|
|
Registros recuperados : 1,672 | |
6. | | PEINADO, G.; ZABALETA, O. 20 años de ideales. In: CONGRESO MUNDIAL ,4.; [CONGRESO] Sudamericano de la razas Polwarth-Ideal, 3., 1999, Montevideo, Uruguay. Montevideo (Uruguay): Sociedad Criadores de Ideal del Uruguay, 1999. p. 7-18. "Asociación Rural del Uruguay; Banco de la República Oriental del Uruguay; Cámara Mercantil Productos del País; INAC; INIA; MGAP; SUL"Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
12. | | FERREIRA, G.; PITTALUGA, O.; BEMHAJA, M.; BENNADJI, Z.; LAVECCHIA, A.; SAN JULIÁN, R.; MEDEROS, A.; SILVA, J. 30 años de la Unidad Experimental y Demostrativa La Magnolia Revista INIA, 2005, no. 5, p. 31-35Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
14. | | MONTOSSI, F.; PIGURINA, G.; BERRETTA, E.J.; SANTAMARINA, I. A comparative grazing study of sheep and cattle diet selection on native pastures in Uruguay. In: International Grassland Congress, 19., 11-21 de febrero, San Pedro, San Pablo, Brazil. Proceedings. Pircicaba: FEALQ, 2001. p. 345-347Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
17. | | Selaive, A. A pesquisa ovino no Brasil ln: Reunión sobre Investigación en Producción Ovina de la Zona Sur, 1979 may 21-25 : Montevideo Caballero D., H. ; Cardellino, R.C. Producción e investigación ovina en Argentina, Brasil, Chile, Paraguay y Uruguay. Montevideo (Uruguay): IICA ; SUL ; OEA, 1979. p113-125 Informes de Conferencias, Cursos y Reuniones (IICA)Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
19. | | Coimbra Filho, A.; Selaive, A. A producao ovina no Brasil ln: Reunión sobre Investigación en Producción Ovina de la Zona Sur, 1979 may 21-25 : Montevideo Caballero D., H. ; Cardellino, R.C. Producción e investigación ovina en Argentina, Brasil, Chile, Paraguay y Uruguay. Montevideo (Uruguay): IICA ; SUL ; OEA, 1979. p53-68 Informes de Conferencias, Cursos y Reuniones (IICA)Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
20. | | MONTOSSI, F.; BERRETTA, E.J.; PIGURINA, G.; SANTAMARINA, I. A sheep and cattle diet selection study on a fertilized native sward in Uruguay. In: International Grassland Congress, 19., 11-21 de febrero, San Pedro, San Pablo, Brazil. Proceedings. Pircicaba: FEALQ, 2001. p. 344-345Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 1,672 | |
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Tacuarembó. Por información adicional contacte bibliotb@tb.inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha actual : |
09/09/2014 |
Actualizado : |
30/09/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
FALZON, L.C.; O´NEILL, T.J.; MENZIES, P.I.; PEREGRINE, A.S.; JONES-BITTON, A.; VANLEEUWEN, J.; MEDEROS, A. |
Afiliación : |
AMERICA ESTHER MEDEROS SILVEIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
A systematic review and meta-analysis of factors associated with anthelmintic resistance in sheep. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2014 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Preventive Veterinary Medicine, 2014, v. 117, p. 388-402. |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.07.003 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 5 March 2014; Received in revised form 27 May 2014; Accepted 3 July 2014. |
Contenido : |
Background: Anthelmintic drugs have been widely used in sheep as a cost-effective meansfor gastro-intestinal nematode (GIN) control. However, growing anthelmintic resistance(AHR) has created a compelling need to identify evidence-based management recommen-dations that reduce the risk of further development and impact of AHR.Objective: To identify, critically assess, and synthesize available data from primary researchon factors associated with AHR in sheep.Methods: Publications reporting original observational or experimental research on selectedfactors associated with AHR in sheep GINs and published after 1974, were identified throughtwo processes. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Agricola, CAB) and Web of Science (acollection of databases) were searched for potentially relevant publications. Additional pub-lications were identified through consultation with experts, manual search of referencesof included publications and conference proceedings, and information solicited from smallruminant practitioner list-serves. Two independent investigators screened abstracts for rel-evance. Relevant publications were assessed for risk of systematic bias. Where sufficientdata were available, random-effects Meta-Analyses (MAs) were performed to estimate thepooled Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) of AHR for factors reported in?2 publications.Results: Of the 1712 abstracts screened for eligibility, 131 were deemed relevant for fullpublication review. Thirty publications describing 25 individual studies (15 observationalstudies, 7 challenge trials, and 3 controlled trials) were included in the qualitative synthesisand assessed for systematic bias. Unclear (i.e. not reported, or unable to assess) or high riskof selection bias and confounding bias was found in 93% (14/15) and 60% (9/15) of theobservational studies, respectively, while unclear risk of selection bias was identified in allof the trials. Ten independent studies were included in the quantitative synthesis, and MAswere performed for five factors. Only high frequency of treatment was a significant riskfactor (OR = 4.39; 95% CI = 1.59, 12.14), while the