|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
16/09/2014 |
Actualizado : |
28/05/2018 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
ALBICETTE, M.M.; CHIAPPE, M. |
Afiliación : |
MARIA MARTA ALBICETTE BASTRERI, Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Uruguay; MARTA CHIAPPE HERNÁNDEZ, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía. |
Título : |
Una experiencia de investigación participativa en Uruguay. An experience of participatory research in Uruguay. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2012 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agricultura, Sociedad y Desarrollo, 2012, vol.9, no.1, p.29-54. |
ISSN : |
1870-5472 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Contenido : |
RESUMEN
Los enfoques participativos para el desarrollo y la investigación e innovación en el sector agrario han buscado respuestas adaptadas a las necesidades de los productores utilizando diferentes metodologías, entre las que se encuentra la investigación participativa (IP). Entre 2006 y 2009 tuvo lugar en Uruguay un proceso denominado Desarrollo Participativo de Innovaciones (DPI), llevado adelante por investigadores del Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA) y productores orgánicos hortícolas, focalizado en tecnología de abonos verdes; siendo el primer caso de IP iniciado y finalizado en el sector agrario uruguayo. En este ensayo se describe una investigación evaluativa del DPI a partir de entrevistas en profundidad a productores y técnicos participantes. Se analizan fortalezas y debilidades, aprendizajes y resultados del DPI, aportando sugerencias para un próximo ciclo o para su aplicación en otros procesos participativos. Como resultado del proceso fue posible introducir la metodología en INIA, progresar en su implementación, compartir saberes entre investigadores y productores y lograr innovación con la tecnología, permitiendo aprendizaje y apropiación social del conocimiento.
ABSTRACT.
Participatory approaches for development, and research and innovation in the agricultural sector have sought answers adapted to the needs of producers using different methodologies, among them participatory research (PR). Between 2006 and 2009, a process took place in Uruguay called Participatory Innovation Development (PID, Desarrollo Participativo de Innovaciones), carried out by researchers in the National Agriculture and Livestock Research Institute (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, INIA) and organic vegetable producers, focused on green fertilizer technologies; this was the first case of PR that began and was finished in the Uruguay agrarian sector. In this essay, we describe the evaluative research of PID, contributing suggestions for the next cycle or to apply in other participatory processes. As a result of the process, it was possible to introduce the INIA methodology, make progress in its implementation, share knowledge between researchers and farmers, and achieve innovation with technology, allowing learning and social appropriation of the knowledge. MenosRESUMEN
Los enfoques participativos para el desarrollo y la investigación e innovación en el sector agrario han buscado respuestas adaptadas a las necesidades de los productores utilizando diferentes metodologías, entre las que se encuentra la investigación participativa (IP). Entre 2006 y 2009 tuvo lugar en Uruguay un proceso denominado Desarrollo Participativo de Innovaciones (DPI), llevado adelante por investigadores del Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA) y productores orgánicos hortícolas, focalizado en tecnología de abonos verdes; siendo el primer caso de IP iniciado y finalizado en el sector agrario uruguayo. En este ensayo se describe una investigación evaluativa del DPI a partir de entrevistas en profundidad a productores y técnicos participantes. Se analizan fortalezas y debilidades, aprendizajes y resultados del DPI, aportando sugerencias para un próximo ciclo o para su aplicación en otros procesos participativos. Como resultado del proceso fue posible introducir la metodología en INIA, progresar en su implementación, compartir saberes entre investigadores y productores y lograr innovación con la tecnología, permitiendo aprendizaje y apropiación social del conocimiento.
ABSTRACT.
