|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Treinta y Tres. Por información adicional contacte bibliott@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha : |
21/02/2014 |
Actualizado : |
11/10/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
TERRA, J.A.; SHAW, J.; REEVES, D. W.; RAPER, R.L.; VAN SANTEN, E.; SCHWAB, E.B.; MASK, P.L. |
Afiliación : |
JOSÉ ALFREDO TERRA FERNÁNDEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Soil management and landscape variability affects field-scale cotton productivity. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2006 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2006, v.70 (1), p. 98-107. |
ISSN : |
0361-5995 |
DOI : |
10.2136/sssaj2005.0179 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Artilce history: Received 8 June 2005 // Published Jan. 2006. |
Contenido : |
A better understanding of interactions between soil management and landscape variability and their effects on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) productivity is needed for precision management. We assessed management practices and landscape variability effects on seed cotton yield in a 9-ha, Alabama field (Typic and Aquic Paleudults) during 2001–2003. We hypothesize that landscapes have major effects on cotton productivity, but these effects vary based on management and climate. Treatments were established in replicated strips traversing the landscape in a corn (Zea mays L.)–cotton rotation.
Treatments included a conventional system with or without 10 Mg ha21 yr21 dairy manure (CTmanure or CT), and a conservation system with and without manure (NTmanure or NT). Conventional systems consisted of chisel plowing/disking 1 in-row subsoiling without cover crops. Conservation systems combined no surface tillage with in-row subsoiling and winter cover crops. A soil survey, topographic survey, and interpolated surfaces of soil electrical conductivity (EC), soil organic carbon (SOC), and surface soil texture were used to delineate five zones using fuzzy k-means clustering. Overall (2001–2003), conservation systems improved cotton yield compared with conventional systems (2710 vs. 2380 kg ha21 ); neither manure nor treatment 3 year interactions were significant. The conservation system was more
productive than the conventional system in 87% of the cluster 3 year combinations. Slope, EC, SOC, and clay content were correlated with yield in all treatments. Soil and terrain attributes explained 16 to 64% of yield variation, however, their significance fluctuated between years and treatments. In dry years, factor analyses suggested variables related with soil quality and field-scale water dynamics had greater impacts on CT yields than NT yields. Our results indicate that management zones developed using relatively static soil-landscape data are relatively more suitable for conservation systems, and these zones are affected by soil management. In addition, the impact of NT on yields is most apparent on degraded soils in dry years. MenosA better understanding of interactions between soil management and landscape variability and their effects on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) productivity is needed for precision management. We assessed management practices and landscape variability effects on seed cotton yield in a 9-ha, Alabama field (Typic and Aquic Paleudults) during 2001–2003. We hypothesize that landscapes have major effects on cotton productivity, but these effects vary based on management and climate. Treatments were established in replicated strips traversing the landscape in a corn (Zea mays L.)–cotton rotation.
Treatments included a conventional system with or without 10 Mg ha21 yr21 dairy manure (CTmanure or CT), and a conservation system with and without manure (NTmanure or NT). Conventional systems consisted of chisel plowing/disking 1 in-row subsoiling without cover crops. Conservation systems combined no surface tillage with in-row subsoiling and winter cover crops. A soil survey, topographic survey, and interpolated surfaces of soil electrical conductivity (EC), soil organic carbon (SOC), and surface soil texture were used to delineate five zones using fuzzy k-means clustering. Overall (2001–2003), conservation systems improved cotton yield compared with conventional systems (2710 vs. 2380 kg ha21 ); neither manure nor treatment 3 year interactions were significant. The conservation system was more
productive than the conventional system in 87% of the cluster 3 year combinations. Slope, EC, S... Presentar Todo |
Thesagro : |
ALGODON; SUELOS. |
Asunto categoría : |
P36 Erosión conservación y recuperación del suelo |
Marc : |
