|
|
Registros recuperados : 675 | |
73. | | MONTOSSI, F.; CAZZULI, F. Ejemplos empresariales y asociativos de marcas de calidad: Uruguay [Associative business examples and quality brands: Uruguay]. In: TEIXEIRA, A.; SAÑUDO, C. (Coord.). Marcas de calidad de carne en Iberoamerica: Caribe, Sudamerica y Peninsula Iberica. Congreso Iberoamericano de Marcas de Calidad de Carne y de Productos Cárnicos, 24-25 de octubre, Bragança, Portugal, 2019. Bragança (Portugal): RED MARCARNE, 2019. p. 181-190Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
74. | | RODRÍGUEZ, V.; PARODI, P.; SCHANZEMBACH, M.; MATTO, C.; GRILLE, L.; GIANNECCHINI , E.; RIVERO, R. Descripción de tres focos de granuloma nasal bovina. In: Jornadas Uruguayas de Buiatría, 47., 2019, Paysandú, UY.; Matto, ; Gianeechini, E. (Ed.). Paysandú: Centro Médico Veterinario de Paysandú/Sociedad Uruguaya de Buiatría, 2019. P. 131-133Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
75. | | ROVIRA, P.J.; MCALLISTER, T.; LAKIN, S.M.; COOK, S.R.; DOSTER, E.; NOYES, N. R.; WEINROTH, M.D.; YANG, X.; PARKER, J. K.; BOUCHER, C.; BOOKER, C. W.; WOENER, D. R.; BELK, K. E.; MORLEY, P. S. Characterization of the microbial resistome in conventional and "raised without antibiotics" beef and dairy production systems. Frontier in Microbiology, September 2019. v. 10, article 1980, 11 p. OPEN ACCESS. Received 18 March 2019 // Accepted 12 August 2019 // Published 4 September 2019.Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
76. | | RABAZA, A.; BANCHERO, G.; CAJARVILLE,C.; ZUNINO, P.; BRITO, A.; REPETTO, J.; FRAGA, M. Effects of feed withdrawal duration on animal behaviour, rumen microbiota and blood chemistry in feedlot cattle: implications for rumen acidosis. Animal, Volume 14 , Issue 1 , January 2020 , pp. 66 - 77. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1751731119001538 Article history: Received 22 October 2018 // Accepted 13 June 2019.Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
78. | | ARÁOZ, V.; SILVEIRA, C.S.; MORÉ, G.; BANCHERO, G.; RIET-CORREA, F.; GIANNITTI, F. Fatal Sarcocystis cruzi-induced eosinophilic myocarditis in a heifer in Uruguay. Journal of Veterinary Diagnostic Investigation, 2019, Vol. 31(4) 656-660, 2019. Article history: Article first published online: June 10, 2019// Issue published: July 1, 2019Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
79. | | MEDEIROS, M.A.DE; BARROS, A.T. M. DE; RIET-CORREA, F.; MARQUES, A.R.; LOPES, J.R.G.; VIEIRA, V.D.; MIRABALLES, C. Identification of Sindhi cows that are susceptible or resistant to Haematobia irritans. Braz. J. Vet. Parasitol., 2019. OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received April 07, 2019; Accepted July 25, 2019.Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 675 | |
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha actual : |
21/02/2014 |
Actualizado : |
10/02/2020 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
MEDEIROS, M.A.DE; BARROS, A.T. M. DE; RIET-CORREA, F.; MARQUES, A.R.; LOPES, J.R.G.; VIEIRA, V.D.; MIRABALLES, C. |
Afiliación : |
MÁRCIA ALVES DE MEDEIROS, Hospital Veterinário, Centro de Saúde e Tecnologia Rural, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Patos, PB, Brasil. Departamento de Medicina Veterinária, Centro Universitário Ritter dos Reis, Porto Alegre, RS, Brasil.; ANTONIO THADEU MEDEIROS DE BARROS, EMBRAPA, Campo Grande, MS, Brasil.; FRANKLIN RIET-CORREA AMARAL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANA RITA MARQUES; JOSÉ RADMÁCYO GOMES LOPES, Hospital Veterinário, Centro de Saúde e Tecnologia Rural, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, Patos, PB, Brasil.; VANESSA DINIZ VIEIRA, Hospital Veterinário, Centro de Saúde e Tecnologia Rural, Universidade Federal de Campina Grande, UFCG, Patos, PB, Brasil.; MÓNICA CECILIA MIRABALLES FERRER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Identification of Sindhi cows that are susceptible or resistant to Haematobia irritans. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Braz. J. Vet. Parasitol., 2019. OPEN ACCESS. |
