|
|
Registros recuperados : 7 | |
2. | | ZUBIETA, Á.S.; ; SAVIAN, J.V.; DE SOUZA FILHO, W.; WALLAU, M.O.; GÓMEZ, A.M.; BINDELLE, J.; ; BONNET, O.J.F.; DE FACCIO CARVALHO, P.C. Does grazing management provide opportunities to mitigate methane emissions by ruminants in pastoral ecosystems? (Review). Science of the Total Environment, 1 February 2021, Volume 754, Article number 142029. DOI: https://doi-org.proxy.timbo.org.uy/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.142029 Article history: Received 18 May 2020 // Received in revised form 26 August 2020 // Accepted 26 August 2020 // Available online 31 August 2020Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
3. | | DE AZEVEDO, E.B.; SAVIAN, J.V.; DO AMARAL, G. A.; DE DAVID, D. B.; GERE, J.I.; MOURA, M.; BREMM, C.; JOCHIMS, F.; ZUBIETA, A. S.; GONDA, H. L.; BAYER, C.; DE FACCIO CARVALHO, P.C. Feed intake, methane yield, and efciency of utilization of energy and nitrogen by sheep fed tropical grasses. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2021, volume 53, Article number 452. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02928-4 Article history: Received: 10 July 2020; Accepted: 10 September 2021; Published online: 18 September 2021.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
4. | | ZUBIETA, A. S.; MARÍN, A.; SAVIAN, J.V.; BOLSAN, A. M. SOARES; ROSSETTO, J.; BARRETO, M. T.; BINDELLE, J.; BREMM, C.; QUISHPE, L. V.; DECRUYENAERE, V.; CARVALHO, P. C. DE F. Long-intensity, high-frecuency grazing positively affects defoliating behavior, nutrient intake and blood indicators of nutrition and stress in sheep. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, June 2021, Volume 8, art. 631820. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.631820 Article history: Received: 21 November 2020 // Accepted: 26 May 2021 // Published: 22 June 2021.Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
5. | | PORTUGAL, T. B.; SZYMCZAK, L. S.; DE MORAES, A.; FONSECA, L.; MEZZALIRA, J.C.; SAVIAN, J.V.; ZUBIETA, A. S.; BREMM, C.; DE FACCIO CARVALHO, P. C.; MONTEIRO, A. L. G. Low-intensity, high-frequency grazing strategy increases herbage production and beef cattle performance on sorghum pastures. Animals 2022, volume 12, number 1, 13 pages. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010013 Article history: Received: 17 October 2021 / Revised: 8 November 2021 / Accepted: 10 November 2021 / Published: 22 December 2021 .Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
6. | | SCHONS, R.M.T.; LACA, E.A.; SAVIAN, J.V.; MEZZALIRA, J.C.; SCHENEIDER, E.A.N.; CAETANO, M.; ZUBIETA, A.S.; BENVENUTTI, M.A.; CARVALHO, P.C. DE F. ´Rotatinuous` stocking: An innovation in grazing management to foster both herbage and animal production. Livestock Science, March 2021, Volume 245, Article number 104406. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.livsci.2021.104406 Article history: Received 23 April 2019 / Received in revised form 30 November 2020 / Accepted 17 January 2021 / Available online 20 January 2021.Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
7. | | PORTUGAL, T. B.; DE FACCIO CARVALHO, P. C.; DE CAMPOS, B.M.; SZYMCZAK, L.S.; SAVIAN, J.V.; ZUBIETA, A.S.; DE SOUZA FILHO, W.; ROSSETTO, J.; BREMM, C.; DE OLIVEIRA, L.B.; DE MORAES, A.; BAYER, C.; GOMES MONTEIRO, A.L. Methane emissions and growth performance of beef cattle grazing multi-species swards in different pesticide-free integrated crop-livestock systems in southern Brazil. Journal of Cleaner Production, 15 August 2023, Volume 414, Article 137536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.137536 Article history: Received 28 December 2022; Received in revised form 16 May 2023; Accepted 19 May 2023; Available online 22 May 2023. -- Correspondence author: Portugal, T.B.; Department of Crop Production and Protection, Federal...Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 7 | |
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha actual : |
03/01/2022 |
Actualizado : |
01/09/2022 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - 1 |
Autor : |
PORTUGAL, T. B.; SZYMCZAK, L. S.; DE MORAES, A.; FONSECA, L.; MEZZALIRA, J.C.; SAVIAN, J.V.; ZUBIETA, A. S.; BREMM, C.; DE FACCIO CARVALHO, P. C.; MONTEIRO, A. L. G. |
Afiliación : |
THALES BAGGIO PORTUGAL, Department of Crop Production and Protection, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, Brazil. CONSIPA—Consulting on Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems, Ponta Grossa 84015-500, Brazil.; LEONARDO SLVESTRI SZYMCZAK, Department of Crop Production and Protection, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, Brazil. Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 91540-000, Brazil; ANIBAL DE MORAES, Department of Crop Production and Protection, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, Brazil.; LIDIANE FONSECA, Department of Crop Production and Protection, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, Brazil.; JEAN CARLOS MEZZALIRA, CONSIPA—Consulting on Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems, Ponta Grossa 84015-500, Brazil.; JEAN VICTOR SAVIAN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANGEL SÁNCHEZ ZUBIETA, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 91540-000, Brazil.; CAROLINA BREMM, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 91540-000, Brazil; PAULO CÉSAR DE FACCIO CARVALHO, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 91540-000, Brazil; ALDA LÚCIA GOMES MONTEIRO, Department of Crop Production and Protection, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, Brazil. Department of Crop Production and Protection, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, Brazil. |
Título : |
Low-intensity, high-frequency grazing strategy increases herbage production and beef cattle performance on sorghum pastures. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animals 2022, volume 12, number 1, 13 pages. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010013 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 17 October 2021 / Revised: 8 November 2021 / Accepted: 10 November 2021 / Published: 22 December 2021 . |
