|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha : |
02/10/2023 |
Actualizado : |
11/10/2023 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
Autor : |
PEREIRA MACHÍN, M.; AREOSA, P.; SOTELO, D.; DE HEGEDUS, P. |
Afiliación : |
MARCELO PEREIRA MACHÍN, Coordinador del Proyecto - IPA; PABLO AREOSA, Responsable Componente de Seguimiento y Evaluación - IPA; DIEGO SOTELO BOVINO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PEDRO DE HEGEDUS, Técnico Extensionista emérito - IPA. |
Título : |
Sistematización de medio gestión del pasto (GP). Una comunidad de práctica (CP) en marcha. |
Complemento del título : |
Proyectos FPTA. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2023 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Revista INIA Uruguay, Setiembre 2023, no.74 p.89-92. |
Serie : |
(Revista INIA; 74). |
ISSN : |
1510-9011 |
Idioma : |
Español |
Contenido : |
A partir de los resultados alcanzados y las lecciones aprendidas luego de más de dos años de trabajo, el equipo del Proyecto reflexiona sobre las estrategias de intervención para capitalizar nuevos aprendizajes, continuar posicionando sus herramientas y escalar los resultados. El proyecto FPTA 356 GP comenzó su ejecución en el 2021. |
Palabras claves : |
CAMPO NATURAL; FPTA (FONDO DE PROMOCIÓN DE TECNOLOGÍA AGROPECUARIA); PASTURAS. |
Thesagro : |
PROYECTOS DE INVESTIGACION. |
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/17383/1/Revista-INIA-74-set-2023-20.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01053naa a2200229 a 4500 001 1064337 005 2023-10-11 008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1510-9011 100 1 $aPEREIRA MACHÍN, M. 245 $aSistematización de medio gestión del pasto (GP). Una comunidad de práctica (CP) en marcha.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2023 490 $a(Revista INIA; 74). 520 $aA partir de los resultados alcanzados y las lecciones aprendidas luego de más de dos años de trabajo, el equipo del Proyecto reflexiona sobre las estrategias de intervención para capitalizar nuevos aprendizajes, continuar posicionando sus herramientas y escalar los resultados. El proyecto FPTA 356 GP comenzó su ejecución en el 2021. 650 $aPROYECTOS DE INVESTIGACION 653 $aCAMPO NATURAL 653 $aFPTA (FONDO DE PROMOCIÓN DE TECNOLOGÍA AGROPECUARIA) 653 $aPASTURAS 700 1 $aAREOSA, P. 700 1 $aSOTELO, D. 700 1 $aDE HEGEDUS, P. 773 $tRevista INIA Uruguay, Setiembre 2023, no.74 p.89-92.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha actual : |
03/01/2022 |
Actualizado : |
01/09/2022 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - 1 |
Autor : |
PORTUGAL, T. B.; SZYMCZAK, L. S.; DE MORAES, A.; FONSECA, L.; MEZZALIRA, J.C.; SAVIAN, J.V.; ZUBIETA, A. S.; BREMM, C.; DE FACCIO CARVALHO, P. C.; MONTEIRO, A. L. G. |
Afiliación : |
THALES BAGGIO PORTUGAL, Department of Crop Production and Protection, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, Brazil. CONSIPA—Consulting on Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems, Ponta Grossa 84015-500, Brazil.; LEONARDO SLVESTRI SZYMCZAK, Department of Crop Production and Protection, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, Brazil. Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 91540-000, Brazil; ANIBAL DE MORAES, Department of Crop Production and Protection, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, Brazil.; LIDIANE FONSECA, Department of Crop Production and Protection, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, Brazil.; JEAN CARLOS MEZZALIRA, CONSIPA—Consulting on Integrated Crop-Livestock Systems, Ponta Grossa 84015-500, Brazil.; JEAN VICTOR SAVIAN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANGEL SÁNCHEZ ZUBIETA, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 91540-000, Brazil.; CAROLINA BREMM, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 91540-000, Brazil; PAULO CÉSAR DE FACCIO CARVALHO, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre 91540-000, Brazil; ALDA LÚCIA GOMES MONTEIRO, Department of Crop Production and Protection, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, Brazil. Department of Crop Production and Protection, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba 80035-050, Brazil. |
Título : |
Low-intensity, high-frequency grazing strategy increases herbage production and beef cattle performance on sorghum pastures. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animals 2022, volume 12, number 1, 13 pages. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010013 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 17 October 2021 / Revised: 8 November 2021 / Accepted: 10 November 2021 / Published: 22 December 2021 . |
Contenido : |
