| |
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA Las Brujas. |
|
Fecha : |
19/07/2023 |
|
Actualizado : |
19/07/2023 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Autor : |
BRANCO-LOPES. R.; BERNAL-CÓRDOBA, C.; VALLDECABRES, A.; WINDER, C.; CANOZZI, M.E.A.; SILVA-DEL-RÍO, R. |
|
Afiliación : |
R. BRANCO-LOPES, Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, Tulare, CA 93274; C. BERNAL-CÓRDOBA, Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, Tulare, CA 93274; A. VALLDECABRES, Teagasc, Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Center, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland P61 C996; C. WINDER, Department of Population Medicine, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada, N1G 2W1; MARÍA EUGENIA ANDRIGHETTO CANOZZI, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; N. SILVA-DEL-RÍO, Veterinary Medicine Teaching and Research Center, Tulare, CA 93274; Department of Population Health and Reproduction, School of Veterinary Medicine, University of California, Davis 95616. |
|
Título : |
Characterization of controlled trials on probiotic supplementation to dairy calves: A scoping review. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2023 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Dairy Science. 2023, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-23017 --- [In Press, Corrected Proof]. OPEN ACCESS. |
|
ISSN : |
0022-0302 |
|
DOI : |
10.3168/jds.2022-23017 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article history: Received 10 November 2022, Accepted 13 February 2023, Available online 16 June 2023. -- Correspondence author: silvadelrio@ucdavis.edu -- LICENSE: This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). -- FUNDING: This project was supported by the California Department of Food and Agriculture Antimicrobial Use Stewardship (Sacramento, CA). |
|
Contenido : |
The objective of this scoping review was to identify, describe, and characterize the literature on probiotic supplementation in dairy calves. Eligible studies were nonrandomized, quasi-randomized and randomized controlled trials in English, Spanish, or Portuguese that evaluated the effect of probiotic supplementation on growth and health of dairy calves. The search strategies were based on a modification of the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) framework and used synonyms and words related to "dairy calves" (population), "probiotics" (intervention), and "growth and health measurements" (outcomes). No restrictions for publication year or language were applied. Searches were conducted in Biosis, CAB Abstracts, Medline, Scopus, and the Dissertations and Theses Database. In total, the search identified 4,467 records, of which 103 studies (110 controlled trials) met the inclusion criteria. The studies were published between 1980 and 2021 and originated from 28 countries. Trials were randomized (80.0%), nonrandomized 16.4%), and quasi-randomized (3.6%), ranging in sample size from 5 to 1,801 dairy calves (mode = 24; average = 64). Enrolled calves were frequently Holstein (74.5%), males (43.6%), and younger than 15 d at the beginning of probiotic supplementation (71.8%). Often, trials were conducted in research facilities (47.3%). Trials evaluated probiotics with single or multiple species of the same genus: Lactobacillus (26.4%), Saccharomyces (15.4%), Bacillus (10.0%), Enterococcus (3.6%), or multiple species of various genera (31.8%). Eight trials did not report the probiotic species used. Lactobacillus acidophilus and Enterococcus faecium were the species most supplemented to calves. The duration of probiotic supplementation ranged from 1 to 462 d (mode = 56; average = 50). In trials with a constant dose, it ranged from 4.0 × 106 to 3.7 × 1011 cfu/calf per day. Most probiotics were administered mixed solely into feed (88.5%; whole milk, milk replacer, starter, or total mixed ration) and less frequently orally as a drench or oral paste (7.9%). Most trials evaluated weight gain (88.2%) as a growth indicator and fecal consistency score (64.5%) as a health indicator. Our scoping review summarizes the breadth of controlled trials evaluating probiotic supplementation in dairy calves. Differences in intervention design (mode of probiotic administration, dose, and duration of probiotic supplementation) and outcomes evaluation (type and methods) justify future efforts toward standardized guidelines in clinical trials. © 2023, The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. and Fass Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®. MenosThe objective of this scoping review was to identify, describe, and characterize the literature on probiotic supplementation in dairy calves. Eligible studies were nonrandomized, quasi-randomized and randomized controlled trials in English, Spanish, or Portuguese that evaluated the effect of probiotic supplementation on growth and health of dairy calves. The search strategies were based on a modification of the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) framework and used synonyms and words related to "dairy calves" (population), "probiotics" (intervention), and "growth and health measurements" (outcomes). No restrictions for publication year or language were applied. Searches were conducted in Biosis, CAB Abstracts, Medline, Scopus, and the Dissertations and Theses Database. In total, the search identified 4,467 records, of which 103 studies (110 controlled trials) met the inclusion criteria. The studies were published between 1980 and 2021 and originated from 28 countries. Trials were randomized (80.0%), nonrandomized 16.4%), and quasi-randomized (3.6%), ranging in sample size from 5 to 1,801 dairy calves (mode = 24; average = 64). Enrolled calves were frequently Holstein (74.5%), males (43.6%), and younger than 15 d at the beginning of probiotic supplementation (71.8%). Often, trials were conducted in research facilities (47.3%). Trials evaluated probiotics with single or multiple species of the same genus: Lactobacillus (26.4%), Saccharomyces (15.4%), Bacillus ... Presentar Todo |
|
Palabras claves : |
Calf; Direct-fed microbial; Feed additive; Review. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
L02 Alimentación animal |
|
URL : |
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030223003533/pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 03925naa a2200265 a 4500
001 1064259
005 2023-07-19
008 2023 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
022 $a0022-0302
024 7 $a10.3168/jds.2022-23017$2DOI
100 1 $aBRANCO-LOPES. R.
