|
|
Registros recuperados : 24 | |
1. | | ZAGO, D.; CANOZZI, M.E.A.; BARCELLOS, J.O.J. Pregnant beef cow's nutrition and its effects on postnatal weight and carcass quality of their progeny. PloS One, 2020, Volume 15, Issue 8, Page e0237941. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0237941 Article history: Received: April 14, 2020/Accepted: August 5, 2020/Published: August 27, 2020. Coordenac¸ão de Aperfeic¸oamento de
Pessoal de N?´vel Superior (CAPES) provided support for this study in the form of a grant awarded to DZ...Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
5. | | BRUTTI, D.D.; CANOZZI, M.E.A.; SARTORI, E.D.; COLOMBATTO, D.; BARCELLOS, J.O.J. Effects of the use of tannins on the ruminal fermentation of cattle: A meta-analysis and meta-regression. Animal Feed Science and Technology, December 2023, Volume 306, article 115806. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2023.115806 Article history: Received 22 January 2022; Received in revised form 11 October 2023; Accepted 21 October 2023; Available online 24 October 2023. -- Correspondence: Barcellos, J.O.J.; Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal do Rio...Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
6. | | MENEGASSI, S.R.O.; CANOZZI, M.E.A.; PERIPOLLI, V.; BARCELLOS, J.O.J. Libido and serving skills of Zebu cattle Bulls. [Libido e habilidade física em touros zebuínos.] Semina: Ciências Agrárias, 2021, volume 42, Issue 5, p. 3057-3063. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.5433/1679-0359.2021v42n5p3057 Article history: Received: Oct. 29, 2020; Approved: May 31, 2021.Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
10. | | SESSIM, A. G.; CANOZZI, M.E.A.; PEREIRA, G. R.; CASTILHO, E. M.; BARCELLOS, J. O. J. Financial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil. Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 2022, Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 127 - 144. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v13i1.5888 Article history: Received 3 December 2020; Accepted 07 June 2021; Published January 2022.
Publisher: INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. Corresponding author: Sessim, A.G.; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of...Biblioteca(s): INIA Las Brujas. |
| |
12. | | FERNANDES, A.M; TEIXEIRA, O DE S.; RIOS, H.V.; CANOZZI, M.E.A.; SCHULTZ, G.; BARCELLOS, J.O.J. Insights of innovation and competitiveness in meat supply chains. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, volume 22, Issue 3, 2019 .OPEN ACCESS.
Doi:https://doi.org/ 10.22434/IFAMR2018.0031 Article history: Received: 24 February 2018 / Accepted: 30 November 2018/Published Online: March 04, 2019.Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
13. | | LOPES, R.B.; CANOZZI, M.E.A.; CANELLAS, L.C; GONZALEZ, F.A.L.; CORRÊA, R.F.; PEREIRA, P.R.R.X; BARCELLOS, J.O.J. Bioeconomic simulation of compensatory growth in beef cattle production systems. Livestock Science, October 2018, v.216,p.165-173. Article history: Received 20 December 2017//Revised 23 August 2018// Accepted 23 August 2018 // Available online 24 August 2018.Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
15. | | CANOZZI, M.E.A.; MEDEROS, A.; MENEGASI, S.R.O.; CAMARGO, C.M.; BREMM, B.; HOERBE, J.B.; BARCELLOS, J.O.J. Effects of dehorning on welfare indicators in beef cattle: systematic review-meta-analysis approach. In: Conference, Reunião Anual da Sociedade Brasileira de Zootecnia (SBZ), 53., 01-04 de Agosto, Gramado, Brasil, 2016.Biblioteca(s): INIA Tacuarembó. |
| |
16. | | QUEIROZ,R.G.; DOMINGUES, C.H.F.; CANOZZI, M.E.A.; GARCIA, R.G.; RUVIARO, C.F.; BARCELLOS, J.O.J.; BORGES, J.A.R. How do Brazilian citizens perceive animal welfare conditions in poultry, beef, and dairy supply chains? PLoS One 13(12):e0202062, 19 December 2018. OPEN ACCESS. Article history: Received:July 23, 2018//Accepted:December 5, 2018//Published:December19, 2018.Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
