|
|
Registros recuperados : 25 | |
2. | | SCARLATO, M.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; GIMENEZ, G.; LENZI, A. Análisis y jerarquización de factores determinantes del rendimiento del cultivo de frutilla en el sur de Uruguay. (Tesis de Maestría Facultad de Agronomía ? Universidad de la Republica, INIA). Día de campo. Predio de la Familia Topetti, San Antonio, Canelones, 3 de setiembre 2013. In: INIA Las Brujas, Programa Nacional Producción Hortícola. Frutilla en el sur del país. Canelones (UY): INIA, 2013. p. 8-15 (INIA Serie Actividades de Difusión; 717)Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
9. | | AGUERRE, V.; ALBICETTE, M.M.; RUGGIA, A.; SCARLATO, S.; SCARLATO, M.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; ALBIN, A. Co-innovando para el desarrollo sostenible de sistemas de producción familiar de Rocha-Uruguay. Ponencia Eje 3: El desarrollo rural desde la gestión de las unidades productivas. In: PRIMER CONGRESO DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES AGRARIAS, 1er. "Desafíos y contribuciones para el desarrollo rural", Montevideo (UY) : Fac.Agronomía (UdelaR), 16-17 Agosto 2012. [Presentación Oral] 25 diap.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
11. | | ARRUABARRENA, A.; RUBIO, L.; BLANCO, O.; SCARLATO, M.; VICENTE, E.; GIMENEZ, G. Colletotrichum nymphaea, del complejo C. acutatum: re-identificación del agente causal de antracnosis de fruto en frutilla en Uruguay. In: JORNADA NACIONAL DE FITOPATOLOGÍA, 3; JORNADA NACIONAL DE PROTECCIÓN VEGETAL, 1., 3 SETIEMBRE 2015, MONTEVIDEO, URUGUAY. Libro de Resúmenes. Montevideo (Uruguay) : SUFIT, 2015. p.14 Financiamiento: INIA Proyecto L2: "Utilización de herramientas moleculares en el mejoramiento genético de frutilla y tomate de Uruguay".Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
12. | | SCARLATO, M.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; BERRUETA, C.; BARROS, C.; REHERMAN, F.; BORGES, A.; GARCÍA, M.; GIMÉNEZ, G. Explaining yield variability between farmers as a first step to reduce gaps. T3. Crop modeling and yield gap analysis for agricultural systems analysis and design. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium for farming systems design. Multi-functional farming systems in a changing world. Montpellier (Francia): European Society of Agronomy, 2015. p. 119-122 Acknowledgements. Without the help of all the farmers that gently contributed their time and fields, and the help of the technical advisers and experts
to select a representative sample of farms, this research would have not be possible,...Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
13. | | AGUERRE, V.; SCARLATO, M.; ALBICETTE, M.M.; SCARLATO, S.; RUGGIA, A.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; ALBIN, A. Un nuevo enfoque en los proyectos de investigación del Programa de Producción familiar de INIA Revista INIA, 2013, no.32, p.41-45Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
14. | | ALBICETTE, M.M.; LEONI, C.; RUGGIA, A.; BORTAGARAY, I.; SCARLATO, M.; SCARLATO, S.; BLUMETTO, O.; ALBIN, A.; AGUERRE, V. Applying the Participatory Impact Pathway Analysis (PIPA) approach to enhance co-innovation for sustainability within livestock family farming in Uruguay. In: EUROPEAN IFSA SYMPOSIUM, 12th., "Social and technological transformation of farming systems: Diverging and converging pathways", Symposium Handbook, Harper Adams University, UK, 12-15 July 2016. 17 p.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
15. | | DOGLIOTTI, S.; SCARLATO, M.; BERRUETA, C.; BARROS, C.; REHERMANN, F.; RIEPPI, M.; INETTI, C.; SOUST, G.; BORGES, A. Análisis y jerarquización de factores determinantes de las brechas de rendimiento y calidad en los principales cultivos hortícolas del Uruguay. Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2021. 81 p. (Serie FPTA-INIA; 91). Proyecto FPTA 288: "Análisis y jerarquización de factores determinantes de las brechas de rendimiento y calidad en los principales cultivos hortícolas del Uruguay." Período de ejecución: Marzo 2014 - Octubre 2017. Institución Ejecutora:...Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
17. | | AGUERRE, V.; ALBICETTE, M.M.; BORTAGARAY, I.; BLUMETTO, O.; CARDOZO, G.; CASTAGNA, A.; CLARA, P.; GARCIA, F.; GILSANZ, J.C.; LEONI, C.; QUINTANS, G.; RUGGIA, A.; SCARLATO, M.; SCARLATO, S.; TISCORNIA, G.; VILARO, F.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; ALBIN, A. Co-innovando para el desarrollo sostenible de sistemas de producción familiar de Rocha-Uruguay: avances sobre la dimensión social del cambio y la comprensión del tipo de procesos de aprendizaje. [Poster] In: CONGRESO DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES Y AGRARIAS, 2. "Enfoques y alternativas para el desarrollo rural", Salto (UY): Fac.Agronomía, Regional Norte (UdelaR), 6-8 Agosto 2014. [Poster] 1 p.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