245 $aCharacterization of controlled trials on probiotic supplementation to dairy calves$bA scoping review.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2023
500 $aArticle history: Received 10 November 2022, Accepted 13 February 2023, Available online 16 June 2023. -- Correspondence author: silvadelrio@ucdavis.edu -- LICENSE: This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). -- FUNDING: This project was supported by the California Department of Food and Agriculture Antimicrobial Use Stewardship (Sacramento, CA).
520 $aThe objective of this scoping review was to identify, describe, and characterize the literature on probiotic supplementation in dairy calves. Eligible studies were nonrandomized, quasi-randomized and randomized controlled trials in English, Spanish, or Portuguese that evaluated the effect of probiotic supplementation on growth and health of dairy calves. The search strategies were based on a modification of the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) framework and used synonyms and words related to "dairy calves" (population), "probiotics" (intervention), and "growth and health measurements" (outcomes). No restrictions for publication year or language were applied. Searches were conducted in Biosis, CAB Abstracts, Medline, Scopus, and the Dissertations and Theses Database. In total, the search identified 4,467 records, of which 103 studies (110 controlled trials) met the inclusion criteria. The studies were published between 1980 and 2021 and originated from 28 countries. Trials were randomized (80.0%), nonrandomized 16.4%), and quasi-randomized (3.6%), ranging in sample size from 5 to 1,801 dairy calves (mode = 24; average = 64). Enrolled calves were frequently Holstein (74.5%), males (43.6%), and younger than 15 d at the beginning of probiotic supplementation (71.8%). Often, trials were conducted in research facilities (47.3%). Trials evaluated probiotics with single or multiple species of the same genus: Lactobacillus (26.4%), Saccharomyces (15.4%), Bacillus (10.0%), Enterococcus (3.6%), or multiple species of various genera (31.8%). Eight trials did not report the probiotic species used. Lactobacillus acidophilus and Enterococcus faecium were the species most supplemented to calves. The duration of probiotic supplementation ranged from 1 to 462 d (mode = 56; average = 50). In trials with a constant dose, it ranged from 4.0 × 106 to 3.7 × 1011 cfu/calf per day. Most probiotics were administered mixed solely into feed (88.5%; whole milk, milk replacer, starter, or total mixed ration) and less frequently orally as a drench or oral paste (7.9%). Most trials evaluated weight gain (88.2%) as a growth indicator and fecal consistency score (64.5%) as a health indicator. Our scoping review summarizes the breadth of controlled trials evaluating probiotic supplementation in dairy calves. Differences in intervention design (mode of probiotic administration, dose, and duration of probiotic supplementation) and outcomes evaluation (type and methods) justify future efforts toward standardized guidelines in clinical trials. © 2023, The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. and Fass Inc. on behalf of the American Dairy Science Association®.
653 $aCalf
653 $aDirect-fed microbial
653 $aFeed additive
653 $aReview
700 1 $aBERNAL-CÓRDOBA, C.
700 1 $aVALLDECABRES, A.
700 1 $aWINDER, C.
700 1 $aCANOZZI, M.E.A.
700 1 $aSILVA-DEL-RÍO, R.
