| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
30/05/2023 |
|
Actualizado : |
30/05/2023 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
CAZZULI, F.; SÁNCHEZ, J.; HIRIGOYEN, A.; ROVIRA, P.J.; BERETTA, V.; SIMEONE, A.; JAURENA, M.; DURANTE, M.; SAVIAN, J.V.; POPPI, D.; MONTOSSI, F.; LAGOMARSINO, X.; LUZARDO, S.; BRITO, G.; VELAZCO, J.I.; BREMM, C.; LATTANZI, F. |
|
Afiliación : |
FIORELLA CARLA CAZZULI ALBA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JAVIER SÁNCHEZ, Department of Health Management, Atlantic Veterinary College, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PEI, Canada; ANDRES EDUARDO HIRIGOYEN DOMINGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PABLO JUAN ROVIRA SANZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; VIRGINIA BERETTA, Animal Science Department, Universidad de la República, Paysandú, Uruguay; ÁLVARO SIMEONE, Animal Science Department, Universidad de la República, Paysandú, Uruguay; MARTIN ALEJANDRO JAURENA BARRIOS, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARTÍN DURANTE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; Estación Experimental Agropecuaria Concepción del Uruguay, Concepción del Uruguay, Argentina; JEAN VICTOR SAVIAN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; DENNIS POPPI, School of Agriculture and Food Sciences, The University of Queensland, Gatton, Australia; FABIO MARCELO MONTOSSI PORCHILE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; XIMENA MARIA LAGOMARSINO LARRIERA, FCA-UDE, Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad de la Empresa, Montevideo, Uruguay; SANTIAGO FELIPE LUZARDO VILLAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GUSTAVO WALTER BRITO DIAZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOSÉ IGNACIO VELAZCO DE LOS REYES, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CAROLINA BREMM, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil; FERNANDO A. LATTANZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Supplement feed efficiency of growing beef cattle grazing native Campos grasslands during winter: a collated analysis. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2023 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Translational Animal Science. 2023, Volume 7, Issue 1, txad028. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad028 -- OPEN ACCESS |
|
ISSN : |
2573-2102 (online) |
|
DOI : |
10.1093/tas/txad028 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 03 October 2022; Accepted 09 March 2023; Published 10 March 2023; Corrected and typeset 01 April 2023. -- Corresponding author: fcazzuli@inia.org.uy -- Issue Section: Forage Based Livestock Systems. -- License: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), -- Supplementary data: txad028_suppl_Supplementary_Data - docx file |
|
Contenido : |
Supplementing growing cattle grazing native subtropical Campos grasslands during winter improves the low, even negative, average daily weight gain (ADG) typical of extensive animal production systems in Uruguay. Nonetheless, to render the practice profitable, it is crucial to control supplement feed efficiency (SFE), that is, the difference in ADG between supplemented and control animals (ADGchng) per unit of supplement dry matter (DM) intake. Little has been studied specifically on how SFE varies in these systems. The objective of this study was to quantify the magnitude and variation in SFE of growing beef cattle grazing stockpiled native Campos grasslands during winter and assess putative associations with herbage, animals, supplements, and climatic variables. We compiled data from supplementation trials carried out in Uruguay between 1993 and 2018, each evaluating between one and six supplementation treatments. © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. |
|
Palabras claves : |
Concentrate supplementation; Growing cattle; Native grasslands; Nutritive value; Protein; Supplement feed efficiency. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L02 Alimentación animal |
|
URL : |
https://academic.oup.com/tas/article-pdf/7/1/txad028/49725363/txad028.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02746naa a2200421 a 4500
001 1064170
005 2023-05-30
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2573-2102 (online)
024 7 $a10.1093/tas/txad028$2DOI
100 1 $aCAZZULI, F.