DOI : |
10.1590/S1984-29612019066 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received April 07, 2019; Accepted July 25, 2019. |
Contenido : |
Abstract: To identify susceptible and resistant Haematobia irritans cows, horn flies were counted biweekly for 3 years in a herd of 25 Sindhi cows. Repeated measures linear mixed models were created including cow as a random factor. The results were analyzed by: 1) observing horn fly counts, considering fly-susceptible cows with infestations appearing in the upper quartile more than 50% of the weeks and in the lower quartile less than 20% of the weeks, and fly-resistant cows those that the number of flies was in the lower quartile more than 50% of the weeks and in the upper quartile less than 20%; 2) by the best linear unbiased predictions (BLUPs), to evaluate the cow effect on fly counts. Fly-susceptible cows were those in which the infestation appeared in the 90th percentile of the BLUPs, whereas fly-resistant cows appeared in the 10th percentile. For the observational method the individuals identified as resistant varied between 8% and 20% and 8% to 12% were susceptible. For the BLUP method, the rates of susceptible and resistant cows were 12%. The agreement among methods suggests that susceptible cows can be identified by observations of fly counts, allowing for selective breeding, culling or treatment. Resumo: Para identificar vacas susceptíveis e resistentes à Haematobia irritans, moscas-dos-chifres foram contadas quinzenalmente durante três anos em 25 vacas de um rebanho Sindhi. Modelos lineares de medidas repetidas foram criados, analisando os resultados de duas formas: 1) pela contagem das moscas, considerando susceptíveis as vacas nas quais a infestação aparecia no quartil superior mais de 50% das semanas e no quartil inferior menos de 20% das semanas. Vacas resistentes foram consideradas aquelas nas quais o número de moscas apareceu no quartil inferior mais de 50% das semanas e no quartil superior menos de 20% das semanas; 2) pela melhor predição linear não-viesada (BLUP), para avaliar o efeito das vacas na contagem de moscas. As vacas foram consideradas susceptíveis quando apareciam no percentil 90 dos BLUPs e resistentes quando apareciam no percentil 10. O método observacional identificou 8% a 20% de indivíduos resistentes e 8% a 12% de susceptíveis. O método dos BLUPs identificou igual taxa de 12% de indivíduos susceptíveis e resistentes. A forte concordância entre estes dois métodos sugere que as vacas susceptíveis podem ser identificadas pela contagem das moscas, o que permite estabelecer seleção dos animais resistentes ou tratamento ou eliminação dos mais susceptíveis. MenosAbstract: To identify susceptible and resistant Haematobia irritans cows, horn flies were counted biweekly for 3 years in a herd of 25 Sindhi cows. Repeated measures linear mixed models were created including cow as a random factor. The results were analyzed by: 1) observing horn fly counts, considering fly-susceptible cows with infestations appearing in the upper quartile more than 50% of the weeks and in the lower quartile less than 20% of the weeks, and fly-resistant cows those that the number of flies was in the lower quartile more than 50% of the weeks and in the upper quartile less than 20%; 2) by the best linear unbiased predictions (BLUPs), to evaluate the cow effect on fly counts. Fly-susceptible cows were those in which the infestation appeared in the 90th percentile of the BLUPs, whereas fly-resistant cows appeared in the 10th percentile. For the observational method the individuals identified as resistant varied between 8% and 20% and 8% to 12% were susceptible. For the BLUP method, the rates of susceptible and resistant cows were 12%. The agreement among methods suggests that susceptible cows can be identified by observations of fly counts, allowing for selective breeding, culling or treatment. Resumo: Para identificar vacas susceptíveis e resistentes à Haematobia irritans, moscas-dos-chifres foram contadas quinzenalmente durante três anos em 25 vacas de um rebanho Sindhi. Modelos lineares de medidas repetidas foram criados, analisando os resultados de duas form... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