Participatory approaches for development, and research and innovation in the agricultural sector have sought answers adapted to the needs of producers using different methodologies, among them participatory research (PR). Between 2006 and 2009, a process took place ... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
INVESTIGACIÓN PARTICIPATIVA; ORGANIC AGRICULTURE; PARTICIPATORY INNOVATION DEVELOPMENT. |
Thesagro : |
AGRICULTURA ORGÁNICA; DESARROLLO PARTICIPATIVO DE INNOVACIÓN. |
Asunto categoría : |
E50 Sociología rural y seguridad social |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/5353/1/Albicette-M.M.-2012..pdf
http://www.colpos.mx/asyd/volumen9/numero1/asd-11-021.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03050naa a2200205 a 4500 001 1050323 005 2018-05-28 008 2012 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1870-5472 100 1 $aALBICETTE, M.M. 245 $aUna experiencia de investigación participativa en Uruguay. An experience of participatory research in Uruguay.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2012 520 $aRESUMEN Los enfoques participativos para el desarrollo y la investigación e innovación en el sector agrario han buscado respuestas adaptadas a las necesidades de los productores utilizando diferentes metodologías, entre las que se encuentra la investigación participativa (IP). Entre 2006 y 2009 tuvo lugar en Uruguay un proceso denominado Desarrollo Participativo de Innovaciones (DPI), llevado adelante por investigadores del Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA) y productores orgánicos hortícolas, focalizado en tecnología de abonos verdes; siendo el primer caso de IP iniciado y finalizado en el sector agrario uruguayo. En este ensayo se describe una investigación evaluativa del DPI a partir de entrevistas en profundidad a productores y técnicos participantes. Se analizan fortalezas y debilidades, aprendizajes y resultados del DPI, aportando sugerencias para un próximo ciclo o para su aplicación en otros procesos participativos. Como resultado del proceso fue posible introducir la metodología en INIA, progresar en su implementación, compartir saberes entre investigadores y productores y lograr innovación con la tecnología, permitiendo aprendizaje y apropiación social del conocimiento. ABSTRACT. Participatory approaches for development, and research and innovation in the agricultural sector have sought answers adapted to the needs of producers using different methodologies, among them participatory research (PR). Between 2006 and 2009, a process took place in Uruguay called Participatory Innovation Development (PID, Desarrollo Participativo de Innovaciones), carried out by researchers in the National Agriculture and Livestock Research Institute (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, INIA) and organic vegetable producers, focused on green fertilizer technologies; this was the first case of PR that began and was finished in the Uruguay agrarian sector. In this essay, we describe the evaluative research of PID, contributing suggestions for the next cycle or to apply in other participatory processes. As a result of the process, it was possible to introduce the INIA methodology, make progress in its implementation, share knowledge between researchers and farmers, and achieve innovation with technology, allowing learning and social appropriation of the knowledge. 650 $aAGRICULTURA ORGÁNICA 650 $aDESARROLLO PARTICIPATIVO DE INNOVACIÓN 653 $aINVESTIGACIÓN PARTICIPATIVA 653 $aORGANIC AGRICULTURE 653 $aPARTICIPATORY INNOVATION DEVELOPMENT 700 1 $aCHIAPPE, M. 773 $tAgricultura, Sociedad y Desarrollo, 2012, vol.9, no.1, p.29-54.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
28/10/2019 |
Actualizado : |
28/10/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
