| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 987 | |
| 22. |  | GAO, L.; KOO, D.H.; JULIANA, P.; RIFE, T.; SINGH, D.; CRISTIANO LEMES DA SILVA; LUX, T.; DORN, K.M.; CLINESMITH, M.; SILVA, P.; WANG, X.; SPANNAGL, M.; MONAT, C.; FRIEBE, B.; STEUERNAGEL, B.; MUEHLBAUER, G.J.; WALKOWIAK, S.; POZNIAK, C.; SINGH, R.; STEIN, N.; MASCHER, M.; FRITZ, A.; POLAND, J. The Aegilops ventricosa 2N v S segment in bread wheat: cytology, genomics and breeding. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, volume 134, pag. 529?542, feb 2021. Open Access. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00122-020-03712-y Article history:Received: 22 June 2020 / Accepted: 17 October 2020/ Published:12 November 2020/ Issue Date:February 2021| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
|    |
| 23. | | CLAVIJO, F.; CURLAND, R.D.; ROMAN-REYNA, V.; DILL-MACKY, R.; PEREYRA, S.; SIRI, M.I. Caracterización de especies del género Xanthomonas patógenas de trigo en Uruguay. In: Sociedad Uruguaya de Fitopatología Jornada Uruguaya de Fitopatología, 6., Jornada Uruguaya de Protección Vegetal, 4., 21-22 octubre, 2021, Montevideo, Uruguay. Libro de resúmenes. Montevideo (UY): Sociedad Uruguay de Fitopatología (SUFIT), 2021. p. 31. Financiamiento: Proyecto de Investigación Fundamental Fondo Clemente Estable (ANII); Programa Grupos de Investigación I+D de CSIC.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 25. | | FRANCIA, C.; PEREYRA, S.; BENÍTEZ, N.; PÉREZ, C. Comparación de distintos métodos de cuantificación de la fusariosis de la espiga de trigo a campo y postcosecha y el contenido de deoxinivalenol en grano. In: Sociedad Uruguaya de Fitopatología Jornada Uruguaya de Fitopatología, 6., Jornada Uruguaya de Protección Vegetal, 4., 21-22 octubre, 2021, Montevideo, Uruguay. Libro de resúmenes. Montevideo (UY): Sociedad Uruguay de Fitopatología (SUFIT), 2021. p. 40 Financiamiento: Beca de maestría ANII, beca de finalización CAP.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 26. | | JARDON, M.; ALVAREZ PRADO, S.; SEVERINI, A.D.; FERNÁNDEZ LONG, M.E.; CRESPO, A.O.; CASTRO, M.; QUINCKE, M.; KAVANOVÁ, M.; SCHOLZ DRODOWSKI, R.; CHÁVEZ SANABRIA, P.; PEREZ-GIANMARCO, T.; ALFARO, C.; CASTILLO, D.; MATUS, I.; GÓMEZ, D; SERRAGO, R.; GÓNZALEZ, F.G.; MIRALLES, D.J. CRONOTRIGO 2.0: nueva versión del modelo de predicción fenológica para el cultivo de trigo. In: Revista Técnica de la Asociación Argentina de Productores en Siembra Directa, Abril 2021, Rosario: AAPRESID. p. 53-60. Se incorporaron cambios respecto a la versión original en cuanto al alcance y la precisión del modelo.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
|  |
| 27. | | CURIN, F.; BALMACEDA, M.; BRACH, A.; CASTRO, M.; KAVANOVÁ, M.; OTERO, A.; ROSETTI, L.; RUIZ, M.; ALFARO, C.; QUINCKE, A.; ZUIL, S.; GONZÁLEZ, F.G. Evaluación de cultivares de trigo contrastantes para tolerancia a deficit hídrico en un amplio rango de ambientes en el cono sur de America. In: IX Congreso Nacional de Calidad de Trigo, 9°; VII Simposio de Cereales de siembra otoño-invernal; III Reunión del Mercosur, 29-30 setiembre 2021, tres arroyos, Provincia de Buenos Aires, Argentina: La Chacra Experimental Integrada Barrow, Instituto Nacional de Tecnología Agropecuaria (INTA), Centro Regional de Ingenieros Agrónomos de Tres Arroyos (CRIATA), Centro Regional de Estudios Superiores de Tres Arroyos (CRESTA).Modalidad Virtual.