| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha : |
09/09/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
05/09/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
RAEGAN HOEFLER; GONZALEZ-BARRIOS , P.; MADHAV BHATTA; NUNES, J.A.R.; BERRO, I.; NALIN, R.S.; BORGES, A.; COVARRUBIAS, E.; DIAZ-GARCIA, L.; QUINCKE, M.; GUTIERREZ, L. |
|
Afiliación : |
HOEFLER, R., Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin?Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA.; PABLO GONZALEZ-BARRIOS, Dpartment of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin?Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA.; BHATTA, M., Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin?Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA.; JOSE A. R. NUNES, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin?Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA.; INES BERRO, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA; RAFAEL S. NALIN, Department of Genetics, Escola Superior de Agricultura “Luiz de Queiroz”, Universidade de São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, 131418-900, Brazil.; ALEJANDRA BORGES, Statistics Department, Facultad de Agronomía, Univesidad de la República, Garzón 780, Montevideo, Uruguay.; EDUARDO COVARRUBIAS, CGIAR Excellence in Breeding Platform (EiB), El Batan, Mexico International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT), El Batan, Mexico.; LUIS DIAZ-GARCIA, Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Forestales, Agricolas y Pecuarias, 20676, Aguascalientes, Mexico.; MARTIN CONRADO QUINCKE WALDEN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LUCIA GUTIERREZ, Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1575 Linden Dr., Madison, WI, 53706, USA. |
|
Título : |
Do Spatial Designs Outperform Classic Experimental Designs?. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 1 December 2020, volume 25, number 4, pag.523-552, 1 December 2020. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2 |
|
DOI : |
10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 15 October 2019/Accepted 01 July 2020/Published 29 August 2020. This project was partially funded through a USDA_AFRI_NIFA_2018-67013-27620 award and by the Hatch Act Formula Fund WISO1984 and WIS03002. Additionally, JARN received funding from CAPES CAPES_PrInt_UFLA 88887.318846_2019-00 as Senior Visiting Professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. |
|
Contenido : |
Controlling spatial variation in agricultural field trials is the most important step to compare treatments efficiently and accurately. Spatial variability can be controlled at the experimental design level with the assignment of treatments to experimental units and at the modeling level with the use of spatial corrections and other modeling strategies. The goal of this study was to compare the efficiency of methods used to control spatial variation in a wide range of scenarios using a simulation approach based on real wheat data. Specifically, classic and spatial experimental designs with and without a twodimensional autoregressive spatial correction were evaluated in scenarios that include differing experimental unit sizes, experiment sizes, relationships among genotypes, genotype by environment interaction levels, and trait heritabilities. Fully replicated designs outperformed partially and unreplicated designs in terms of accuracy; the alpha-lattice incomplete block design was best in all scenarios of the medium-sized experiments.
However, in terms of response to selection, partially replicated experiments that evaluate large population sizes were superior in most scenarios. The AR1×AR1 spatial correction had little benefit in most scenarios except for the medium-sized experiments with the largest experimental unit size and low GE. Overall, the results from this study provide a guide to researchers designing and analyzing large field experiments. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online. MenosControlling spatial variation in agricultural field trials is the most important step to compare treatments efficiently and accurately. Spatial variability can be controlled at the experimental design level with the assignment of treatments to experimental units and at the modeling level with the use of spatial corrections and other modeling strategies. The goal of this study was to compare the efficiency of methods used to control spatial variation in a wide range of scenarios using a simulation approach based on real wheat data. Specifically, classic and spatial experimental designs with and without a twodimensional autoregressive spatial correction were evaluated in scenarios that include differing experimental unit sizes, experiment sizes, relationships among genotypes, genotype by environment interaction levels, and trait heritabilities. Fully replicated designs outperformed partially and unreplicated designs in terms of accuracy; the alpha-lattice incomplete block design was best in all scenarios of the medium-sized experiments.
However, in terms of response to selection, partially replicated experiments that evaluate large population sizes were superior in most scenarios. The AR1×AR1 spatial correction had little benefit in most scenarios except for the medium-sized experiments with the largest experimental unit size and low GE. Overall, the results from this study provide a guide to researchers designing and analyzing large field experiments. Supplementary materials ... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
AUTOREGRESSIVE PROCESS; EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN; PREDICTION ACCURACY; RANDOMIZATION-BASED EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS; RESPONSE TO SELECTION; SPATIAL CORRECTION. |
|
Thesagro : |
DISENO EXPERIMENTAL. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16700/1/JABES-2020.pdf
https://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03067naa a2200349 a 4500
001 1061304
005 2022-09-05
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2$2DOI
100 1 $aRAEGAN HOEFLER
245 $aDo Spatial Designs Outperform Classic Experimental Designs?.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aArticle history: Received 15 October 2019/Accepted 01 July 2020/Published 29 August 2020. This project was partially funded through a USDA_AFRI_NIFA_2018-67013-27620 award and by the Hatch Act Formula Fund WISO1984 and WIS03002. Additionally, JARN received funding from CAPES CAPES_PrInt_UFLA 88887.318846_2019-00 as Senior Visiting Professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.
