| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha : |
02/04/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
24/02/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autor : |
HELGUERA, M.; ABUGALIEVA, A.; BATTENFIELD, S.; BÉKÉS, F.; BRANLARD, G.; CUNIBERTI, M.; HÜSKEN,A.; JOHANSSON, E.; MORRIS, C.F.; NURIT, E.; SISSONS, M.; VÁZQUEZ, D. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARCELO HELGUERA, National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), Marcos Juárez, Argentina .; AIGUL ABUGALIEVA, Kazakh Scientific Research Institute of Agriculture and Plant Growing, Almalybak, Kazakhstan.; SARAH BATTENFIELD, Syngenta, Junction City, KS, USA.; FERENC BÉKÉS, FBFD PTY LTD, Sydney, NSW, Australia.; GÉRARD BRANLARD, INRAE, UCA UMR1095 GDEC, Clermont-Ferrand, France.; MARTHA CUNIBERTI, Wheat and Soybean Quality Laboratory, National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.; ALEXANDRA HÜSKEN, Department of Safety and Quality of CerealsMax Rubner-Institut, Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food Detmold, Germany.; EVA JOHANSSON, Department of Plant Breeding The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.; CRAIG F. MORRIS, Western Wheat Quality LaboratoryUSDA-ARS,Pullman,USA.; ERIC NURIT, Mazan,France.; MIKE SISSONS, NSW Department of Primary Industries Tamworth Centre for Crop Improvement Calala, Australia.; DANIEL VÁZQUEZ PEYRONEL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Grain Quality in Breeding. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: Igrejas G., Ikeda T., Guzmán C. (eds). Wheat Quality For Improving Processing And Human Health. Cham:Springer. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34163-3_12 |
|
Páginas : |
p. 273-307. |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history:First Online: 18 March 2020. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
Technological (processing performance and end-product) and nutritional quality of wheat is in principle determined by a number of compounds within the wheat grain, including proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, minerals, heavy metals, vitamins and phytochemicals, effecting these characters. The genotype and environment is of similar importance for the determination of the content and composition of these compounds. Furthermore, the interaction between genotypes and the cultivation environment may play a significant role. Many studies have evaluated whether the genotype or the environment plays the major role in determining the content of the mentioned compounds. An overall conclusion of these studies is that except for compounds encoded by single major genes, importance of certain factors mainly depend on how wide environments and how diverse cultivars are within these comparative studies. Comparing environments all over, e.g. across Latin America, ends up with a high significance of the environment while large studies including genotypes of wide genetic background result in a significant role for the genotype. In addition, for some technological properties and components, genotype has a higher effect (e.g. grain hardness and gluten proteins), while environment influences stronger on others (e.g. protein and mineral content).Content and concentration of proteins, but also to some extent of starch, some non-starch polysaccharides and lipids, are essential in determining the technological quality of a wheat flour. For nutritional quality of the flour, the majority of the compounds are together the important determinant. Thus an increased understanding of environmental effects is essential. As to how the environment is influencing the content of the compounds, there are some differences. The protein content and composition is strongly affected by environmental factors influencing nitrogen availability and cultivar development time. However, these two factors are impacted by a range of environmental (temperature, precipitation, humidity/sun hours, etc.) and agronomic (soil properties, crop management practices such as seeding density, nitrogen fertilizer application timing and amount, etc.) components. Thus, to understand the interplay between the various environmental and agronomic factors impacting the technological quality of a wheat flour, modeling is a useful tool. Several other compounds, including minerals and heavy metals, are to a higher extent determined by site specific variation, resulting in similar rankings of entries across locations, although the total content is varying among years. The bioactive compounds and vitamins are a part of the defense mechanisms of plants and thus there is a variation in these compounds depending on prevailing biotic and abiotic stresses (heat, drought, excess rainfall, nutrition, diseases and pests). Thus, even for nutritional quality of wheat, incorporating all compounds of relevance in the evaluation would benefit from modeling tools. MenosAbstract:
