| |
|
|
 | Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
04/02/2020 |
|
Actualizado : |
04/02/2020 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
DEBLITZ, C.; BORBELY, C.; CHARRY, A.A.; COSTA, F.P.; VON DAVIER, Z.; FERNANDEZ, E.; GRABNER, R.; HASHMI, A.H.; IZQUIERDO, L.; JAKOBE, P.; KLAPKA, J.; MAHMOOD, K.; OSTROWSKI, B.; PARTON. K.; PEREIRA, M.; RAS, C.H.; REYES, E.; RICHARDSON, J.W.; SARZEAUD, P.; SWITLYK, M.; SZABO, K.; THORNE, F.; WILCZYNSKI, A. |
|
Afiliación : |
C. DEBLITZ, Institute of Farm Economics, FAL, Bundesallee 50, 38116 Braunschweig, Germany; C. BORBELY, University of Kaposvár, Kaposvár, Hungary; A. A. CHARRY, University of Sydney, Faculty of Rural Management, Orange, NSW, Australia; F. P. COSTA, EMBRAPA Gado de Corte, Embrapa Beef Cattle, Campo Grande, Brazil; Z. VON DAVIER, FAL Fed. Agric. Research Centre, Institute of Farm Economics, Braunschweig, Germany; ENRIQUE GENARO FERNANDEZ RODRIGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; R. GRABNER, Chamber of Agriculture Styria, Weiz, Austria; A. H. HASHMI, Small and Medium Entpr. Devmt. Auth., Pakistan; L. IZQUIERDO, FAL Fed. Agric. Research Centre, Institute of Farm Economics, Braunschweig, Germany; P. JAKOBE, Res. Inst. of Agricultural Economics, Praha, Czech Republic; J. KLAPKA, J., Agricultural Research Institute, Kromeríz, Czech Republic; K. MAHMOOD, Agric. Policy Studies Institute, Lahore, Pakistan; B. OSTROWSKI, Cátedra de Admin. Rural, Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad Buenos Aires (UBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina; K. PARTON, University of Sydney, Faculty of Rural Management, Orange, NSW, Australia; M. PEREIRA, EMBRAPA Gado de Corte, Embrapa Beef Cattle, Campo Grande, Brazil; C. H. RAS, Cátedra de Admin. Rural, Facultad de Agronomia, Universidad Buenos Aires (UBA), Buenos Aires, Argentina; E. REYES, Animal Health and Livestock Services, TRAGSEGA, Madrid, Spain; J. W. RICHARDSON, Texas A and M University, Agricultural Food Policy Centre, Department of Agricultural Economics, College Station, TX, United States; P. SARZEAUD, Dept. Action Régionale, Institut de l'Élevage, Rennes, France; M. SWITLYK, University of Szczecin, Institute of Management, Szczecin, Poland; K. SZABO, University of Kaposvár, Kaposvár, Hungary; F. THORNE, TEAGASC, Dublin, Ireland; A. WILCZYNSKI, University of Szczecin, Institute of Management, Szczecin, Poland. |
|
Título : |
Status quo and prospects of beef production world-wide. (Review) |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2004 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Landbauforschung Völkenrode, December 2004, Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages 237-249. |
|
Descripción física : |
2-s2.0-9944252565 |
|
ISSN : |
0458-6859 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: |
|
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
The purpose of this paper is to provide an idea about the market shares of important beef producers, to analyse the competitive situation of beef production on the farm-level and to assess the potential of beef production in a worldwide context. The global players in beef production are North America, Brazil, Argentina, Australia and the EU-25. In value-terms, the main exporters are North America, Australia, Brazil and Argentina. Main importers are again North America, Japan and the Far East. Within the framework of the International Farm Comparison Network (IFCN), and using harmonised methods for analysis, a total of 29 typical beef finishing farms in 15 important beef producing countries were analysed. The farms show significant differences in production systems and productivity levels. The highest cost of beef production is found in the EU-countries (US$ 350-500 per 100 kg carcass weight), the lowest in Argentina, Uruguay and Pakistan (US$ 100-130). In the case of trade liberalisation, farms with low cost of production have an incentive to export to markets with higher price levels. The potential to increase production depends on numerous factors, amongst them the availability of additional land, the possibilities to intensify production and the competition with other land uses. The development of beef production in the EU is mainly determined by the impact of the latest CAP-reform. In many countries (like Brazil, the U.S., Canada and Australia) the main potential lays in intensification rather than making additional land resources available for beef production. In the next ten years, a world-wide increase of beef production as well as world trade can be expected. In some countries the increases of production are likely to be at least partially offset by consumption in the short term (China) or over the long term (Brazil). MenosABSTRACT.