245 $aSupplement feed efficiency of growing beef cattle grazing native Campos grasslands during winter$ba collated analysis.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
500 $aArticle history: Received 03 October 2022; Accepted 09 March 2023; Published 10 March 2023; Corrected and typeset 01 April 2023. -- Corresponding author: fcazzuli@inia.org.uy -- Issue Section: Forage Based Livestock Systems. -- License: This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), -- Supplementary data: txad028_suppl_Supplementary_Data - docx file
520 $aSupplementing growing cattle grazing native subtropical Campos grasslands during winter improves the low, even negative, average daily weight gain (ADG) typical of extensive animal production systems in Uruguay. Nonetheless, to render the practice profitable, it is crucial to control supplement feed efficiency (SFE), that is, the difference in ADG between supplemented and control animals (ADGchng) per unit of supplement dry matter (DM) intake. Little has been studied specifically on how SFE varies in these systems. The objective of this study was to quantify the magnitude and variation in SFE of growing beef cattle grazing stockpiled native Campos grasslands during winter and assess putative associations with herbage, animals, supplements, and climatic variables. We compiled data from supplementation trials carried out in Uruguay between 1993 and 2018, each evaluating between one and six supplementation treatments. © The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science.
653 $aConcentrate supplementation
653 $aGrowing cattle
653 $aNative grasslands
653 $aNutritive value
653 $aProtein
653 $aSupplement feed efficiency
700 1 $aSÁNCHEZ, J.
700 1 $aHIRIGOYEN, A.
700 1 $aROVIRA, P.J.
700 1 $aBERETTA, V.
700 1 $aSIMEONE, A.
700 1 $aJAURENA, M.
700 1 $aDURANTE, M.
700 1 $aSAVIAN, J.V.
700 1 $aPOPPI, D.
700 1 $aMONTOSSI, F.
700 1 $aLAGOMARSINO, X.
700 1 $aLUZARDO, S.
700 1 $aBRITO, G.
700 1 $aVELAZCO, J.I.
700 1 $aBREMM, C.
700 1 $aLATTANZI, F.
773 $tTranslational Animal Science. 2023, Volume 7, Issue 1, txad028. https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txad028 -- OPEN ACCESS
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
07/12/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
07/12/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
DALAZEN, G.; KASPARY, T. E.; MARKUS, C.; PISONIC, A.; MEROTTO JR, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
GILIARDI DALAZEN, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Paraná-PR, Brasil.; TIAGO EDU KASPARY, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CATARINE MARKUS, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre - RS, Brasil.; ALEXANDRE PISONIC, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre - RS, Brasil.; ALDO MEROTTO JR. |
|
Título : |
Soybean tolerance to sulfentrazone and diclosulam in sandy soil. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Planta daninha vol.38 Viçosa 2020 Epub Dec 04, 2020.OPEN ACCESS. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582020380100081 |
|
ISSN : |
1806-9681 (online) |
|
DOI : |
10.1590/s0100-83582020380100081 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received: June 27, 2019/ Accepted: September 24, 2020. Corresponding author: . Cite this article:
Dalazen G, Kaspary TE, Markus C,Pisoni A, Merotto Jr. A. Soybean tolerance to sulfentrazone and diclosulam in sandy soil. Planta Daninha.
2020;38:e020225717. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100081 |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT: Background: The use of pre-emergent herbicides is an important tool to control weeds, however the tolerance of soybean to these herbicides can vary according to the type of soil. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate sulfentrazone and diclosulam soybean selectivity in a sandy soil, in order to establish these herbicides as supporting tools in weed control. Methods: The treatments consisted of six doses of sulfentrazone (150 to 400 g ha-1) and diclosulam (25.2 to 75.6 g ha-1), and an untreated control. A field study was repeated in two growing seasons (2013/14 and 2014/15) in a sandy soil. Results: The occurrence of injury depended on the growing season. The
first season presented lower rainfall rates during the crop cycle. The recommended dose of sulfentrazone (200 g ha-1) caused 26% and 10%
of plant injury at 15 days after the treatment for the first and second season, respectively. For diclosulam, the recommended dose of
35.3 g ha-1 caused 20% and 8% of plant injury, respectively, for the first and second season. However, at the recommended doses, only for
diclosulam and in the rainy season there was a reduction in soybean productivity. Conclusions: The herbicide sulfentrazone, although causing visual soybean plant injury, present satisfactory selectivity at recommended doses and can be used as an important tool on weed control on sandy