520 $aControlling spatial variation in agricultural field trials is the most important step to compare treatments efficiently and accurately. Spatial variability can be controlled at the experimental design level with the assignment of treatments to experimental units and at the modeling level with the use of spatial corrections and other modeling strategies. The goal of this study was to compare the efficiency of methods used to control spatial variation in a wide range of scenarios using a simulation approach based on real wheat data. Specifically, classic and spatial experimental designs with and without a twodimensional autoregressive spatial correction were evaluated in scenarios that include differing experimental unit sizes, experiment sizes, relationships among genotypes, genotype by environment interaction levels, and trait heritabilities. Fully replicated designs outperformed partially and unreplicated designs in terms of accuracy; the alpha-lattice incomplete block design was best in all scenarios of the medium-sized experiments. However, in terms of response to selection, partially replicated experiments that evaluate large population sizes were superior in most scenarios. The AR1×AR1 spatial correction had little benefit in most scenarios except for the medium-sized experiments with the largest experimental unit size and low GE. Overall, the results from this study provide a guide to researchers designing and analyzing large field experiments. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.
650 $aDISENO EXPERIMENTAL
653 $aAUTOREGRESSIVE PROCESS
653 $aEXPERIMENTAL DESIGN
653 $aPREDICTION ACCURACY
653 $aRANDOMIZATION-BASED EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS
653 $aRESPONSE TO SELECTION
653 $aSPATIAL CORRECTION
700 1 $aGONZALEZ-BARRIOS , P.
700 1 $aMADHAV BHATTA
700 1 $aNUNES, J.A.R.
700 1 $aBERRO, I.
700 1 $aNALIN, R.S.
700 1 $aBORGES, A.
700 1 $aCOVARRUBIAS, E.
700 1 $aDIAZ-GARCIA, L.
700 1 $aQUINCKE, M.
700 1 $aGUTIERREZ, L.
773 $tJournal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics, 1 December 2020, volume 25, number 4, pag.523-552, 1 December 2020. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-020-00406-2
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
16/03/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
16/03/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
HIRIGOYEN, A.; ACOSTA-MUÑOZ, C.; SALAMANCA, A.J.A.; VARO-MARTINEZ, M.Á.; RACHID, C.; FRANCO, J.; NAVARRO-CERRILLO, R. |
|
Afiliación : |
ANDRES EDUARDO HIRIGOYEN DOMINGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CRISTINA ACOSTA-MUÑOZ, Department of Forestry Engineering, Laboratory of Silviculture, Dendrochronology and Climate Change, DendrodatLab-ERSAF, University of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain; ANTONIO JESÚS ARIZA SALAMANCA, Department of Forestry Engineering, Laboratory of Silviculture, Dendrochronology and Climate Change, DendrodatLab-ERSAF, University of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain; MARIA ÁNGELES VARO-MARTINEZ, Department of Forestry Engineering, Laboratory of Silviculture, Dendrochronology and Climate Change, DendrodatLab-ERSAF, University of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain; ANA CECILIA RACHID CASNATI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JORGE FRANCO, Faculty of Agronomy, University of the Republic, Paysandú, Uruguay; RAFAEL NAVARRO-CERRILLO, Department of Forestry Engineering, Laboratory of Silviculture, Dendrochronology and Climate Change, DendrodatLab-ERSAF, University of Cordoba, Córdoba, Spain. |
|
Título : |
A machine learning approach to model leaf area index in Eucalyptus plantations using high-resolution satellite imagery and airborne laser scanner data. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Annals of Forest Research, 2021, Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages 165-183. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2021.2073 |
|
ISSN : |
1844-8135 |
|
DOI : |
10.15287/afr.2021.2073 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received October 27, 2020; Revised December 14, 2021; Accepted December 21, 2021.