GEORGE, T.S.; GILES, C.D.; MENEZES-BLACKBURN, D.; CONDRON, L.M.; GAMA-RODRIGUES, A.C.; JAISI, D.; LANG, F.; NEAL, A.L.; STUTTER, M.I.; ALMEIDA, D.S.; BOL, R.; CABUGAO, K.G.; CELI, L.; COTNER, J.B.; FENG, G.; GOLL, D.S.; HALLAMA, M.; KRUEGER, J.; PLASSARD, C.; ROSLING, A.; DARCH, T.; FRASER, T.; GIESLER, R.; RICHARDSON, A.E.; TAMBURINI, F.; SHAND, C.A.; LUMSDON, D.G.; ZHANG, H.; BLACKWEL, M.S.A.; WEARING, C.; MEZELI, M.M.; ALMÅS, Å.R.; AUDETTE, Y.; BERTRAND, I.; BEYHAUT, E.; BOITT, G.; BRADSHAW, N.; BREARLEY, C.A.; BRUULSEMA, T.W.; CIAIS, P.; COZZOLINO, V.; DURAN, P.C.; MORA, M.L.; DE MENEZES, A.B.; DODD, R.J.; DUNFIELD, K.; ENGL, C.; FRAZÃO, J.J.; GARLAND, G.; GONZÁLEZ JIMÉNEZ, J.L.; GRACA, J.; GRANGER, S.J.; HARRISON, A.F.; HEUCK, C.; HOU, E.Q.; JOHNES, P.J.; KAISER, K.; KJÆR. H.A.; KLUMPP, E.; LAMB, A.L.; MACINTOSH, K.A.A; MACKAY, E.B.; MCGRATH, J.; MCINTYRE, C.; MCLAREN, T.; MÉSZÁROS, E.; MISSONG, A.; MOOSHAMMER, M.; NEGRÓN, C.P.; NELSON, L.A.; PFAHLER, V.; POBLETE-GRANT, P.; RANDALL, M.; SEGUEL, A.; SETH, K.; SMITH, A.C.; SMITS, M.M.; SOBARZO, J.A.; SPOHN, M.; TAWARAYA, K.; TIBBETT, M.; VORONEY, V.; WALLANDER, H.; WANG, L.; WASAKI, J.; HAYGARTH, P.M. |
Afiliación : |
T. S. GEORGE, The James Hutton Institute, United Kingdom.; C. D. GILES, The James Hutton Institute, United Kingdom.; D. MENEZES-BLACKBURN, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, United Kingdom.; L. M. CONDRON, Lincoln University, New Zealand.; A. C. GAMA-RODRIGUES, Universidade Estadual do Norte Fluminense Darcy Ribeiro (UENF - Laboratório de Solos), Brazil.; D. JAISI, Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, United States; F. LANG, Plant and Soil Sciences, University of Delaware, United States; A. L. NEAL, Rothamsted Research, West Common, United Kingdom; M. I. STUTTER, The James Hutton Institute, United Kingdom; D. S. ALMEIDA, College of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Crop Science, Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Brazil; R. BOL, Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-3: Agrosphere, Germany; K. G. CABUGAO, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, United States; L. CELI, DISAFA, Soil Biogeochemistry, University of Turin, Italy; J. B. COTNER, University of Minnesota, United States; G. FENG, China Agricultural University, Beijing, China; D. S. GOLL, Le Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, IPSL-LSCE CEA/CNRS/UVSQ Saclay, France; M. HALLAMA, Institute of Soil Science, University of Hohenheim, Germany; J. KRUEGER, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources, Chair of Soil Ecology, University of Freiburg, Germany; C. PLASSARD, INRA UMR ECO&SOLS, Montpellier, France; A. ROSLING, Evolutionary Biology Centre, EBC, Sweden; T. DARCH, Rothamsted Research, West Common, United Kingdom; T. FRASER, Centre for Agri-environmental Research, School of Agriculture Policy and Development, University of Reading, United Kingdom; R. GIESLER, Climate Impacts Research Centre, Dep. of Ecology and Environmental Science, Umeå University, Sweden; A. E. RICHARDSON, CSIRO Agriculture & Food, ACT, Australia; F. TAMBURINI, D-USYS, ETH Zurich, Switzerland; C. A. SHAND, The James Hutton Institute, United Kingdom; D. G. LUMSDON, The James Hutton Institute, United Kingdom; H. ZHANG, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, United Kingdom; M. S. A. BLACKWEL, Rothamsted Research, West Common, United Kingdom; C. WEARING, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, United Kingdom; M. M. MEZELI, The James Hutton Institute, United Kingdom; Å. R. ALMÅS, Department of Environmental Sciences, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Norway; Y. AUDETTE, University of Guelph, Canada; I. BERTRAND, INRA UMR ECO&SOLS, Montpellier, France; ELENA BEYHAUT GUTIERREZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; G. BOITT, Lincoln University, New Zealand; N. BRADSHAW, Department of Chemical & Biological Engineering, The University of Sheffield, United Kingdom; C. A. BREARLEY, School of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, United Kingdom; T. W. BRUULSEMA, International Plant Nutrition Institute, Canada; P. CIAIS, Le Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l’Environnement, IPSL-LSCE CEA/CNRS/UVSQ Saclay, France; V. COZZOLINO, Centro Interdipartimentale di Ricerca sulla Risonanza Magnetica Nucleare per l’Ambiente, l’Agro-Alimentare ed i Nuovi Materiali (CERMANU), Università di Napoli Federico II, Italy; P. C. DURAN, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile; M. L. MORA, Centro Interdipartimentale di