|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
05/11/2018 |
Actualizado : |
05/11/2018 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Informes Agroclimáticos |
Autor : |
GIMÉNEZ, A.; CAL, A.; TISCORNIA, G.; SCHIAVI, C. |
Afiliación : |
AGUSTIN EDUARDO GIMÉNEZ FUREST, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ADRIAN TABARE CAL ALVAREZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUADALUPE TISCORNIA TOSAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CARLOS IGNACIO SCHIAVI RAMPELBERG, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Informe agroclimático 2018 - Situación a Octubre. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Montevideo (Uruguay): INIA, 2018. |
Páginas : |
4 p. |
Serie : |
(Informe Agroclimático; 150) |
Idioma : |
Español |
Palabras claves : |
AGROCLIMA; AGROCLIMATOLOGÍA; BOLETIN AGROCLIMÁTICO; CARACTERIZACIÓN AGROCLIMÁTICA; DIRECCION VIENTO; ESTACIONES AGROMETEOROLOGICAS; ESTACIONES AUTOMATICAS; ESTACIONES INIA; ESTADO DEL TIEMPO; ESTRÉS HÍDRICO; GRAFICAS AGROCLIMATICOS; GRAS; HELIOFANOGRAFO; INFORMACION SATELITAL; INFORME AGROCLIMÁTICO 2018; INUNDACIONES; LLUVIAS DIARIAS; MAXIMA; MEDIA; MINIMA; PANEL SOLAR; PERSPECTIVAS CLIMATICAS; PLUVIOMETRO; PRECIPITACION NACIONAL; PREVENCION HELADAS; PRONOSTICO; SENSOR; SIMETRICO; TANQUE A; TERMOCUPLAS; TERMOHIDROGRAFO; VARIABLES AGROCLIMATICAS; VELETA. |
Thesagro : |
AGROCLIMATOLOGIA; CAMBIO CLIMATICO; CLIMA; CLIMATOLOGIA; ESTACIONES METEOROLOGICAS; ESTRES HIDRICO; EVAPORACION; EVAPOTRANSPIRACION; HUMEDAD; HUMEDAD RELATIVA; LLUVIA; METEOROLOGIA; PERSPECTIVAS; PLUVIOMETROS; PRONOSTICO DEL TIEMPO; SENSORES; SISTEMAS; SISTEMAS DE INFORMACION; SUELO; TEMPERATURA; TERMOMETROS. |
Asunto categoría : |
P40 Meteorología y climatología |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/11809/1/Informe-agroclimatico-INIA-GRAS-Octubre-de-2018.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02128nam a2200805 a 4500 001 1059270 005 2018-11-05 008 2018 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 100 1 $aGIMÉNEZ, A. 245 $aInforme agroclimático 2018 - Situación a Octubre.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aMontevideo (Uruguay): INIA$c2018 300 $a4 p. 490 $a(Informe Agroclimático; 150) 650 $aAGROCLIMATOLOGIA 650 $aCAMBIO CLIMATICO 650 $aCLIMA 650 $aCLIMATOLOGIA 650 $aESTACIONES METEOROLOGICAS 650 $aESTRES HIDRICO 650 $aEVAPORACION 650 $aEVAPOTRANSPIRACION 650 $aHUMEDAD 650 $aHUMEDAD RELATIVA 650 $aLLUVIA 650 $aMETEOROLOGIA 650 $aPERSPECTIVAS 650 $aPLUVIOMETROS 650 $aPRONOSTICO DEL TIEMPO 650 $aSENSORES 650 $aSISTEMAS 650 $aSISTEMAS DE INFORMACION 650 $aSUELO 650 $aTEMPERATURA 650 $aTERMOMETROS 653 $aAGROCLIMA 653 $aAGROCLIMATOLOGÍA 653 $aBOLETIN AGROCLIMÁTICO 653 $aCARACTERIZACIÓN AGROCLIMÁTICA 653 $aDIRECCION VIENTO 653 $aESTACIONES AGROMETEOROLOGICAS 653 $aESTACIONES AUTOMATICAS 653 $aESTACIONES INIA 653 $aESTADO DEL TIEMPO 653 $aESTRÉS HÍDRICO 653 $aGRAFICAS AGROCLIMATICOS 653 $aGRAS 653 $aHELIOFANOGRAFO 653 $aINFORMACION SATELITAL 653 $aINFORME AGROCLIMÁTICO 2018 653 $aINUNDACIONES 653 $aLLUVIAS DIARIAS 653 $aMAXIMA 653 $aMEDIA 653 $aMINIMA 653 $aPANEL SOLAR 653 $aPERSPECTIVAS CLIMATICAS 653 $aPLUVIOMETRO 653 $aPRECIPITACION NACIONAL 653 $aPREVENCION HELADAS 653 $aPRONOSTICO 653 $aSENSOR 653 $aSIMETRICO 653 $aTANQUE A 653 $aTERMOCUPLAS 653 $aTERMOHIDROGRAFO 653 $aVARIABLES AGROCLIMATICAS 653 $aVELETA 700 1 $aCAL, A. 700 1 $aTISCORNIA, G. 700 1 $aSCHIAVI, C.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha actual : |
10/09/2020 |
Actualizado : |
01/02/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
GARCÍA, L. F.; NÚÑEZ, E.; LACAVA, M.; SILVA, H.; MARTÍNEZ, S.; PÉTILLON, J. |
Afiliación : |
