|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Treinta y Tres. |
Fecha : |
06/07/2021 |
Actualizado : |
08/07/2021 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
SOUZA CONGIO, G. F. DE; BANNINK, A.; MAYORGA, MOGOLLÓN, O. L.; NICOLOV HRISTOV, A.; JAURENA, G.; GONDA, H.; GERE, J. I.; CERÓN-CUCCHI, M.E.; ORTIZ-CHURA, A.; TIERI, M.P.; HERNÁNDEZ, O.; RICCI, P.; JULIARENA, M.P.; LOMBARDI, B.; ABDALLA, A.L.; ABDALLA-FILHO, A.L.; BERNDT, A.; ANCHAO OLIVEIRA, P. P.; HENRIQUE, F. L.; GOMEZ MONTEIRO, A.L.; BORGES, L. I.; RIBEIRO-FILHO, H.M.N.; RIBEIRO PEREIRA, L.G.; RIBEIRO TOMICH, T.; MAGALHAES CAMPOS, M.; SAMARINI MACHADO, F.; MARCONDES, M. I.; ZERLOTTI MERCADANTE, M. E.; SANNOMIYA SAKAMOTO, L.; GALVAO ALBUQUERQUE, L.; FACCIO CARVALHO, P. C. DE; ROSSETTO, J.; SAVIAN, J.V.; MAZZA RODRIGUES, P. H.; PERNA JÚNIOR, F.; MOREIRA, T.S.; MAURÍCIO, R. M.; PACHECO RODRIGUES, J.P.; CRUZ BORGES, A.L. DA C.; REIS E SILVA, R.; FERREIRA LAGE, H.; ANDRADE REIS, R.; RUGGIERI, A.C.; CARDOSO, A. DA SILVA; SILVA, S. CARNEIRO DA; BARBOSA CHIAVEGATO, M.; VALADARES-FILHO, S. DE CAMPOS; SILVA, F. A. DE SALES; ZANETTI, D.; BERCHIELLI, T.T.; DUARTE MESSANA, J.; MUÑOZ, C.; ARIZA-NIETO, C.J.; SIERRA-ALARCÓN, L.I.; GUALDRÓN-DUARTE, L.B.; MESTRA-VARGAS, L.I.; MOLINA-BOTERO, I. C.; BARAHONA-ROSALES, R.; ARANGO, J.; GAVIRIA-URIBE, X.; GIRALDO VALDERRAMA, L.A.; ROSERO-NOGUERA, J.R.; POSADA-OCHOA, S.L.; ABARCA-MONGE, SERGIO; SOTO-BLANCO, R.; KU-VERA, J.C.; JIMÉNEZ-OCAMPO, R.; FLORES-SANTIAGO, E. DEL J.; CASTELÁN-ORTEGA, O.A.; VÁZQUEZ-CARRILLO, M.F.; BENAOUDA, M.; GÓMEZ-BRAVO, C. A.; ALVARADO BOLOVICH, V.I.; DÍAZ CÉSPEDES, M.A.; ASTIGARRAGA, L. |
Afiliación : |
GUILHERMO FRANCKLIN DE SOUZA CONGIO, Colombian Corporation for Agricultural Research, AGROSAVIA, Colombia. // Department of Animal Science, Piracicaba, SP. Brazil.; ANDRÉ BANNINK, Wageningen Livestock Research, Wageningen University & Research, The Netherlands.; OLGA LUCÍA MAYORGA MOGOLLÓN; ALEXANDER NIKOLOV HRISTOV, Department of Animal Science, The Pennsylvania State University, USA.; GUSTAVO JAURENA, Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agronomy, University of Buenos Aires (UBA), Argentina; HORACIO GONDA, Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.; JOSÉ IGNACIO GERE, Regional Faculty of Buenos Aires, National Technological University (UTN) Buenos Aires, Argentina. // National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina; MARÍA ESPERANZA CERÓN-CUCCHI, Institute of Pathobiology, National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA) (INTA-CONICET) Buenos Aires, Argentina; ABUNAEK IRTÑUZ.CHURA, Institute of Pathobiology, National Institute of Agricultural Technology (INTA) (INTA-CONICET) Buenos Aires, Argentina; MARÍA PAZ TIERI, Dairy Value Chain Research Institute (IDICAL) (INTA-CONICET), Rafaela, Argentina // Regional Faculty of Rafaela,UTN, Rafaela, Argentina.; OLEGARIO HERNÁNDEZ, INTA, Santiago del Estero, Argentina; PATRICIA RICCI, National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina.// Institute of Innovation for Agri-Livestock Production and Sustainable Develpment, INTA, Balcarce, Argentina; MARIA PAULA JULIARENA, National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina. // Phisics and Engineering Research Centre, National University of the Centre of the Buenos Aires Province (UNCPBA), Tandil, Argentina.; BANIRA LOMBARDI, National Scientific and Technical Research Council (CONICET), Buenos Aires, Argentina. // Phisics and Engineering Research Centre, National University of the Centre of the Buenos Aires Province (UNCPBA), Tandil, Argentina.; ADIBE LUIZ ABDALLA, Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Centre for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture (CENA), University fo Sao Paulo (USP), Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.; ADIBE LUIZ ABDALLA-FILHO, Laboratory of Animal Nutrition, Centre for Nuclear Energy in Agriculture (CENA), University fo Sao Paulo (USP), Piracicaba, SP, Brazil.; ALEXANDRE BERNDT, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa) Southeast Livestock, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.; PATRICIA PERONDI ANCHAO OLIVEIRA, Brazilian Agricultural Research Corporation (Embrapa) Southeast Livestock, Sao