| |
|
|
| Registros recuperados : 35 | |
| 6. |  | CARDOZO, G.; SCARLATO, S.; BLUMETTO, O.; RUGGIA, A.; JAURENA, M. ¿Es afectada la doble estructura de arbustos y pajas por los cambios en la gestión del pastoreo en campos naturales? In: Reunión del Grupo Técnico en Forrajeras del Cono Sur, Grupo Campos, 24, 2017, Tacuarembó, Uruguay; Ayala, W.; Boggiano, P.; Álvarez, O.; eds. Bioma campos : Retomando un camino de oportunidades para una producción ganadera sustentable. Memorias. Tacuarembó (Uruguay): Grupo Campos, 2017. p. 150-152 ver elect. La paginación electrónica difiere de la versión papel, paginación papel: p.159-161.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|    |
| 7. | | TORRES, L.; AGUERRE, V.; RUGGIA, A.; SCARLATO, S.; DOGLIOTTI, S. Guía para el diseño de sistemas ganaderos climáticamente inteligentes. Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2024. (INIA, Edición Especial). Equipo de trabajo: Colaboradores: Florencia Meijides, Isabel Barros (Extensionistas del proyecto Ganadería y Clima); Gervasio Piñeiro, Pablo Soca, Ignacio Paparamborda, Cecilia Márquez (Facultad de Agronomía (Fagro) - Universidad de la...| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 9. | | CARDOZO, G.; SCARLATO, S.; BLUMETTO, O.; RUGGIA, A.; JAURENA, M. How species community are affected by an increase in biomass of Campos grassland, seven case studies.(Abstract). Revista de Divulgación Técnica Agropecuaria, Agroindustrial y Ambiental Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias. UNLZ, v. 3(4) 2016. p. 105. Congreso Nacional sobre Manejo de Pastizales Naturales, 7. Encuentro de Ganaderos del Pastizal del Cono Sur, 10. 5-6 Nov. 2016, Virasoro, Corrientes (Argentina).| Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
| 10. | | BLUMETTO, O.; CASTAGNA, A.; GARCIA, F.; SCARLATO, S.; CARDOZO, G. Management strategies for a win-win relationship between increasing productivity an environmental protection: proposal bases and first results. International Conference on Sustainable Environment and Agriculture, 2., IACSIT Press, Singapore, 2014. International Proceedings of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering (IPCBEE), 2014, volume 76, p.36-41.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 11. | | AGUERRE, V.; ALBICETTE, M.M.; RUGGIA, A.; SCARLATO, S.; SCARLATO, M.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; ALBIN, A. Co-innovando para el desarrollo sostenible de sistemas de producción familiar de Rocha-Uruguay. Ponencia Eje 3: El desarrollo rural desde la gestión de las unidades productivas. In: PRIMER CONGRESO DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES AGRARIAS, 1er. "Desafíos y contribuciones para el desarrollo rural", Montevideo (UY) : Fac.Agronomía (UdelaR), 16-17 Agosto 2012. [Presentación Oral] 25 diap.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 12. | | ALBICETTE, M.M.; LEONI, C.; RUGGIA, A.; SCARLATO, S.; ALBIN, A.; AGUERRE, V. A co-innovation approach in family-farming livestock systems in Rocha - Uruguay: A three-year learning process. In: EUROPEAN IFSA SYMPOSIUM, 12th., "Social and technological transformation of farming systems: Diverging and converging pathways", Symposium Handbook, Harper Adams University, UK, 12-15 July 2016. 13 p.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 14. | | ALBICETTE, M.M.; LEONI, C.; RUGGIA, A.; SCARLATO, S.; BLUMETTO, O.; ALBIN, A.; AGUERRE, V. Co-innovation in family-farming livestock systems in Rocha, Uruguay: A 3-year learning process. Outlook in Agriculture, 2017, v.46 (2): 92-98. Article history: Article first published online: June 8, 2017 / Issue published: June 1, 2017.