Contenido : |
We assessed the effects of high-intensity and low-frequency (HILF) vs. low-intensity and high-frequency (LIHF) grazing on herbage production and performance of beef cattle grazing sorghum pastures. The experimental design was a complete randomized block with two treatments and four replicates (paddocks), carried out in 2014/15. The management target of 50 and 30 cm for pre- and post-grazing, respectively, a LIHF grazing management strategy oriented to maximize beef cattle herbage intake per unit time, was compared with a HILF grazing management strategy of 80 and 20 cm for pre- and post-grazing, respectively, aiming to maximize herbage accumulation and harvest efficiency. Sixteen Brangus steers of 15-month-old and 265 ± 21 kg of live weight (LW) were randomly distributed to paddocks (experimental units). The LIHF resulted in shorter rest periods when compared with the HILF. The greater leaf lamina mass in LIHF allowed greater sward light interception at post-grazing, resulting in greater total herbage production than HILF (7581 and 4154 kg DM/ha, respectively). The average daily gain (ADG) of steers was greater for the LIHF than for the HILF treatment (0.950 and 0.702 kg/animal, respectively); however, even with a greater stocking rate in the HILF, there was no difference for LW gain per ha, with an average of 4 kg LW/ha/day. Our findings demonstrated that the LIHF strategy that is based on offering to the animals an optimal sward structure to favor the maximum herbage intake rate fosters greater herbage production, harvesting efficiency, and ADG without compromising LW gain per area of beef steers, despite the lower herbage harvested per stocking cycle. MenosWe assessed the effects of high-intensity and low-frequency (HILF) vs. low-intensity and high-frequency (LIHF) grazing on herbage production and performance of beef cattle grazing sorghum pastures. The experimental design was a complete randomized block with two treatments and four replicates (paddocks), carried out in 2014/15. The management target of 50 and 30 cm for pre- and post-grazing, respectively, a LIHF grazing management strategy oriented to maximize beef cattle herbage intake per unit time, was compared with a HILF grazing management strategy of 80 and 20 cm for pre- and post-grazing, respectively, aiming to maximize herbage accumulation and harvest efficiency. Sixteen Brangus steers of 15-month-old and 265 ± 21 kg of live weight (LW) were randomly distributed to paddocks (experimental units). The LIHF resulted in shorter rest periods when compared with the HILF. The greater leaf lamina mass in LIHF allowed greater sward light interception at post-grazing, resulting in greater total herbage production than HILF (7581 and 4154 kg DM/ha, respectively). The average daily gain (ADG) of steers was greater for the LIHF than for the HILF treatment (0.950 and 0.702 kg/animal, respectively); however, even with a greater stocking rate in the HILF, there was no difference for LW gain per ha, with an average of 4 kg LW/ha/day. Our findings demonstrated that the LIHF strategy that is based on offering to the animals an optimal sward structure to favor the maximum herbage intak... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
GRAZING MANAGEMENT; OPTIMAL SWARD STRUCTURE; ROTATIONAL STOCKING. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16653/1/animals-12-00013-Baggio-Portugal.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02697naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1062627 005 2022-09-01 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aPORTUGAL, T. B. 245 $aLow-intensity, high-frequency grazing strategy increases herbage production and beef cattle performance on sorghum pastures.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 500 $aArticle history: Received: 17 October 2021 / Revised: 8 November 2021 / Accepted: 10 November 2021 / Published: 22 December 2021 . 520 $aWe assessed the effects of high-intensity and low-frequency (HILF) vs. low-intensity and high-frequency (LIHF) grazing on herbage production and performance of beef cattle grazing sorghum pastures. The experimental design was a complete randomized block with two treatments and four replicates (paddocks), carried out in 2014/15. The management target of 50 and 30 cm for pre- and post-grazing, respectively, a LIHF grazing management strategy oriented to maximize beef cattle herbage intake per unit time, was compared with a HILF grazing management strategy of 80 and 20 cm for pre- and post-grazing, respectively, aiming to maximize herbage accumulation and harvest efficiency. Sixteen Brangus steers of 15-month-old and 265 ± 21 kg of live weight (LW) were randomly distributed to paddocks (experimental units). The LIHF resulted in shorter rest periods when compared with the HILF. The greater leaf lamina mass in LIHF allowed greater sward light interception at post-grazing, resulting in greater total herbage production than HILF (7581 and 4154 kg DM/ha, respectively). The average daily gain (ADG) of steers was greater for the LIHF than for the HILF treatment (0.950 and 0.702 kg/animal, respectively); however, even with a greater stocking rate in the HILF, there was no difference for LW gain per ha, with an average of 4 kg LW/ha/day. Our findings demonstrated that the LIHF strategy that is based on offering to the animals an optimal sward structure to favor the maximum herbage intake rate fosters greater herbage production, harvesting efficiency, and ADG without compromising LW gain per area of beef steers, despite the lower herbage harvested per stocking cycle. 653 $aGRAZING MANAGEMENT 653 $aOPTIMAL SWARD STRUCTURE 653 $aROTATIONAL STOCKING 700 1 $aSZYMCZAK, L. S. 700 1 $aDE MORAES, A. 700 1 $aFONSECA, L. 700 1 $aMEZZALIRA, J.C. 700 1 $aSAVIAN, J.V. 700 1 $aZUBIETA, A. S. 700 1 $aBREMM, C. 700 1 $aDE FACCIO CARVALHO, P. C. 700 1 $aMONTEIRO, A. L. G. 773 $tAnimals 2022, volume 12, number 1, 13 pages. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010013
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|