Technological (processing performance and end-product) and nutritional quality of wheat is in principle determined by a number of compounds within the wheat grain, including proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, minerals, heavy metals, vitamins and phytochemicals, effecting these characters. The genotype and environment is of similar importance for the determination of the content and composition of these compounds. Furthermore, the interaction between genotypes and the cultivation environment may play a significant role. Many studies have evaluated whether the genotype or the environment plays the major role in determining the content of the mentioned compounds. An overall conclusion of these studies is that except for compounds encoded by single major genes, importance of certain factors mainly depend on how wide environments and how diverse cultivars are within these comparative studies. Comparing environments all over, e.g. across Latin America, ends up with a high significance of the environment while large studies including genotypes of wide genetic background result in a significant role for the genotype. In addition, for some technological properties and components, genotype has a higher effect (e.g. grain hardness and gluten proteins), while environment influences stronger on others (e.g. protein and mineral content).Content and concentration of proteins, but also to some extent of starch, some non-starch polysaccharides and lipids, are essential in determini... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
CASE-STUDIES; DURUM-WHEAT; NUTRITIONAL-QUALITY; PLATAFORMA AGROALIMENTOS; QUALITY-SELECTION; SOFT-WHEAT; WILD-RELATIVES. |
|
Thesagro : |
TRIGO. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F30 Genética vegetal y fitomejoramiento |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04132naa a2200373 a 4500
001 1060983
005 2022-02-24
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aHELGUERA, M.
245 $aGrain Quality in Breeding.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
300 $ap. 273-307.
500 $aArticle history:First Online: 18 March 2020.
520 $aAbstract: Technological (processing performance and end-product) and nutritional quality of wheat is in principle determined by a number of compounds within the wheat grain, including proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, minerals, heavy metals, vitamins and phytochemicals, effecting these characters. The genotype and environment is of similar importance for the determination of the content and composition of these compounds. Furthermore, the interaction between genotypes and the cultivation environment may play a significant role. Many studies have evaluated whether the genotype or the environment plays the major role in determining the content of the mentioned compounds. An overall conclusion of these studies is that except for compounds encoded by single major genes, importance of certain factors mainly depend on how wide environments and how diverse cultivars are within these comparative studies. Comparing environments all over, e.g. across Latin America, ends up with a high significance of the environment while large studies including genotypes of wide genetic background result in a significant role for the genotype. In addition, for some technological properties and components, genotype has a higher effect (e.g. grain hardness and gluten proteins), while environment influences stronger on others (e.g. protein and mineral content).Content and concentration of proteins, but also to some extent of starch, some non-starch polysaccharides and lipids, are essential in determining the technological quality of a wheat flour. For nutritional quality of the flour, the majority of the compounds are together the important determinant. Thus an increased understanding of environmental effects is essential. As to how the environment is influencing the content of the compounds, there are some differences. The protein content and composition is strongly affected by environmental factors influencing nitrogen availability and cultivar development time. However, these two factors are impacted by a range of environmental (temperature, precipitation, humidity/sun hours, etc.) and agronomic (soil properties, crop management practices such as seeding density, nitrogen fertilizer application timing and amount, etc.) components. Thus, to understand the interplay between the various environmental and agronomic factors impacting the technological quality of a wheat flour, modeling is a useful tool. Several other compounds, including minerals and heavy metals, are to a higher extent determined by site specific variation, resulting in similar rankings of entries across locations, although the total content is varying among years. The bioactive compounds and vitamins are a part of the defense mechanisms of plants and thus there is a variation in these compounds depending on prevailing biotic and abiotic stresses (heat, drought, excess rainfall, nutrition, diseases and pests). Thus, even for nutritional quality of wheat, incorporating all compounds of relevance in the evaluation would benefit from modeling tools.
650 $aTRIGO
653 $aCASE-STUDIES
653 $aDURUM-WHEAT
653 $aNUTRITIONAL-QUALITY
653 $aPLATAFORMA AGROALIMENTOS
653 $aQUALITY-SELECTION
653 $aSOFT-WHEAT
653 $aWILD-RELATIVES
700 1 $aABUGALIEVA, A.
700 1 $aBATTENFIELD, S.
700 1 $aBÉKÉS, F.
700 1 $aBRANLARD, G.
700 1 $aCUNIBERTI, M.