19. | | CANOZZI, M.E.A.; MARQUES, P.M.; TEIXEIRA, O. DE S.; PIMENTEL, C.M.M.; DILL, M.D.; BARCELLOS, J.O.J. Typology of beef production systems according to bioeconomic efficiency in the south of Brazil. [Tipologia de sistemas de produção de carne bovina de acordo com a eficiência bioeconômica no sul do Brasil]¨. Ciencia Rural, Santa Marìa, september 2019, vol.49, no.10,e20190030. OPEN ACCESS. Doi: 10.1590/0103-8478cr20190030 Article history: Received 01.14.19 / Approved 07.26.19/ Returned by the author 08.21.19.Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
20. | | DE SOUZA TEIXEIRA, O.; KUCZYNSKI DA ROCHA, M; MENDES PAIZANO ALFORMA, A.; SILVA FERNANDES, V.; DE OLIVEIRA FEIJÓ, J; NUNES CORRÊA, M.; CANOZZI, M.E.A.; MCMANUS,C.; BARCELLOS, J,O.J. Behavioural and physiological responses of male and female beef cattle to weaning at 30, 75 or 180 days of age. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Volume 240, July 2021, 105339. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2021.105339Biblioteca(s): INIA La Estanzuela. |
| |
Registros recuperados : 24 | |
|
|
Registro completo
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
Fecha actual : |
20/05/2022 |
Actualizado : |
20/05/2022 |
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
Circulación / Nivel : |
Internacional - -- |
Autor : |
SESSIM, A. G.; CANOZZI, M.E.A.; PEREIRA, G. R.; CASTILHO, E. M.; BARCELLOS, J. O. J. |
Afiliación : |
AMIR GIL SESSIM, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; MARÍA EUGENIA ANDRIGHETTO CANOZZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; GABRIEL RIBAS PEREIRA, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; EDUARDO MADEIRA CASTILHO, Federal University of Pelotas, UFPEL, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Pelotas, Brazil; JÚLIO OTÁVIO JARDIM BARCELLOS, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil. |
Título : |
Financial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil. |
Fecha de publicación : |
2022 |
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Revista Mexicana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 2022, Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 127 - 144. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v13i1.5888 |
ISSN : |
2007-1124; e-ISSN: 2448-6698 |
DOI : |
10.22319/RMCP.V13I1.5888 |
Idioma : |
Inglés |
Notas : |
Article history: Received 3 December 2020; Accepted 07 June 2021; Published January 2022.
Publisher: INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. Corresponding author: Sessim, A.G.; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; email:amirsessim@hotmail.com -- This study was supported by the Brazilian Council of Scientific and Technological Development (Project CNPq No. 133454/2014-2) and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel/CAPES, Brazil (Project CAPES/PNPD No. 2842/2010). Licencia: licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional. |
Contenido : |
ABSTRACT.- This study compares the technical and financial performance of different beef cattle production systems and assesses the opportunistic commercialization practiced in these systems. It was evaluated data from four production units located in southern Brazil: cow-calf in native pastures (CCNP; 1,155 ha; 1,529 animals); cow-calf with agriculture (CCA; 1,008 ha; 1,313 animals); rearing-fattening (RFU; 360 ha; 435 animals); and fattening (FU; 205 ha; 168 animals) as well as an integrated system simulating the physical and economic parameters of the four units (IAS; 2,728 ha; 3,445 animals). The four independent units were considered as opportunistic commercialization and IAS as non-opportunistic. The highest yield was obtained for RFU (297 kg/ha), followed by IAS (114 kg/ha), FU (98 kg/ha), CCNP (87 kg/ha), and CCA (83 kg/ha). The CCNP was the most economically efficient, considering the gross margin per kilogram (GM/kg) (US$ 0.93). The GM/kg value of IAS (US$ 0.74) was 37 % higher compared to the sum of the average of the four units (US$ 0.54), and IAS had the lowest total production costs per kg (22.5 %). It was concluded that each independent unit could increase GM/kg (37 %) and GM/ha (3.8 %) and use calves in a rearing-fattening unit for further sale. Hence, the integration of beef production systems increases the gross margin of firms, presenting a profitable business advantage to rural entrepreneurs through non-opportunistic commercialization.