The purpose of this paper is to provide an idea about the market shares of important beef producers, to analyse the competitive situation of beef production on the farm-level and to assess the potential of beef production in a worldwide context. The global players in beef production are North America, Brazil, Argentina, Australia and the EU-25. In value-terms, the main exporters are North America, Australia, Brazil and Argentina. Main importers are again North America, Japan and the Far East. Within the framework of the International Farm Comparison Network (IFCN), and using harmonised methods for analysis, a total of 29 typical beef finishing farms in 15 important beef producing countries were analysed. The farms show significant differences in production systems and productivity levels. The highest cost of beef production is found in the EU-countries (US$ 350-500 per 100 kg carcass weight), the lowest in Argentina, Uruguay and Pakistan (US$ 100-130). In the case of trade liberalisation, farms with low cost of production have an incentive to export to markets with higher price levels. The potential to increase production depends on numerous factors, amongst them the availability of additional land, the possibilities to intensify production and the competition with other land uses. The development of beef production in the EU is mainly determined by the impact of the latest CAP-reform. In many countries (like Brazil, the U.S., Canada and Australia) the main potenti... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Beef production; International competitiveness. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03052naa a2200445 a 4500
001 1060762
005 2020-02-04
008 2004 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0458-6859
100 1 $aDEBLITZ, C.
245 $aStatus quo and prospects of beef production world-wide. (Review)$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2004
300 $c2-s2.0-9944252565
500 $aArticle history:
520 $aABSTRACT. The purpose of this paper is to provide an idea about the market shares of important beef producers, to analyse the competitive situation of beef production on the farm-level and to assess the potential of beef production in a worldwide context. The global players in beef production are North America, Brazil, Argentina, Australia and the EU-25. In value-terms, the main exporters are North America, Australia, Brazil and Argentina. Main importers are again North America, Japan and the Far East. Within the framework of the International Farm Comparison Network (IFCN), and using harmonised methods for analysis, a total of 29 typical beef finishing farms in 15 important beef producing countries were analysed. The farms show significant differences in production systems and productivity levels. The highest cost of beef production is found in the EU-countries (US$ 350-500 per 100 kg carcass weight), the lowest in Argentina, Uruguay and Pakistan (US$ 100-130). In the case of trade liberalisation, farms with low cost of production have an incentive to export to markets with higher price levels. The potential to increase production depends on numerous factors, amongst them the availability of additional land, the possibilities to intensify production and the competition with other land uses. The development of beef production in the EU is mainly determined by the impact of the latest CAP-reform. In many countries (like Brazil, the U.S., Canada and Australia) the main potential lays in intensification rather than making additional land resources available for beef production. In the next ten years, a world-wide increase of beef production as well as world trade can be expected. In some countries the increases of production are likely to be at least partially offset by consumption in the short term (China) or over the long term (Brazil).
653 $aBeef production
653 $aInternational competitiveness
700 1 $aBORBELY, C.
700 1 $aCHARRY, A.A.
700 1 $aCOSTA, F.P.
700 1 $aVON DAVIER, Z.
700 1 $aFERNANDEZ, E.
700 1 $aGRABNER, R.
700 1 $aHASHMI, A.H.
700 1 $aIZQUIERDO, L.
700 1 $aJAKOBE, P.
700 1 $aKLAPKA, J.
700 1 $aMAHMOOD, K.