LUIS FERNANDO GARCÍA, Grupo multidisciplinario en Ecología para la Agricultura, Centro Universitario Regional del Este (CURE), UDELAR, Treinta y Tres; ERIKA NÚÑEZ, PDU - Estudios Interdisciplinarios de Sistemas Territoriales Complejos, CENUR Noreste, Universidad de la República, Rivera Uruguay. Programa para el Desarrollo en Ciencias Básicas (PEDECIBA, UDELAR, Montevideo, Uruguay.; MARIÁNGELES LACAVA, PDU Estudios Interdisciplinarios de Sistemas Territoriales Complejos, CENUR Noreste, UDELAR, Rivera, Uruguay.; HORACIO SILVA, Estación Experimental Mario A. Cassinoni, Facultad de Agronomía, UDELAR, Paysandú, Uruguay.; SEBASTIÁN MARTÍNEZ KOPP, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JULIEN PÉTILLON, UMR CNRS Université de Rennes, Rennes, France. |
Título : |
Experimental assessment of trophic ecology in a generalist spider predator: implications for biocontrol in uruguayan crops. [Original contribution]. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Applied Entomology, February 2021, Volume145, Issue1-2, p.82-91. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12811 |
ISSN : |
0931-2048 |
DOI : |
doi.org/10.1111/jen.12811 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 22 April 2020; Revised: 15 July 2020; Accepted: 17 July 2020; First published: 05 September 2020. |
Contenido : |
Conservative biological control promotes the use of native natural enemies to limit the size and growth of pest populations. Although spiders constitute one of the most important groups of native predators in several crops, their trophic ecology remains largely unknown, especially for several generalist taxa. In laboratory, we assessed the predatory behaviour of a wandering spider (the wolf spider Lycosa thorelli (Keyserling, 1877) against several arthropods varying in size and trophic positions, all found in South American soybean and rice crops. As prey we used the bug Piezodorus guildinii (Westwood, 1837) as well as larvae and adults of the moth Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith, 1797), both being considered important pests in Uruguayan crops. We also used several non‐pest arthropods as prey, sarcophagid flies, carabid beetles and wolf spiders. All prey were attacked in more or less high, although not statistically differing, proportions. However, carabids were not consumed, and bugs were consumed in significantly lower proportions than flies. A negative correlation was found between prey size and acceptance rate. Immobilization times were longer against larvae when compared to moths and flies, while predatory sequences were longer for bugs when compared to flies, moths and spiders. In addition, we found a positive effect of prey size on predatory sequence length and complexity. Our results confirm the ability of spiders to attack and feed upon prey with different morphologies, included well‐defended arthropods, and their potential use as natural enemies of several pests in South American crops. MenosConservative biological control promotes the use of native natural enemies to limit the size and growth of pest populations. Although spiders constitute one of the most important groups of native predators in several crops, their trophic ecology remains largely unknown, especially for several generalist taxa. In laboratory, we assessed the predatory behaviour of a wandering spider (the wolf spider Lycosa thorelli (Keyserling, 1877) against several arthropods varying in size and trophic positions, all found in South American soybean and rice crops. As prey we used the bug Piezodorus guildinii (Westwood, 1837) as well as larvae and adults of the moth Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith, 1797), both