Corresponding author: Hirigoyen, A.; National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA), Tacuarembó, Uruguay; email:ahirigoyen@inia.org.uy -- The authors thank the Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIA-Uruguay) for supporting our research work and for help during the fieldwork. We are particularly grateful to Roberto Scoz, Demian Gomez, Leonidas Carrasco and Alicia Peduzzi for their assistance during this research. RMNC acknowledge the institutional support of the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovaci?n y Universidades (Spain), through the ESPECTRAMED (CGL2017-86161-R). show significant changes. |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT. - As a forest structural parameter, leaf area index (LAI) is crucial for efficient intensive plantation management. Leaf area is responsible for the energy absorption needed for photosynthetic production and transpiration, both affecting growth. Currently, LAI can be estimated either by remote-sensing methods or ground-based methods. However, unlike ground-based methods, remote estimation provides a cost-effective and ecologically significant advance. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether machine learning algorithms can be used to quantify LAI, using either optical remote sensing or LiDAR metrics in Eucalyptus dunnii and Eucalyptus grandis stands. First, empirical relationships between LAI and remote-sensing data using LiDAR metrics and multispectral high-resolution satellite metrics, were assessed. Selected variables for LAI estimation were: forest canopy cover, laser penetration index, canopy relief ratio (from among the LiDAR data), the green normalized difference vegetation index, and normalized difference vegetation index (from among spectral vegetation indices). We compared the accuracy of three machine learning algorithms: artificial neural networks (ANN), random forest (RF) and support vector regression (SVR). The coefficient of determination ranged from 0.60, for ANN, to 0.84, for SVR. The SVR regression methods showed the best performance in terms of overall model accuracy and RMSE (0.60). The results show that the remote sensing data applied through machine learning algorithms provide an effective method to estimate LAI in eucalypt plantations. The methodology proposed is directly applicable for operational forest planning at the landscape level. © 2021, Editura Silvica. All rights reserved. MenosABSTRACT. - As a forest structural parameter, leaf area index (LAI) is crucial for efficient intensive plantation management. Leaf area is responsible for the energy absorption needed for photosynthetic production and transpiration, both affecting growth. Currently, LAI can be estimated either by remote-sensing methods or ground-based methods. However, unlike ground-based methods, remote estimation provides a cost-effective and ecologically significant advance. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether machine learning algorithms can be used to quantify LAI, using either optical remote sensing or LiDAR metrics in Eucalyptus dunnii and Eucalyptus grandis stands. First, empirical relationships between LAI and remote-sensing data using LiDAR metrics and multispectral high-resolution satellite metrics, were assessed. Selected variables for LAI estimation were: forest canopy cover, laser penetration index, canopy relief ratio (from among the LiDAR data), the green normalized difference vegetation index, and normalized difference vegetation index (from among spectral vegetation indices). We compared the accuracy of three machine learning algorithms: artificial neural networks (ANN), random forest (RF) and support vector regression (SVR). The coefficient of determination ranged from 0.60, for ANN, to 0.84, for SVR. The SVR regression methods showed the best performance in terms of overall model accuracy and RMSE (0.60). The results show that the remote sensing data applied throu... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Intensive silviculture; LAI canopy; Machine learning algorithms. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
K01 Ciencias forestales - Aspectos generales |
|
URL : |
https://www.afrjournal.org/index.php/afr/article/viewFile/2073/1177
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03380naa a2200265 a 4500
001 1062842
005 2022-03-16
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1844-8135
024 7 $a10.15287/afr.2021.2073$2DOI
100 1 $aHIRIGOYEN, A.
245 $aA machine learning approach to model leaf area index in Eucalyptus plantations using high-resolution satellite imagery and airborne laser scanner data.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Received October 27, 2020; Revised December 14, 2021; Accepted December 21, 2021. Corresponding author: Hirigoyen, A.; National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA), Tacuarembó, Uruguay; email:ahirigoyen@inia.org.uy -- The authors thank the Instituto Nacional de Investigaciones Agropecuarias (INIA-Uruguay) for supporting our research work and for help during the fieldwork. We are particularly grateful to Roberto Scoz, Demian Gomez, Leonidas Carrasco and Alicia Peduzzi for their assistance during this research. RMNC acknowledge the institutional support of the Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovaci?n y Universidades (Spain), through the ESPECTRAMED (CGL2017-86161-R). show significant changes.
520 $aABSTRACT. - As a forest structural parameter, leaf area index (LAI) is crucial for efficient intensive plantation management. Leaf area is responsible for the energy absorption needed for photosynthetic production and transpiration, both affecting growth. Currently, LAI can be estimated either by remote-sensing methods or ground-based methods. However, unlike ground-based methods, remote estimation provides a cost-effective and ecologically significant advance. The aim of our study was to evaluate whether machine learning algorithms can be used to quantify LAI, using either optical remote sensing or LiDAR metrics in Eucalyptus dunnii and Eucalyptus grandis stands. First, empirical relationships between LAI and remote-sensing data using LiDAR metrics and multispectral high-resolution satellite metrics, were assessed. Selected variables for LAI estimation were: forest canopy cover, laser penetration index, canopy relief ratio (from among the LiDAR data), the green normalized difference vegetation index, and normalized difference vegetation index (from among spectral vegetation indices). We compared the accuracy of three machine learning algorithms: artificial neural networks (ANN), random forest (RF) and support vector regression (SVR). The coefficient of determination ranged from 0.60, for ANN, to 0.84, for SVR. The SVR regression methods showed the best performance in terms of overall model accuracy and RMSE (0.60). The results show that the remote sensing data applied through machine learning algorithms provide an effective method to estimate LAI in eucalypt plantations. The methodology proposed is directly applicable for operational forest planning at the landscape level. © 2021, Editura Silvica. All rights reserved.
653 $aIntensive silviculture
653 $aLAI canopy
653 $aMachine learning algorithms
700 1 $aACOSTA-MUÑOZ, C.
700 1 $aSALAMANCA, A.J.A.
700 1 $aVARO-MARTINEZ, M.Á.
700 1 $aRACHID, C.
700 1 $aFRANCO, J.
700 1 $aNAVARRO-CERRILLO, R.
773 $tAnnals of Forest Research, 2021, Volume 64, Issue 2, Pages 165-183. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.15287/afr.2021.2073
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
