| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
|
Fecha : |
26/07/2021 |
|
Actualizado : |
26/07/2021 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
TSENG, C-M.; ROEL, A.; MACEDO, I.; MARELLA, M.; TERRA, J.A.; PITTELKOW, C. M. |
|
Afiliación : |
MENG-CHUN TSENG, Department of Crop Sciences, University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA; ALVARO ROEL DELLAZOPPA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; IGNACIO MACEDO YAPOR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MUZIO MARELLA, Sociedad Anónima Molinos Arroceros Nacionales (SAMAN), Uruguay; JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CAMERON M. PITTELKOW, Department of Plant Sciences, University of California, Davis, CA 95616, USA. |
|
Título : |
Synergies and tradeoffs among yield, resource use efficiency, and environmental footprint indicators in rice systems. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Current Research in Environmental Sustainability, 2021, volume 3, 100070. OPEN ACCESS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070 |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 30 April 2021 / / Revised 12 July 2021 // Accepted 13 July 2021 // Available online 24 July 2021. |
|
Contenido : |
A major question facing global rice systems is the extent to which yield and resource use efficiency indicators can be simultaneously optimized to sustainably meet future food demand. However, research approaches for evaluating synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators have been limited to date. Using the case study of rice production in Uruguay, we quantified five cropping system performance indicators at the farm-level from 2012 to 2017, covering approximately 40% of national rice area. Results suggest that maximizing performance in one
indicator is associated with tradeoffs for other indicators, with no farm simultaneously ranking as a topperformer (defined as top 10% of farms) across all indicators. The gaps between the average and topperforming farms were largest for agrochemical contamination risk (33%) and smallest for yield (11%). Comparing the groups of top-performing farms within each indicator revealed opportunities for improving system-level performance via synergistic effects between yield and resource use efficiencies, but not between carbon footprint, agrochemical contamination risk, and other indicators. Importantly, synergistic effects were more pronounced for farms at lower compared to higher productivity levels, suggesting less room for ustainability improvements at higher yield levels, unless yields can be further increased without elevated inputs. Important factors to improve the aggregated sustainability index included N fertilizer rate and seeding date. With potential application to rice production systems worldwide, this study highlights an integrated research approach for quantifying synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators to understand opportunities for increasing crop yields without negatively impacting resource use efficiency and environmental footprint. MenosA major question facing global rice systems is the extent to which yield and resource use efficiency indicators can be simultaneously optimized to sustainably meet future food demand. However, research approaches for evaluating synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators have been limited to date. Using the case study of rice production in Uruguay, we quantified five cropping system performance indicators at the farm-level from 2012 to 2017, covering approximately 40% of national rice area. Results suggest that maximizing performance in one
indicator is associated with tradeoffs for other indicators, with no farm simultaneously ranking as a topperformer (defined as top 10% of farms) across all indicators. The gaps between the average and topperforming farms were largest for agrochemical contamination risk (33%) and smallest for yield (11%). Comparing the groups of top-performing farms within each indicator revealed opportunities for improving system-level performance via synergistic effects between yield and resource use efficiencies, but not between carbon footprint, agrochemical contamination risk, and other indicators. Importantly, synergistic effects were more pronounced for farms at lower compared to higher productivity levels, suggesting less room for ustainability improvements at higher yield levels, unless yields can be further increased without elevated inputs. Important factors to improve the aggregated sustainability index included N fertilizer rate and seed... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
CARBON FOOTPRINT; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; NITROGEN USE EFFICIENCE; RICE; SUSTAINABILITY; TRADEOFFS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
P01 Conservación de la naturaleza y recursos de La tierra |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/15908/1/Current-Research-Environmental-Sustainability-2021-3-100070.pdf
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666049021000463
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02847naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1062325
005 2021-07-26
008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070$2DOI
100 1 $aTSENG, C-M.
245 $aSynergies and tradeoffs among yield, resource use efficiency, and environmental footprint indicators in rice systems.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2021
500 $aArticle history: Received 30 April 2021 / / Revised 12 July 2021 // Accepted 13 July 2021 // Available online 24 July 2021.