ANIMAL SELECTION; BOVINES; BOVINOS; CONTROLE INTEGRADO; HORN FLY; INTEGRATED CONTROL; MOSCA DO CHIFRES; SELECAO ANIMAL. |
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/13158/1/Miraballes-2019.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03492naa a2200313 a 4500 001 1027521 005 2020-02-10 008 2019 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1590/S1984-29612019066$2DOI 100 1 $aMEDEIROS, M.A.DE 245 $aIdentification of Sindhi cows that are susceptible or resistant to Haematobia irritans.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2019 500 $aArticle history: Received April 07, 2019; Accepted July 25, 2019. 520 $aAbstract: To identify susceptible and resistant Haematobia irritans cows, horn flies were counted biweekly for 3 years in a herd of 25 Sindhi cows. Repeated measures linear mixed models were created including cow as a random factor. The results were analyzed by: 1) observing horn fly counts, considering fly-susceptible cows with infestations appearing in the upper quartile more than 50% of the weeks and in the lower quartile less than 20% of the weeks, and fly-resistant cows those that the number of flies was in the lower quartile more than 50% of the weeks and in the upper quartile less than 20%; 2) by the best linear unbiased predictions (BLUPs), to evaluate the cow effect on fly counts. Fly-susceptible cows were those in which the infestation appeared in the 90th percentile of the BLUPs, whereas fly-resistant cows appeared in the 10th percentile. For the observational method the individuals identified as resistant varied between 8% and 20% and 8% to 12% were susceptible. For the BLUP method, the rates of susceptible and resistant cows were 12%. The agreement among methods suggests that susceptible cows can be identified by observations of fly counts, allowing for selective breeding, culling or treatment. Resumo: Para identificar vacas susceptíveis e resistentes à Haematobia irritans, moscas-dos-chifres foram contadas quinzenalmente durante três anos em 25 vacas de um rebanho Sindhi. Modelos lineares de medidas repetidas foram criados, analisando os resultados de duas formas: 1) pela contagem das moscas, considerando susceptíveis as vacas nas quais a infestação aparecia no quartil superior mais de 50% das semanas e no quartil inferior menos de 20% das semanas. Vacas resistentes foram consideradas aquelas nas quais o número de moscas apareceu no quartil inferior mais de 50% das semanas e no quartil superior menos de 20% das semanas; 2) pela melhor predição linear não-viesada (BLUP), para avaliar o efeito das vacas na contagem de moscas. As vacas foram consideradas susceptíveis quando apareciam no percentil 90 dos BLUPs e resistentes quando apareciam no percentil 10. O método observacional identificou 8% a 20% de indivíduos resistentes e 8% a 12% de susceptíveis. O método dos BLUPs identificou igual taxa de 12% de indivíduos susceptíveis e resistentes. A forte concordância entre estes dois métodos sugere que as vacas susceptíveis podem ser identificadas pela contagem das moscas, o que permite estabelecer seleção dos animais resistentes ou tratamento ou eliminação dos mais susceptíveis. 653 $aANIMAL SELECTION 653 $aBOVINES 653 $aBOVINOS 653 $aCONTROLE INTEGRADO 653 $aHORN FLY 653 $aINTEGRATED CONTROL 653 $aMOSCA DO CHIFRES 653 $aSELECAO ANIMAL 700 1 $aBARROS, A.T. M. DE 700 1 $aRIET-CORREA, F. 700 1 $aMARQUES, A.R. 700 1 $aLOPES, J.R.G. 700 1 $aVIEIRA, V.D. 700 1 $aMIRABALLES, C. 773 $tBraz. J. Vet. Parasitol., 2019. OPEN ACCESS.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|