773 $tJournal of Dairy Science. 2023, https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2022-23017 --- [In Press, Corrected Proof]. OPEN ACCESS.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA Las Brujas (LB) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
|
|
|
Registro completo
|
|
Biblioteca (s) : |
INIA La Estanzuela. |
|
Fecha actual : |
21/02/2014 |
|
Actualizado : |
25/09/2019 |
|
Tipo de producción científica : |
Artículos en Revistas Indexadas Internacionales |
|
Circulación / Nivel : |
A - 2 |
|
Autor : |
ANTÚNEZ, K.; D'ALESSANDRO, B.; CORBELLA, E.; ZUNINO, P. |
|
Afiliación : |
KARINA ANTÚNEZ, Laboratorio de Microbiología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Avenida Italia 3318, CP 11600, Montevideo, Uruguay.; BRUNO D'ALESSANDRO, Laboratorio de Microbiología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Avenida Italia 3318, CP 11600, Montevideo, Uruguay.; EDUARDO DANIEL CORBELLA GONZALEZ, INIA (Instituto Nacional de Investigación Agropecuaria), Uruguay; PABLO ZUNINO, Laboratorio de Microbiología, Instituto de Investigaciones Biológicas Clemente Estable, Avenida Italia 3318, CP 11600, Montevideo, Uruguay. |
|
Título : |
Detection of Chronic bee paralysis virus and Acute bee paralysis virus in Uruguayan honeybees. |
|
Fecha de publicación : |
2005 |
|
Fuente / Imprenta : |
Journal of Invertebrate Pathology, September 2005, Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages 69-72. |
|
DOI : |
10.1016/j.jip.2005.07.001 |
|
Idioma : |
Inglés |
|
Notas : |
Article History: Received 6 April 2005 / Accepted 19 July 2005/Available online 15 September 2005 |
|
Contenido : |
Abstract:
Chronic bee paralysis virus (CBPV) causes a disease characterized by trembling, flightless, and crawling bees, while Acute bee paralysis virus (ABPV) is commonly detected in apparently healthy colonies, usually associated to Varroa destructor. Both viruses had been detected in most regions of the world, except in South America. In this work, we detected CBPV and ABPV in samples of Uruguayan honeybees by RT-PCR. The detection of both viruses in different provinces and the fact that most of the analyzed samples were infected, suggest that, they are widely spread in the region. This is the first record of the presence of CBPV and ABPV in Uruguay and South America. |
|
Palabras claves : |
ABEJAS MELÍFERAS; ACUTE BEE PARALYSIS VIRUS; APIS MELLIFERA; CHRONIC BEE PARALYSIS VIRUS; HONEYBEE MORTALITY; MORTALIDAD DE ABEJAS; PARALISIS; RT-PCR. |
|
Thesagro : |
ABEJAS. |
|
Asunto categoría : |
-- |
|
URL : |
http://www.ainfo.inia.uy/digital/bitstream/item/13343/1/Detection-of-Chronic-bee-paralysis-virus.pdf
|
|
Marc : |
LEADER 01647naa a2200289 a 4500
001 1049564
005 2019-09-25
008 2005 bl uuuu u00u1 u #d
024 7 $a10.1016/j.jip.2005.07.001$2DOI
100 1 $aANTÚNEZ, K.
245 $aDetection of Chronic bee paralysis virus and Acute bee paralysis virus in Uruguayan honeybees.$h[electronic resource]
260 $c2005
500 $aArticle History: Received 6 April 2005 / Accepted 19 July 2005/Available online 15 September 2005
520 $aAbstract: Chronic bee paralysis virus (CBPV) causes a disease characterized by trembling, flightless, and crawling bees, while Acute bee paralysis virus (ABPV) is commonly detected in apparently healthy colonies, usually associated to Varroa destructor. Both viruses had been detected in most regions of the world, except in South America. In this work, we detected CBPV and ABPV in samples of Uruguayan honeybees by RT-PCR. The detection of both viruses in different provinces and the fact that most of the analyzed samples were infected, suggest that, they are widely spread in the region. This is the first record of the presence of CBPV and ABPV in Uruguay and South America.
650 $aABEJAS
653 $aABEJAS MELÍFERAS
653 $aACUTE BEE PARALYSIS VIRUS
653 $aAPIS MELLIFERA
653 $aCHRONIC BEE PARALYSIS VIRUS
653 $aHONEYBEE MORTALITY
653 $aMORTALIDAD DE ABEJAS
653 $aPARALISIS
653 $aRT-PCR
700 1 $aD'ALESSANDRO, B.
700 1 $aCORBELLA, E.
700 1 $aZUNINO, P.
773 $tJournal of Invertebrate Pathology, September 2005, Volume 90, Issue 1, Pages 69-72.
Descargar
Esconder MarcPresentar Marc Completo |
|
Registro original : |
INIA La Estanzuela (LE) |
|
|
Biblioteca
|
Identificación
|
Origen
|
Tipo / Formato
|
Clasificación
|
Cutter
|
Registro
|
Volumen
|
Estado
|
Volver
|
| Expresión de búsqueda válido. Check! |
|
|
