|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
27/07/2022 |
Actualizado : |
27/02/2023 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
Autor : |
MISZTAL, I.; LOURENCO, D.; TSURUTA, S.; AGUILAR, I.; MASUDA, Y.; BERMANN, M.; CESARANI, A.; LEGARRA, A. |
Afiliación : |
I. MISZTAL, University of Georgia, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, 30602, Athens, GA, USA; D. LOURENCO, University of Georgia, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, 30602, Athens, GA, USA; S. TSURUTA, University of Georgia, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, 30602, Athens, GA, USA; IGNACIO AGUILAR GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Y. MASUDA, Rakuno Gakuen University, 069-8501, Ebetsu, Hokkaido, Japan; M. BERMANN, University of Georgia, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, 30602, Athens, GA, USA; A. CESARANI, University of Georgia, Department of Animal and Dairy Science, 30602, Athens, GA, USA; A. LEGARRA, Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement, UMR1388 GenPhySE, 31326, Castanet Tolosan, France. |
Título : |
How ssGBLUP became suitable for national dairy cattle evaluations. [668]. |
Complemento del título : |
Part 37 - Bovine dairy - genetic evaluation methods. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP), 12., Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 3-8 July 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-940-4_668 |
Páginas : |
2757-2760. |
DOI : |
10.3920/978-90-8686-940-4_668 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Published online: February 9, 2023 -- Corresponding author: I. Misztal, email: ignacy@uga.edu |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- National dairy evaluations use mostly multistep methods, where a nongenomic BLUP evaluation is followed by extraction of pseudo-phenotypes, genomic analyses, and merging nongenomic and genomic evaluations. With genomic preselection and many females genotyped, pseudo-phenotypes are biased, and it is hard to accommodate female genotypes fully. Such problems were successfully solved in other species by ssGBLUP, but large biases and expensive computing were experienced in dairy. This paper documents several improvements that made ssGBLUP feasible for national dairy evaluations. |
Palabras claves : |
BLUP (BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION); GENOTYPES. |
Asunto categoría : |
L10 Genética y mejoramiento animal |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/17001/1/978-90-8686-940-4-668.pdf
https://www.wageningenacademic.com/doi/epdf/10.3920/978-90-8686-940-4_668
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01567nam a2200253 a 4500 001 1063466 005 2023-02-27 008 2022 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.3920/978-90-8686-940-4_668$2DOI 100 1 $aMISZTAL, I. 245 $aHow ssGBLUP became suitable for national dairy cattle evaluations. [668].$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: Proceedings of the World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production (WCGALP), 12., Rotterdam, the Netherlands, 3-8 July 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.3920/978-90-8686-940-4_668$c8686 300 $a2757-2760. 500 $aArticle history: Published online: February 9, 2023 -- Corresponding author: I. Misztal, email: ignacy@uga.edu 520 $aABSTRACT.- National dairy evaluations use mostly multistep methods, where a nongenomic BLUP evaluation is followed by extraction of pseudo-phenotypes, genomic analyses, and merging nongenomic and genomic evaluations. With genomic preselection and many females genotyped, pseudo-phenotypes are biased, and it is hard to accommodate female genotypes fully. Such problems were successfully solved in other species by ssGBLUP, but large biases and expensive computing were experienced in dairy. This paper documents several improvements that made ssGBLUP feasible for national dairy evaluations. 653 $aBLUP (BEST LINEAR UNBIASED PREDICTION) 653 $aGENOTYPES 700 1 $aLOURENCO, D. 700 1 $aTSURUTA, S. 700 1 $aAGUILAR, I. 700 1 $aMASUDA, Y. 700 1 $aBERMANN, M. 700 1 $aCESARANI, A. 700 1 $aLEGARRA, A.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha actual : |
20/05/2015 |
Actualizado : |
17/10/2018 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Documentos |
Autor : |
RAVAGNOLO, O.; AGUILAR, I.; PRAVIA, M.I.; CALISTRO, S.; OLEGGINI, G. |
Afiliación : |
OLGA RAVAGNOLO GUMILA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; IGNACIO AGUILAR GARCIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA ISABEL PRAVIA NIN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SERGIO ARIEL CALISTRO PEREZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GABRIEL OLEGGINI, Sociedad de Criadores Hereford (SCH), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Informe de padres Hereford 2007. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2007 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: Anuario [de la] Sociedad de Criadores Hereford del Uruguay, p. 241-[331], 2007. |
Idioma : |
Español |
Palabras claves : |
DIFERENCIA ESPERADA EN LA PROGENIE; EPDs; MEJORAMIENTO GENÉTICO ANIMAL. |
Thesagro : |
BOVINOS PARA CARNE; URUGUAY. |
Asunto categoría : |
L10 Genética y mejoramiento animal |
Marc : |
LEADER 00614naa a2200217 a 4500 001 1052664 005 2018-10-17 008 2007 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aRAVAGNOLO, O. 245 $aInforme de padres Hereford 2007. 260 $c2007 650 $aBOVINOS PARA CARNE 650 $aURUGUAY 653 $aDIFERENCIA ESPERADA EN LA PROGENIE 653 $aEPDs 653 $aMEJORAMIENTO GENÉTICO ANIMAL 700 1 $aAGUILAR, I. 700 1 $aPRAVIA, M.I. 700 1 $aCALISTRO, S. 700 1 $aOLEGGINI, G. 773 $tIn: Anuario [de la] Sociedad de Criadores Hereford del Uruguay, p. 241-[331], 2007.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|