|
|
Registros recuperados : 4 | |
2. | | DINI, Y.; CAJARVILLE, C.; GERE, J.I.; FERNANDEZ. S.; FRAGA, M.; PRAVIA, M.I.; NAVAJAS, E.; CIGANDA, V. Association between residual feed intake and enteric methane emissions in Hereford steers. Translational Animal Science, v. 3, Issue 1, 1 January 2019, Pages 65-72. Doi: https://doi.10.1093/tas/txy111. Article history: Published: 01 October 2018 // Received: 12 September 2018.Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
3. | | DE AZEVEDO, E.B.; SAVIAN, J.V.; DO AMARAL, G. A.; DE DAVID, D. B.; GERE, J.I.; MOURA, M.; BREMM, C.; JOCHIMS, F.; ZUBIETA, A. S.; GONDA, H. L.; BAYER, C.; DE FACCIO CARVALHO, P.C. Feed intake, methane yield, and efciency of utilization of energy and nitrogen by sheep fed tropical grasses. Tropical Animal Health and Production, 2021, volume 53, Article number 452. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11250-021-02928-4 Article history: Received: 10 July 2020; Accepted: 10 September 2021; Published online: 18 September 2021.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
4. | | SOUZA CONGIO, G. F. DE; BANNINK, A.; MAYORGA, MOGOLLÓN, O. L.; NICOLOV HRISTOV, A.; JAURENA, G.; GONDA, H.; GERE, J. I.; CERÓN-CUCCHI, M.E.; ORTIZ-CHURA, A.; TIERI, M.P.; HERNÁNDEZ, O.; RICCI, P.; JULIARENA, M.P.; LOMBARDI, B.; ABDALLA, A.L.; ABDALLA-FILHO, A.L.; BERNDT, A.; ANCHAO OLIVEIRA, P. P.; HENRIQUE, F. L.; GOMEZ MONTEIRO, A.L.; BORGES, L. I.; RIBEIRO-FILHO, H.M.N.; RIBEIRO PEREIRA, L.G.; RIBEIRO TOMICH, T.; MAGALHAES CAMPOS, M.; SAMARINI MACHADO, F.; MARCONDES, M. I.; ZERLOTTI MERCADANTE, M. E.; SANNOMIYA SAKAMOTO, L.; GALVAO ALBUQUERQUE, L.; FACCIO CARVALHO, P. C. DE; ROSSETTO, J.; SAVIAN, J.V.; MAZZA RODRIGUES, P. H.; PERNA JÚNIOR, F.; MOREIRA, T.S.; MAURÍCIO, R. M.; PACHECO RODRIGUES, J.P.; CRUZ BORGES, A.L. DA C.; REIS E SILVA, R.; FERREIRA LAGE, H.; ANDRADE REIS, R.; RUGGIERI, A.C.; CARDOSO, A. DA SILVA; SILVA, S. CARNEIRO DA; BARBOSA CHIAVEGATO, M.; VALADARES-FILHO, S. DE CAMPOS; SILVA, F. A. DE SALES; ZANETTI, D.; BERCHIELLI, T.T.; DUARTE MESSANA, J.; MUÑOZ, C.; ARIZA-NIETO, C.J.; SIERRA-ALARCÓN, L.I.; GUALDRÓN-DUARTE, L.B.; MESTRA-VARGAS, L.I.; MOLINA-BOTERO, I. C.; BARAHONA-ROSALES, R.; ARANGO, J.; GAVIRIA-URIBE, X.; GIRALDO VALDERRAMA, L.A.; ROSERO-NOGUERA, J.R.; POSADA-OCHOA, S.L.; ABARCA-MONGE, SERGIO; SOTO-BLANCO, R.; KU-VERA, J.C.; JIMÉNEZ-OCAMPO, R.; FLORES-SANTIAGO, E. DEL J.; CASTELÁN-ORTEGA, O.A.; VÁZQUEZ-CARRILLO, M.F.; BENAOUDA, M.; GÓMEZ-BRAVO, C. A.; ALVARADO BOLOVICH, V.I.; DÍAZ CÉSPEDES, M.A.; ASTIGARRAGA, L. Enteric methane mitigation strategies for ruminant livestock systems in the Latin America and Caribbean region: a meta-analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021. v. 312, art. 127693, 13 p. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127693 Article history: Receiived 22 December 2020; Received in revised form 24 April 2021; Accepted 25 May 2021. Available online 30 May 2021.
Latin America Methane Project Collaborators está integrada por 71 investigadores en este artículo.Biblioteca(s): INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 4 | |
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
22/07/2018 |
Actualizado : |
12/02/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
DINI, Y.; GERE, J.I.; CAJARVILLE, C.; CIGANDA, V. |
Afiliación : |
YOANA FATIMA DINI VILAR, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; JOSÉ IGNACIO GERE, Universidad Tecnológica Nacional, Facultad Regional Buenos Aires.; CECILIA CAJARVILLE, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Veterinaria; VERONICA SOLANGE CIGANDA BRASCA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Using highly nutritious pastures to mitigate enteric methane emissions from cattle grazing systems in South America. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2018 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Animal Production Science, 2018, Volume 58, Issue 12, Pages 2329-2334. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16803 |
Serie : |
1836-0939 |
DOI : |
10.1071/AN16803 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 9 December 2016 / Accepted 3 August 2017 / Published online 23 November 2017. |
Contenido : |
Abstract.
