|
|
Registros recuperados : 54 | |
27. | ![Imagen marcada / sin marcar](/consulta/web/img/desmarcado.png) | AGUERRE, V.; ALBICETTE, M.M.; RUGGIA, A.; SCARLATO, S.; SCARLATO, M.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; ALBIN, A. Co-innovando para el desarrollo sostenible de sistemas de producción familiar de Rocha-Uruguay. Ponencia Eje 3: El desarrollo rural desde la gestión de las unidades productivas. In: PRIMER CONGRESO DE CIENCIAS SOCIALES AGRARIAS, 1er. "Desafíos y contribuciones para el desarrollo rural", Montevideo (UY) : Fac.Agronomía (UdelaR), 16-17 Agosto 2012. [Presentación Oral] 25 diap.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| ![Ver detalles del registro](/consulta/web/img/visualizar.png) ![Acceso al objeto digital](/consulta/web/img/pdf.png) ![Imprime registro en el formato completo](/consulta/web/img/print.png) |
30. | ![Imagen marcada / sin marcar](/consulta/web/img/desmarcado.png) | GALVÁN, G.; SOLLIER, S.; PACHECO, P.; ACOSTA, M.; CURBELO, N.; DOGLIOTTI, S. Crecimiento y rendimiento de poblaciones locales de morrón (Capsicum annuum L) bajo diferentes épocas de trasplante y criterios de cosecha (verde, rojo) ln: Congreso Nacional de Horticultura, 8.; Seminario Regional de Frutilla, 2001, Salto, Uruguay. Resúmenes. Montevideo (Uruguay): SUH; INIA, 2001. p. 27 "Sociedad Uruguaya de Horticultura; Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria, Uruguay"Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas; INIA Salto Grande; INIA Tacuarembó; INIA Treinta y Tres. |
| ![Ver detalles del registro](/consulta/web/img/visualizar.png) ![Acceso al objeto digital](/consulta/web/img/pdf.png) ![Imprime registro en el formato completo](/consulta/web/img/print.png) |
31. | ![Imagen marcada / sin marcar](/consulta/web/img/desmarcado.png) | DOGLIOTTI, S.; ALDABA, L.; DIESTE, J. P.; PEDEMONTE, A.; BASIGALUPE, G. F.; PELUFFO, S. Cuando lo urgente no nos deja tiempo para pensar en lo importante. Proyecto Eulacias, FPTA 209. Noticiero, 2009, no.15, p. 26-27.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| ![Ver detalles del registro](/consulta/web/img/visualizar.png) ![Acceso al objeto digital](/consulta/web/img/pdf.png) ![Imprime registro en el formato completo](/consulta/web/img/print.png) |
32. | ![Imagen marcada / sin marcar](/consulta/web/img/desmarcado.png) | TORRES, L.; BERGÓS, S.; MÁRQUEZ, C.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; AGUERRE, V.; RUGGIA, A.; LAPETINA, J. Construir hoy la sostenibilidad del mañana: Guía para el diseño de sistemas ganaderos climáticamente inteligentes. Producción animal. Revista INIA Uruguay, Marzo 2024, no.76, p.31-34. (Revista INIA; 76).Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| ![Ver detalles del registro](/consulta/web/img/visualizar.png) ![Acceso al objeto digital](/consulta/web/img/pdf.png) ![Imprime registro en el formato completo](/consulta/web/img/print.png) |
33. | ![Imagen marcada / sin marcar](/consulta/web/img/desmarcado.png) | SCARLATO, M.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; BERRUETA, C.; BARROS, C.; REHERMAN, F.; BORGES, A.; GARCÍA, M.; GIMÉNEZ, G. Explaining yield variability between farmers as a first step to reduce gaps. T3. Crop modeling and yield gap analysis for agricultural systems analysis and design. In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium for farming systems design. Multi-functional farming systems in a changing world. Montpellier (Francia): European Society of Agronomy, 2015. p. 119-122 Acknowledgements. Without the help of all the farmers that gently contributed their time and fields, and the help of the technical advisers and experts