soils. Similar response was observed for diclosulam in 2013/14. However, in a rainfall season diclosulam impacted on soybean yield at
the recommended dose for sandy soils, with selectivity depending of the growth season. MenosABSTRACT: Background: The use of pre-emergent herbicides is an important tool to control weeds, however the tolerance of soybean to these herbicides can vary according to the type of soil. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate sulfentrazone and diclosulam soybean selectivity in a sandy soil, in order to establish these herbicides as supporting tools in weed control. Methods: The treatments consisted of six doses of sulfentrazone (150 to 400 g ha-1) and diclosulam (25.2 to 75.6 g ha-1), and an untreated control. A field study was repeated in two growing seasons (2013/14 and 2014/15) in a sandy soil. Results: The occurrence of injury depended on the growing season. The
first season presented lower rainfall rates during the crop cycle. The recommended dose of sulfentrazone (200 g ha-1) caused 26% and 10%
of plant injury at 15 days after the treatment for the first and second season, respectively. For diclosulam, the recommended dose of
35.3 g ha-1 caused 20% and 8% of plant injury, respectively, for the first and second season. However, at the recommended doses, only for
diclosulam and in the rainy season there was a reduction in soybean productivity. Conclusions: The herbicide sulfentrazone, although causing visual soybean plant injury, present satisfactory selectivity at recommended doses and can be used as an important tool on weed control on sandy
soils. Similar response was observed for diclosulam in 2013/14. However, in a rainfall season diclosulam impacted on ... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
PLANT INJURY; PRE-EMERGENCE HERBICIDE; WEED MANAGEMENT. |
|
Thesagro : |
GLYCINA MAX; SOJA. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/14831/1/Planta-Dainha2020Kaspary.pdf
https://www.scielo.br/pdf/pd/v38/0100-8358-PD-38-e020225717.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02753naa a2200265 a 4500
001 1061540
005 2020-12-07
008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1806-9681 (online)
024 7 $a10.1590/s0100-83582020380100081$2DOI
100 1 $aDALAZEN, G.
245 $aSoybean tolerance to sulfentrazone and diclosulam in sandy soil.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2020
500 $aArticle history: Received: June 27, 2019/ Accepted: September 24, 2020. Corresponding author: . Cite this article: Dalazen G, Kaspary TE, Markus C,Pisoni A, Merotto Jr. A. Soybean tolerance to sulfentrazone and diclosulam in sandy soil. Planta Daninha. 2020;38:e020225717. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100081
520 $aABSTRACT: Background: The use of pre-emergent herbicides is an important tool to control weeds, however the tolerance of soybean to these herbicides can vary according to the type of soil. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate sulfentrazone and diclosulam soybean selectivity in a sandy soil, in order to establish these herbicides as supporting tools in weed control. Methods: The treatments consisted of six doses of sulfentrazone (150 to 400 g ha-1) and diclosulam (25.2 to 75.6 g ha-1), and an untreated control. A field study was repeated in two growing seasons (2013/14 and 2014/15) in a sandy soil. Results: The occurrence of injury depended on the growing season. The first season presented lower rainfall rates during the crop cycle. The recommended dose of sulfentrazone (200 g ha-1) caused 26% and 10% of plant injury at 15 days after the treatment for the first and second season, respectively. For diclosulam, the recommended dose of 35.3 g ha-1 caused 20% and 8% of plant injury, respectively, for the first and second season. However, at the recommended doses, only for diclosulam and in the rainy season there was a reduction in soybean productivity. Conclusions: The herbicide sulfentrazone, although causing visual soybean plant injury, present satisfactory selectivity at recommended doses and can be used as an important tool on weed control on sandy soils. Similar response was observed for diclosulam in 2013/14. However, in a rainfall season diclosulam impacted on soybean yield at the recommended dose for sandy soils, with selectivity depending of the growth season.
650 $aGLYCINA MAX
650 $aSOJA
653 $aPLANT INJURY
653 $aPRE-EMERGENCE HERBICIDE
653 $aWEED MANAGEMENT
700 1 $aKASPARY, T. E.
700 1 $aMARKUS, C.
700 1 $aPISONIC, A.
700 1 $aMEROTTO JR, A.
773 $tPlanta daninha vol.38 Viçosa 2020 Epub Dec 04, 2020.OPEN ACCESS. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582020380100081
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