Carlos, SP, Brazil.; FÁBIO LUIS HENRIQUE, Associated Colleges of Uberaba (FAZU), Uberaba, MG, Brazil.; ALDA LÚCIA GOMEZ MONTEIRO, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Paraná, (UFPR), Curitiba. PR, Brazil.; LUIZA ILHA BORGES, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Paraná, (UFPR), Curitiba. PR, Brazil.; HENRIQUE MENDOCA NUNES RIBEIRO-FILHO, Department of Animal and Food Science, Santa Catarina State University (udesc), Lages, SC, Brazil.; LUIS GUSTAVO RIBEIRO PEREIRA, Embrapa Dairy Cattle, M.G, Brazil; THIERRY RIBEIRO TOMICH, Embrapa Dairy Cattle, M.G, Brazil; MARIANA MAGALHAES CAMPOS, Embrapa Dairy Cattle, M.G, Brazil; FERNANDA SAMARINI MACHADO, Embrapa Dairy Cattle, M.G, Brazil; MARCOS INÁCIO MARCONDES, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Vicosa (UFV), Vicosa, MG, Brazil.; MARIA EUGENIA ZERLOTTI MERCADANTE, Institute of Animal Science (IZ) Sao Paulo Agribusiness Technology Agency (APTA), SP, Brazil.; LEANDRO SANNOMIYA SAKAMOTO, Institute of Animal Science (IZ) Sao Paulo Agribusiness Technology Agency (APTA), SP, Brazil.; LUCÍA GALVAO ALBUQUERQUE, Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (FCAV), Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.; PAULO CÉSAR DE FACCIO CARVALHO, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Department of Forage Plants and Agrometeorology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.; JULIANE ROSSETTO, Grazing Ecology Research Group, Department of Forage Plants and Agrometeorology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.; JEAN VICTOR SAVIAN, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. // Grazing Ecology Research Group, Department of Forage Plants and Agrometeorology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS), Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil.; PAULO HENRIQUE MAZZA RODRIGUES, Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ), USP, Pirassuninga, SP, Brazil.; FLAVIO PERNA JÚNIOR, Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ), USP, Pirassuninga, SP, Brazil.; TAINÁ SILVESTRE MOREIRA, Department of Animal Nutrition and Production, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science (FMVZ), USP, Pirassuninga, SP, Brazil.// Department of Bioengineering, Federal University of Sao Joao del Rei (UFSJ), MG, Brazil.; ROGÉLIO MARTINS MAURÍCIO, Department of Bioengineering, Federal University of Sao Joao del Rei (UFSJ), MG, Brazil.; JOAO PAULO PACHECO RODRIGUES, Faculty of Animal Science, Federal University of Southern and Southeastern Pará (UNIFESSPA), PA, Brazil.; ANA LUIZA DA COSTA CRUZ BORGES, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.; RICARDO REIS E SILVA, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Minas Gerais (UFMG), Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.; HELENA FERREIRA LAGE, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Newton Paiva University, Belo Horizonte, MG, Brazil.; RICARDO ANDRADE REIS, Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (FCAV), Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.; ANA CLAUDIA RUGGIERI, Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (FCAV), Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.; ABNAEK DA SILVA CARDOSO, Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (FCAV), Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.; SILA CARNEIRO DA SILVA, Department of Animal Science, Piracicaba, SP. Brazil.; MARÍLIA BARBOSA CHIAVEGATO, Department of Horticulture & Crop Science and Animal Science, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH, USA.; SEBASTIAO DE CAMPOS VALADARES-FILHO, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Vicosa (UFV), Vicosa, MG, Brazil.; FLÁVIA ADRIANE DE SALES SILVA, Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Vicosa (UFV), Vicosa, MG, Brazil.; DIEGO ZANETTI, Federal Institute of Education, Science and Technology of Southern Minas Gerais,MG, Brazil.; TELMA TERESINHA BERCHIELLI, Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (FCAV), Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.; JULIANA DUARTE MESSANA, Department of Animal Science, School of Agriculture and Veterinary Science (FCAV), Sao Paulo State University (UNESP), Jaboticabal, SP, Brazil.; CAMILA MUÑOZ, Instituto de