to select a representative sample of farms, this research would have not be possible,...Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| ![Ver detalles del registro](/consulta/web/img/visualizar.png) ![Acceso al objeto digital](/consulta/web/img/pdf.png) ![Imprime registro en el formato completo](/consulta/web/img/print.png) |
36. | ![Imagen marcada / sin marcar](/consulta/web/img/desmarcado.png) | AGUERRE, V.; SCARLATO, M.; ALBICETTE, M.M.; SCARLATO, S.; RUGGIA, A.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; ALBIN, A. Un nuevo enfoque en los proyectos de investigación del Programa de Producción familiar de INIA Revista INIA, 2013, no.32, p.41-45Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela; INIA Las Brujas; INIA Tacuarembó. |
| ![Ver detalles del registro](/consulta/web/img/visualizar.png) ![Acceso al objeto digital](/consulta/web/img/pdf.png) ![Imprime registro en el formato completo](/consulta/web/img/print.png) |
37. | ![Imagen marcada / sin marcar](/consulta/web/img/desmarcado.png) | DOGLIOTTI, S.; SCARLATO, M.; BERRUETA, C.; BARROS, C.; REHERMANN, F.; RIEPPI, M.; INETTI, C.; SOUST, G.; BORGES, A. Análisis y jerarquización de factores determinantes de las brechas de rendimiento y calidad en los principales cultivos hortícolas del Uruguay. Montevideo (UY): INIA, 2021. 81 p. (Serie FPTA-INIA; 91). Proyecto FPTA 288: "Análisis y jerarquización de factores determinantes de las brechas de rendimiento y calidad en los principales cultivos hortícolas del Uruguay." Período de ejecución: Marzo 2014 - Octubre 2017. Institución Ejecutora:...Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| ![Ver detalles del registro](/consulta/web/img/visualizar.png) ![Acceso al objeto digital](/consulta/web/img/pdf.png) ![Imprime registro en el formato completo](/consulta/web/img/print.png) |
38. | ![Imagen marcada / sin marcar](/consulta/web/img/desmarcado.png) | SCHOLBERG, J. M. S.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; ZOTARELLI, L.; CHERR, C. M.; LEONI, C.; ROSSING, W. A. H. Cover crops in agrosystems: innovations and applications. In: Lichtfouse E. (eds) Genetic Engineering, Biofertilisation, Soil Quality and Organic Farming. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. pp 59-97. (Sustainable Agriculture Reviews; volume 4) Chapter history: First Online 23 March 2010.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| ![Ver detalles del registro](/consulta/web/img/visualizar.png) ![Acceso restrito al objeto digital](/consulta/web/img/lock.png) ![Imprime registro en el formato completo](/consulta/web/img/print.png) |
39. | ![Imagen marcada / sin marcar](/consulta/web/img/desmarcado.png) | SCHOLBERG, J. M. S.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; LEONI, C.; CHERR, C. M.; ZOTARELLI, L.; ROSSING, W. A. H. Cover crops for sustainable agrosystems in the Americas. In: Lichtfouse E. (eds) Genetic Engineering, Biofertilisation, Soil Quality and Organic Farming. Sustainable Agriculture Reviews, vol 4. Springer, Dordrecht. pp 23-58 Chapter history: First Online: 23 March 2010.Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| ![Ver detalles del registro](/consulta/web/img/visualizar.png) ![Acceso restrito al objeto digital](/consulta/web/img/lock.png) ![Imprime registro en el formato completo](/consulta/web/img/print.png) |
40. | ![Imagen marcada / sin marcar](/consulta/web/img/desmarcado.png) | DUMONT, B.; MODERNEL, P.; BENOIT, M.; RUGGIA, A.; SOCA, P.; DERNAT, S.; TOURNADRE, H.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; ROSSING, W. Mobilizing ecological processes for herbivore production: farmers and researchers learning together. Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 16 November 2020, Volume 4, Article number 544828. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.544828 Article history: Received: 22 March 2020; Accepted: 24 September 2020; Published: 16 November 2020.
