|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
Fecha : |
07/12/2020 |
Actualizado : |
07/12/2020 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Autor : |
DALAZEN, G.; KASPARY, T. E.; MARKUS, C.; PISONIC, A.; MEROTTO JR, A. |
Afiliación : |
GILIARDI DALAZEN, Universidade Estadual de Londrina, Paraná-PR, Brasil.; TIAGO EDU KASPARY, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CATARINE MARKUS, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre - RS, Brasil.; ALEXANDRE PISONIC, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre - RS, Brasil.; ALDO MEROTTO JR. |
Título : |
Soybean tolerance to sulfentrazone and diclosulam in sandy soil. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2020 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Planta daninha vol.38 Viçosa 2020 Epub Dec 04, 2020.OPEN ACCESS. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582020380100081 |
ISSN : |
1806-9681 (online) |
DOI : |
10.1590/s0100-83582020380100081 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received: June 27, 2019/ Accepted: September 24, 2020. Corresponding author: . Cite this article:
Dalazen G, Kaspary TE, Markus C,Pisoni A, Merotto Jr. A. Soybean tolerance to sulfentrazone and diclosulam in sandy soil. Planta Daninha.
2020;38:e020225717. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100081 |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT: Background: The use of pre-emergent herbicides is an important tool to control weeds, however the tolerance of soybean to these herbicides can vary according to the type of soil. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate sulfentrazone and diclosulam soybean selectivity in a sandy soil, in order to establish these herbicides as supporting tools in weed control. Methods: The treatments consisted of six doses of sulfentrazone (150 to 400 g ha-1) and diclosulam (25.2 to 75.6 g ha-1), and an untreated control. A field study was repeated in two growing seasons (2013/14 and 2014/15) in a sandy soil. Results: The occurrence of injury depended on the growing season. The
first season presented lower rainfall rates during the crop cycle. The recommended dose of sulfentrazone (200 g ha-1) caused 26% and 10%
of plant injury at 15 days after the treatment for the first and second season, respectively. For diclosulam, the recommended dose of
35.3 g ha-1 caused 20% and 8% of plant injury, respectively, for the first and second season. However, at the recommended doses, only for
diclosulam and in the rainy season there was a reduction in soybean productivity. Conclusions: The herbicide sulfentrazone, although causing visual soybean plant injury, present satisfactory selectivity at recommended doses and can be used as an important tool on weed control on sandy
soils. Similar response was observed for diclosulam in 2013/14. However, in a rainfall season diclosulam impacted on soybean yield at
the recommended dose for sandy soils, with selectivity depending of the growth season. MenosABSTRACT: Background: The use of pre-emergent herbicides is an important tool to control weeds, however the tolerance of soybean to these herbicides can vary according to the type of soil. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate sulfentrazone and diclosulam soybean selectivity in a sandy soil, in order to establish these herbicides as supporting tools in weed control. Methods: The treatments consisted of six doses of sulfentrazone (150 to 400 g ha-1) and diclosulam (25.2 to 75.6 g ha-1), and an untreated control. A field study was repeated in two growing seasons (2013/14 and 2014/15) in a sandy soil. Results: The occurrence of injury depended on the growing season. The
first season presented lower rainfall rates during the crop cycle. The recommended dose of sulfentrazone (200 g ha-1) caused 26% and 10%
of plant injury at 15 days after the treatment for the first and second season, respectively. For diclosulam, the recommended dose of
35.3 g ha-1 caused 20% and 8% of plant injury, respectively, for the first and second season. However, at the recommended doses, only for
diclosulam and in the rainy season there was a reduction in soybean productivity. Conclusions: The herbicide sulfentrazone, although causing visual soybean plant injury, present satisfactory selectivity at recommended doses and can be used as an important tool on weed control on sandy
soils. Similar response was observed for diclosulam in 2013/14. However, in a rainfall season diclosulam impacted on ... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
PLANT INJURY; PRE-EMERGENCE HERBICIDE; WEED MANAGEMENT. |
Thesagro : |
GLYCINA MAX; SOJA. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/14831/1/Planta-Dainha2020Kaspary.pdf
https://www.scielo.br/pdf/pd/v38/0100-8358-PD-38-e020225717.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02753naa a2200265 a 4500 001 1061540 005 2020-12-07 008 2020 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a1806-9681 (online) 024 7 $a10.1590/s0100-83582020380100081$2DOI 100 1 $aDALAZEN, G. 245 $aSoybean tolerance to sulfentrazone and diclosulam in sandy soil.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2020 500 $aArticle history: Received: June 27, 2019/ Accepted: September 24, 2020. Corresponding author: . Cite this article: Dalazen G, Kaspary TE, Markus C,Pisoni A, Merotto Jr. A. Soybean tolerance to sulfentrazone and diclosulam in sandy soil. Planta Daninha. 2020;38:e020225717. https://doi.org/10.1590/S0100-83582020380100081 520 $aABSTRACT: Background: The use of pre-emergent herbicides is an important tool to control weeds, however the tolerance of soybean to these herbicides can vary according to the type of soil. Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate sulfentrazone and diclosulam soybean selectivity in a sandy soil, in order to establish these herbicides as supporting tools in weed control. Methods: The treatments consisted of six doses of sulfentrazone (150 to 400 g ha-1) and diclosulam (25.2 to 75.6 g ha-1), and an untreated control. A field study was repeated in two growing seasons (2013/14 and 2014/15) in a sandy soil. Results: The occurrence of injury depended on the growing season. The first season presented lower rainfall rates during the crop cycle. The recommended dose of sulfentrazone (200 g ha-1) caused 26% and 10% of plant injury at 15 days after the treatment for the first and second season, respectively. For diclosulam, the recommended dose of 35.3 g ha-1 caused 20% and 8% of plant injury, respectively, for the first and second season. However, at the recommended doses, only for diclosulam and in the rainy season there was a reduction in soybean productivity. Conclusions: The herbicide sulfentrazone, although causing visual soybean plant injury, present satisfactory selectivity at recommended doses and can be used as an important tool on weed control on sandy soils. Similar response was observed for diclosulam in 2013/14. However, in a rainfall season diclosulam impacted on soybean yield at the recommended dose for sandy soils, with selectivity depending of the growth season. 650 $aGLYCINA MAX 650 $aSOJA 653 $aPLANT INJURY 653 $aPRE-EMERGENCE HERBICIDE 653 $aWEED MANAGEMENT 700 1 $aKASPARY, T. E. 700 1 $aMARKUS, C. 700 1 $aPISONIC, A. 700 1 $aMEROTTO JR, A. 773 $tPlanta daninha vol.38 Viçosa 2020 Epub Dec 04, 2020.OPEN ACCESS. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0100-83582020380100081