Investigaciones Agropecuarias, INIA Remehue, Osorno, Chile.; CLAUDIA JANETH ARIZA-NIETO, Centro de Investigación Tibaitatá de AGROSAVIA, Colombia; LORENA INÉS SIERRA-ALARCÓN, Centro de Investigación Tibaitatá de AGROSAVIA, Colombia; LAURA BIBIANA GUALDRÓN-DUARTE, AGROSAVIA, Turipaná, Cereté, Colombia.; LORENA INÉS MESTRA-VARGAS, AGROSAVIA, Turipaná, Cereté, Colombia.; ISABEL CRISTINA MOLINA-BOTERO, Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Animal Science, National Agrarian University La Molina (UNALM), Lima, Perú.; ROLANDO BARAHONA-ROSALES, Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, National University of Colombia (UNAL), Medellín, Colombia.; JACOBO ARANGO, International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.; XIOMARA GAVIRIA-URIBE, Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, National University of Colombia (UNAL), Medellín, Colombia. //International Center for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT), Cali, Colombia.; LUIS ALFONSO GIRALDO VALDERRAMA, Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, National University of Colombia, (UNAL), Medellín, Colombia.; JAIME RICARDO ROSERO-NOGUERA, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Antioquia (UdeA), Medellín, Colombia.; SANDRA LUCÍA POSADA-OCHOA, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, University of Antioquia (UdeA), Medellín, Colombia.; SERGIO ABARCA-MONGE, National Institute of Innovation and Agricultual Technology Transfer (INTA), Turrialba, Costa Rica.; ROBERTO SOTO-BLANCO, National Institute of Innovation and Agricultual Technology Transfer (INTA), Turrialba, Costa Rica.; JUAN CARLOS KU-VERA, Laboratory of Climate Change and Livestock Production, Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Yucatan (UADY), Mérida, Yucatán, México; RAFAEL JIMÉNEZ-OCAMPO, Laboratory of Climate Change and Livestock Production, Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Yucatan (UADY), Mérida, Yucatán, México. // National Institute for Forestry, Agriculture and Livestock; EVER DEL JESUS FLORES-SANTIAGO, Laboratory of Climate Change and Livestock Production, Department of Animal Nutrition, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Sciences, University of Yucatan (UADY), Mérida, Yucatán, México. Chapingo Autonomous University, (URUSSE), Mexico; OCTAVIO ALONSO CASTELÁN-ORTEGA, Laboratory of Livestock, Environment and Renewabel Energies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Autonumous University Of the State of Mexico (UAEMex), México.; MARÍA FERNANDA VÁZQUEZ-CARRILLO, Laboratory of Livestock, Environment and Renewabel Energies, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Animal Science, Autonumous University Of the State of Mexico (UAEMex), México.; MOHAMMED BENAOUDA, UMR1213 Herbivores, French National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food, and Environment (INRAE), France. // AgroSup Dijon, Dijon, France.; CARLOS ALFREDO GÓMEZ-BRAVO, Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Animal Science, National Agrarian University La Molina (UNALM), Lima, Perú.; VICTOR ILICH ALVARADO BOLOVICH, Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Animal Science, National Agrarian University La Molina (UNALM), Lima, Perú.; MEDARDO ANTONIO DÍAZ CÉSPEDES, Department of Animal Husbandry, Faculty of Animal Science, National Agrarian University La Molina (UNALM), Lima, Perú.; LAURA ASTIGARRAGA, Department of Animal Science and Pasture, Faculty of Agronomy, University of the Republic of Uruguay (UdelaR), Montevideo, Uruguay. //Department of Animal Production, Faculty of Agronomy, University of Buenos Aires (UBA), Argentina. |
Título : |
Enteric methane mitigation strategies for ruminant livestock systems in the Latin America and Caribbean region: a meta-analysis. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2021 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Cleaner Production. 2021. v. 312, art. 127693, 13 p. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127693 |
DOI : |
10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127693 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Receiived 22 December 2020; Received in revised form 24 April 2021; Accepted 25 May 2021. Available online 30 May 2021.
