|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha : |
24/10/2019 |
Actualizado : |
24/10/2019 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Documentos |
Autor : |
BARRIOS, E.; SARAIVA, O.; CÁCERES, M.; CIAPPESONI, G. |
Afiliación : |
ETHEL BALOISA BARRIOS PIRIZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; OTAVIO SARAIVA, Universidad Federal de Pelotas, Brasil.; MARIA CÁCERES, UTU La Carolina.; CARLOS GABRIEL CIAPPESONI SCARONE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Módulo intensivo de producción ovina: resultados preliminares 2019. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2019 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
En: DÍA DE CAMPO, 2019, UNIDAD EXPERIMENTAL PALO A PIQUE (UEPP), TREINTA Y TRES, UY. |
Páginas : |
p. 28. |
Idioma : |
Español |
Palabras claves : |
SISTEMAS INTENSIVOS DE PRODUCCIÓN OVINA. |
Thesagro : |
OVINOS. |
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/13582/1/DC-UEPP-octubre-2019-p.26.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 00558nam a2200169 a 4500 001 1060348 005 2019-10-24 008 2019 bl uuuu u0uu1 u #d 100 1 $aBARRIOS, E. 245 $aMódulo intensivo de producción ovina$bresultados preliminares 2019.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aEn: DÍA DE CAMPO, 2019, UNIDAD EXPERIMENTAL PALO A PIQUE (UEPP), TREINTA Y TRES, UY.$c2019 300 $ap. 28. 650 $aOVINOS 653 $aSISTEMAS INTENSIVOS DE PRODUCCIÓN OVINA 700 1 $aSARAIVA, O. 700 1 $aCÁCERES, M. 700 1 $aCIAPPESONI, G.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
| Acceso al texto completo restringido a Biblioteca INIA Las Brujas. Por información adicional contacte bibliolb@inia.org.uy. |
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
01/03/2024 |
Actualizado : |
01/03/2024 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
MALTESE, N.; CARCIOCHI, W.D.; CAVIGLIA, O.P.; SAINZ ROZAS, H.R.; GARCÍA, M.; LAPAZ, ADRIAN O.; CIAMPITTI, I.A.; REUSSI CALVO, N.I. |
Afiliación : |
NICOLÁS E. MALTESE, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; WALTER D. CARCIOCHI, National Research Council (CONICET), Argentina; Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Ruta 226 km 73.5, Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina; OCTAVIO P. CAVIGLIA, National Research Council (CONICET), Argentina; Facultad de Ciencias Agropecuarias, Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos, Ruta 11, km 10.5 (3101), Oro Verde, Entre Ríos, Argentina; HERNAN R. SAINZ ROZAS, National Research Council (CONICET), Argentina; Fac. Ciencias Agrarias, Univ. Nac. de Mar del Plata, Ruta 226 km 73.5, Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina; Dep. Agronomía, EEA INTA Balcarce, Balcarce, Argentina; MAURICIO GARCÍA, Corteva Agriscience, Argentina; ADRIAN O. LAPAZ, National Research Council (CONICET), Argentina; IGNACIO A. CIAMPITTI, Department of Agronomy, Kansas State University, 2004 Throckmorton Plant Science Center, Manhattan, KS, United States; NAHUEL I. REUSSI CALVO, National Research Council (CONICET), Argentina; Facultad de Ciencias Agrarias, Universidad Nacional de Mar del Plata, Ruta 226 km 73.5, Balcarce, Buenos Aires, Argentina. |
Título : |
Assessing the effect of split and additional late N fertilisation on N economy of maize. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2024 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Field Crops Research. 2024, Volume 308, Article 109279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109279 |
ISSN : |
0378-4290 |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109279 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 23 November 2023; Received in revised form 22 January 2024; Accepted 25 January 2024; Available online 6 February 2024. -- Correspondence: Maltese, N.E.; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental "Dr. Alberto Boerger", Ruta 50, km 11, Colonia, Uruguay; email:nmaltese@inia.org.uy -- Funding: Partial funding for this work was provided by ANPCyT (PICT-2020-SERIEA-01122 ; PICT-2020-SERIEA-00605 ) and UNER (PID 2227). Contribution no. 24-183-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station. -- |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Context: In the temperate-humid region of Argentina, nitrogen (N) fertilisers in maize (Zea mays L.) are mainly applied around sowing, whereas N-splitting is rare and occurs during early vegetative stages. Splitting and late N fertilisation, even up to silking (R1), effects on yield have been recently studied. However, to the extent of our knowledge, these studies have mainly focused on the effect of these strategies on maize yield, but less on the crop N economy. Objective: The aims were to study the mechanisms explaining the effect of i) splitting N and ii) additional N application at R1 on yield, post-flowering N uptake, kernel weight, N uptake efficiency, and the relationship of these variables with the N nutrition index (NNI). Methods: Seven experiments were carried out throughout the humid temperate region of Argentina, evaluating seven treatments: a control without N fertilisation, N rate entirely applied at sowing or split between sowing, eight leaf (V8), and R1, an additional N rate at R1, and an N sufficiency treatment. Results: The scenario with split N application had no adverse effect on either yield or N uptake at maturity (P > 0.05), with less pre-flowering N uptake compensated with more post-flowering N uptake in late N applications. In turn, increases in both yield and kernel weight were related to increases in post-flowering N uptake. Positive yield responses to N-splitting (plateauing at 450 kg ha-1) were obtained with yield responses to N greater than 3107 kg ha-1. Likewise, yield responses to additional N at R1 (plateauing at 1107 kg ha-1) were evident with yield responses greater than 2943 kg ha-1. The NNI at R1 accounted for variations in post-flowering N uptake and yield, as well as yield responses to additional N at R1 and their impact on kernel weight. Conclusion: Results show that N-splitting and late N fertilisation are promising strategies that, combined with crop N status monitoring, could lead to improvements in both maize yield and N economy. © 2024 Elsevier B.V. MenosABSTRACT.