520 $aA major question facing global rice systems is the extent to which yield and resource use efficiency indicators can be simultaneously optimized to sustainably meet future food demand. However, research approaches for evaluating synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators have been limited to date. Using the case study of rice production in Uruguay, we quantified five cropping system performance indicators at the farm-level from 2012 to 2017, covering approximately 40% of national rice area. Results suggest that maximizing performance in one indicator is associated with tradeoffs for other indicators, with no farm simultaneously ranking as a topperformer (defined as top 10% of farms) across all indicators. The gaps between the average and topperforming farms were largest for agrochemical contamination risk (33%) and smallest for yield (11%). Comparing the groups of top-performing farms within each indicator revealed opportunities for improving system-level performance via synergistic effects between yield and resource use efficiencies, but not between carbon footprint, agrochemical contamination risk, and other indicators. Importantly, synergistic effects were more pronounced for farms at lower compared to higher productivity levels, suggesting less room for ustainability improvements at higher yield levels, unless yields can be further increased without elevated inputs. Important factors to improve the aggregated sustainability index included N fertilizer rate and seeding date. With potential application to rice production systems worldwide, this study highlights an integrated research approach for quantifying synergies and tradeoffs among multiple indicators to understand opportunities for increasing crop yields without negatively impacting resource use efficiency and environmental footprint.
653 $aCARBON FOOTPRINT
653 $aENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT
653 $aNITROGEN USE EFFICIENCE
653 $aRICE
653 $aSUSTAINABILITY
653 $aTRADEOFFS
700 1 $aROEL, A.
700 1 $aMACEDO, I.
700 1 $aMARELLA, M.
700 1 $aTERRA, J.A.
700 1 $aPITTELKOW, C. M.
773 $tCurrent Research in Environmental Sustainability, 2021, volume 3, 100070. OPEN ACCESS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.crsust.2021.100070
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
29/11/2022 |
|
Actualizado : |
29/11/2022 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
|
Autor : |
LANGRIDGE, P.; ALAUX, M.; ALMEIDA, N.F.; AMMAR, K.; BAUM, M.; BEKKAOUI, F.; BENTLEY, A.R.; BERES, B.L.; BERGER, B.; BRAUN, H.-J.; BROWN-GUEDIRA, G.; BURT, C.J.; CACCAMO, M.J.; CATTIVELLI, L.; CHARMET, G.; CIVÁN, P.; CLOUTIER, S.; COHAN, J-P.; DEVAUX, P.; DOOHAN, F.M.; DRECCER, M.F.; FERRAHI, M.; GERMAN, S.; GOODWIN, S.B.; GRIFFITHS, S.; GUZMÁN, C.; HANDA, H.; HAWKESFORD, M.J.; HE, Z.; HUTTNER, E.; IKEDA, T.M.; KILIAN, B.; KING, I.P.; KING, J.; KIRKEGAARD, J.A.; LAGE, J.; LE GOUIS, J.; MONDAL, S.; MULLINS, E.; ORDON, F.; ORTIZ-MONASTERIO, J.I.; ÖZKAN, H.; ÖZTÜRK, I.; PEREYRA, S.; POZNIAK, C.J.; QUESNEVILLE, H.; QUINCKE, M.; REBETZKE, G.J.; CHRISTOPH REIF, J.; SAAVEDRA-BRAVO, T.; SCHURR, U.; SHARMA, S.; SINGH, S.K.; SINGH, R.P.; SNAPE, J.W.; TADESSE, W.; TSUJIMOTO, H.; TUBEROSA, R.; WILLIS, T.G.; ZHANG, X. |
|
Afiliación : |
PETER LANGRIDGE, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, PMB1, Glen Osmond, 5064, SA, Australia Wheat Initiative, JKI (Julius Kühn Institute), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Berlin, 14195, Germany; MICHAEL ALAUX, INRAE, URGI, Université Paris-Saclay, Versailles, 78026, France; NUNO FELIPE ALMEIDA, ASUR Plant Breeding, Estrées-Saint-Denis, 60190, France; KARIM AMMAR, CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center), Texcoco, 56237, Mexico; MICHAEL BAUM, ICARDA (International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas), Rabat, 10106, Morocco; FAOUZI BEKKAOUI, INRA (National Institute for Agricultural Research), Rabat, 10090, Morocco; ALISON R. BENTLEY, CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center), Texcoco, 56237, Mexico; BRIAN L. BERES, AAFC (Agriculture Agri-Food Canada), Lethbridge Research and Development Centre, Lethbridge, T1J 4B1, AB, Canada; BETTINA BERGER, Australian Plant Phenomics Facility, School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Urrbrae, 5064, SA, Australia; HANS-JOACHIM