Latin America Methane Project Collaborators está integrada por 71 investigadores en este artículo. |
Contenido : |
Abstract: Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) is a developing region characterized for its importance for global food security,
producing 23 and 11% of the global beef and milk production, respectively. The region?s ruminant livestock sector however, is under scrutiny on environmental grounds due to its large contribution to enteric methane (CH4) emissions and influence on global climate change. Thus, the identification of effective CH4 mitigation strategies which do not compromise animal performance is urgently needed, especially in context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) defined in the Paris Agreement of the United Nations. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to: 1) collate a database of individual sheep, beef and dairy cattle records from enteric CH4 emission studies conducted in the LAC region, and 2) perform a meta-analysis to identify feasible enteric CH4 mitigation strategies, which do not compromise animal performance. After outlier?s removal, 2745 animal records (65% of the original data) from 103 studies were retained (from 2011 to 2021) in the LAC database. Potential mitigation strategies were classified into three main categories (i.e., animal breeding, dietary, and rumen manipulation) and up to three subcategories, totaling 34 evaluated strategies. A random effects model weighted by inverse variance was used (Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V3.3.070). Six strategies decreased at least one enteric CH4 metric and simultaneously increased milk yield (MY; dairy cattle) or average daily gain (ADG; beef cattle and sheep). The breed composition F1 Holstein ×Gyr decreased CH4 emission per MY (CH4IMilk) while increasing MY by 99%. Adequate strategies of grazing management under continuous and rotational stocking decreased CH4 emission per ADG (CH4IGain) by 22 and 35%, while increasing ADG by 22 and 71%, respectively. Increased dietary protein concentration, and increased concentrate level through cottonseed meal inclusion, decreased CH4IMilk and CH4IGain by 10 and 20% and increased MY and ADG by 12 and 31%, respectively. Lastly, increased feeding level decreased CH4IGain by 37%, while increasing ADG by 171%. The identified effective mitigation strategies can be adopted by livestock producers according to their specific needs and aid LAC countries in achieving SDG as defined in the Paris Agreement. MenosAbstract: Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) is a developing region characterized for its importance for global food security,
producing 23 and 11% of the global beef and milk production, respectively. The region?s ruminant livestock sector however, is under scrutiny on environmental grounds due to its large contribution to enteric methane (CH4) emissions and influence on global climate change. Thus, the identification of effective CH4 mitigation strategies which do not compromise animal performance is urgently needed, especially in context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) defined in the Paris Agreement of the United Nations. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to: 1) collate a database of individual sheep, beef and dairy cattle records from enteric CH4 emission studies conducted in the LAC region, and 2) perform a meta-analysis to identify feasible enteric CH4 mitigation strategies, which do not compromise animal performance. After outlier?s removal, 2745 animal records (65% of the original data) from 103 studies were retained (from 2011 to 2021) in the LAC database. Potential mitigation strategies were classified into three main categories (i.e., animal breeding, dietary, and rumen manipulation) and up to three subcategories, totaling 34 evaluated strategies. A random effects model weighted by inverse variance was used (Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V3.3.070). Six strategies decreased at least one enteric CH4 metric and simultaneously increased milk ... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
CATTLE; ENTERIC METHANE; GLOBAL WARMING; GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS; MITIGATION; SHEPP. |
Asunto categoría : |