Ricerca sulla Risonanza Magnetica Nucleare per l’Ambiente, l’Agro-Alimentare ed i Nuovi Materiali (CERMANU), Università di Napoli Federico II, Italy; A. B. DE MENEZES, School of Environment and Life Sciences, University of Salford, United Kingdom; R. J. DODD, School of the Environment, Natural Resources and Geography, Bangor University, United Kingdom; K. DUNFIELD, University of Guelph, Canada; C. ENGL, School of Biological Sciences and Institute for Global Food Security, The Queen’s University of Belfast, United Kingdom; J. J. FRAZÃO, CENA, University of Sao Paulo, Brazil; G. GARLAND, D-USYS, ETH Zurich, Switzerland; J. L. GONZÁLEZ JIMÉNEZ, Teagasc, Environmental Research Centre, Ireland; J. GRACA, Teagasc, Environmental Research Centre, Ireland; S. J. GRANGER, Rothamsted Research, West Common, United Kingdom; A. F. HARRISON, Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, United Kingdom; C. HEUCK, Department of Soil Biogeochemistry, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University Bayreuth, Germany; E. Q. HOU, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China; P. J. JOHNES, School of Geographical Sciences & School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, United Kingdom; K. KAISER, Soil Science and Soil Protection, Martin Luther University Halle-Wittenberg, Germany; H. A. KJÆR, Centre for Ice and Climate, Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen, Denmark; E. KLUMPP, Evolutionary Biology Centre, EBC, Sweden; A. L. LAMB, NERC Isotope Geosciences Facility, British Geological Survey, United Kingdom; K. A. MACINTOSH, School of Biological Sciences and Institute for Global Food Security, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, United Kingdom; E. B. MACKAY, Centre for Ecology & Hydrology, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, United Kingdom; J. MCGRATH, School of Biological Sciences and Institute for Global Food Security, The Queen’s University of Belfast, Medical Biology Centre, United Kingdom; C. MCINTYRE, School of Geographical Sciences & School of Chemistry, University of Bristol, United Kingdom; T. MCLAREN, D-USYS, ETH Zurich, Switzerland; E. MÉSZÁROS, D-USYS, ETH Zurich, Switzerland; A. MISSONG, Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-3: Agrosphere, Germany; M. MOOSHAMMER, Department of Microbiology and Ecosystem Science, University of Vienna, Austria; C. P. NEGRÓN, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile; L. A. NELSON, University of Northern British Columbia, Canada; V. PFAHLER, Rothamsted Research, West Common, United Kingdom; P. POBLETE-GRANT, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile; M. RANDALL, Brigham Young University, United States; A. SEGUEL, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile; K. SETH, Lincoln University, New Zealand; A. C. SMITH, NERC Isotope Geosciences Facility, British Geological Survey, United Kingdom; M. M. SMITS, Centre for Environmental Sciences, Hasselt University Building D, Belgium; J. A. SOBARZO, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco, Chile; M. SPOHN, Department of Soil Biogeochemistry, Bayreuth Center of Ecology and Environmental Research (BayCEER), University Bayreuth, Germany; K. TAWARAYA, Yamagata University, Japan; M. TIBBETT, Centre for Agri-environmental Research, School of Agriculture Policy and Development, University of Reading, United Kingdom; V. VORONEY, University of Guelph, Canada; H. WALLANDER, Department of Biology, Lund University, Sweden; L. WANG, Institute of Bio- and Geosciences, IBG-3: Agrosphere, Germany; J. WASAKI, Assessment of Microbial Environment, Graduate School of Biosphere Science, Hiroshima University, Japan; P. M. HAYGARTH, Lancaster Environment Centre, Lancaster University, United Kingdom. |
Título : |
Organic phosphorus in the terrestrial environment: a perspective on the state of the art and future priorities. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Plant and Soil, 1 June 2018, Volume 427, Issue 1-2, Pages 191-208. |
ISSN : |
0032-079X |
DOI : |
10.1007/s11104-017-3391-x |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 28 April 2017 /Accepted: 17 August 2017 / Published online: 6 October 2017.