Edited by: Iain James Gordon, Australian National University, Australia. Reviewed by: Jane Addison, James Cook University, Australia;
Luis...Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| ![Ver detalles del registro](/consulta/web/img/visualizar.png) ![Acceso al objeto digital](/consulta/web/img/pagina.png) ![Imprime registro en el formato completo](/consulta/web/img/print.png) |
Registros recuperados : 54 | |
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
10/12/2020 |
Actualizado : |
10/12/2020 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
DUMONT, B.; MODERNEL, P.; BENOIT, M.; RUGGIA, A.; SOCA, P.; DERNAT, S.; TOURNADRE, H.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; ROSSING, W. |
Afiliación : |
BERTRAND DUMONT, Université Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, VetAgro Sup, UMR Herbivores, Saint-Genès Champanelle, France; PABLO MODERNEL, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands; Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay; MARC BENOIT, Université Clermont Auvergne, INRAE, VetAgro Sup, UMR Herbivores, Saint-Genès Champanelle, France; ANDREA PAOLA RUGGIA CHIESA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PABLO SOCA, Université Clermont Auvergne, Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement, AgroParisTech, VetAgro Sup, UMR Territoires, Aubière, France; SYLVAIN DERNAT, Université Clermont Auvergne, Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement, AgroParisTech, VetAgro Sup, UMR Territoires, Aubière, France; HERVÉ TOURNADRE, Institut national de recherche pour l'agriculture, l'alimentation et l'environnement, UE Herbipôle, Saint-Genès-Champanelle, France; SANTIAGO DOGLIOTTI, Facultad de Agronomía, Universidad de la República, Montevideo, Uruguay; WALTER A.H. ROSSING, Wageningen University & Research, Wageningen, Netherlands. |
Título : |
Mobilizing ecological processes for herbivore production: farmers and researchers learning together. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 16 November 2020, Volume 4, Article number 544828. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.544828 |
ISSN : |
2571-581X |
DOI : |
10.3389/fsufs.2020.544828 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received: 22 March 2020; Accepted: 24 September 2020; Published: 16 November 2020.
Edited by: Iain James Gordon, Australian National University, Australia. Reviewed by: Jane Addison, James Cook University, Australia;
Luis F. Goulao, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Carlos Gonzalez Fischer, New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre, New Zealand.
Corresponding author: Bertrand Dumont, bertrand.dumont@inrae.fr |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.
Grazing plays a key role in reducing the external inputs required for ruminant production and in alleviating feed-food competition. Beyond the production of meat and milk, grassland-based systems provide a wide range of ecosystem services. Agroecology and organic farming aim to reconcile natural resource management and food production, in the long term, based on the management of ecological processes. In this perspective paper, we report what we have learned from case studies with beef cattle, sheep, and dairy cattle across Uruguay and western Europe, in which we have been involved. Multicriteria methods, such as Pareto frontiers and positive deviances, were used to analyze trade-offs and identify win?wins from farm surveys. Long-term farm networks coupled with bioeconomic optimization models revealed fluctuations in farm income and allowed estimating system resilience. Extensive farmlet experiments made it possible to integrate knowledge on animal physiology and grassland ecology in the system redesign process and to test for innovative and risky management options that could lead to unacceptable learning costs in commercial farms. Finally, learning from farmers' local knowledge in teams with researchers and technical advisers can provide positive changes in grazing systems. In Uruguayan family farms, for example, the scientific knowledge gained from farmlet experiments led to advice on management options based on farm-specific diagnosis. Farmers adapted the proposals, with researchers supporting the processes by providing quantitative information on consequences and spaces for reflection. In a French cheese production area, the focus was on farmers' own experience. Games facilitated interactions as participants could challenge each other's reasoning and conclusions in a safe environment. These two case studies illustrate the diversity of co-innovation approaches, but in both cases knowledge sharing between researchers, farmers, and other stakeholders appeared more efficient to help farmers understand and adapt their own system properties than researching ?best practice? solutions for large-scale transfer.
© Copyright © 2020 Dumont, Modernel, Benoit, Ruggia, Soca, Dernat, Tournadre, Dogliotti and Rossing. MenosABSTRACT.