P01 Conservación de la naturaleza y recursos de La tierra |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/15802/1/Journal-Cleaner-Production-2021.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 05911naa a2201105 a 4500 001 1062273 005 2021-07-08 008 2021 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 024 7 $a10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127693$2DOI 100 1 $aSOUZA CONGIO, G. F. DE 245 $aEnteric methane mitigation strategies for ruminant livestock systems in the Latin America and Caribbean region$ba meta-analysis.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2021 500 $aArticle history: Receiived 22 December 2020; Received in revised form 24 April 2021; Accepted 25 May 2021. Available online 30 May 2021. Latin America Methane Project Collaborators está integrada por 71 investigadores en este artículo. 520 $aAbstract: Latin America and Caribbean (LAC) is a developing region characterized for its importance for global food security, producing 23 and 11% of the global beef and milk production, respectively. The region?s ruminant livestock sector however, is under scrutiny on environmental grounds due to its large contribution to enteric methane (CH4) emissions and influence on global climate change. Thus, the identification of effective CH4 mitigation strategies which do not compromise animal performance is urgently needed, especially in context of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) defined in the Paris Agreement of the United Nations. Therefore, the objectives of the current study were to: 1) collate a database of individual sheep, beef and dairy cattle records from enteric CH4 emission studies conducted in the LAC region, and 2) perform a meta-analysis to identify feasible enteric CH4 mitigation strategies, which do not compromise animal performance. After outlier?s removal, 2745 animal records (65% of the original data) from 103 studies were retained (from 2011 to 2021) in the LAC database. Potential mitigation strategies were classified into three main categories (i.e., animal breeding, dietary, and rumen manipulation) and up to three subcategories, totaling 34 evaluated strategies. A random effects model weighted by inverse variance was used (Comprehensive Meta-Analysis V3.3.070). Six strategies decreased at least one enteric CH4 metric and simultaneously increased milk yield (MY; dairy cattle) or average daily gain (ADG; beef cattle and sheep). The breed composition F1 Holstein ×Gyr decreased CH4 emission per MY (CH4IMilk) while increasing MY by 99%. Adequate strategies of grazing management under continuous and rotational stocking decreased CH4 emission per ADG (CH4IGain) by 22 and 35%, while increasing ADG by 22 and 71%, respectively. Increased dietary protein concentration, and increased concentrate level through cottonseed meal inclusion, decreased CH4IMilk and CH4IGain by 10 and 20% and increased MY and ADG by 12 and 31%, respectively. Lastly, increased feeding level decreased CH4IGain by 37%, while increasing ADG by 171%. The identified effective mitigation strategies can be adopted by livestock producers according to their specific needs and aid LAC countries in achieving SDG as defined in the Paris Agreement. 653 $aCATTLE 653 $aENTERIC METHANE 653 $aGLOBAL WARMING 653 $aGREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 653 $aMITIGATION 653 $aSHEPP 700 1 $aBANNINK, A. 700 1 $aMAYORGA, MOGOLLÓN, O. L. 700 1 $aNICOLOV HRISTOV, A. 700 1 $aJAURENA, G. 700 1 $aGONDA, H. 700 1 $aGERE, J. I. 700 1 $aCERÓN-CUCCHI, M.E. 700 1 $aORTIZ-CHURA, A. 700 1 $aTIERI, M.P. 700 1 $aHERNÁNDEZ, O. 700 1 $aRICCI, P. 700 1 $aJULIARENA, M.P. 700 1 $aLOMBARDI, B. 700 1 $aABDALLA, A.L. 700 1 $aABDALLA-FILHO, A.L. 700 1 $aBERNDT, A. 700 1 $aANCHAO OLIVEIRA, P. P. 700 1 $aHENRIQUE, F. L. 700 1 $aGOMEZ MONTEIRO, A.L. 700 1 $aBORGES, L. I. 700 1 $aRIBEIRO-FILHO, H.M.N. 700 1 $aRIBEIRO PEREIRA, L.G. 700 1 $aRIBEIRO TOMICH, T. 700 1 $aMAGALHAES CAMPOS, M. 700 1 $aSAMARINI MACHADO, F. 700 1 $aMARCONDES, M. I. 700 1 $aZERLOTTI MERCADANTE, M. E. 700 1 $aSANNOMIYA SAKAMOTO, L. 700 1 $aGALVAO ALBUQUERQUE, L. 700 1 $aFACCIO CARVALHO, P. C. DE 700 1 $aROSSETTO, J. 700 1 $aSAVIAN, J.V. 700 1 $aMAZZA RODRIGUES, P. H. 700 1 $aPERNA JÚNIOR, F. 700 1 $aMOREIRA, T.S. 700 1 $aMAURÍCIO, R. M. 700 1 $aPACHECO RODRIGUES, J.P. 700 1 $aCRUZ BORGES, A.L. DA C. 700 1 $aREIS E SILVA, R. 700 1 $aFERREIRA LAGE, H. 700 1 $aANDRADE REIS, R. 700 1 $aRUGGIERI, A.C. 700 1 $aCARDOSO, A. DA SILVA 700 1 $aSILVA, S. CARNEIRO DA 700 1 $aBARBOSA CHIAVEGATO, M. 700 1 $aVALADARES-FILHO, S. DE CAMPOS 700 1 $aSILVA, F. A. DE SALES 700 1 $aZANETTI, D. 700 1 $aBERCHIELLI, T.T. 700 1 $aDUARTE MESSANA, J. 700 1 $aMUÑOZ, C. 700 1 $aARIZA-NIETO, C.J. 700 1 $aSIERRA-ALARCÓN, L.I. 700 1 $aGUALDRÓN-DUARTE, L.B. 700 1 $aMESTRA-VARGAS, L.I. 700 1 $aMOLINA-BOTERO, I. C. 700 1 $aBARAHONA-ROSALES, R. 700 1 $aARANGO, J. 700 1 $aGAVIRIA-URIBE, X. 700 1 $aGIRALDO VALDERRAMA, L.A. 700 1 $aROSERO-NOGUERA, J.R. 700 1 $aPOSADA-OCHOA, S.L. 700 1 $aABARCA-MONGE, SERGIO 700 1 $aSOTO-BLANCO, R. 700 1 $aKU-VERA, J.C. 700 1 $aJIMÉNEZ-OCAMPO, R. 700 1 $aFLORES-SANTIAGO, E. DEL J. 700 1 $aCASTELÁN-ORTEGA, O.A. 700 1 $aVÁZQUEZ-CARRILLO, M.F. 700 1 $aBENAOUDA, M. 700 1 $aGÓMEZ-BRAVO, C. A. 700 1 $aALVARADO BOLOVICH, V.I. 700 1 $aDÍAZ CÉSPEDES, M.A. 700 1 $aASTIGARRAGA, L. 773 $tJournal of Cleaner Production. 