LEADER 02913naa a2200253 a 4500 001 1032797 005 2019-10-11 008 2006 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0361-5995 024 7 $a10.2136/sssaj2005.0179$2DOI 100 1 $aTERRA, J.A. 245 $aSoil management and landscape variability affects field-scale cotton productivity.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2006 500 $aArtilce history: Received 8 June 2005 // Published Jan. 2006. 520 $aA better understanding of interactions between soil management and landscape variability and their effects on cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) productivity is needed for precision management. We assessed management practices and landscape variability effects on seed cotton yield in a 9-ha, Alabama field (Typic and Aquic Paleudults) during 2001–2003. We hypothesize that landscapes have major effects on cotton productivity, but these effects vary based on management and climate. Treatments were established in replicated strips traversing the landscape in a corn (Zea mays L.)–cotton rotation. Treatments included a conventional system with or without 10 Mg ha21 yr21 dairy manure (CTmanure or CT), and a conservation system with and without manure (NTmanure or NT). Conventional systems consisted of chisel plowing/disking 1 in-row subsoiling without cover crops. Conservation systems combined no surface tillage with in-row subsoiling and winter cover crops. A soil survey, topographic survey, and interpolated surfaces of soil electrical conductivity (EC), soil organic carbon (SOC), and surface soil texture were used to delineate five zones using fuzzy k-means clustering. Overall (2001–2003), conservation systems improved cotton yield compared with conventional systems (2710 vs. 2380 kg ha21 ); neither manure nor treatment 3 year interactions were significant. The conservation system was more productive than the conventional system in 87% of the cluster 3 year combinations. Slope, EC, SOC, and clay content were correlated with yield in all treatments. Soil and terrain attributes explained 16 to 64% of yield variation, however, their significance fluctuated between years and treatments. In dry years, factor analyses suggested variables related with soil quality and field-scale water dynamics had greater impacts on CT yields than NT yields. Our results indicate that management zones developed using relatively static soil-landscape data are relatively more suitable for conservation systems, and these zones are affected by soil management. In addition, the impact of NT on yields is most apparent on degraded soils in dry years. 650 $aALGODON 650 $aSUELOS 700 1 $aSHAW, J. 700 1 $aREEVES, D. W. 700 1 $aRAPER, R.L. 700 1 $aVAN SANTEN, E. 700 1 $aSCHWAB, E.B. 700 1 $aMASK, P.L. 773 $tSoil Science Society of America Journal, 2006$gv.70 (1), p. 98-107.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Tacuarembó. |
Fecha actual : |
26/01/2021 |
Actualizado : |
27/01/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
BONIFACINO, S.; RESQUÍN, F.; LOPRETTI, M.; BUXEDAS, L.; VÁZQUEZ, S.; GONZÁLEZ, M.; SAPOLINSKI, A.; HIRIGOYEN, A.; DOLDÁN, J.; RACHID, C.; CARRASCO-LETELIER, L. |
Afiliación : |
SILVANA BONIFACINO, Laboratorio de Técnicas nucleares aplicadas en Bioquímica y Biotecnología, Centro de Investigaciones Nucleares, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay; JOSE FERNANDO RESQUIN PEREZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; MARY LOPRETTI, Laboratorio de Técnicas nucleares aplicadas en Bioquímica y Biotecnología, Centro de Investigaciones Nucleares, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay; I&D Biotecnología, Laboratorio Tecnol#19;ogico de Uruguay (LATU); LUCIANA BUXEDAS, Laboratorio de Técnicas nucleares aplicadas en Bioquímica y Biotecnología, Centro de Investigaciones Nucleares, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay; SYLVIA VÁZQUEZ, Laboratorio de Técnicas nucleares aplicadas en Bioquímica y Biotecnología, Centro de Investigaciones Nucleares, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay; MARIANA GONZÁLEZ, I&D Biotecnología, Laboratorio Tecnologico de Uruguay (LATU); ALEJANDRA SAPOLINSKI, I&D Biotecnología, Laboratorio Tecnologico de Uruguay (LATU); ANDRES EDUARDO HIRIGOYEN DOMINGUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JAVIER DOLDÁN, Departamento de Forestales, Laboratorio Tecnol#19;ogico de Uruguay (LATU), Montevideo, Uruguay; ANA CECILIA RACHID CASNATI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; LEONIDAS CARRASCO-LETELIER, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Bioethanol production using high density Eucalyptus crops in Uruguay [Research article] |