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 28. | | BRANCATTI, G.; GARMENDIA, G.; PEREYRA, S.; VERO, S. Fusarium en trigo: aislamiento, identificación, caracterización según quimiotipos y sensibilidad a fungicidas. In: Sociedad Uruguaya de Fitopatología Jornada Uruguaya de Fitopatología, 6., Jornada Uruguaya de Protección Vegetal, 4., 21-22 octubre, 2021, Montevideo, Uruguay. Libro de resúmenes. Montevideo (UY): Sociedad Uruguay de Fitopatología (SUFIT), 2021. p. 28 Financiamiento: ANII, CAP.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 30. | | SANGUIÑEDO, P.; ABREO, E.; ALBORÉS, S. Nanopartículas biogénicas de plata a partir de Trichoderma spp. y su aplicación en el control de fitopatógenos. In: Sociedad Uruguaya de Fitopatología Jornada Uruguaya de Fitopatología, 6., Jornada Uruguaya de Protección Vegetal, 4., 21-22 octubre, 2021, Montevideo, Uruguay. Libro de resúmenes. Montevideo (UY): Sociedad Uruguay de Fitopatología (SUFIT), 2021. p. 51 Financiamiento: Proyecto INNOVAGRO ANII FSA_1_152546, PEDECIBA QUÍMICA, Beca ANII, Posgrado en Biotecnología-UdelaR.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 36. | | KOLMER, J.A.; HERMAN, A.; ORDOÑEZ, M.E.; GERMAN, S.; MORGOUNOV, A.; PRETORIUS, Z.; VISSER, B.; ANISKSTER, Y.; ACEVEDO, M. Endemic and panglobal genetic groups, and divergence of host-associated forms in worldwide collections of the wheat leaf rust fungus Puccinia triticina as determined by genotyping by sequencing. Heredity, 1 March 2020, Volume 124, Issue 3, Pages 397-409. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-019-0288-x Article history: Received: 5 September 2019 / Revised: 3 December 2019 / Accepted: 3 December 2019 / Published online: 20 December 2019.
Supplementary information The online version of this article...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 38. | | HELGUERA, M.; ABUGALIEVA, A.; BATTENFIELD, S.; BÉKÉS, F.; BRANLARD, G.; CUNIBERTI, M.; HÜSKEN,A.; JOHANSSON, E.; MORRIS, C.F.; NURIT, E.; SISSONS, M.; VÁZQUEZ, D. Grain Quality in Breeding. In: Igrejas G., Ikeda T., Guzmán C. (eds). Wheat Quality For Improving Processing And Human Health. Cham:Springer. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34163-3_12 p. 273-307. Article history:First Online: 18 March 2020.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| 39. | | CRUPPE, G.; SILVA, P.; SILVA, C. LEMES DA; PETERSON, G.; PEDLEY, K. F.; CRUZ, C. D.; ASIF, M.; LOLLATO, R. P.; FRITZ, A. K.; VALENT, B. Genome wide association reveals limited benefits of pyramiding the 1B and 1D loci with the 2Nv S translocation for wheat blast control. Crop Science [First Online]. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csc2.20397 42 p. Article history: Manuscript received, 09 June 2020 // Manuscript accepted, 23 October 2020 // Accepted manuscript online, 31 October 2020 // Version of Record online,