700 1 $aHÜSKEN,A.
700 1 $aJOHANSSON, E.
700 1 $aMORRIS, C.F.
700 1 $aNURIT, E.
700 1 $aSISSONS, M.
700 1 $aVÁZQUEZ, D.
773 $tIn: Igrejas G., Ikeda T., Guzmán C. (eds). Wheat Quality For Improving Processing And Human Health. Cham:Springer. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34163-3_12
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
25/10/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
25/10/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
DORSCH, M.; CANTÓN, G.J.; DRIEMEIER, D.; ANDERSON, M.L.; MOELLER, R.B.; GIANNITTI, F. |
|
Afiliación : |
MATÍAS ANDRÉS DORSCH, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GERMÁN J. CANTÓN, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina.; DAVID DRIEMEIER, .Setor de Patologia Veterinária, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil.; MARK L. ANDERSON, California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory (CAHFS), University of California, Davis, USA; ROBERT B. MOELLER, California Animal Health and Food Safety Laboratory (CAHFS), University of California, Davis, USA; FEDERICO GIANNITTI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Bacterial, protozoal and viral abortions in sheep and goats in South America: A review. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Small Ruminant Research, Volume 205, December 2021, 106547. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2021.106547 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.smallrumres.2021.106547 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 18 May 2021/ Received in revised form 11 August 2021/ Accepted 30 September 2021/ Available online 6 October 2021. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:Bacterial, protozoal and viral diseases are major causes of abortion in sheep and goats. These agents cause significant economic losses, and many are considered of concern for public health (zoonotic pathogens) and/or the international trade of livestock, such as those causing diseases notifiable to the World Organization of Animal Health (OIE). In South America, information about their occurrence, prevalence and economic impact is scarce. We review the available literature on bacterial, protozoal and viral abortifacients identified through laboratory testing in sheep and goats in South America and discuss whether the diagnostic investigations are conclusive in demonstrating abortion causality. We also compile information on diagnostic methods recommended by the OIE for the laboratory diagnosis of these abortifacients and on salient fetoplacental lesions induced by them. Campylobacteriosis (Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus), listeriosis (Listeria ivanovii), chlamydiosis (Chlamydia abortus), toxoplasmosis, neosporosis and sarcocystiosis have been confirmed as small ruminant abortifacients in this region. Brucella ovis, Brucella melitensis, Campylobacter jejuni, Chlamydia pecorum, Coxiella burnetii, Leptospira spp., Bacillus licheniformis and bluetongue virus, are probable causes of abortion in the region since they have been detected in aborted fetuses and/or associated with abortions through seroepidemiologic studies. Listeria monocytogenes, Histophilus ovis, Actinobacillus seminis, Trueperella pyogenes, Yersinia spp., Trypanosoma vivax, caprine herpesvirus 1 and pestiviruses also infect small ruminants in the region and could thus be considered possible causes of abortion, although they have not been associated with abortion in South America (i.e., not detected in aborted fetuses nor associated with abortion through seroepidemiologic studies). Other agents such as Flexispira rappini, Francisella tularensis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Rift Valley fever virus, Wesselbron disease virus and bunyaviruses, known to be abortifacients for sheep and goats in other regions of the world, have not been documented in South America. While some of these agents could be exotic in this subcontinent, others may have been undiagnosed considering the limitations of active animal disease surveillance systems, which hamper the eventual detection of emerging, re-emerging, and communicable diseases in South America. MenosAbstract:Bacterial, protozoal and viral diseases are major causes of abortion in sheep and goats. These agents cause significant economic losses, and many are considered of concern for public health (zoonotic pathogens) and/or the international trade of livestock, such as those causing diseases notifiable to the World Organization of Animal Health (OIE). In South America, information about their occurrence, prevalence and economic impact is scarce. We review the available literature on bacterial, protozoal and viral abortifacients identified through laboratory testing in sheep and goats in South America and discuss whether the diagnostic investigations are conclusive in demonstrating abortion causality. We also compile information on diagnostic methods recommended by the OIE for the laboratory diagnosis of these abortifacients and on salient fetoplacental lesions induced by them. Campylobacteriosis (Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus), listeriosis (Listeria ivanovii), chlamydiosis (Chlamydia abortus), toxoplasmosis, neosporosis and sarcocystiosis have been confirmed as small ruminant abortifacients in this region. Brucella ovis, Brucella melitensis, Campylobacter jejuni, Chlamydia pecorum, Coxiella burnetii, Leptospira spp., Bacillus licheniformis and bluetongue virus, are probable causes of abortion in the region since they have been detected in aborted fetuses and/or associated with abortions through seroepidemiologic studies. Listeria monocytogenes, Histophilus ovis, Actino... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Abortions; Diagnostic investigation; Goats; Infectious diseases; Pathology; PLATAFORMA DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SALUD ANIMAL; PLATAFORMA DE SALUD ANIMAL; Protozoa; Sheep; South America. |
|
Thesagro : |
OVEJA; SUD AMERICA. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03634naa a2200349 a 4500
001 1062496
005 2021-10-25
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.smallrumres.2021.106547$2DOI
100 1 $aDORSCH, M.