We assessed the effects of high-intensity and low-frequency (HILF) vs. low-intensity and high-frequency (LIHF) grazing on herbage production and performance of beef cattle grazing sorghum pastures. The experimental design was a complete randomized block with two treatments and four replicates (paddocks), carried out in 2014/15. The management target of 50 and 30 cm for pre- and post-grazing, respectively, a LIHF grazing management strategy oriented to maximize beef cattle herbage intake per unit time, was compared with a HILF grazing management strategy of 80 and 20 cm for pre- and post-grazing, respectively, aiming to maximize herbage accumulation and harvest efficiency. Sixteen Brangus steers of 15-month-old and 265 ± 21 kg of live weight (LW) were randomly distributed to paddocks (experimental units). The LIHF resulted in shorter rest periods when compared with the HILF. The greater leaf lamina mass in LIHF allowed greater sward light interception at post-grazing, resulting in greater total herbage production than HILF (7581 and 4154 kg DM/ha, respectively). The average daily gain (ADG) of steers was greater for the LIHF than for the HILF treatment (0.950 and 0.702 kg/animal, respectively); however, even with a greater stocking rate in the HILF, there was no difference for LW gain per ha, with an average of 4 kg LW/ha/day. Our findings demonstrated that the LIHF strategy that is based on offering to the animals an optimal sward structure to favor the maximum herbage intake rate fosters greater herbage production, harvesting efficiency, and ADG without compromising LW gain per area of beef steers, despite the lower herbage harvested per stocking cycle. MenosWe assessed the effects of high-intensity and low-frequency (HILF) vs. low-intensity and high-frequency (LIHF) grazing on herbage production and performance of beef cattle grazing sorghum pastures. The experimental design was a complete randomized block with two treatments and four replicates (paddocks), carried out in 2014/15. The management target of 50 and 30 cm for pre- and post-grazing, respectively, a LIHF grazing management strategy oriented to maximize beef cattle herbage intake per unit time, was compared with a HILF grazing management strategy of 80 and 20 cm for pre- and post-grazing, respectively, aiming to maximize herbage accumulation and harvest efficiency. Sixteen Brangus steers of 15-month-old and 265 ± 21 kg of live weight (LW) were randomly distributed to paddocks (experimental units). The LIHF resulted in shorter rest periods when compared with the HILF. The greater leaf lamina mass in LIHF allowed greater sward light interception at post-grazing, resulting in greater total herbage production than HILF (7581 and 4154 kg DM/ha, respectively). The average daily gain (ADG) of steers was greater for the LIHF than for the HILF treatment (0.950 and 0.702 kg/animal, respectively); however, even with a greater stocking rate in the HILF, there was no difference for LW gain per ha, with an average of 4 kg LW/ha/day. Our findings demonstrated that the LIHF strategy that is based on offering to the animals an optimal sward structure to favor the maximum herbage intak... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
GRAZING MANAGEMENT; OPTIMAL SWARD STRUCTURE; ROTATIONAL STOCKING. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16653/1/animals-12-00013-Baggio-Portugal.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02697naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1062627 005 2022-09-01 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 100 1 $aPORTUGAL, T. B. 245 $aLow-intensity, high-frequency grazing strategy increases herbage production and beef cattle performance on sorghum pastures.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 500 $aArticle history: Received: 17 October 2021 / Revised: 8 November 2021 / Accepted: 10 November 2021 / Published: 22 December 2021 . 520 $aWe assessed the effects of high-intensity and low-frequency (HILF) vs. low-intensity and high-frequency (LIHF) grazing on herbage production and performance of beef cattle grazing sorghum pastures. The experimental design was a complete randomized block with two treatments and four replicates (paddocks), carried out in 2014/15. The management target of 50 and 30 cm for pre- and post-grazing, respectively, a LIHF grazing management strategy oriented to maximize beef cattle herbage intake per unit time, was compared with a HILF grazing management strategy of 80 and 20 cm for pre- and post-grazing, respectively, aiming to maximize herbage accumulation and harvest efficiency. Sixteen Brangus steers of 15-month-old and 265 ± 21 kg of live weight (LW) were randomly distributed to paddocks (experimental units). The LIHF resulted in shorter rest periods when compared with the HILF. The greater leaf lamina mass in LIHF allowed greater sward light interception at post-grazing, resulting in greater total herbage production than HILF (7581 and 4154 kg DM/ha, respectively). The average daily gain (ADG) of steers was greater for the LIHF than for the HILF treatment (0.950 and 0.702 kg/animal, respectively); however, even with a greater stocking rate in the HILF, there was no difference for LW gain per ha, with an average of 4 kg LW/ha/day. Our findings demonstrated that the LIHF strategy that is based on offering to the animals an optimal sward structure to favor the maximum herbage intake rate fosters greater herbage production, harvesting efficiency, and ADG without compromising LW gain per area of beef steers, despite the lower herbage harvested per stocking cycle. 653 $aGRAZING MANAGEMENT 653 $aOPTIMAL SWARD STRUCTURE 653 $aROTATIONAL STOCKING 700 1 $aSZYMCZAK, L. S. 700 1 $aDE MORAES, A. 700 1 $aFONSECA, L. 700 1 $aMEZZALIRA, J.C. 700 1 $aSAVIAN, J.V. 700 1 $aZUBIETA, A. S. 700 1 $aBREMM, C. 700 1 $aDE FACCIO CARVALHO, P. C. 700 1 $aMONTEIRO, A. L. G. 773 $tAnimals 2022, volume 12, number 1, 13 pages. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12010013
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|