18. | | AGUERRE, V.; ALBICETTE, M.M.; RUGGIA, A.; SCARLATO, S.; BLUMETTO, O.; BORTAGARAY, I.; CARDOZO, G.; CASTAGNA, A.; CLARA, P.; GARCIA, F.; GILSANZ, J.C.; LEONI, C.; QUINTANS, G.; SCARLATO, M.; SILVERA, M.; TISCORNIA, G.; VILARO, F.; ALBIN, A. El desafío para la ganadería familiar: ¿cómo aumentar producción e ingresos conservando el medio ambiente?. Revista INIA Uruguay, 2014, No.39, p.75-78. (Revista INIA; 39)Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
19. | | SCARLATO, M.; PELUFFO, S.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; DIESTE, J.P.; ABEDALA, C.; AGUERRE, V.; ALBÍN, A.; ALLIAUME, F.; ALVAREZ, J.; BACIGALUPE, G.F.; BARRETO, M.; CHIAPPE, M.; GARCÍA, M.; LEONI, C.; MALÁN, I.; MANCASSOLA, V.; PEDEMONTE, A.; SALVO, G. Un enfoque sistémico y participativo para el desarrollo de sistemas de producción familiares más sostenibles: la experiencia realizada en dos predios de Canelones en el marco de un proyecto de investigación. [resumen] Sistemas de Producción. Agroecología. ln: Congreso Nacional de Horti-Fruticultura, 12. Jornadas Regionales de Manejo Poscosecha de Frutas. Seminario Suelos en Horticultura. Seminario Frutales de Pepita. 20-23 octubre 2012, Montevideo (UY) Trabajos presentados. Montevideo (UY): INIA; SUHF, 2010. p.32.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
20. | | ALBICETTE, M.M.; LEONI, C.; RUGGIA, A.; ALBIN, A.; BENVENUTO, M.; BORTAGARAY, I.; BLUMETTO, O.; CANTIERI, R.; CARDOZO, G.; CASTAGNA, A.; CLARA, P.; DEL PINO, M.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; GARCIA, F.; GILSANZ, J.C.; MONTALDO, S.; QUINTANS, G.; SCARLATO, M.; SCARLATO, S.; SILVERA, M.; TISCORNIA, G.; AGUERRE, V. Co-innovación en sistemas ganaderos familiares del este de Uruguay. [Poster] En: Congreso Nacional de Ingenieros Agrónomos , 11° y Encuentro Regional de Ingeniería Agronómica, 4°; Montevideo (UY), 11-12 Agosto 2016. [Poster] + [Resumen] 1 p. Agradecimientos: "Los autores agradecemos a los productores y sus familias con los que hemos trabajo y compartido experiencias, así como a los actores locales que se involucraron en la Red Interinstitucional y su accionar"Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 25 | |
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
25/10/2016 |
Actualizado : |
28/02/2020 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Abstracts/Resúmenes |
Autor : |
SCARLATO, S.; ALBICETTE, M.M.; BORTAGARAY, I.; RUGGIA, A.; SCARLATO, M.; AGUERRE, V. |
Afiliación : |
SANTIAGO SCARLATO GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA MARTA ALBICETTE BASTRERI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ISABEL BORTAGARAY SABARROS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDREA PAOLA RUGGIA CHIESA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIANA SCARLATO GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA VERONICA AGUERRE ANTIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Co-innovation as an effective approach to promote changes in farm management in livestock systems in Uruguay. |
Complemento del título : |
T8. Co-design and co-innovation with farmers and stakeholders: methods, results and challenges. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium for farming systems design. Multi-functional farming systems in a changing world. Montpellier (Francia): European Society of Agronomy, 2015. |
Páginas : |
p. 283-284 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Contenido : |
In Uruguay, livestock production involves 65% of the family farmers and more than 70% of the area of the country. Low levels of sustainability were diagnosed in livestock family farming systems based on natural grasslands in Uruguay, being the main causes low meat yield and income. Scientific evidence shows that it is possible to increase production while preserving natural resources and enhancing ecosystem services through changes in management practices of pastures and animals (Nabinger et al., 2011). However, during the last decades low levels of technological innovation has been applied in livestock systems. Lack of improvement by farmers could be explained by the weakness and the traditional approach of the extension service. From a traditional approach, innovations are designed externally to the systems and farmers adopt those innovations by an “extension” process. Extension linearly involves awareness of the problem by the farmer, interest in the solution, evaluation, experimentation and finally adoption (Cramb, 2000). Nevertheless, the active participation of the farmers in the diagnosis and redesign might maximize the impact of the proposals generated, promoting learning processes that support innovation in practices in the long term (Leeuwis & Van der Ban, 2004). The