BRAUN, CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center), Texcoco, 56237, Mexico; GINA BROWN-GUEDIRA, USDA-ARS (United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service), Plant Science Research, Raleigh, 27695, NC, United States; CHRISTOPHER JAMES BURT, RAGT2n, Place du Bourg, Druelle Balsac, 12510, France; MARIO JOSE CACCAMO, NIAB (National Institute of Agricultural Botany), Cambridge, CB3 0LE, United Kingdom; LUIGI CATTIVELLI, CREA (Council for Agricultural Research and Economics), Research Centre for Genomics and Bioinformatics, Fiorenzuola d'Arda, 29017, Italy; GILLES CHARMET, INRAE (National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment), University of Clermont-Auvergne, UMR 1095 GDEC, Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France; PETER CIVÁN, INRAE (National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment), University of Clermont-Auvergne, UMR 1095 GDEC, Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France; SYLVIE CLOUTIER, AAFC (Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada), Ottawa Research and Development Centre, Ottawa, K1A 0C6, ON, Canada; JEAN-PIERRE COHAN, ARVALIS-Institut du Végétal, Loireauxence, 44370, France; PIERRE J. DEVAUX, Florimond Desprez, Research Innovation, Cappelle-en-Pévèle, 59242, France; FIONA M. DOOHAN, School of Biology and Environmental Science and UCD Earth Institute, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland; M. FERNANDA DRECCER, CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation), Agriculture and Food, Queensland Biosciences Precinct, Saint Lucia, 4067, QLD, Australia; MOHA FERRAHI, INRA (National Institute for Agricultural Research), Rabat, 10090, Morocco; SILVIA ELISA GERMAN FAEDO, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; STEPHEN B. GOODWIN, USDA-ARS (United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service), West Lafayette, 47907, IN, United States; SIMON GRIFFITHS, John Innes Centre, Norwich, NR4 7UH, United Kingdom; CARLOS GUZMÁN, Departamento de Genética, Escuela Técnica Superior de Ingeniería Agronómica y de Montes, CeiA3, Universidad de Córdoba, Campus de Rabanales, Córdoba, ES-14071, Spain; HIROKAZU HANDA, Graduate School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Kyoto Prefectural University, Kyoto, 606-8502, Japan; MALCOLM JOHN HAWKESFORD, Rothamsted Research, Harpenden, AL5 2JQ, United Kingdom; ZHONGHU HE, Institute of Crop Sciences, CAAS (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences), Beijing, 100081, China; ERIC HUTTNER, ACIAR (Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research), Bruce, 2617, ACT, Australia; TATSUYA M. IKEDA, NARO (National Agriculture and Food Research Organization), Western Region Agricultural Research Center, Fukuyama, 721-8514, Japan; BENJAMIN KILIAN, Global Crop Diversity Trust, Bonn, 53113, Germany; IAN PHILIP KING, School of Biosciences, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom; JULIE KING, School of Biosciences, The University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington Campus, Loughborough, LE12 5RD, United Kingdom; JOHN A. KIRKEGAARD, CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation), Agriculture and Food, Canberra, 2601, ACT, Australia; JACOB LAGE, KWS UK, Thriplow, SG8 7RE, United Kingdom; JACQUES LE GOUIS, INRAE (National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and the Environment), University of Clermont-Auvergne, UMR 1095 GDEC, Clermont-Ferrand, 63000, France; SUCHISMITA MONDAL, Plant Sciences and Plant Pathology Department, Montana State University, Bozeman, 59717, MT, United States; EWEN MULLINS, Teagasc, Carlow, R93 XE12, Ireland; FRANK ORDON, JKI (Julius Kühn Institute), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Quedlinburg, 06484, Germany; JOSE IVAN ORTIZ-MONASTERIO, CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center), Texcoco, 56237, Mexico; HAKAN ÖZKAN, Faculty of Agriculture, Department of Field Crops, University of Çukurova, Adana, 01330, Turkey; IRFAN ÖZTÜRK, Trakya Agricultural Reseach Institute, Edirne, 22100, Turkey; SILVIA ANTONIA PEREYRA CORREA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CURTIS J. POZNIAK, Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, S7N5A8, SK, Canada; HADI QUESNEVILLE, INRAE, URGI, Université Paris-Saclay, Versailles, 78026, France; MARTIN CONRADO QUINCKE WALDEN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GREG