| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA La Estanzuela. Por información adicional contacte bib_le@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha : |
02/04/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
24/02/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Capítulo en Libro Técnico-Científico |
|
Autor : |
JOHANSSON, E.; BRANLARD, G.; CUNIBERTI, M.; FLAGELLA, Z.; HÜSKEN, A.; NURIT, E.; PEÑA, R.J.; SISSONS, M.; VÁZQUEZ, D. |
|
Afiliación : |
EVA JOHANSSON, Department of Plant BreedingThe Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Alnarp,Sweden.; GÉRARD BRANLARD, INRAE, UCA UMR1095 GDEC Clermont-Ferrand, France.; MARTA CUNIBERTI, Wheat and Soybean Quality Lab, National Institute of Agriculture Technology (INTA). Marcos Juárez, órdoba,Argentina.; ZINA FLAGELLA, Department of Agricultural, Food and Environmental SciencesUniversity of Foggia, Foggia, Italy.; ALEXANDRA HÜSKEN, Department of Safety and Quality of CerealsMax Rubner-Institut, Federal Research Institute of Nutrition and Food Detmold, Germany.; ERIC NURIT, Mazan,France.; ROBERTO JAVIER PEÑA, International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center (CIMMYT)Texcoco, Mexico.; MIKE SISSONS, NSW Department of Primary IndustriesTamworth Centre for Crop Improvement Calala,Australia.; DANIEL VÁZQUEZ PEYRONEL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Genotypic and Environmental Effects on Wheat Technological and Nutritional Quality. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: Igrejas G., Ikeda T., Guzmán C. (eds). Wheat Quality For Improving Processing And Human Health. Cham:Springer. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34163-3_8 |
|
Páginas : |
p. 171-204. |
|
ISBN : |
978-3-030-34163-3 (eBook) |
|
DOI : |
10.1007/978-3-030-34163-3_8 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article histotory: First Online: 18 March 2020. |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
Technological (processing performance and end-product) and nutritional quality of wheat is in principle determined by a number of compounds within the wheat grain, including proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, minerals, heavy metals, vitamins and phytochemicals, effecting these characters. The genotype and environment is of similar importance for the determination of the content and composition of these compounds. Furthermore, the interaction between genotypes and the cultivation environment may play a significant role. Many studies have evaluated whether the genotype or the environment plays the major role in determining the content of the mentioned compounds. An overall conclusion of these studies is that except for compounds encoded by single major genes, importance of certain factors mainly depend on how wide environments and how diverse cultivars are within these comparative studies. Comparing environments all over, e.g. across Latin America, ends up with a high significance of the environment while large studies including genotypes of wide genetic background result in a significant role for the genotype. In addition, for some technological properties and components, genotype has a higher effect (e.g. grain hardness and gluten proteins), while environment influences stronger on others (e.g. protein and mineral content).Content and concentration of proteins, but also to some extent of starch, some non-starch polysaccharides and lipids, are essential in determining the technological quality of a wheat flour. For nutritional quality of the flour, the majority of the compounds are together the important determinant. Thus an increased understanding of environmental effects is essential. As to how the environment is influencing the content of the compounds, there are some differences. The protein content and composition is strongly affected by environmental factors influencing nitrogen availability and cultivar development time. However, these two factors are impacted by a range of environmental (temperature, precipitation, humidity/sun hours, etc.) and agronomic (soil properties, crop management practices such as seeding density, nitrogen fertilizer application timing and amount, etc.) components. Thus, to understand the interplay between the various environmental and agronomic factors impacting the technological quality of a wheat flour, modeling is a useful tool. Several other compounds, including minerals and heavy metals, are to a higher extent determined by site specific variation, resulting in similar rankings of entries across locations, although the total content is varying among years. The bioactive compounds and vitamins are a part of the defense mechanisms of plants and thus there is a variation in these compounds depending on prevailing biotic and abiotic stresses (heat, drought, excess rainfall, nutrition, diseases and pests). Thus, even for nutritional quality of wheat, incorporating all compounds of relevance in the evaluation would benefit from modeling tools. MenosAbstract:
