activities. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Minerva, 2022, Volume 60, Issue 3, pages 375-395. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09461-0 |
|
ISSN : |
0026-4695 (print); 1573-1871 (electronic) |
|
DOI : |
10.1007/s11024-022-09461-0 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Accepted 24 January 2022; Published 07 March 2022; To be published September 2022. -- Corresponding author: Federico Vasen, fvasen@uba.ar ---
This work was supported by Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria and Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica [grant PICT2018-2794]. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Technology development and innovation are fundamentally different from scientific research. However, in many circumstances, they are evaluated jointly and by the same processes. In these cases, peer review -the most usual procedure for evaluating research - is also applied to the evaluation of technological products and innovation activities. This can lead to unfair results and end up discouraging the involvement of researchers in these fields. This paper analyzes the evaluation processes in Uruguay's National System of Researchers. In this system, all members' activities, both scientific and technological, are evaluated by peer committees. Based on documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews, the difficulties faced by evaluators in assessing technology products are explored. The article highlights the persistence of a linear conception of the link between science and technology and describes the obstacles to assimilate the particularities of technological activities. Refereed publications are presented as the only uncontested product. Other types of output are reviewed with suspicion. This study emphasizes the need for specific mechanisms to evaluate technological production within academic careers.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022 |
|
Palabras claves : |
Latin America; National system of researchers; Peer review; Research evaluation; Technological outputs; Uruguay. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02398naa a2200241 a 4500
001 1062792
005 2022-11-30
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0026-4695 (print); 1573-1871 (electronic)
024 7 $a10.1007/s11024-022-09461-0$2DOI
100 1 $aVASEN, F.
245 $a"The Hardest Task"-peer review and the evaluation of technological activities.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history: Accepted 24 January 2022; Published 07 March 2022; To be published September 2022. -- Corresponding author: Federico Vasen, fvasen@uba.ar --- This work was supported by Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria and Agencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y Tecnológica [grant PICT2018-2794].
520 $aABSTRACT.- Technology development and innovation are fundamentally different from scientific research. However, in many circumstances, they are evaluated jointly and by the same processes. In these cases, peer review -the most usual procedure for evaluating research - is also applied to the evaluation of technological products and innovation activities. This can lead to unfair results and end up discouraging the involvement of researchers in these fields. This paper analyzes the evaluation processes in Uruguay's National System of Researchers. In this system, all members' activities, both scientific and technological, are evaluated by peer committees. Based on documentary analysis and semi-structured interviews, the difficulties faced by evaluators in assessing technology products are explored. The article highlights the persistence of a linear conception of the link between science and technology and describes the obstacles to assimilate the particularities of technological activities. Refereed publications are presented as the only uncontested product. Other types of output are reviewed with suspicion. This study emphasizes the need for specific mechanisms to evaluate technological production within academic careers. © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2022
653 $aLatin America
653 $aNational system of researchers
653 $aPeer review
653 $aResearch evaluation
653 $aTechnological outputs
653 $aUruguay
700 1 $aSIERRA, M.
773 $tMinerva, 2022, Volume 60, Issue 3, pages 375-395. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11024-022-09461-0
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