Grazing plays a key role in reducing the external inputs required for ruminant production and in alleviating feed-food competition. Beyond the production of meat and milk, grassland-based systems provide a wide range of ecosystem services. Agroecology and organic farming aim to reconcile natural resource management and food production, in the long term, based on the management of ecological processes. In this perspective paper, we report what we have learned from case studies with beef cattle, sheep, and dairy cattle across Uruguay and western Europe, in which we have been involved. Multicriteria methods, such as Pareto frontiers and positive deviances, were used to analyze trade-offs and identify win?wins from farm surveys. Long-term farm networks coupled with bioeconomic optimization models revealed fluctuations in farm income and allowed estimating system resilience. Extensive farmlet experiments made it possible to integrate knowledge on animal physiology and grassland ecology in the system redesign process and to test for innovative and risky management options that could lead to unacceptable learning costs in commercial farms. Finally, learning from farmers' local knowledge in teams with researchers and technical advisers can provide positive changes in grazing systems. In Uruguayan family farms, for example, the scientific knowledge gained from farmlet experiments led to advice on management options based on farm-specific diagnosis. Farmers adapted the propo... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
AGROECOLOGY; CO-INNOVATION; GRAZING; MANAGEMENT; TRADE-OFFS. |
Asunto categoría : |
A50 Investigación agraria |
URL : |
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2020.544828/full
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fsufs.2020.544828/pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03640naa a2200313 a 4500 001 1061558 005 2020-12-10 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a2571-581X 024 7 $a10.3389/fsufs.2020.544828$2DOI 100 1 $aDUMONT, B. 245 $aMobilizing ecological processes for herbivore production$bfarmers and researchers learning together.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2020 500 $aArticle history: Received: 22 March 2020; Accepted: 24 September 2020; Published: 16 November 2020. Edited by: Iain James Gordon, Australian National University, Australia. Reviewed by: Jane Addison, James Cook University, Australia; Luis F. Goulao, University of Lisbon, Portugal; Carlos Gonzalez Fischer, New Zealand Agricultural Greenhouse Gas Research Centre, New Zealand. Corresponding author: Bertrand Dumont, bertrand.dumont@inrae.fr 520 $aABSTRACT. Grazing plays a key role in reducing the external inputs required for ruminant production and in alleviating feed-food competition. Beyond the production of meat and milk, grassland-based systems provide a wide range of ecosystem services. Agroecology and organic farming aim to reconcile natural resource management and food production, in the long term, based on the management of ecological processes. In this perspective paper, we report what we have learned from case studies with beef cattle, sheep, and dairy cattle across Uruguay and western Europe, in which we have been involved. Multicriteria methods, such as Pareto frontiers and positive deviances, were used to analyze trade-offs and identify win?wins from farm surveys. Long-term farm networks coupled with bioeconomic optimization models revealed fluctuations in farm income and allowed estimating system resilience. Extensive farmlet experiments made it possible to integrate knowledge on animal physiology and grassland ecology in the system redesign process and to test for innovative and risky management options that could lead to unacceptable learning costs in commercial farms. Finally, learning from farmers' local knowledge in teams with researchers and technical advisers can provide positive changes in grazing systems. In Uruguayan family farms, for example, the scientific knowledge gained from farmlet experiments led to advice on management options based on farm-specific diagnosis. Farmers adapted the proposals, with researchers supporting the processes by providing quantitative information on consequences and spaces for reflection. In a French cheese production area, the focus was on farmers' own experience. Games facilitated interactions as participants could challenge each other's reasoning and conclusions in a safe environment. These two case studies illustrate the diversity of co-innovation approaches, but in both cases knowledge sharing between researchers, farmers, and other stakeholders appeared more efficient to help farmers understand and adapt their own system properties than researching ?best practice? solutions for large-scale transfer. © Copyright © 2020 Dumont, Modernel, Benoit, Ruggia, Soca, Dernat, Tournadre, Dogliotti and Rossing. 653 $aAGROECOLOGY 653 $aCO-INNOVATION 653 $aGRAZING 653 $aMANAGEMENT 653 $aTRADE-OFFS 700 1 $aMODERNEL, P. 700 1 $aBENOIT, M. 700 1 $aRUGGIA, A. 700 1 $aSOCA, P. 700 1 $aDERNAT, S. 700 1 $aTOURNADRE, H. 700 1 $aDOGLIOTTI, S. 700 1 $aROSSING, W. 773 $tFrontiers in Sustainable Food Systems, 16 November 2020, Volume 4, Article number 544828. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fsufs.2020.544828
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|