Technological (processing performance and end-product) and nutritional quality of wheat is in principle determined by a number of compounds within the wheat grain, including proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, minerals, heavy metals, vitamins and phytochemicals, effecting these characters. The genotype and environment is of similar importance for the determination of the content and composition of these compounds. Furthermore, the interaction between genotypes and the cultivation environment may play a significant role. Many studies have evaluated whether the genotype or the environment plays the major role in determining the content of the mentioned compounds. An overall conclusion of these studies is that except for compounds encoded by single major genes, importance of certain factors mainly depend on how wide environments and how diverse cultivars are within these comparative studies. Comparing environments all over, e.g. across Latin America, ends up with a high significance of the environment while large studies including genotypes of wide genetic background result in a significant role for the genotype. In addition, for some technological properties and components, genotype has a higher effect (e.g. grain hardness and gluten proteins), while environment influences stronger on others (e.g. protein and mineral content).Content and concentration of proteins, but also to some extent of starch, some non-starch polysaccharides and lipids, are essential in determini... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
BIOACTIVE COMPOUNDS; CULTIVAR X ENVIRONMENTAL; END-USE QUALITY; GENOTIPO X AMBIENTE; INTERACTIONS; MINERALS; PLATAFORMA AGROALIMENTOS; PROCESSING; PROTEINS; WHEAT. |
|
Thesagro : |
TRIGO. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F30 Genética vegetal y fitomejoramiento |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04237naa a2200385 a 4500
001 1060979
005 2022-02-24
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1007/978-3-030-34163-3_8$2DOI
100 1 $aJOHANSSON, E.
245 $aGenotypic and Environmental Effects on Wheat Technological and Nutritional Quality.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
300 $ap. 171-204.
500 $aArticle histotory: First Online: 18 March 2020.
520 $aAbstract: Technological (processing performance and end-product) and nutritional quality of wheat is in principle determined by a number of compounds within the wheat grain, including proteins, polysaccharides, lipids, minerals, heavy metals, vitamins and phytochemicals, effecting these characters. The genotype and environment is of similar importance for the determination of the content and composition of these compounds. Furthermore, the interaction between genotypes and the cultivation environment may play a significant role. Many studies have evaluated whether the genotype or the environment plays the major role in determining the content of the mentioned compounds. An overall conclusion of these studies is that except for compounds encoded by single major genes, importance of certain factors mainly depend on how wide environments and how diverse cultivars are within these comparative studies. Comparing environments all over, e.g. across Latin America, ends up with a high significance of the environment while large studies including genotypes of wide genetic background result in a significant role for the genotype. In addition, for some technological properties and components, genotype has a higher effect (e.g. grain hardness and gluten proteins), while environment influences stronger on others (e.g. protein and mineral content).Content and concentration of proteins, but also to some extent of starch, some non-starch polysaccharides and lipids, are essential in determining the technological quality of a wheat flour. For nutritional quality of the flour, the majority of the compounds are together the important determinant. Thus an increased understanding of environmental effects is essential. As to how the environment is influencing the content of the compounds, there are some differences. The protein content and composition is strongly affected by environmental factors influencing nitrogen availability and cultivar development time. However, these two factors are impacted by a range of environmental (temperature, precipitation, humidity/sun hours, etc.) and agronomic (soil properties, crop management practices such as seeding density, nitrogen fertilizer application timing and amount, etc.) components. Thus, to understand the interplay between the various environmental and agronomic factors impacting the technological quality of a wheat flour, modeling is a useful tool. Several other compounds, including minerals and heavy metals, are to a higher extent determined by site specific variation, resulting in similar rankings of entries across locations, although the total content is varying among years. The bioactive compounds and vitamins are a part of the defense mechanisms of plants and thus there is a variation in these compounds depending on prevailing biotic and abiotic stresses (heat, drought, excess rainfall, nutrition, diseases and pests). Thus, even for nutritional quality of wheat, incorporating all compounds of relevance in the evaluation would benefit from modeling tools.
650 $aTRIGO
653 $aBIOACTIVE COMPOUNDS
653 $aCULTIVAR X ENVIRONMENTAL
653 $aEND-USE QUALITY
653 $aGENOTIPO X AMBIENTE
653 $aINTERACTIONS
653 $aMINERALS
653 $aPLATAFORMA AGROALIMENTOS
653 $aPROCESSING
653 $aPROTEINS
653 $aWHEAT
700 1 $aBRANLARD, G.