JOHN REBETZKE, CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation), Agriculture and Food, Canberra, 2601, ACT, Australia; JOCHEN CHRISTOPH REIF, IPK (Leibniz Institute of Plant Genetics and Crop Plant Research), OT Gatersleben, Seeland, 06466, Germany; TERESA SAAVEDRA-BRAVO, Wheat Initiative, JKI (Julius Kühn Institute), Federal Research Centre for Cultivated Plants, Berlin, 14195, Germany; ULRICH SCHURR, Forchungszentrum Jülich GmbH, IBG-2: Plant Sciences, Jülich, 52428, Germany; SHIVALI SHARMA, Global Crop Diversity Trust, Bonn, 53113, Germany; SANJAY KUMAR SINGH, ICAR-Indian Agricultural Research Institute, Genetics Division, Pusa, New Delhi, 110012, India; RAVI P. SINGH, CIMMYT (International Maize and Wheat Improvement Center), Texcoco, 56237, Mexico; JOHN W. SNAPE, John Innes Centre, Norwich, NR4 7UH, United Kingdom; WULETAW TADESSE, ICARDA (International Center for Agricultural Research in the Dry Areas), Beirut, 1108-2010, Lebanon; HISASHI TSUJIMOTO, Arid Land Research Centre, Tottori University, 1390 Hamasaka, Tottori, 680-0001, Japan; ROBERTO TUBEROSA, Department of Agricultural and Food Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, 40127, Italy; TIM G. WILLIS, UKRI-BBSRC (UK Research and Innovation-Biotechnology and Biological Research Council), Swindon, SN2 1FL, United Kingdom; XUEYONG ZHANG, Institute of Crop Sciences, CAAS (Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences), Beijing, 100081, China. |
|
Título : |
Meeting the challenges facing wheat production: the strategic research agenda of the Global Wheat Initiative. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agronomy, 2022, volume 12, issue 11, 2767. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112767 |
|
ISSN : |
2073-4395 |
|
DOI : |
10.3390/agronomy12112767 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 26 September 2022; Revised 28 October 2022; Accepted 29 October 2022; Published 7 November 2022. -- Academic Editor: Andreas Katsiotis. -- Corresponding author: Langridge, P.; School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, PMB1, Glen Osmond, SA, Australia; email:peter.langridge@adelaide.edu.au -- Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). -- This article belongs to the Collection A Series of Special Reviews and Topic Analyses That Explore Major Trends and Challenges in Agronomy (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/agronomy/topical_collections/U67MP747QP ) -- |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Wheat occupies a special role in global food security since, in addition to providing 20% of our carbohydrates and protein, almost 25% of the global production is traded internationally. The importance of wheat for food security was recognised by the Chief Agricultural Scientists of the G20 group of countries when they endorsed the establishment of the Wheat Initiative in 2011. The Wheat Initiative was tasked with supporting the wheat research community by facilitating collaboration, information and resource sharing and helping to build the capacity to address challenges facing production in an increasingly variable environment. Many countries invest in wheat research. Innovations in wheat breeding and agronomy have delivered enormous gains over the past few decades, with the average global yield increasing from just over 1 tonne per hectare in the early 1960s to around 3.5 tonnes in the past decade. These gains are threatened by climate change, the rapidly rising financial and environmental costs of fertilizer, and pesticides, combined with declines in water availability for irrigation in many regions. The international wheat research community has worked to identify major opportunities to help ensure that global wheat production can meet demand. The outcomes of these discussions are presented in this paper. © 2022 by the authors. |
|
Palabras claves : |
Agronomy; Climate change; Coordination; Germplasm; Strategy; Wheat; Yield. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
F30 Genética vegetal y fitomejoramiento |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/16889/1/agronomy-12-02767.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 04569naa a2200949 a 4500
001 1063799
005 2022-11-29
008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a2073-4395
024 7 $a10.3390/agronomy12112767$2DOI
100 1 $aLANGRIDGE, P.