Update notice: Correction to: Organic phosphorus in the terrestrial environment: a perspective on the state of the art and future priorities (Plant and Soil, (2018), 427, 1-2, (191-208), 10.1007/s11104-017-3391-x) (2018) Plant and Soil, 427 (1-2), pp. 209-211.
Funding text: Acknowledgements This work was performed with the financial support of the Organic Phosphorus Utilisation in Soils (OPUS) project, funded by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC – BBSRC - BB/K018167/1) in the UK and the Rural & Environment Science & Analytical Services Division of the Scottish Government. Fraser and Tibbett acknowledge the support of BBSRC SARISA programme BB/L025671/2. We also acknowledge the contribution to the output of the OP2016 workshop of all the attendees of the meeting who chose not be named as an author on this paper. In particular, the authors would like to thank Barbara Cade-Menun and Ben Turner and acknowledge there contribution to drafts of this manuscript. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Background: The dynamics of phosphorus (P) in the environment is important for regulating nutrient cycles in natural and managed ecosystems and an integral part in assessing biological resilience against environmental change. Organic P (Po) compounds play key roles in biological and ecosystems function in the terrestrial environment being critical to cell function, growth and reproduction. Scope: We asked a group of experts to consider the global issues associated with Po in the terrestrial environment, methodological strengths and weaknesses, benefits to be gained from understanding the Po cycle, and to set priorities for Po research. Conclusions: We identified seven key opportunities for Po research including: the need for integrated, quality controlled and functionally based methodologies; assessment of stoichiometry with other elements in organic matter; understanding the dynamics of Po in natural and managed systems; the role of microorganisms in controlling Po cycles; the implications of nanoparticles in the environment and the need for better modelling and communication of the research. Each priority is discussed and a statement of intent for the Po research community is made that highlights there are key contributions to be made toward understanding biogeochemical cycles, dynamics and function of natural ecosystems and the management of agricultural systems.
© 2017, Springer International Publishing AG. |
Palabras claves : |
Ecosystems services; Method development; Microbiome; Modelling; Organic phosphorus; Stoichiometry. |
Asunto categoría : |
P01 Conservación de la naturaleza y recursos de La tierra |
Marc : |
LEADER 05693naa a2201249 a 4500 001 1060354 005 2019-10-28 008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0032-079X 024 7 $a10.1007/s11104-017-3391-x$2DOI 100 1 $aGEORGE, T.S. 245 $aOrganic phosphorus in the terrestrial environment$ba perspective on the state of the art and future priorities.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2018 500 $aArticle history: Received: 28 April 2017 /Accepted: 17 August 2017 / Published online: 6 October 2017. Update notice: Correction to: Organic phosphorus in the terrestrial environment: a perspective on the state of the art and future priorities (Plant and Soil, (2018), 427, 1-2, (191-208), 10.1007/s11104-017-3391-x) (2018) Plant and Soil, 427 (1-2), pp. 209-211. Funding text: Acknowledgements This work was performed with the financial support of the Organic Phosphorus Utilisation in Soils (OPUS) project, funded by Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC – BBSRC - BB/K018167/1) in the UK and the Rural & Environment Science & Analytical Services Division of the Scottish Government. Fraser and Tibbett acknowledge the support of BBSRC SARISA programme BB/L025671/2. We also acknowledge the contribution to the output of the OP2016 workshop of all the attendees of the meeting who chose not be named as an author on this paper. In particular, the authors would like to thank Barbara Cade-Menun and Ben Turner and acknowledge there contribution to drafts of this manuscript. 