co-innovation approach combines complex systems theory, social learning and dynamic project monitoring and evaluation to stimulate strategic re-orientation of family farm systems (Rossing et al., 2010). We hypothesized that a systemic and participative approach such as this one is necessary for re-designing productive systems in order to improve their sustainability, being the learning process in farmers as important as the bio-physical changes in their production systems. MenosIn Uruguay, livestock production involves 65% of the family farmers and more than 70% of the area of the country. Low levels of sustainability were diagnosed in livestock family farming systems based on natural grasslands in Uruguay, being the main causes low meat yield and income. Scientific evidence shows that it is possible to increase production while preserving natural resources and enhancing ecosystem services through changes in management practices of pastures and animals (Nabinger et al., 2011). However, during the last decades low levels of technological innovation has been applied in livestock systems. Lack of improvement by farmers could be explained by the weakness and the traditional approach of the extension service. From a traditional approach, innovations are designed externally to the systems and farmers adopt those innovations by an “extension” process. Extension linearly involves awareness of the problem by the farmer, interest in the solution, evaluation, experimentation and finally adoption (Cramb, 2000). Nevertheless, the active participation of the farmers in the diagnosis and redesign might maximize the impact of the proposals generated, promoting learning processes that support innovation in practices in the long term (Leeuwis & Van der Ban, 2004). The co-innovation approach combines complex systems theory, social learning and dynamic project monitoring and evaluation to stimulate strategic re-orientation of family farm systems (Rossing et al., 2010)... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
LIVESTOCK SYSTEMS; PRODUCCION FAMILIAR; SISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN FAMILIAR. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/6242/1/Scarlato-S.-2015.-5th-Int.Symp.Farming-Systems-Montpellier.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02596nam a2200217 a 4500 001 1055899 005 2020-02-28 008 2015 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d 100 1 $aSCARLATO, S. 245 $aCo-innovation as an effective approach to promote changes in farm management in livestock systems in Uruguay.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium for farming systems design. Multi-functional farming systems in a changing world. Montpellier (Francia): European Society of Agronomy$c2015 300 $ap. 283-284 520 $aIn Uruguay, livestock production involves 65% of the family farmers and more than 70% of the area of the country. Low levels of sustainability were diagnosed in livestock family farming systems based on natural grasslands in Uruguay, being the main causes low meat yield and income. Scientific evidence shows that it is possible to increase production while preserving natural resources and enhancing ecosystem services through changes in management practices of pastures and animals (Nabinger et al., 2011). However, during the last decades low levels of technological innovation has been applied in livestock systems. Lack of improvement by farmers could be explained by the weakness and the traditional approach of the extension service. From a traditional approach, innovations are designed externally to the systems and farmers adopt those innovations by an “extension” process. Extension linearly involves awareness of the problem by the farmer, interest in the solution, evaluation, experimentation and finally adoption (Cramb, 2000). Nevertheless, the active participation of the farmers in the diagnosis and redesign might maximize the impact of the proposals generated, promoting learning processes that support innovation in practices in the long term (Leeuwis & Van der Ban, 2004). The co-innovation approach combines complex systems theory, social learning and dynamic project monitoring and evaluation to stimulate strategic re-orientation of family farm systems (Rossing et al., 2010). We hypothesized that a systemic and participative approach such as this one is necessary for re-designing productive systems in order to improve their sustainability, being the learning process in farmers as important as the bio-physical changes in their production systems. 653 $aLIVESTOCK SYSTEMS 653 $aPRODUCCION FAMILIAR 653 $aSISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN FAMILIAR 700 1 $aALBICETTE, M.M. 700 1 $aBORTAGARAY, I. 700 1 $aRUGGIA, A. 700 1 $aSCARLATO, M. 700 1 $aAGUERRE, V.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|