700 1 $aOSTROWSKI, B.
700 1 $aPARTON. K.
700 1 $aPEREIRA, M.
700 1 $aRAS, C.H.
700 1 $aREYES, E.
700 1 $aRICHARDSON, J.W.
700 1 $aSARZEAUD, P.
700 1 $aSWITLYK, M.
700 1 $aSZABO, K.
700 1 $aTHORNE, F.
700 1 $aWILCZYNSKI, A.
773 $tLandbauforschung Völkenrode, December 2004, Volume 54, Issue 4, Pages 237-249.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha actual : |
12/04/2023 |
|
Actualizado : |
12/04/2023 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Agropecuarias |
|
Autor : |
CIBILS-STEWART, X.; GONZALEZ, M.; PESSIO, M.; CALISTRO, P.; ROSSI, C.; GIAMBIASI, M.; CHIARAVALLE, W.; ABBATE, S.; BARAIBAR, N. |
|
Afiliación : |
XIMENA CIBILS-STEWART, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARY ALICIA GONZALEZ BOLLETTA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MABEL ELIZABETH PESSIO TORRES, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PABLO ANDRES CALISTRO PEREZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CARLOS ALBERTO ROSSI RODRIGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARIO ALEJANDRO GIAMBIASI RODRIGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; WILLY CHIARAVALLE, Asesor privado; SILVANA ABBATE, CENUR Litoral Norte-EEMAC-Udelar; NICOLÁS BARAIBAR PEDERSEN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Crónica del daño de la lagarta medidora (Rachiplusia nu) en soja Intacta®. |
|
Complemento del título : |
Cultivos. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2023 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Revista INIA Uruguay, Marzo 2023, no.72, p.53-58. |
|
Serie : |
(Revista INIA; 72). |
|
ISSN : |
1510-9011 |
|
Idioma : |
Español |
|
Contenido : |
En febrero de la pasada zafra se reportó, en nuestro país, la presencia y el daño de lagartas medidoras (Rachiplusia nu) en soja Bt (foto de portada y Figura 1).
Se presentan aquí los resultados del trabajo que procuró generar información para clarificar lo sucedido. Se reitera la importancia de siembra de áreas refugio no-Bt, el monitoreo aun en soja Bt y la adopción de los umbrales de daño (UD) establecidos para soja no-Bt en caso de constatar daño (aprox. 30 % de defoliación constantando la presencia de larvas vivas). |
|
Palabras claves : |
LAGARTA DE LA SOJA. |
|
Thesagro : |
LEPIDOPTERA; SOJA. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
H10 Plagas de las plantas |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/17042/1/Revista-INIA-72-marzo-2023-15.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01290naa a2200277 a 4500
001 1064015
005 2023-04-12
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a1510-9011
100 1 $aCIBILS-STEWART, X.
245 $aCrónica del daño de la lagarta medidora (Rachiplusia nu) en soja Intacta®.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
490 $a(Revista INIA; 72).
520 $aEn febrero de la pasada zafra se reportó, en nuestro país, la presencia y el daño de lagartas medidoras (Rachiplusia nu) en soja Bt (foto de portada y Figura 1). Se presentan aquí los resultados del trabajo que procuró generar información para clarificar lo sucedido. Se reitera la importancia de siembra de áreas refugio no-Bt, el monitoreo aun en soja Bt y la adopción de los umbrales de daño (UD) establecidos para soja no-Bt en caso de constatar daño (aprox. 30 % de defoliación constantando la presencia de larvas vivas).
650 $aLEPIDOPTERA
650 $aSOJA
653 $aLAGARTA DE LA SOJA
700 1 $aGONZALEZ, M.
700 1 $aPESSIO, M.
700 1 $aCALISTRO, P.
700 1 $aROSSI, C.
700 1 $aGIAMBIASI, M.
700 1 $aCHIARAVALLE, W.
700 1 $aABBATE, S.
700 1 $aBARAIBAR, N.
773 $tRevista INIA Uruguay, Marzo 2023, no.72, p.53-58.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