245 $aMeeting the challenges facing wheat production$bthe strategic research agenda of the Global Wheat Initiative.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2022
500 $aArticle history: Received 26 September 2022; Revised 28 October 2022; Accepted 29 October 2022; Published 7 November 2022. -- Academic Editor: Andreas Katsiotis. -- Corresponding author: Langridge, P.; School of Agriculture, Food and Wine, University of Adelaide, Waite Campus, PMB1, Glen Osmond, SA, Australia; email:peter.langridge@adelaide.edu.au -- Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). -- This article belongs to the Collection A Series of Special Reviews and Topic Analyses That Explore Major Trends and Challenges in Agronomy (https://www.mdpi.com/journal/agronomy/topical_collections/U67MP747QP ) --
520 $aABSTRACT.- Wheat occupies a special role in global food security since, in addition to providing 20% of our carbohydrates and protein, almost 25% of the global production is traded internationally. The importance of wheat for food security was recognised by the Chief Agricultural Scientists of the G20 group of countries when they endorsed the establishment of the Wheat Initiative in 2011. The Wheat Initiative was tasked with supporting the wheat research community by facilitating collaboration, information and resource sharing and helping to build the capacity to address challenges facing production in an increasingly variable environment. Many countries invest in wheat research. Innovations in wheat breeding and agronomy have delivered enormous gains over the past few decades, with the average global yield increasing from just over 1 tonne per hectare in the early 1960s to around 3.5 tonnes in the past decade. These gains are threatened by climate change, the rapidly rising financial and environmental costs of fertilizer, and pesticides, combined with declines in water availability for irrigation in many regions. The international wheat research community has worked to identify major opportunities to help ensure that global wheat production can meet demand. The outcomes of these discussions are presented in this paper. © 2022 by the authors.
653 $aAgronomy
653 $aClimate change
653 $aCoordination
653 $aGermplasm
653 $aStrategy
653 $aWheat
653 $aYield
700 1 $aALAUX, M.
700 1 $aALMEIDA, N.F.
700 1 $aAMMAR, K.
700 1 $aBAUM, M.
700 1 $aBEKKAOUI, F.
700 1 $aBENTLEY, A.R.
700 1 $aBERES, B.L.
700 1 $aBERGER, B.
700 1 $aBRAUN, H.-J.
700 1 $aBROWN-GUEDIRA, G.
700 1 $aBURT, C.J.
700 1 $aCACCAMO, M.J.
700 1 $aCATTIVELLI, L.
700 1 $aCHARMET, G.
700 1 $aCIVÁN, P.
700 1 $aCLOUTIER, S.
700 1 $aCOHAN, J-P.
700 1 $aDEVAUX, P.
700 1 $aDOOHAN, F.M.
700 1 $aDRECCER, M.F.
700 1 $aFERRAHI, M.
700 1 $aGERMAN, S.
700 1 $aGOODWIN, S.B.
700 1 $aGRIFFITHS, S.
700 1 $aGUZMÁN, C.
700 1 $aHANDA, H.
700 1 $aHAWKESFORD, M.J.
700 1 $aHE, Z.
700 1 $aHUTTNER, E.
700 1 $aIKEDA, T.M.
700 1 $aKILIAN, B.
700 1 $aKING, I.P.
700 1 $aKING, J.
700 1 $aKIRKEGAARD, J.A.
700 1 $aLAGE, J.
700 1 $aLE GOUIS, J.
700 1 $aMONDAL, S.
700 1 $aMULLINS, E.
700 1 $aORDON, F.
700 1 $aORTIZ-MONASTERIO, J.I.
700 1 $aÖZKAN, H.
700 1 $aÖZTÜRK, I.
700 1 $aPEREYRA, S.
700 1 $aPOZNIAK, C.J.
700 1 $aQUESNEVILLE, H.
700 1 $aQUINCKE, M.
700 1 $aREBETZKE, G.J.
700 1 $aCHRISTOPH REIF, J.
700 1 $aSAAVEDRA-BRAVO, T.
700 1 $aSCHURR, U.
700 1 $aSHARMA, S.
700 1 $aSINGH, S.K.
700 1 $aSINGH, R.P.
700 1 $aSNAPE, J.W.
700 1 $aTADESSE, W.
700 1 $aTSUJIMOTO, H.
700 1 $aTUBEROSA, R.
700 1 $aWILLIS, T.G.
700 1 $aZHANG, X.
773 $tAgronomy, 2022, volume 12, issue 11, 2767. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/agronomy12112767
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