Special issue: Co-innovation in agricultural settings. Guest Editor : Neels Botha , James A Turner , Simon Fielke , and Laurens Klerkx.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
|  |
| 15. | | BLUMETTO, O.; CASTAGNA, A.; CARDOZO, G.; RUGGIA, A.; SCARLATO, S.; TISCORNIA, G.; GARCIA, F.; AGUERRE, V. Ecosystem Integrity Index: A New Tool for Ecosystem Services Evaluation in Livestock Production Systems. Ecological Goods & Services of Rangelands and Pasturelands. In: PROCEEDINGS OF THE INTERNATIONAL RANGELAND CONGRESS, 10th, "The Future Management of Grazing and Wild Lands in a High-Tech World". Saskatoon, SK, Canadá, July 16-22, 2016, p. 448-449.| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 16. | | BLUMETTO, O.; CASTAGNA, A.; CARDOZO, G.; RUGGIA, A.; SCARLATO, S.; TISCORNIA, G.; GARCÍA, F.; AGUERRE, V. Desarrollando herramientas para evaluar el estado de los ecosistemas: El Índice de Integridad Ecosistémica (IIE). [Presentación oral y Resúmen] In: Libro de resúmenes de las TERCERAS JORNADAS INTERDISCIPLINARIAS EN BIODIVERSIDAD Y ECOLOGIA. "Desafíos socio-ambientales para el Uruguay del futuro" 28 de Noviembre a 2 de Diciembre 2016, Centro Universitario Regional del Este Rocha, Uruguay. p.104| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| 17. | | Fernández Abella, D.; Formoso, D.; Goicoechea, I.; Locatelli, A.; Scarlato, S.; Ibañez, W.; Irabuena, O. Estudio de la mortalidad embrionaria y fetal en ovinos. III. Efecto de la asignación forraje y de un estrés pluviométrico artificial sobre la tasa ovulatoria y pérdidas reproductivas en ovejas Corriedale SUL Producción Ovina, 2007, v. 19, p. 15-23| Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
| 18. | | BLUMETTO, O.; SCARLATO, S.; CASTAGNA, A.; TISCORNIA, G.; RUGGIA, A.; CARDOZO, G. Improving livestock production assuring natural grassland ecosystem conservation: three key management practices at farm level. In: INTERNATIONAL GRASSLAND CONGRESS, 23., IGC 2015 20 - 24 November, New Delhi. Sustainable use of grassland resources for forage production, biodiversity and environmental protection: Extended abstracts. Nova Delhi: ICAR-Indian Grassland and Fodder Research Institute, 2015. 3 p. Paper ID: 450 Theme 2. Grassland production and utilization. Sub-theme 2.1. Quality, production, conservation and utilisation| Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
| Registros recuperados : 35 | |
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
25/10/2016 |
|
Actualizado : |
25/10/2016 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Abstracts/Resúmenes |
|
Autor : |
SCARLATO, S.; AGUERRE, V.; BORTAGARAY, I.; SCARLATO, M.; RUGGIA, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
SANTIAGO SCARLATO GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA VERONICA AGUERRE ANTIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ISABEL BORTAGARAY SABARROS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIANA SCARLATO GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDREA PAOLA RUGGIA CHIESA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Co-inovação em sistemas familiares de gado de corte na região leste do Uruguay. II: Abordagem metodológica em estabelecimentos de referência. [Co-innovation in family livestock systems in eastern Uruguay. II: Methodological approach at farm-scales level] |
|
Complemento del título : |
GRUPO DE TRABALHO (GT) - GT1 - Diagnóstico e Intervenção em Busca de Sistemas de Produção Sustentáveis [Resumos expandidos] |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2014 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: CONGRESSO DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE SISTEMAS DE PRODUÇÃO, 10, "ENFOQUE SISTEMICO E AGRICULTURA FAMILIAR NA CONSTRUÇÃO DO DESENVOLVIMENTO RURAL SUSTENTAVEL", Foz do Iguaçu - PR, 14 a 17 de maio de 2014. [Resumen expandido] |
|
Páginas : |
p. 453-460 |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
In Uruguay, livestock production involves 65% of the family farmers and more than 70% of the total area of the country. Several technologies have been generated by researchers
to increase economic and productive results in beef-cattle production systems. However, these technologies are poorly adopted and have a relative low impact on the sustainability
of the farming systems. Among other reasons, this could be due to the difficulty in combining all the information in a particular productive system. In Uruguay, the sustainability
of horticulture-livestock family farming systems was improved using the co-innovation approach, and till now, no efforts were made with livestock family systems. In the present
work, we hypothesized that is necessary to use a systemic and participative approach for re-designing productive systems in order to improve their sustainability. So the objective
was to adapt the co-innovation approach for livestock family farming systems in the Eastern region of Uruguay through its application in pilot farms. The work was carried out
with 7 pilot farms, using the co-innovation approach and following three steps: 1- characterization and diagnosis, 2- re-design and 3- implementation, monitoring and evaluation.
The social dimension of the changes and the comprehension of the type of learning process, related to the changes that the families involved deal with, were systematized with
in-depth interviews, participant observations and other complementary techniques. The interchange process between technical and local knowledge is a distinctive and relevant
characteristic of the project. The planning of the decision process associated with farming activities is one of the learning that farmers highlight and clearly associate with the project. However, in other areas planning is not so noticeable. For example, one of the most critical limitations is the difficulty to project a model of family farming inside the family. In most of the families, is not possible to visualize new generations to maintain and sustain the model in the future. The co-innovation approach has demonstrated to be appropriate
and of high relevance to facilitate significant changes in the farming systems that are directly involved with the project. A tailored and precise diagnosis along with the re-design of
the farming system with a systemic approach, constructed together between farmers and technicians, were key factors for the successful implementation of the changes. MenosABSTRACT.