2021.$gv. 312, art. 127693, 13 p. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127693
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Treinta y Tres (TT) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
04/03/2024 |
Actualizado : |
04/03/2024 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Nacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Nacional - -- |
Autor : |
RIBAS, G.; GARCIA, C. |
Afiliación : |
GABRIEL RIBAS, Instituto Nacional de Colonización (INC), Departamento de Riego, Salto, Uruguay; CLAUDIO CESAR GARCIA GALLARRETA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Performance assessment of furrow irrigation in two different soil textures under high rainfall and field slope conditions. [Análisis del rendimiento del riego por surcos en dos texturas de suelo diferentes bajo condiciones de alta precipitación y topografía del suelo.]. [Análise do desempenho da irrigação por sulco em duas texturas diferentes de solo sob condições de alta precipitação e inclinação do solo.] |
Complemento del título : |
Advances in Water in Agroscience. Irrigation and water management. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2023 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Agrociencia Uruguay, 2023, Vol.27(NE1), e1187. https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.27.1187 -- OPEN ACCESS. |
ISSN : |
2730-5066 |
DOI : |
10.31285/AGRO.27.1187 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 29 April 2023; Accepted 13 September 2023; Published 06 February 2024. -- Editor: Lucía Puppo. Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Montevideo, Uruguay. -- Correspondence: Gabriel Ribas, inggribas@gmail.com -- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- Furrow irrigation systems have been widely evaluated around the world. However, there is no national data indicating how efficient furrow irrigation is under Uruguayan conditions. The objective of the present work was to evaluate the performance of a system of furrow irrigation in two different soils texture. Seventeen irrigation events were analyzed in sugar-cane cultivation in northern Uruguay during 2016-17 and 2017-18 irrigation seasons. The water advance and recess curves were determined; flow rate during irrigation and runoff were monitored. The maximum furrow length studied was 100 m and the average slope was 0.24%. Application efficiencies in both types of soils were observed above 75%. These field data were compared with data simulated by the WinSRFR model, where high correlations were observed in the results of water application efficiency, distribution uniformity and runoff. These first results encourage to continue working in the efficient use of water, not only thinking about a better use of the resource but also in less loss by run-off, and therefore, less possibility of contamination and lower cost of energy and labor. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. RESUMEN.- Los sistemas de riego por surcos han sido ampliamente evaluados en todo el mundo. Sin embargo, no hay datos nacionales que indiquen cuán eficiente es el riego por surcos. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar el desempeño de un sistema de riego por surcos en dos suelos de diferente textura. Se analizaron 17 eventos de riego en cultivos de caña de azúcar en el norte de Uruguay durante las temporadas de riego 2016-17 y 2017-18. Se determinaron las curvas de avance y retroceso del agua, se monitoreó el caudal durante el riego y el escurrimiento. La longitud máxima de surco estudiada fue de 100 m y la pendiente promedio fue de 0,24%. Se observaron eficiencias de aplicación en ambos tipos de suelos superiores al 75%. Estos datos de campo fueron comparados con datos simulados por el modelo WinSRFR, donde se observaron altas correlaciones en los resultados de eficiencia de aplicación de agua, uniformidad de distribución y escorrentía. Estos primeros resultados alientan a seguir trabajando en el uso eficiente del agua, no solo pensando en un mejor aprovechamiento del recurso, sino también en menores pérdidas por escurrimiento y, por ende, menor posibilidad de contaminación y menor costo de energía y de mano de obra. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. RESUMO.- Os sistemas de irrigação por sulcos têm sido amplamente avaliados em todo o mundo. No entanto, não há dados nacionais que indiquem quão eficiente a irrigação por sulcos é nas condições uruguaias. O objetivo do presente trabalho foi avaliar o desempenho de um sistema de irrigação por sulcos em dois solos de texturas diferentes. Foram analisados 17 eventos de irrigação em cultivos de cana-de-açúcar no norte do Uruguai durante as temporadas de irrigação de 2016-17 e 2017-18. Foram determinadas as curvas de avanço e retrocesso da água, o fluxo durante a irrigação e o escoamento. O comprimento máximo do sulco estudado foi de 100 m e a inclinação média foi de 0,24%. Foram observadas eficiências de aplicação em ambos os tipos de solos superiores a 75%. Esses dados de campo foram comparados com dados simulados pelo modelo WinSRFR, onde foram observadas altas correlações nos resultados de eficiência de aplicação de água, uniformidade de distribuição e escoamento. Esses primeiros resultados incentivam a continuar trabalhando no uso eficiente da água, não apenas pensando em um melhor aproveitamento do recurso, mas também em menores perdas por escoamento e, portanto, menor possibilidade de contaminação e menor custo de energia e mão de obra. -- @2023 Agrociencia Uruguay. MenosABSTRACT.- Furrow irrigation systems have been widely evaluated around the world. However, there is no national data indicating how efficient furrow irrigation is under Uruguayan conditions. The objective of the present work was to evaluate the performance of a system of furrow irrigation in two different soils texture. Seventeen irrigation events were analyzed in sugar-cane cultivation in northern Uruguay during 2016-17 and 2017-18 irrigation seasons. The water advance and recess curves were determined; flow rate during irrigation and runoff were monitored. The maximum furrow length studied was 100 m and the average slope was 0.24%. Application efficiencies in both types of soils were observed above 75%. These field data were compared with data simulated by the WinSRFR model, where high correlations were observed in the results of water application efficiency, distribution uniformity and runoff. These first results encourage to continue working in the efficient use of water, not only thinking about a better use of the resource but also in less loss by run-off, and therefore, less possibility of contamination and lower cost of energy and labor. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. RESUMEN.- Los sistemas de riego por surcos han sido ampliamente evaluados en todo el mundo. Sin embargo, no hay datos nacionales que indiquen cuán eficiente es el riego por surcos. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar el desempeño de un sistema de riego por surcos en dos suelos de diferente textura. Se ... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Application efficiency; Avaliação da irrigação; Eficiência de aplicação; Eficiencia de aplicación; Evaluación del riego; Furrow irrigation; Gestão da irrigação; Irrigação por sulcos; Irrigation evaluation; Water management; WinSRFR. |
Thesagro : |
MANEJO DEL RIEGO; RIEGO POR SURCOS. |
Asunto categoría : |
P10 Recursos hídricos y su ordenación |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/17511/1/2730-5066-1187.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 05554naa a2200325 a 4500 001 1064487 005 2024-03-04 008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a2730-5066 024 7 $a10.31285/AGRO.27.1187$2DOI 100 1 $aRIBAS, G. 245 $aPerformance assessment of furrow irrigation in two different soil textures under high rainfall and field slope conditions. [Análisis del rendimiento del riego por surcos en dos texturas de suelo diferentes bajo condiciones de alta precipitación y topografía del suelo.]. [Análise do desempenho da irrigação por sulco em duas texturas diferentes de solo sob condições de alta precipitação e inclinação do solo.]