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Heliyon, January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, e06031. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06031 |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06031 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 9 August 2020; Received in revised form 16 November 2020; Accepted 14 January 2021. Corresponding author. E-mail address: silvana.bonifacino@gmail.com (S. Bonifacino). Acknowledgements: The authors thank the Forestal Oriental Company for its collaborationin thefield experiments and planting. |
Contenido : |
Experimental scale crops for Eucalyptus grandis, Eucalyptus benthamii, Eucalyptus dunnii and Eucalyptus tereticornis, at 2,220, 4,440 and 6,660 trees ha?1 were established in two soil units, at Paysandú and Tacuarembó, Uruguay. Wood samples were taken from twenty-two-months-old trees, and were used to produce bioethanol by pre-hydrolysis simultaneous saccharyfication and fermentation process (PSSF). Cellulose and lignin content was analyzed. Species and planting density affected biomass production at both sites; the highest value was obtained with E. dunnii at 6,660 trees ha?1 at Paysandú. Cellulose content of wood varied between species at both sites, but only between planting densities at Tacuarembó. The site effect showed that the highest amount of cellulose (14.7 Mg ha?1) was produced at Paysandú. E. benthamii and E. tereticornis wood showed higher lignin contents, conversely, the PSSF yields showed no differences, which led to a bioethanol average of 97 L Mg?1. Bioethanol productivity was associated to the biomass productivity. It was possible to obtain 2,650 L ha?1 of bioethanol using wood from E. benthamii, E. dunnii and E. grandis at 4,440 and 6,660 trees ha?1 at Paysandú, and with E. benthamii at 4,440 and 6,660 trees ha?1, and E. dunnii at 6,660 trees ha?1 at Tacuarembó. |
Palabras claves : |
BIOETHANOL; BIOMASS; EUCALYPTUS SPECIES; HIGH PLANTING DENSITY; PRODUCCIÓN FORESTAL; SHORT ROTATION FORESTRY. |
Asunto categoría : |
K10 Producción forestal |
URL : |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/sdfe/reader/pii/S2405844021001365/pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02643naa a2200337 a 4500 001 1061681 005 2021-01-27 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06031$2DOI 100 1 $aBONIFACINO, S. 245 $aBioethanol production using high density Eucalyptus crops in Uruguay [Research article]$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 500 $aArticle history: Received 9 August 2020; Received in revised form 16 November 2020; Accepted 14 January 2021. Corresponding author. E-mail address: silvana.bonifacino@gmail.com (S. Bonifacino). Acknowledgements: The authors thank the Forestal Oriental Company for its collaborationin thefield experiments and planting. 520 $aExperimental scale crops for Eucalyptus grandis, Eucalyptus benthamii, Eucalyptus dunnii and Eucalyptus tereticornis, at 2,220, 4,440 and 6,660 trees ha?1 were established in two soil units, at Paysandú and Tacuarembó, Uruguay. Wood samples were taken from twenty-two-months-old trees, and were used to produce bioethanol by pre-hydrolysis simultaneous saccharyfication and fermentation process (PSSF). Cellulose and lignin content was analyzed. Species and planting density affected biomass production at both sites; the highest value was obtained with E. dunnii at 6,660 trees ha?1 at Paysandú. Cellulose content of wood varied between species at both sites, but only between planting densities at Tacuarembó. The site effect showed that the highest amount of cellulose (14.7 Mg ha?1) was produced at Paysandú. E. benthamii and E. tereticornis wood showed higher lignin contents, conversely, the PSSF yields showed no differences, which led to a bioethanol average of 97 L Mg?1. Bioethanol productivity was associated to the biomass productivity. It was possible to obtain 2,650 L ha?1 of bioethanol using wood from E. benthamii, E. dunnii and E. grandis at 4,440 and 6,660 trees ha?1 at Paysandú, and with E. benthamii at 4,440 and 6,660 trees ha?1, and E. dunnii at 6,660 trees ha?1 at Tacuarembó. 653 $aBIOETHANOL 653 $aBIOMASS 653 $aEUCALYPTUS SPECIES 653 $aHIGH PLANTING DENSITY 653 $aPRODUCCIÓN FORESTAL 653 $aSHORT ROTATION FORESTRY 700 1 $aRESQUÍN, F. 700 1 $aLOPRETTI, M. 700 1 $aBUXEDAS, L. 700 1 $aVÁZQUEZ, S. 700 1 $aGONZÁLEZ, M. 700 1 $aSAPOLINSKI, A. 700 1 $aHIRIGOYEN, A. 700 1 $aDOLDÁN, J. 700 1 $aRACHID, C. 700 1 $aCARRASCO-LETELIER, L. 773 $tHeliyon, January 2021, Volume 7, Issue 1, e06031. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06031
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Tacuarembó (TBO) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|