remaining 4 variables were marginallysignificant: mixed-species grazing (OR = 1.63; 95% CI = 0.66, 4.07); flock size (OR = 1.02; 95%CI = 0.97, 1.07); use of long-acting drug formulations (OR = 2.85; 95% CI = 0.79, 10.24); anddrench-and-shift pasture management (OR = 4.08; 95% CI = 0.75, 22.16). MenosBackground: Anthelmintic drugs have been widely used in sheep as a cost-effective meansfor gastro-intestinal nematode (GIN) control. However, growing anthelmintic resistance(AHR) has created a compelling need to identify evidence-based management recommen-dations that reduce the risk of further development and impact of AHR.Objective: To identify, critically assess, and synthesize available data from primary researchon factors associated with AHR in sheep.Methods: Publications reporting original observational or experimental research on selectedfactors associated with AHR in sheep GINs and published after 1974, were identified throughtwo processes. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Agricola, CAB) and Web of Science (acollection of databases) were searched for potentially relevant publications. Additional pub-lications were identified through consultation with experts, manual search of referencesof included publications and conference proceedings, and information solicited from smallruminant practitioner list-serves. Two independent investigators screened abstracts for rel-evance. Relevant publications were assessed for risk of systematic bias. Where sufficientdata were available, random-effects Meta-Analyses (MAs) were performed to estimate thepooled Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) of AHR for factors reported in?2 publications.Results: Of the 1712 abstracts screened for eligibility, 131 were deemed relevant for fullpublication review. Thirty publications... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
DRENCH RESISTANCE; EVIDENCE-BASED RECOMMENDATIONS; GASTRO-INTESTINAL NEMATODES; MANAGEMENT PRACTICES; QUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE SYNTHESIS. |
Thesagro : |
OVINOS. |
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
Marc : |
LEADER 03419naa a2200289 a 4500 001 1050071 005 2019-09-30 008 2014 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.07.003$2DOI 100 1 $aFALZON, L.C. 245 $aA systematic review and meta-analysis of factors associated with anthelmintic resistance in sheep. 260 $c2014 500 $aArticle history: Received 5 March 2014; Received in revised form 27 May 2014; Accepted 3 July 2014. 520 $aBackground: Anthelmintic drugs have been widely used in sheep as a cost-effective meansfor gastro-intestinal nematode (GIN) control. However, growing anthelmintic resistance(AHR) has created a compelling need to identify evidence-based management recommen-dations that reduce the risk of further development and impact of AHR.Objective: To identify, critically assess, and synthesize available data from primary researchon factors associated with AHR in sheep.Methods: Publications reporting original observational or experimental research on selectedfactors associated with AHR in sheep GINs and published after 1974, were identified throughtwo processes. Three electronic databases (PubMed, Agricola, CAB) and Web of Science (acollection of databases) were searched for potentially relevant publications. Additional pub-lications were identified through consultation with experts, manual search of referencesof included publications and conference proceedings, and information solicited from smallruminant practitioner list-serves. Two independent investigators screened abstracts for rel-evance. Relevant publications were assessed for risk of systematic bias. Where sufficientdata were available, random-effects Meta-Analyses (MAs) were performed to estimate thepooled Odds Ratio (OR) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) of AHR for factors reported in?2 publications.Results: Of the 1712 abstracts screened for eligibility, 131 were deemed relevant for fullpublication review. Thirty publications describing 25 individual studies (15 observationalstudies, 7 challenge trials, and 3 controlled trials) were included in the qualitative synthesisand assessed for systematic bias. Unclear (i.e. not reported, or unable to assess) or high riskof selection bias and confounding bias was found in 93% (14/15) and 60% (9/15) of theobservational studies, respectively, while unclear risk of selection bias was identified in allof the trials. Ten independent studies were included in the quantitative synthesis, and MAswere performed for five factors. Only high frequency of treatment was a significant riskfactor (OR = 4.39; 95% CI = 1.59, 12.14), while the remaining 4 variables were marginallysignificant: mixed-species grazing (OR = 1.63; 95% CI = 0.66, 4.07); flock size (OR = 1.02; 95%CI = 0.97, 1.07); use of long-acting drug formulations (OR = 2.85; 95% CI = 0.79, 10.24); anddrench-and-shift pasture management (OR = 4.08; 95% CI = 0.75, 22.16). 650 $aOVINOS 653 $aDRENCH RESISTANCE 653 $aEVIDENCE-BASED RECOMMENDATIONS 653 $aGASTRO-INTESTINAL NEMATODES 653 $aMANAGEMENT PRACTICES 653 $aQUALITATIVE AND QUANTITATIVE SYNTHESIS 700 1 $aO´NEILL, T.J. 700 1 $aMENZIES, P.I. 700 1 $aPEREGRINE, A.S. 700 1 $aJONES-BITTON, A. 700 1 $aVANLEEUWEN, J. 700 1 $aMEDEROS, A. 773 $tPreventive Veterinary Medicine, 2014$gv. 117, p. 388-402.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|