In Uruguay, livestock production involves 65% of the family farmers and more than 70% of the total area of the country. Several technologies have been generated by researchers
to increase economic and productive results in beef-cattle production systems. However, these technologies are poorly adopted and have a relative low impact on the sustainability
of the farming systems. Among other reasons, this could be due to the difficulty in combining all the information in a particular productive system. In Uruguay, the sustainability
of horticulture-livestock family farming systems was improved using the co-innovation approach, and till now, no efforts were made with livestock family systems. In the present
work, we hypothesized that is necessary to use a systemic and participative approach for re-designing productive systems in order to improve their sustainability. So the objective
was to adapt the co-innovation approach for livestock family farming systems in the Eastern region of Uruguay through its application in pilot farms. The work was carried out
with 7 pilot farms, using the co-innovation approach and following three steps: 1- characterization and diagnosis, 2- re-design and 3- implementation, monitoring and evaluation.
The social dimension of the changes and the comprehension of the type of learning process, related to the changes that the families involved deal with, were systematized with
in-depth interviews, participant observations and other complementar... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
FAMILY PRODUCTION SYSTEMS; INNOVATION; INVESTIGACIÓN PARTICIPATIVA; LEARNING PROCESS; PARTICIPATORY RESEARCH; SISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN FAMILIAR; SYSTEMS APPROACH. |
|
Thesagro : |
AGRICULTURA FAMILIAR; AGROECOLOGÍA; APRENDIZAJE; ENFOQUE DE SISTEMAS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/6235/1/Scarlato-S.-X-Anais-SBSP-Sociedade-Brasileira-de-Sistema-2014.pdf
http://www.sbsp.org.br/z1files/pub/147403629942442_Anais-SBSP-Sociedade-Brasileira-de-Sistema.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03766nam a2200301 a 4500
001 1055890
005 2016-10-25
008 2014 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d
100 1 $aSCARLATO, S.
245 $aCo-inovação em sistemas familiares de gado de corte na região leste do Uruguay. II$bAbordagem metodológica em estabelecimentos de referência. [Co-innovation in family livestock systems in eastern Uruguay. II: Methodological approach at farm-scales level]$h[electronic resource]
260 $aIn: CONGRESSO DA SOCIEDADE BRASILEIRA DE SISTEMAS DE PRODUÇÃO, 10, "ENFOQUE SISTEMICO E AGRICULTURA FAMILIAR NA CONSTRUÇÃO DO DESENVOLVIMENTO RURAL SUSTENTAVEL", Foz do Iguaçu - PR, 14 a 17 de maio de 2014. [Resumen expandido]$c2014
300 $ap. 453-460
520 $aABSTRACT. In Uruguay, livestock production involves 65% of the family farmers and more than 70% of the total area of the country. Several technologies have been generated by researchers to increase economic and productive results in beef-cattle production systems. However, these technologies are poorly adopted and have a relative low impact on the sustainability of the farming systems. Among other reasons, this could be due to the difficulty in combining all the information in a particular productive system. In Uruguay, the sustainability of horticulture-livestock family farming systems was improved using the co-innovation approach, and till now, no efforts were made with livestock family systems. In the present work, we hypothesized that is necessary to use a systemic and participative approach for re-designing productive systems in order to improve their sustainability. So the objective was to adapt the co-innovation approach for livestock family farming systems in the Eastern region of Uruguay through its application in pilot farms. The work was carried out with 7 pilot farms, using the co-innovation approach and following three steps: 1- characterization and diagnosis, 2- re-design and 3- implementation, monitoring and evaluation. The social dimension of the changes and the comprehension of the type of learning process, related to the changes that the families involved deal with, were systematized with in-depth interviews, participant observations and other complementary techniques. The interchange process between technical and local knowledge is a distinctive and relevant characteristic of the project. The planning of the decision process associated with farming activities is one of the learning that farmers highlight and clearly associate with the project. However, in other areas planning is not so noticeable. For example, one of the most critical limitations is the difficulty to project a model of family farming inside the family. In most of the families, is not possible to visualize new generations to maintain and sustain the model in the future. The co-innovation approach has demonstrated to be appropriate and of high relevance to facilitate significant changes in the farming systems that are directly involved with the project. A tailored and precise diagnosis along with the re-design of the farming system with a systemic approach, constructed together between farmers and technicians, were key factors for the successful implementation of the changes.
650 $aAGRICULTURA FAMILIAR
650 $aAGROECOLOGÍA
650 $aAPRENDIZAJE
650 $aENFOQUE DE SISTEMAS
653 $aFAMILY PRODUCTION SYSTEMS
653 $aINNOVATION
653 $aINVESTIGACIÓN PARTICIPATIVA
653 $aLEARNING PROCESS
653 $aPARTICIPATORY RESEARCH
653 $aSISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN FAMILIAR
653 $aSYSTEMS APPROACH
700 1 $aAGUERRE, V.
700 1 $aBORTAGARAY, I.
700 1 $aSCARLATO, M.
700 1 $aRUGGIA, A.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