22 December 2020.
Corresponding authors: Barbara Valent,...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 40. | | JOHANSSON, E.; BRANLARD, G.; CUNIBERTI, M.; FLAGELLA, Z.; HÜSKEN, A.; NURIT, E.; PEÑA, R.J.; SISSONS, M.; VÁZQUEZ, D. Genotypic and Environmental Effects on Wheat Technological and Nutritional Quality. In: Igrejas G., Ikeda T., Guzmán C. (eds). Wheat Quality For Improving Processing And Human Health. Cham:Springer. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34163-3_8 p. 171-204. Article histotory: First Online: 18 March 2020.| Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 987 | |
|
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
02/04/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
24/02/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autor : |
HELGUERA, M.; ABUGALIEVA, A.; BATTENFIELD, S.; BÉKÉS, F.; BRANLARD, G.; CUNIBERTI, M.; HÜSKEN,A.; JOHANSSON, E.; MORRIS, C.F.; NURIT, E.; SISSONS, M.; VÁZQUEZ, D. |
|
Afiliación : |
MARCELO HELGUERA, National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), Marcos Juárez, Argentina .; AIGUL ABUGALIEVA, Kazakh Scientific Research Institute of Agriculture and Plant Growing, Almalybak, Kazakhstan.; SARAH BATTENFIELD, Syngenta, Junction City, KS, USA.; FERENC BÉKÉS, FBFD PTY LTD, Sydney, NSW, Australia.; GÉRARD BRANLARD, INRAE, UCA UMR1095 GDEC, Clermont-Ferrand, France.; MARTHA CUNIBERTI, Wheat and Soybean Quality Laboratory, National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA), Buenos Aires, Argentina.; ALEXANDRA HÜSKEN, Department of Safety and Quality of CerealsMax Rubner-Institut, Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food Detmold, Germany.; EVA JOHANSSON, Department of Plant Breeding The Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp, Sweden.; CRAIG F. MORRIS, Western Wheat Quality LaboratoryUSDA-ARS,Pullman,USA.; ERIC NURIT, Mazan,France.; MIKE SISSONS, NSW Department of Primary Industries Tamworth Centre for Crop Improvement Calala, Australia.; DANIEL VÁZQUEZ PEYRONEL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Grain Quality in Breeding. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: Igrejas G., Ikeda T., Guzmán C. (eds). Wheat Quality For Improving Processing And Human Health. Cham:Springer. Doi:
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34163-3_12 |
|
Páginas : |
p. 273-307. |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history:First Online: 18 March 2020. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
Technological (processing performance and end-product) and nutritional quality of wheat is in principle determined by a number of compounds within the wheat grain, including proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, minerals, heavy metals, vitamins and phytochemicals, effecting these characters. The genotype and environment is of similar importance for the determination of the content and composition of these compounds. Furthermore, the interaction between genotypes and the cultivation environment may play a significant role. Many studies have evaluated whether the genotype or the environment plays the major role in determining the content of the mentioned compounds. An overall conclusion of these studies is that except for compounds encoded by single major genes, importance of certain factors mainly depend on how wide environments and how diverse cultivars are within these comparative studies. Comparing environments all over, e.g. across Latin America, ends up with a high significance of the environment while large studies including genotypes of wide genetic background result in a significant role for the genotype. In addition, for some technological properties and components, genotype has a higher effect (e.g. grain hardness and gluten proteins), while environment influences stronger on others (e.g. protein and mineral content).Content and concentration of proteins, but also to some extent of starch, some non-starch polysaccharides and lipids, are essential in determining the technological quality of a wheat flour. For nutritional quality of the flour, the majority of the compounds are together the important determinant. Thus an increased understanding of environmental effects is essential. As to how the environment is influencing the content of the compounds, there are some differences. The protein content and composition is strongly affected by environmental factors influencing nitrogen availability and cultivar development time. However, these two factors are impacted by a range of environmental (temperature, precipitation, humidity/sun hours, etc.) and agronomic (soil properties, crop management practices such as seeding density, nitrogen fertilizer application timing and amount, etc.) components. Thus, to understand the interplay between the various environmental and agronomic factors impacting the technological quality of a wheat flour, modeling is a useful tool. Several other compounds, including minerals and heavy metals, are to a higher extent determined by site specific variation, resulting in similar rankings of entries across locations, although the total content is varying among years. The bioactive compounds and vitamins are a part of the defense mechanisms of plants and thus there is a variation in these compounds depending on prevailing biotic and abiotic stresses (heat, drought, excess rainfall, nutrition, diseases and pests). Thus, even for nutritional quality of wheat, incorporating all compounds of relevance in the evaluation would benefit from modeling tools. MenosAbstract:
Technological (processing performance and end-product) and nutritional quality of wheat is in principle determined by a number of compounds within the wheat grain, including proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, minerals, heavy metals, vitamins and phytochemicals, effecting these characters. The genotype and environment is of similar importance for the determination of the content and composition of these compounds. Furthermore, the interaction between genotypes and the cultivation environment may play a significant role. Many studies have evaluated whether the genotype or the environment plays the major role in determining the content of the mentioned compounds. An overall conclusion of these studies is that except for compounds encoded by single major genes, importance of certain factors mainly depend on how wide environments and how diverse cultivars are within these comparative studies. Comparing environments all over, e.g. across Latin America, ends up with a high significance of the environment while large studies including genotypes of wide genetic background result in a significant role for the genotype. In addition, for some technological properties and components, genotype has a higher effect (e.g. grain hardness and gluten proteins), while environment influences stronger on others (e.g. protein and mineral content).Content and concentration of proteins, but also to some extent of starch, some non-starch polysaccharides and lipids, are essential in determini... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
CASE-STUDIES; DURUM-WHEAT; NUTRITIONAL-QUALITY; PLATAFORMA AGROALIMENTOS; QUALITY-SELECTION; SOFT-WHEAT; WILD-RELATIVES. |
|
Thesagro : |
TRIGO. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F30 Genética vegetal y fitomejoramiento |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04132naa a2200373 a 4500
001 1060983
005 2022-02-24
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
100 1 $aHELGUERA, M.