Enteric methane (CH4) emissions are directly related to the quantity and type of feed intake. Existing mitigation strategies, for example, the addition of legumes to grass-based diets and increased use of grains, have been thoroughly researched and applied in different production systems. In this paper, we propose a need to expand the capacity to mitigate enteric CH4 emissions in cattle under grazing conditions. The objective of this paper was to contribute to evaluate a mitigation strategy under grazing conditions of using contrasting levels of pasture quality. The study was performed with 20 heifers twice during the year: winter and spring. Each season, the study employed a crossover design with two treatments and two 5-day measurement periods. The treatments were two pastures with different nutritional values, including a pasture with a low quality (70% of neutral detergent fibre, 1% of ether extract, 8% of non-fibre carbohydrates), 9% of crude protein, 35% of dry matter digestibility and a pasture with a high quality (42% neutral detergent fibre, 1.3% ether extract, 24% non-fibre carbohydrates, 21% crude protein and 63% dry matter digestibility). Enteric CH4 emissions were measured with sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. The dry matter intake (kg/day) was measured indirectly using titanium dioxide as an external marker. CH4 emissions from animals grazing the high-quality pasture were 14% lower expressed as % of gross energy intake, and 11% lower expressed by unit of dry matter intake (g CH4/kg). These results quantitative showed the alternative to mitigate CH4 emissions from grazing bovines exclusively through the improvement of the forage quality offered.
© CSIRO. MenosAbstract.
Enteric methane (CH4) emissions are directly related to the quantity and type of feed intake. Existing mitigation strategies, for example, the addition of legumes to grass-based diets and increased use of grains, have been thoroughly researched and applied in different production systems. In this paper, we propose a need to expand the capacity to mitigate enteric CH4 emissions in cattle under grazing conditions. The objective of this paper was to contribute to evaluate a mitigation strategy under grazing conditions of using contrasting levels of pasture quality. The study was performed with 20 heifers twice during the year: winter and spring. Each season, the study employed a crossover design with two treatments and two 5-day measurement periods. The treatments were two pastures with different nutritional values, including a pasture with a low quality (70% of neutral detergent fibre, 1% of ether extract, 8% of non-fibre carbohydrates), 9% of crude protein, 35% of dry matter digestibility and a pasture with a high quality (42% neutral detergent fibre, 1.3% ether extract, 24% non-fibre carbohydrates, 21% crude protein and 63% dry matter digestibility). Enteric CH4 emissions were measured with sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. The dry matter intake (kg/day) was measured indirectly using titanium dioxide as an external marker. CH4 emissions from animals grazing the high-quality pasture were 14% lower expressed as % of gross energy intake, and 11% lower expressed by... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
GRAZING CONDITIONS; PASTURE QUALITY; SF6 TRACER TECHNIQUE. |
Thesagro : |
PASTURAS. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
Marc : |
LEADER 02575naa a2200241 a 4500 001 1058832 005 2021-02-12 008 2018 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1071/AN16803$2DOI 100 1 $aDINI, Y. 245 $aUsing highly nutritious pastures to mitigate enteric methane emissions from cattle grazing systems in South America.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2018 490 $a1836-0939 500 $aArticle history: Received 9 December 2016 / Accepted 3 August 2017 / Published online 23 November 2017. 520 $aAbstract. Enteric methane (CH4) emissions are directly related to the quantity and type of feed intake. Existing mitigation strategies, for example, the addition of legumes to grass-based diets and increased use of grains, have been thoroughly researched and applied in different production systems. In this paper, we propose a need to expand the capacity to mitigate enteric CH4 emissions in cattle under grazing conditions. The objective of this paper was to contribute to evaluate a mitigation strategy under grazing conditions of using contrasting levels of pasture quality. The study was performed with 20 heifers twice during the year: winter and spring. Each season, the study employed a crossover design with two treatments and two 5-day measurement periods. The treatments were two pastures with different nutritional values, including a pasture with a low quality (70% of neutral detergent fibre, 1% of ether extract, 8% of non-fibre carbohydrates), 9% of crude protein, 35% of dry matter digestibility and a pasture with a high quality (42% neutral detergent fibre, 1.3% ether extract, 24% non-fibre carbohydrates, 21% crude protein and 63% dry matter digestibility). Enteric CH4 emissions were measured with sulfur hexafluoride tracer technique. The dry matter intake (kg/day) was measured indirectly using titanium dioxide as an external marker. CH4 emissions from animals grazing the high-quality pasture were 14% lower expressed as % of gross energy intake, and 11% lower expressed by unit of dry matter intake (g CH4/kg). These results quantitative showed the alternative to mitigate CH4 emissions from grazing bovines exclusively through the improvement of the forage quality offered. © CSIRO. 650 $aPASTURAS 653 $aGRAZING CONDITIONS 653 $aPASTURE QUALITY 653 $aSF6 TRACER TECHNIQUE 700 1 $aGERE, J.I. 700 1 $aCAJARVILLE, C. 700 1 $aCIGANDA, V. 773 $tAnimal Production Science, 2018, Volume 58, Issue 12, Pages 2329-2334. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1071/AN16803
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|