700 1 $aCUNIBERTI, M.
700 1 $aFLAGELLA, Z.
700 1 $aHÜSKEN, A.
700 1 $aNURIT, E.
700 1 $aPEÑA, R.J.
700 1 $aSISSONS, M.
700 1 $aVÁZQUEZ, D.
773 $tIn: Igrejas G., Ikeda T., Guzmán C. (eds). Wheat Quality For Improving Processing And Human Health. Cham:Springer. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-34163-3_8
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
18/01/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
18/01/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
MOOJEN, F.G.; BREMM, C.; LACA, E.A.; MACHADO, D.R.; SAVIAN, J.V.; CARVALHO P.C.D.F. |
|
Afiliación : |
FERNANDA G. MOOJEN, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.; CAROLINA BREMM, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal Univ. Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; Department of Agricultural Diagnosis and Research, Secretary of Agriculture, Livestock and Rural Development-Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; EMILIO A. LACA, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California - Davis, Davis, CA, United States.; DÉBORA R. MACHADO, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.; JEAN VICTOR SAVIAN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PAULO C. DE F. CARVALHO, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil. |
|
Título : |
Herbage allowance and stocking method effect on grazing systems: Results of a long-term experiment. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Grass and Forage Science, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12556 |
|
ISSN : |
0142-5242 |
|
DOI : |
10.1111/gfs.12556 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 12 October 2020; Revised 25 September 2021; Accepted 28 October 2021; First published 23 November 2021.
Corresponding author: Moojen, F.G.; Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; email:femoojen@hotmail.com |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT. - Sward management is critical for animal performance in pastoral environments. We evaluated the performance of sheep grazing Italian ryegrass pastures under factorial combinations of two stocking methods (SM) (continuous and rotational) and two herbage allowances (HA) (10% and 20% of LWT) over 9 years. Average daily gain (ADG) was greater in continuous than in rotational stocking (p <.001) and in HA-20% when compared with HA-10% (p =.002). Weight gain per hectare was greater in HA-10% than HA-20% (p <.001). HA and total herbage production were the most important factors determining live weight (LW) gain per hectare, whilst sheep ADG relies upon sward parameters (i.e., sward height). Moreover, to increase sheep LW production per hectare in grazing systems, the amount of herbage production and its availability to animals is more important than the SM. These outcomes provide the basis to build sound grazing systems through the optimization of sward management. © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd. |
|
Palabras claves : |
Decision tree; Grazing management; Herbage production; Italian ryegrass; Sheep; Sward height. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02147naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1062642
005 2022-01-18
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0142-5242
024 7 $a10.1111/gfs.12556$2DOI
100 1 $aMOOJEN, F.G.
245 $aHerbage allowance and stocking method effect on grazing systems$bResults of a long-term experiment.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Received 12 October 2020; Revised 25 September 2021; Accepted 28 October 2021; First published 23 November 2021. Corresponding author: Moojen, F.G.; Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil; email:femoojen@hotmail.com
520 $aABSTRACT. - Sward management is critical for animal performance in pastoral environments. We evaluated the performance of sheep grazing Italian ryegrass pastures under factorial combinations of two stocking methods (SM) (continuous and rotational) and two herbage allowances (HA) (10% and 20% of LWT) over 9 years. Average daily gain (ADG) was greater in continuous than in rotational stocking (p <.001) and in HA-20% when compared with HA-10% (p =.002). Weight gain per hectare was greater in HA-10% than HA-20% (p <.001). HA and total herbage production were the most important factors determining live weight (LW) gain per hectare, whilst sheep ADG relies upon sward parameters (i.e., sward height). Moreover, to increase sheep LW production per hectare in grazing systems, the amount of herbage production and its availability to animals is more important than the SM. These outcomes provide the basis to build sound grazing systems through the optimization of sward management. © 2021 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
653 $aDecision tree
653 $aGrazing management
653 $aHerbage production
653 $aItalian ryegrass
653 $aSheep
653 $aSward height
700 1 $aBREMM, C.
700 1 $aLACA, E.A.
700 1 $aMACHADO, D.R.
700 1 $aSAVIAN, J.V.
700 1 $aCARVALHO P.C.D.F.
773 $tGrass and Forage Science, 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12556
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