being considered important pests in Uruguayan crops. We also used several non‐pest arthropods as prey, sarcophagid flies, carabid beetles and wolf spiders. All prey were attacked in more or less high, although not statistically differing, proportions. However, carabids were not consumed, and bugs were consumed in significantly lower proportions than flies. A negative correlation was found between prey size and acceptance rate. Immobilization times were longer against larvae when compared to moths and flies, while predatory sequences were longer for bugs when compared to flies, moths and spiders. In addition, we found a positive effect of prey size on predatory sequence length and complexity. Our results confirm the ability of spiders to attack and feed upon prey with different morpho... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
ARAÑA LOBO; BEHAVIOURAL SEQUENCE; BIOLOGICAL CONTROL; CONDITIONAL PREY ACCEPTANCE; RICE; SOYBEAN; WOLF SPIDER. |
Thesagro : |
ARROZ; CONTROL BIOLÓGICO; SOJA. |
Asunto categoría : |
F01 Cultivo |
Marc : |
LEADER 02792naa a2200337 a 4500 001 1061305 005 2021-02-01 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0931-2048 024 7 $adoi.org/10.1111/jen.12811$2DOI 100 1 $aGARCÍA, L. F. 245 $aExperimental assessment of trophic ecology in a generalist spider predator$bimplications for biocontrol in uruguayan crops. [Original contribution].$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 500 $aArticle history: Received: 22 April 2020; Revised: 15 July 2020; Accepted: 17 July 2020; First published: 05 September 2020. 520 $aConservative biological control promotes the use of native natural enemies to limit the size and growth of pest populations. Although spiders constitute one of the most important groups of native predators in several crops, their trophic ecology remains largely unknown, especially for several generalist taxa. In laboratory, we assessed the predatory behaviour of a wandering spider (the wolf spider Lycosa thorelli (Keyserling, 1877) against several arthropods varying in size and trophic positions, all found in South American soybean and rice crops. As prey we used the bug Piezodorus guildinii (Westwood, 1837) as well as larvae and adults of the moth Spodoptera frugiperda (Smith, 1797), both being considered important pests in Uruguayan crops. We also used several non‐pest arthropods as prey, sarcophagid flies, carabid beetles and wolf spiders. All prey were attacked in more or less high, although not statistically differing, proportions. However, carabids were not consumed, and bugs were consumed in significantly lower proportions than flies. A negative correlation was found between prey size and acceptance rate. Immobilization times were longer against larvae when compared to moths and flies, while predatory sequences were longer for bugs when compared to flies, moths and spiders. In addition, we found a positive effect of prey size on predatory sequence length and complexity. Our results confirm the ability of spiders to attack and feed upon prey with different morphologies, included well‐defended arthropods, and their potential use as natural enemies of several pests in South American crops. 650 $aARROZ 650 $aCONTROL BIOLÓGICO 650 $aSOJA 653 $aARAÑA LOBO 653 $aBEHAVIOURAL SEQUENCE 653 $aBIOLOGICAL CONTROL 653 $aCONDITIONAL PREY ACCEPTANCE 653 $aRICE 653 $aSOYBEAN 653 $aWOLF SPIDER 700 1 $aNÚÑEZ, E. 700 1 $aLACAVA, M. 700 1 $aSILVA, H. 700 1 $aMARTÍNEZ, S. 700 1 $aPÉTILLON, J. 773 $tJournal of Applied Entomology, February 2021, Volume145, Issue1-2, p.82-91. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/jen.12811
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|