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
25/10/2016 |
Actualizado : |
28/02/2020 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Trabajos en Congresos/Conferencias |
Autor : |
SCARLATO, M.; DOGLIOTTI, S.; BERRUETA, C.; BARROS, C.; REHERMAN, F.; BORGES, A.; GARCÍA, M.; GIMÉNEZ, G. |
Afiliación : |
MARIANA SCARLATO GARCIA, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía; SANTIAGO DOGLIOTTI, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía; MARIA CECILIA BERRUETA MOREIRA, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; CARLOS BARROS, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía; FACUNDO REHERMAN, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía; ALEJANDRA BORGES, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía; MARGARITA GARCIA, Universidad de la República (UdelaR)/ Facultad de Agronomía; GUSTAVO GIMÉNEZ FRANQUEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay. |
Título : |
Explaining yield variability between farmers as a first step to reduce gaps. |
Complemento del título : |
T3. Crop modeling and yield gap analysis for agricultural systems analysis and design. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2015 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
In: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium for farming systems design. Multi-functional farming systems in a changing world. Montpellier (Francia): European Society of Agronomy, 2015. |
Páginas : |
p. 119-122 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Acknowledgements. Without the help of all the farmers that gently contributed their time and fields, and the help of the technical advisers and experts
to select a representative sample of farms, this research would have not be possible, so our sincere gratitude to all of them. This research was funded
by the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA), Project FPTA 288. |
Contenido : |
Reducing yield gaps is one of the major pathways identified to meet the future food demand (Keating et al., 2014). A prerequisite to design strategies to reduce the yield gap of crops is to understand its causes. The sustainability of most vegetable farms in south Uruguay is threatened by low family income and deteriorating soil quality. The main cause of low income is that most farms obtain 50% or less of the attainable crop yields in the region, with similar production resources and proper management (Dogliotti et al., 2014). Low yields are the main cause of low labour productivity and resource use efficiency. There is a huge variability between farmers in crop yields, product quality and economic results. To explain the main causes of this variability and to identify strategies to reduce the distance between the average yield and the top yielding fields and farms, we started a project to study important vegetable crops in south Uruguay (onion, tomato, sweet potato and strawberry). In this paper we present the method developed to explain variability in physical and economic results, the main causes identified in the seasons studied on strawberry and onion,
and discuss strategies to reduce the observed gaps. |
Palabras claves : |
ONION; STRAWBERRY. |
Thesagro : |
CEBOLLA; FRUTILLA. |
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/6241/1/Scarlato-M.-2015.-5th-Int.Symp.Farming-Systems-Montpellier.pdf
|
Marc : |
LEADER 02440nam a2200265 a 4500 001 1055898 005 2020-02-28 008 2015 bl uuuu u01u1 u #d 100 1 $aSCARLATO, M. 245 $aExplaining yield variability between farmers as a first step to reduce gaps.$h[electronic resource] 260 $aIn: Proceedings of the 5th international symposium for farming systems design. Multi-functional farming systems in a changing world. Montpellier (Francia): European Society of Agronomy$c2015 300 $ap. 119-122 500 $aAcknowledgements. Without the help of all the farmers that gently contributed their time and fields, and the help of the technical advisers and experts to select a representative sample of farms, this research would have not be possible, so our sincere gratitude to all of them. This research was funded by the National Institute of Agricultural Research (INIA), Project FPTA 288. 520 $aReducing yield gaps is one of the major pathways identified to meet the future food demand (Keating et al., 2014). A prerequisite to design strategies to reduce the yield gap of crops is to understand its causes. The sustainability of most vegetable farms in south Uruguay is threatened by low family income and deteriorating soil quality. The main cause of low income is that most farms obtain 50% or less of the attainable crop yields in the region, with similar production resources and proper management (Dogliotti et al., 2014). Low yields are the main cause of low labour productivity and resource use efficiency. There is a huge variability between farmers in crop yields, product quality and economic results. To explain the main causes of this variability and to identify strategies to reduce the distance between the average yield and the top yielding fields and farms, we started a project to study important vegetable crops in south Uruguay (onion, tomato, sweet potato and strawberry). In this paper we present the method developed to explain variability in physical and economic results, the main causes identified in the seasons studied on strawberry and onion, and discuss strategies to reduce the observed gaps. 650 $aCEBOLLA 650 $aFRUTILLA 653 $aONION 653 $aSTRAWBERRY 700 1 $aDOGLIOTTI, S. 700 1 $aBERRUETA, C. 700 1 $aBARROS, C. 700 1 $aREHERMAN, F. 700 1 $aBORGES, A. 700 1 $aGARCÍA, M. 700 1 $aGIMÉNEZ, G.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|