245 $aGrain Quality in Breeding.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
300 $ap. 273-307.
500 $aArticle history:First Online: 18 March 2020.
520 $aAbstract: Technological (processing performance and end-product) and nutritional quality of wheat is in principle determined by a number of compounds within the wheat grain, including proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, minerals, heavy metals, vitamins and phytochemicals, effecting these characters. The genotype and environment is of similar importance for the determination of the content and composition of these compounds. Furthermore, the interaction between genotypes and the cultivation environment may play a significant role. Many studies have evaluated whether the genotype or the environment plays the major role in determining the content of the mentioned compounds. An overall conclusion of these studies is that except for compounds encoded by single major genes, importance of certain factors mainly depend on how wide environments and how diverse cultivars are within these comparative studies. Comparing environments all over, e.g. across Latin America, ends up with a high significance of the environment while large studies including genotypes of wide genetic background result in a significant role for the genotype. In addition, for some technological properties and components, genotype has a higher effect (e.g. grain hardness and gluten proteins), while environment influences stronger on others (e.g. protein and mineral content).Content and concentration of proteins, but also to some extent of starch, some non-starch polysaccharides and lipids, are essential in determining the technological quality of a wheat flour. For nutritional quality of the flour, the majority of the compounds are together the important determinant. Thus an increased understanding of environmental effects is essential. As to how the environment is influencing the content of the compounds, there are some differences. The protein content and composition is strongly affected by environmental factors influencing nitrogen availability and cultivar development time. However, these two factors are impacted by a range of environmental (temperature, precipitation, humidity/sun hours, etc.) and agronomic (soil properties, crop management practices such as seeding density, nitrogen fertilizer application timing and amount, etc.) components. Thus, to understand the interplay between the various environmental and agronomic factors impacting the technological quality of a wheat flour, modeling is a useful tool. Several other compounds, including minerals and heavy metals, are to a higher extent determined by site specific variation, resulting in similar rankings of entries across locations, although the total content is varying among years. The bioactive compounds and vitamins are a part of the defense mechanisms of plants and thus there is a variation in these compounds depending on prevailing biotic and abiotic stresses (heat, drought, excess rainfall, nutrition, diseases and pests). Thus, even for nutritional quality of wheat, incorporating all compounds of relevance in the evaluation would benefit from modeling tools.
650 $aTRIGO
653 $aCASE-STUDIES
653 $aDURUM-WHEAT
653 $aNUTRITIONAL-QUALITY
653 $aPLATAFORMA AGROALIMENTOS
653 $aQUALITY-SELECTION
653 $aSOFT-WHEAT
653 $aWILD-RELATIVES
700 1 $aABUGALIEVA, A.
700 1 $aBATTENFIELD, S.
700 1 $aBÉKÉS, F.
700 1 $aBRANLARD, G.
700 1 $aCUNIBERTI, M.
700 1 $aHÜSKEN,A.
700 1 $aJOHANSSON, E.
700 1 $aMORRIS, C.F.
700 1 $aNURIT, E.
700 1 $aSISSONS, M.
700 1 $aVÁZQUEZ, D.
773 $tIn: Igrejas G., Ikeda T., Guzmán C. (eds). Wheat Quality For Improving Processing And Human Health. Cham:Springer. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34163-3_12
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