© 2022 INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. All rights reserved. MenosABSTRACT.- This study compares the technical and financial performance of different beef cattle production systems and assesses the opportunistic commercialization practiced in these systems. It was evaluated data from four production units located in southern Brazil: cow-calf in native pastures (CCNP; 1,155 ha; 1,529 animals); cow-calf with agriculture (CCA; 1,008 ha; 1,313 animals); rearing-fattening (RFU; 360 ha; 435 animals); and fattening (FU; 205 ha; 168 animals) as well as an integrated system simulating the physical and economic parameters of the four units (IAS; 2,728 ha; 3,445 animals). The four independent units were considered as opportunistic commercialization and IAS as non-opportunistic. The highest yield was obtained for RFU (297 kg/ha), followed by IAS (114 kg/ha), FU (98 kg/ha), CCNP (87 kg/ha), and CCA (83 kg/ha). The CCNP was the most economically efficient, considering the gross margin per kilogram (GM/kg) (US$ 0.93). The GM/kg value of IAS (US$ 0.74) was 37 % higher compared to the sum of the average of the four units (US$ 0.54), and IAS had the lowest total production costs per kg (22.5 %). It was concluded that each independent unit could increase GM/kg (37 %) and GM/ha (3.8 %) and use calves in a rearing-fattening unit for further sale. Hence, the integration of beef production systems increases the gross margin of firms, presenting a profitable business advantage to rural entrepreneurs through non-opportunistic commercialization.
© 2022 INIFAP-CENI... Presentar Todo |
Palabras claves : |
Animal production; Economy; Gross revenue; Integration; PLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMAL; Production cost. |
Asunto categoría : |
L01 Ganadería |
URL : |
https://cienciaspecuarias.inifap.gob.mx/index.php/Pecuarias/article/download/5888/4707
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03152naa a2200277 a 4500 001 1063153 005 2022-05-20 008 2022 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d 022 $a2007-1124; e-ISSN: 2448-6698 024 7 $a10.22319/RMCP.V13I1.5888$2DOI 100 1 $aSESSIM, A. G. 245 $aFinancial performance and opportunistic commercialization of beef production systems in southern Brazil.$h[electronic resource] 260 $c2022 500 $aArticle history: Received 3 December 2020; Accepted 07 June 2021; Published January 2022. Publisher: INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. Corresponding author: Sessim, A.G.; Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul - UFRGS, Faculty of Agronomy, Department of Animal Science, RS, Porto Alegre, Brazil; email:amirsessim@hotmail.com -- This study was supported by the Brazilian Council of Scientific and Technological Development (Project CNPq No. 133454/2014-2) and the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel/CAPES, Brazil (Project CAPES/PNPD No. 2842/2010). Licencia: licencia de Creative Commons Reconocimiento-NoComercial-CompartirIgual 4.0 Internacional. 520 $aABSTRACT.- This study compares the technical and financial performance of different beef cattle production systems and assesses the opportunistic commercialization practiced in these systems. It was evaluated data from four production units located in southern Brazil: cow-calf in native pastures (CCNP; 1,155 ha; 1,529 animals); cow-calf with agriculture (CCA; 1,008 ha; 1,313 animals); rearing-fattening (RFU; 360 ha; 435 animals); and fattening (FU; 205 ha; 168 animals) as well as an integrated system simulating the physical and economic parameters of the four units (IAS; 2,728 ha; 3,445 animals). The four independent units were considered as opportunistic commercialization and IAS as non-opportunistic. The highest yield was obtained for RFU (297 kg/ha), followed by IAS (114 kg/ha), FU (98 kg/ha), CCNP (87 kg/ha), and CCA (83 kg/ha). The CCNP was the most economically efficient, considering the gross margin per kilogram (GM/kg) (US$ 0.93). The GM/kg value of IAS (US$ 0.74) was 37 % higher compared to the sum of the average of the four units (US$ 0.54), and IAS had the lowest total production costs per kg (22.5 %). It was concluded that each independent unit could increase GM/kg (37 %) and GM/ha (3.8 %) and use calves in a rearing-fattening unit for further sale. Hence, the integration of beef production systems increases the gross margin of firms, presenting a profitable business advantage to rural entrepreneurs through non-opportunistic commercialization. © 2022 INIFAP-CENID Parasitologia Veterinaria. All rights reserved. 653 $aAnimal production 653 $aEconomy 653 $aGross revenue 653 $aIntegration 653 $aPLATAFORMA SALUD ANINMAL 653 $aProduction cost 700 1 $aCANOZZI, M.E.A. 700 1 $aPEREIRA, G. R. 700 1 $aCASTILHO, E. M. 700 1 $aBARCELLOS, J. O. J. 773 $tRevista Mexicana De Ciencias Pecuarias, 2022, Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 127 - 144. OPEN ACCESS. doi: https://doi.org/10.22319/rmcp.v13i1.5888
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|