245 $aBacterial, protozoal and viral abortions in sheep and goats in South America$bA review.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Received 18 May 2021/ Received in revised form 11 August 2021/ Accepted 30 September 2021/ Available online 6 October 2021.
520 $aAbstract:Bacterial, protozoal and viral diseases are major causes of abortion in sheep and goats. These agents cause significant economic losses, and many are considered of concern for public health (zoonotic pathogens) and/or the international trade of livestock, such as those causing diseases notifiable to the World Organization of Animal Health (OIE). In South America, information about their occurrence, prevalence and economic impact is scarce. We review the available literature on bacterial, protozoal and viral abortifacients identified through laboratory testing in sheep and goats in South America and discuss whether the diagnostic investigations are conclusive in demonstrating abortion causality. We also compile information on diagnostic methods recommended by the OIE for the laboratory diagnosis of these abortifacients and on salient fetoplacental lesions induced by them. Campylobacteriosis (Campylobacter fetus subsp. fetus), listeriosis (Listeria ivanovii), chlamydiosis (Chlamydia abortus), toxoplasmosis, neosporosis and sarcocystiosis have been confirmed as small ruminant abortifacients in this region. Brucella ovis, Brucella melitensis, Campylobacter jejuni, Chlamydia pecorum, Coxiella burnetii, Leptospira spp., Bacillus licheniformis and bluetongue virus, are probable causes of abortion in the region since they have been detected in aborted fetuses and/or associated with abortions through seroepidemiologic studies. Listeria monocytogenes, Histophilus ovis, Actinobacillus seminis, Trueperella pyogenes, Yersinia spp., Trypanosoma vivax, caprine herpesvirus 1 and pestiviruses also infect small ruminants in the region and could thus be considered possible causes of abortion, although they have not been associated with abortion in South America (i.e., not detected in aborted fetuses nor associated with abortion through seroepidemiologic studies). Other agents such as Flexispira rappini, Francisella tularensis, Anaplasma phagocytophilum, Rift Valley fever virus, Wesselbron disease virus and bunyaviruses, known to be abortifacients for sheep and goats in other regions of the world, have not been documented in South America. While some of these agents could be exotic in this subcontinent, others may have been undiagnosed considering the limitations of active animal disease surveillance systems, which hamper the eventual detection of emerging, re-emerging, and communicable diseases in South America.
650 $aOVEJA
650 $aSUD AMERICA
653 $aAbortions
653 $aDiagnostic investigation
653 $aGoats
653 $aInfectious diseases
653 $aPathology
653 $aPLATAFORMA DE INVESTIGACIÓN EN SALUD ANIMAL
653 $aPLATAFORMA DE SALUD ANIMAL
653 $aProtozoa
653 $aSheep
653 $aSouth America
700 1 $aCANTÓN, G.J.
700 1 $aDRIEMEIER, D.
700 1 $aANDERSON, M.L.
700 1 $aMOELLER, R.B.
700 1 $aGIANNITTI, F.
773 $tSmall Ruminant Research, Volume 205, December 2021, 106547. Doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.smallrumres.2021.106547
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
