| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
19/07/2023 |
|
Actualizado : |
19/07/2023 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
BRANCO-LOPES. R.; BERNAL-CÓRDOBA, C.; VALLDECABRES, A.; WINDER, C.; CANOZZI, M.E.A.; SILVA-DEL-RÍO, R. |
|
Afiliación : |
R. BRANCO-LOPES, Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, Tulare, CA 93274; C. BERNAL-CÓRDOBA, Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, Tulare, CA 93274; A. VALLDECABRES, Teagasc, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Center, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland P61 C996; C. WINDER, Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 2W1; MARÍA EUGENIA ANDRIGHETTO CANOZZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; N. SILVA-DEL-RÍO, Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, Tulare, CA 93274; Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616. |
|
Título : |
Characterization of controlled trials on probiotic supplementation to dairy calves: A scoping review. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2023 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Dairy Science. 2023, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-23017 --- [In Press, Corrected Proof]. OPEN ACCESS. |
|
ISSN : |
0022-0302 |
|
DOI : |
10.3168/jds.2022-23017 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 10 November 2022, Accepted 13 February 2023, Available online 16 June 2023. -- Correspondence author: silvadelrio@ucdavis.edu -- LICENSE: This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). -- FUNDING: This project was supported by the California Department of Food and Agriculture Antimicrobial Use Stewardship (Sacramento, CA). |
|
Contenido : |
The objective of this scoping review was to identify, describe, and characterize the literature on probiotic supplementation in dairy calves. Eligible studies were nonrandomized, quasi-randomized and randomized controlled trials in English, Spanish, or Portuguese that evaluated the effect of probiotic supplementation on growth and health of dairy calves. The search strategies were based on a modification of the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) framework and used synonyms and words related to "dairy calves" (population), "probiotics" (intervention), and "growth and health measurements" (outcomes). No restrictions for publication year or language were applied. Searches were conducted in Biosis, CAB Abstracts, Medline, Scopus, and the Dissertations and Theses Database. In total, the search identified 4,467 records, of which 103 studies (110 controlled trials) met the inclusion criteria. The studies were published between 1980 and 2021 and originated from 28 countries. Trials were randomized (80.0%), nonrandomized 16.4%), and quasi-randomized (3.6%), ranging in sample size from 5 to 1,801 dairy calves (mode = 24; average = 64). Enrolled calves were frequently Holstein (74.5%), males (43.6%), and younger than 15 d at the beginning of probiotic supplementation (71.8%). Often, trials were conducted in research facilities (47.3%). Trials evaluated probiotics with single or multiple species of the same genus: Lactobacillus (26.4%), Saccharomyces (15.4%), Bacillus (10.0%), Enterococcus (3.6%), or multiple species of various genera (31.8%). Eight trials did not report the probiotic species used. Lactobacillus acidophilus and Enterococcus faecium were the species most supplemented to calves. The duration of probiotic supplementation ranged from 1 to 462 d (mode = 56; average = 50). In trials with a constant dose, it ranged from 4.0 × 106 to 3.7 × 1011 cfu/calf per day. Most probiotics were administered mixed solely into feed (88.5%; whole milk, milk replacer, starter, or total mixed ration) and less frequently orally as a drench or oral paste (7.9%). Most trials evaluated weight gain (88.2%) as a growth indicator and fecal consistency score (64.5%) as a health indicator. Our scoping review summarizes the breadth of controlled trials evaluating probiotic supplementation in dairy calves. Differences in intervention design (mode of probiotic administration, dose, and duration of probiotic supplementation) and outcomes evaluation (type and methods) justify future efforts toward standardized guidelines in clinical trials. © 2023, The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. and Fass Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. MenosThe objective of this scoping review was to identify, describe, and characterize the literature on probiotic supplementation in dairy calves. Eligible studies were nonrandomized, quasi-randomized and randomized controlled trials in English, Spanish, or Portuguese that evaluated the effect of probiotic supplementation on growth and health of dairy calves. The search strategies were based on a modification of the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) framework and used synonyms and words related to "dairy calves" (population), "probiotics" (intervention), and "growth and health measurements" (outcomes). No restrictions for publication year or language were applied. Searches were conducted in Biosis, CAB Abstracts, Medline, Scopus, and the Dissertations and Theses Database. In total, the search identified 4,467 records, of which 103 studies (110 controlled trials) met the inclusion criteria. The studies were published between 1980 and 2021 and originated from 28 countries. Trials were randomized (80.0%), nonrandomized 16.4%), and quasi-randomized (3.6%), ranging in sample size from 5 to 1,801 dairy calves (mode = 24; average = 64). Enrolled calves were frequently Holstein (74.5%), males (43.6%), and younger than 15 d at the beginning of probiotic supplementation (71.8%). Often, trials were conducted in research facilities (47.3%). Trials evaluated probiotics with single or multiple species of the same genus: Lactobacillus (26.4%), Saccharomyces (15.4%), Bacillus ... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Calf; Direct-fed microbial; Feed additive; Review. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L02 Alimentación animal |
|
URL : |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030223003533/pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03925naa a2200265 a 4500
001 1064259
005 2023-07-19
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0022-0302
024 7 $a10.3168/jds.2022-23017$2DOI
100 1 $aBRANCO-LOPES. R.
245 $aCharacterization of controlled trials on probiotic supplementation to dairy calves$bA scoping review.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
500 $aArticle history: Received 10 November 2022, Accepted 13 February 2023, Available online 16 June 2023. -- Correspondence author: silvadelrio@ucdavis.edu -- LICENSE: This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). -- FUNDING: This project was supported by the California Department of Food and Agriculture Antimicrobial Use Stewardship (Sacramento, CA).