520 $aABSTRACT. Background: The dynamics of phosphorus (P) in the environment is important for regulating nutrient cycles in natural and managed ecosystems and an integral part in assessing biological resilience against environmental change. Organic P (Po) compounds play key roles in biological and ecosystems function in the terrestrial environment being critical to cell function, growth and reproduction. Scope: We asked a group of experts to consider the global issues associated with Po in the terrestrial environment, methodological strengths and weaknesses, benefits to be gained from understanding the Po cycle, and to set priorities for Po research. Conclusions: We identified seven key opportunities for Po research including: the need for integrated, quality controlled and functionally based methodologies; assessment of stoichiometry with other elements in organic matter; understanding the dynamics of Po in natural and managed systems; the role of microorganisms in controlling Po cycles; the implications of nanoparticles in the environment and the need for better modelling and communication of the research. Each priority is discussed and a statement of intent for the Po research community is made that highlights there are key contributions to be made toward understanding biogeochemical cycles, dynamics and function of natural ecosystems and the management of agricultural systems. © 2017, Springer International Publishing AG. 653 $aEcosystems services 653 $aMethod development 653 $aMicrobiome 653 $aModelling 653 $aOrganic phosphorus 653 $aStoichiometry 700 1 $aGILES, C.D. 700 1 $aMENEZES-BLACKBURN, D. 700 1 $aCONDRON, L.M. 700 1 $aGAMA-RODRIGUES, A.C. 700 1 $aJAISI, D. 700 1 $aLANG, F. 700 1 $aNEAL, A.L. 700 1 $aSTUTTER, M.I. 700 1 $aALMEIDA, D.S. 700 1 $aBOL, R. 700 1 $aCABUGAO, K.G. 700 1 $aCELI, L. 700 1 $aCOTNER, J.B. 700 1 $aFENG, G. 700 1 $aGOLL, D.S. 700 1 $aHALLAMA, M. 700 1 $aKRUEGER, J. 700 1 $aPLASSARD, C. 700 1 $aROSLING, A. 700 1 $aDARCH, T. 700 1 $aFRASER, T. 700 1 $aGIESLER, R. 700 1 $aRICHARDSON, A.E. 700 1 $aTAMBURINI, F. 700 1 $aSHAND, C.A. 700 1 $aLUMSDON, D.G. 700 1 $aZHANG, H. 700 1 $aBLACKWEL, M.S.A. 700 1 $aWEARING, C. 700 1 $aMEZELI, M.M. 700 1 $aALMÅS, Å.R. 700 1 $aAUDETTE, Y. 700 1 $aBERTRAND, I. 700 1 $aBEYHAUT, E. 700 1 $aBOITT, G. 700 1 $aBRADSHAW, N. 700 1 $aBREARLEY, C.A. 700 1 $aBRUULSEMA, T.W. 700 1 $aCIAIS, P. 700 1 $aCOZZOLINO, V. 700 1 $aDURAN, P.C. 700 1 $aMORA, M.L. 700 1 $aDE MENEZES, A.B. 700 1 $aDODD, R.J. 700 1 $aDUNFIELD, K. 700 1 $aENGL, C. 700 1 $aFRAZÃO, J.J. 700 1 $aGARLAND, G. 700 1 $aGONZÁLEZ JIMÉNEZ, J.L. 700 1 $aGRACA, J. 700 1 $aGRANGER, S.J. 700 1 $aHARRISON, A.F. 700 1 $aHEUCK, C. 700 1 $aHOU, E.Q. 700 1 $aJOHNES, P.J. 700 1 $aKAISER, K. 700 1 $aKJÆR. H.A. 700 1 $aKLUMPP, E. 700 1 $aLAMB, A.L. 700 1 $aMACINTOSH, K.A.A 700 1 $aMACKAY, E.B. 700 1 $aMCGRATH, J. 700 1 $aMCINTYRE, C. 700 1 $aMCLAREN, T. 700 1 $aMÉSZÁROS, E. 700 1 $aMISSONG, A. 700 1 $aMOOSHAMMER, M. 700 1 $aNEGRÓN, C.P. 700 1 $aNELSON, L.A. 700 1 $aPFAHLER, V. 700 1 $aPOBLETE-GRANT, P. 700 1 $aRANDALL, M. 700 1 $aSEGUEL, A. 700 1 $aSETH, K. 700 1 $aSMITH, A.C. 700 1 $aSMITS, M.M. 700 1 $aSOBARZO, J.A. 700 1 $aSPOHN, M. 700 1 $aTAWARAYA, K. 700 1 $aTIBBETT, M. 700 1 $aVORONEY, V. 700 1 $aWALLANDER, H. 700 1 $aWANG, L. 700 1 $aWASAKI, J. 700 1 $aHAYGARTH, P.M. 773 $tPlant and Soil, 1 June 2018, Volume 427, Issue 1-2, Pages 191-208.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|