$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2023 500 $aArticle history: Received 29 April 2023; Accepted 13 September 2023; Published 06 February 2024. -- Editor: Lucía Puppo. Universidad de la República, Facultad de Agronomía, Montevideo, Uruguay. -- Correspondence: Gabriel Ribas, inggribas@gmail.com -- License: This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ ) 520 $aABSTRACT.- Furrow irrigation systems have been widely evaluated around the world. However, there is no national data indicating how efficient furrow irrigation is under Uruguayan conditions. The objective of the present work was to evaluate the performance of a system of furrow irrigation in two different soils texture. Seventeen irrigation events were analyzed in sugar-cane cultivation in northern Uruguay during 2016-17 and 2017-18 irrigation seasons. The water advance and recess curves were determined; flow rate during irrigation and runoff were monitored. The maximum furrow length studied was 100 m and the average slope was 0.24%. Application efficiencies in both types of soils were observed above 75%. These field data were compared with data simulated by the WinSRFR model, where high correlations were observed in the results of water application efficiency, distribution uniformity and runoff. These first results encourage to continue working in the efficient use of water, not only thinking about a better use of the resource but also in less loss by run-off, and therefore, less possibility of contamination and lower cost of energy and labor. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. RESUMEN.- Los sistemas de riego por surcos han sido ampliamente evaluados en todo el mundo. Sin embargo, no hay datos nacionales que indiquen cuán eficiente es el riego por surcos. El objetivo del presente trabajo fue evaluar el desempeño de un sistema de riego por surcos en dos suelos de diferente textura. Se analizaron 17 eventos de riego en cultivos de caña de azúcar en el norte de Uruguay durante las temporadas de riego 2016-17 y 2017-18. Se determinaron las curvas de avance y retroceso del agua, se monitoreó el caudal durante el riego y el escurrimiento. La longitud máxima de surco estudiada fue de 100 m y la pendiente promedio fue de 0,24%. Se observaron eficiencias de aplicación en ambos tipos de suelos superiores al 75%. Estos datos de campo fueron comparados con datos simulados por el modelo WinSRFR, donde se observaron altas correlaciones en los resultados de eficiencia de aplicación de agua, uniformidad de distribución y escorrentía. Estos primeros resultados alientan a seguir trabajando en el uso eficiente del agua, no solo pensando en un mejor aprovechamiento del recurso, sino también en menores pérdidas por escurrimiento y, por ende, menor posibilidad de contaminación y menor costo de energía y de mano de obra. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. RESUMO.- Os sistemas de irrigação por sulcos têm sido amplamente avaliados em todo o mundo. No entanto, não há dados nacionais que indiquem quão eficiente a irrigação por sulcos é nas condições uruguaias. O objetivo do presente trabalho foi avaliar o desempenho de um sistema de irrigação por sulcos em dois solos de texturas diferentes. Foram analisados 17 eventos de irrigação em cultivos de cana-de-açúcar no norte do Uruguai durante as temporadas de irrigação de 2016-17 e 2017-18. Foram determinadas as curvas de avanço e retrocesso da água, o fluxo durante a irrigação e o escoamento. O comprimento máximo do sulco estudado foi de 100 m e a inclinação média foi de 0,24%. Foram observadas eficiências de aplicação em ambos os tipos de solos superiores a 75%. Esses dados de campo foram comparados com dados simulados pelo modelo WinSRFR, onde foram observadas altas correlações nos resultados de eficiência de aplicação de água, uniformidade de distribuição e escoamento. Esses primeiros resultados incentivam a continuar trabalhando no uso eficiente da água, não apenas pensando em um melhor aproveitamento do recurso, mas também em menores perdas por escoamento e, portanto, menor possibilidade de contaminação e menor custo de energia e mão de obra. -- @2023 Agrociencia Uruguay. 650 $aMANEJO DEL RIEGO 650 $aRIEGO POR SURCOS 653 $aApplication efficiency 653 $aAvaliação da irrigação 653 $aEficiência de aplicação 653 $aEficiencia de aplicación 653 $aEvaluación del riego 653 $aFurrow irrigation 653 $aGestão da irrigação 653 $aIrrigação por sulcos 653 $aIrrigation evaluation 653 $aWater management 653 $aWinSRFR 700 1 $aGARCIA, C. 773 $tAgrociencia Uruguay, 2023, Vol.27(NE1), e1187. https://doi.org/10.31285/AGRO.27.1187 -- OPEN ACCESS.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|