520 $aThe objective of this scoping review was to identify, describe, and characterize the literature on probiotic supplementation in dairy calves. Eligible studies were nonrandomized, quasi-randomized and randomized controlled trials in English, Spanish, or Portuguese that evaluated the effect of probiotic supplementation on growth and health of dairy calves. The search strategies were based on a modification of the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) framework and used synonyms and words related to "dairy calves" (population), "probiotics" (intervention), and "growth and health measurements" (outcomes). No restrictions for publication year or language were applied. Searches were conducted in Biosis, CAB Abstracts, Medline, Scopus, and the Dissertations and Theses Database. In total, the search identified 4,467 records, of which 103 studies (110 controlled trials) met the inclusion criteria. The studies were published between 1980 and 2021 and originated from 28 countries. Trials were randomized (80.0%), nonrandomized 16.4%), and quasi-randomized (3.6%), ranging in sample size from 5 to 1,801 dairy calves (mode = 24; average = 64). Enrolled calves were frequently Holstein (74.5%), males (43.6%), and younger than 15 d at the beginning of probiotic supplementation (71.8%). Often, trials were conducted in research facilities (47.3%). Trials evaluated probiotics with single or multiple species of the same genus: Lactobacillus (26.4%), Saccharomyces (15.4%), Bacillus (10.0%), Enterococcus (3.6%), or multiple species of various genera (31.8%). Eight trials did not report the probiotic species used. Lactobacillus acidophilus and Enterococcus faecium were the species most supplemented to calves. The duration of probiotic supplementation ranged from 1 to 462 d (mode = 56; average = 50). In trials with a constant dose, it ranged from 4.0 × 106 to 3.7 × 1011 cfu/calf per day. Most probiotics were administered mixed solely into feed (88.5%; whole milk, milk replacer, starter, or total mixed ration) and less frequently orally as a drench or oral paste (7.9%). Most trials evaluated weight gain (88.2%) as a growth indicator and fecal consistency score (64.5%) as a health indicator. Our scoping review summarizes the breadth of controlled trials evaluating probiotic supplementation in dairy calves. Differences in intervention design (mode of probiotic administration, dose, and duration of probiotic supplementation) and outcomes evaluation (type and methods) justify future efforts toward standardized guidelines in clinical trials. © 2023, The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. and Fass Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®.
653 $aCalf
653 $aDirect-fed microbial
653 $aFeed additive
653 $aReview
700 1 $aBERNAL-CÓRDOBA, C.
700 1 $aVALLDECABRES, A.
700 1 $aWINDER, C.
700 1 $aCANOZZI, M.E.A.
700 1 $aSILVA-DEL-RÍO, R.
773 $tJournal of Dairy Science. 2023, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-23017 --- [In Press, Corrected Proof]. OPEN ACCESS.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
|
Fecha actual : |
21/02/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
17/10/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
|
Autor : |
BENNADJI, Z.; ALONSO, R.; CASTRO, M.; CIGANDA, V.; GOÑI, C.; PÉREZ DE VIDA, F.; VÁZQUEZ, D.; BERGER, A.; GASO, D.; CERETTA, S.; FASSIO, A.; SALDAIN, N.E.; OTERO, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
ZOHRA BENNADJI SOUALHIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIA DEL ROSARIO ALONSO DE SOUZA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARINA CASTRO DERENYI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; VERONICA SOLANGE CIGANDA BRASCA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CARMEN TERESITA GOÑI ALTUNA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; FERNANDO BLAS PEREZ DE VIDA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; DANIEL VÁZQUEZ PEYRONEL, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ANDRES GUSTAVO BERGER RICCA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; DEBORAH VIVIANA GASO MELGAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; SERGIO EDUARDO CERETTA SORIA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ALBERTO SANTIAGO FASSIO ARAUJO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; NÉSTOR ELIO SALDAIN CROCCE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; ALVARO RICARDO OTERO CAMA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Mejoramiento genético más ecofisiología: generando espacios interdisciplinarios para la disminución de la vulnerabilidad al cambio climático |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2011 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Revista INIA Uruguay, 2011, no. 25 p. 43-48 |
|
Serie : |
(Revista INIA; 25) |
|
ISSN : |
1510-9011 |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Thesagro : |
CAMBIO CLIMATICO; FITOMEJORAMIENTO; MEJORA GENETICA; SISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN; SOSTENIBILIDAD. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
K01 Ciencias forestales - Aspectos generales |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/6980/1/18429130112144824.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 00959naa a2200337 a 4500
001 1013176
005 2019-10-17
008 2011 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1510-9011
100 1 $aBENNADJI, Z.
245 $aMejoramiento genético más ecofisiología$bgenerando espacios interdisciplinarios para la disminución de la vulnerabilidad al cambio climático
260 $c2011
490 $a(Revista INIA; 25)
650 $aCAMBIO CLIMATICO
650 $aFITOMEJORAMIENTO
650 $aMEJORA GENETICA
650 $aSISTEMAS DE PRODUCCIÓN
650 $aSOSTENIBILIDAD
700 1 $aALONSO, R.
700 1 $aCASTRO, M.
700 1 $aCIGANDA, V.
700 1 $aGOÑI, C.
700 1 $aPÉREZ DE VIDA, F.
700 1 $aVÁZQUEZ, D.
700 1 $aBERGER, A.
700 1 $aGASO, D.
700 1 $aCERETTA, S.
700 1 $aFASSIO, A.
700 1 $aSALDAIN, N.E.
700 1 $aOTERO, A.
773 $tRevista INIA Uruguay, 2011, no. 25 p. 43-48
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