- Context: In the temperate-humid region of Argentina, nitrogen (N) fertilisers in maize (Zea mays L.) are mainly applied around sowing, whereas N-splitting is rare and occurs during early vegetative stages. Splitting and late N fertilisation, even up to silking (R1), effects on yield have been recently studied. However, to the extent of our knowledge, these studies have mainly focused on the effect of these strategies on maize yield, but less on the crop N economy. Objective: The aims were to study the mechanisms explaining the effect of i) splitting N and ii) additional N application at R1 on yield, post-flowering N uptake, kernel weight, N uptake efficiency, and the relationship of these variables with the N nutrition index (NNI). Methods: Seven experiments were carried out throughout the humid temperate region of Argentina, evaluating seven treatments: a control without N fertilisation, N rate entirely applied at sowing or split between sowing, eight leaf (V8), and R1, an additional N rate at R1, and an N sufficiency treatment. Results: The scenario with split N application had no adverse effect on either yield or N uptake at maturity (P > 0.05), with less pre-flowering N uptake compensated with more post-flowering N uptake in late N applications. In turn, increases in both yield and kernel weight were related to increases in post-flowering N uptake. Positive yield responses to N-splitting (plateauing at 450 kg ha-1) were obtained with yield responses to N great... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Crop nutrition; N use efficiency; Nitrogen nutrition index; Timing of fertilisation. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
Marc : |
LEADER 03492naa a2200289 a 4500 001 1064485 005 2024-03-01 008 2024 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a0378-4290 024 7 $a10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109279$2DOI 100 1 $aMALTESE, N. 245 $aAssessing the effect of split and additional late N fertilisation on N economy of maize.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2024 500 $aArticle history: Received 23 November 2023; Received in revised form 22 January 2024; Accepted 25 January 2024; Available online 6 February 2024. -- Correspondence: Maltese, N.E.; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria (INIA), Estación Experimental "Dr. Alberto Boerger", Ruta 50, km 11, Colonia, Uruguay; email:nmaltese@inia.org.uy -- Funding: Partial funding for this work was provided by ANPCyT (PICT-2020-SERIEA-01122 ; PICT-2020-SERIEA-00605 ) and UNER (PID 2227). Contribution no. 24-183-J from the Kansas Agricultural Experiment Station. -- 520 $aABSTRACT.- Context: In the temperate-humid region of Argentina, nitrogen (N) fertilisers in maize (Zea mays L.) are mainly applied around sowing, whereas N-splitting is rare and occurs during early vegetative stages. Splitting and late N fertilisation, even up to silking (R1), effects on yield have been recently studied. However, to the extent of our knowledge, these studies have mainly focused on the effect of these strategies on maize yield, but less on the crop N economy. Objective: The aims were to study the mechanisms explaining the effect of i) splitting N and ii) additional N application at R1 on yield, post-flowering N uptake, kernel weight, N uptake efficiency, and the relationship of these variables with the N nutrition index (NNI). Methods: Seven experiments were carried out throughout the humid temperate region of Argentina, evaluating seven treatments: a control without N fertilisation, N rate entirely applied at sowing or split between sowing, eight leaf (V8), and R1, an additional N rate at R1, and an N sufficiency treatment. Results: The scenario with split N application had no adverse effect on either yield or N uptake at maturity (P > 0.05), with less pre-flowering N uptake compensated with more post-flowering N uptake in late N applications. In turn, increases in both yield and kernel weight were related to increases in post-flowering N uptake. Positive yield responses to N-splitting (plateauing at 450 kg ha-1) were obtained with yield responses to N greater than 3107 kg ha-1. Likewise, yield responses to additional N at R1 (plateauing at 1107 kg ha-1) were evident with yield responses greater than 2943 kg ha-1. The NNI at R1 accounted for variations in post-flowering N uptake and yield, as well as yield responses to additional N at R1 and their impact on kernel weight. Conclusion: Results show that N-splitting and late N fertilisation are promising strategies that, combined with crop N status monitoring, could lead to improvements in both maize yield and N economy. © 2024 Elsevier B.V. 653 $aCrop nutrition 653 $aN use efficiency 653 $aNitrogen nutrition index 653 $aTiming of fertilisation 700 1 $aCARCIOCHI, W.D. 700 1 $aCAVIGLIA, O.P. 700 1 $aSAINZ ROZAS, H.R. 700 1 $aGARCÍA, M. 700 1 $aLAPAZ, ADRIAN O. 700 1 $aCIAMPITTI, I.A. 700 1 $aREUSSI CALVO, N.I. 773 $tField Crops Research. 2024, Volume 308, Article 109279. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2024.109279
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|